a chance to serve in, or be employed by government. The "input" that
you seek to destroy the USA isn't available to tyrants like you. — J.
A. A. —
>
On Mar 26, 7:36 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> Once again John has resorted to cut and paste name calling rather than
> engage in meaningful dialog.
>
> On 03/26/2011 03:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
> > Jonathan Ashley, the socialist-communist, is undeserving of a reply.
> > � J. A. A. �
> > On Mar 25, 2:41 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> John,
>
> >> I am shocked. I am in agreement with your statement, "In the case of
> >> contract law, a FAIR contract is one in which both parties to the
> >> contract are happy with the deal." That is voluntary interaction. That
> >> is how things should be.
>
> >> However, you lose me with, "If a person thinks they have been treated
> >> unfairly by government or by business they can sue in civil court and
> >> let the jury decide." Would not a better (and less expensive) solution
> >> be to enter into a private contract with an arbitration firm that has no
> >> vested interest in the outcome of the arbitration? No one would need, as
> >> you have phrased it, "to go to any czar to see what the God-damned
> >> government has to say!" Yet, if we follow your remedy when "treated
> >> unfairly by government," we must seek redress from an arm of the
> >> government that has treated us unfairly.
>
> >> How can government be the problem and the solution at the same time?
> >> Existing tax courts are a prime example of how this does not work. How
> >> does one get remedy from the IRS when both the judge sitting on the
> >> bench of a tax court and the prosecutor are biased toward the collection
> >> of taxes for their very existence? A private arbitration firm would have
> >> no vested interest either way.
>
> >> Even if we accept that "sue in civil court and let the jury decide" is
> >> the way to proceed, it is incompatible with your want of "democracy."
> >> Will the population collectively sit on every jury?
>
> >> *DEMOCRACY*, n. [Gr. People, and to possess, to govern.] Government
> >> by the people; a form of government, in which the supreme power is
> >> lodged in the hands of the people collectively, or in which the
> >> people exercise the powers of legislation. Such was the government
> >> of Athens.
>
> >> On 03/25/2011 10:36 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> Jonathan: You are a hopeless case. No one is needed to explain the
> >>> 'Golden Rule': "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
> >>> And no prudent person has trouble knowing what is fair. In the case
> >>> of contract law, a FAIR contract is one in which both parties to the
> >>> contract are happy with the deal. If a person thinks they have been
> >>> treated unfairly by government or by business they can sue in civil
> >>> court and let the jury decide. Those with a conscience (but not you)
> >>> know, instinctively, when they are being fair to others. No one needs
> >>> to go to any czar to see what the God-damned government has to say!
> >>> Give up your hobby of replying on Political Forum. You don't have the
> >>> reasoning ability of a (blind) mole. � J. A. A. �
> >>> On Mar 24, 2:40 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> John,
> >>>> Are you serious? "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA!"
> >>>> Who decides what is "fair play"? You? Mob rule?
> >>>> "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting to decide what's for lunch."
> >>>> On 03/24/2011 09:36 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Jonathan: If you had spent 14 years of your life writing a New
> >>>>> Constitution for the benefit of most Americans, you'd realize that
> >>>>> "ego" just wouldn't be a suitable enough motive. Apparently, I pegged
> >>>>> you right that you are simply jealous that I have already accomplished
> >>>>> things you've only talked about. Conservatives such as Glenn Beck and
> >>>>> Rush Limbaugh like to talk about this country's problems, but can't be
> >>>>> taken seriously that they actually want those problems to be solved.
> >>>>> Judge Andrew Napolitano has close to the right assessments of the
> >>>>> unconstitutionality of much that the WH is doing. But he always grins
> >>>>> and stops short of calling for the immediate arrest of Barack Obama
> >>>>> for TREASON. My New Constitution will hang any public official not
> >>>>> upholding this simple sworn statement: "Fair play and democracy shall
> >>>>> have supremacy in the USA!" Since socialism and communism are the
> >>>>> anti-theses of fair play and of democracy, I highly recommend that no
> >>>>> socialist-communist-minded air-heads ever seek public office. If they
> >>>>> do, there could become a shortage of hangman's nooses! � John A.
> >>>>> Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>> On Mar 23, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> It always comes back to John's ego: "I suspect you can't see the
> >>>>>> positive tone, because you are jealous of my commitment and talent to
> >>>>>> accomplish what I have."
> >>>>>> On 03/23/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear Mark: Should I be flattered that you remember what I say from
> >>>>>>> one day to the next? If indeed you can read and comprehend, you
> >>>>>>> wouldn't need to put those words in capitals. Unlike you and MJ, I
> >>>>>>> don't depend on YELLING to make my points. If you find what I'm
> >>>>>>> writing to be interesting enough to read every day, then you are
> >>>>>>> either very much in favor of what I'm saying or very threatened and
> >>>>>>> thus opposed. The "tone" of my document is pro control of government
> >>>>>>> by the people; maximum civil liberties; having the most efficient use
> >>>>>>> of tax dollars; respect for the environment; and respect for the
> >>>>>>> rights of others. I suspect you can't see the positive tone, because
> >>>>>>> you are jealous of my commitment and talent to accomplish what I
> >>>>>>> have. If you are FOR the people, Mark, embrace my New Constitution.
> >>>>>>> If you are AGAINST the people, then stop replying on my posts. No
> >>>>>>> socialist-communists are welcomed in the USA! � John A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>> On Mar 22, 7:50 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> The biggest problem Einstein will have with his "New Constitution" is that
> >>>>>>>> we CAN READ AND COMPREHEND.
> >>>>>>>> The other immediate problem is that he can't remember one day to the next
> >>>>>>>> what he says.
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while pretending
> >>>>>>>>> it did not occur. ELSEWHERE in THIS thread: Socialism and communism are
> >>>>>>>>> the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy. My New
> >>>>>>>>> Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail or
> >>>>>>>>> hang those in government who support socialism and communism. When you
> >>>>>>>>> attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are attacking
> >>>>>>>>> THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get
> >>>>>>>>> lost, Jonathan! � J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>>>> And now HERE in THIS thread the same person:
> >>>>>>>>> I am personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
> >>>>>>>>> Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatized�while continuing to "cover" only
> >>>>>>>>> those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of
> >>>>>>>>> getting first rate care.
> >>>>>>>>> The implications are rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see
> >>>>>>>>> his EMBRACE of socialism.
> >>>>>>>>> There is ALSO this from the same person:
> >>>>>>>>> Businesses or professions meeting licensing standards germane to the type
> >>>>>>>>> and scope of work such perform, and being regularly apprised of substantive
> >>>>>>>>> new developments, may control their own work without governmental sanction,
> >>>>>>>>> nor, once licensed, being required to be other than self-trained to maintain
> >>>>>>>>> continuing competency for doing safe work within their chosen type.
> >>>>>>>>> Professionals qualified by training, testing and experience who perform safe
> >>>>>>>>> and acceptable work within an area of their competency shall not be
> >>>>>>>>> sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job class or licensing
> >>>>>>>>> jurisdiction�beyond fair registration cost. No more than 25% of regulatory
> >>>>>>>>> board members shall have been employed in the profession or industry
> >>>>>>>>> regulated.
> >>>>>>>>> Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.
> >>>>>>>>> It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER fully
> >>>>>>>>> presented NOR that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.<sigh>
> >>>>>>>>> Sad.
> >>>>>>>>> As noted, were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE
> >>>>>>>>> examples -- one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason you
> >>>>>>>>> refuse to present and merey proclaim.
> >>>>>>>>> Regard$,
> >>>>>>>>> --MJ
> >>>>>>>>> Much of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It
> >>>>>>>>> has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside
> >>>>>>>>> and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or
> >>>>>>>>> contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual
> >>>>>>>>> process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as
> >>>>>>>>> a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power
> >>>>>>>>> in unbridled ways. -- Thomas Sowell
> >>>>>>>>> At 06:43 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> MJ: You are a deranged, socialist-communist who is clearly LYING about
> >>>>>>>>> the people-oriented content of my New Constitution! Please reference
> >>>>>>>>> a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private
> >>>>>>>>> property is used. You can't do that, I'm sure! Ha, ha, HA! � John
> >>>>>>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA! You
> >>>>>>>>>> aren't telling me anything that I don't tout,
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0 comments:
Post a Comment