Re: Newt Gingrich, Weasel

I have replied to a number of your "cut and pastes";  and as EVERYONE in this group can attest, you never, ever respond! 

 

Don't even go there Michael.   You're beginning to piss me off.

 

 

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:04 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

And you CONTINUE with your meaningless drivel about nonsensical nothingness.
Several People in THIS forum forward/provide 'discussion starters' ... articles, quotes, cartoons, etc.
In the instances I have called you on your wanting responses, instead of addressing these words, concepts and ideas that are presented, you make meaningless proclamations that could be appended to *any* effort provided by *anyone* with similar results OR (your favorite) you simply chant "poopeyhead" as though THAT -- in itself -- has some meaningful refutation of those words, concepts and ideas.

Here is your -- what, 4th? -- effort to CONTINUE to obfuscate and avoid the discussion as it progressed. Can we safely conclude by now that you are simply giving up on your defense of the statist Gingrich?

Regard$,
--MJ

It is hard to believe that a man is telling the truth when you know that you would lie if you were in his place. -- H. L. Mencken

At 03:56 PM 5/16/2011, you wrote:

What is it that you have provided to the Group Michael, besides cut and paste articles from Moonbats and Crackpots?  I have at least come forward (recently)  and shown why the "Fallacy Spew"  from these Moonbats and Crackpots is exactly that,  and you have yet to post a cognitive opinion from you, yourself......Come to think of it......Ever.
 


 
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:51 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

So your "solution" is to spew MORE fallacy?

You apparently do not grasp the logical argument.

So why is it you AVOIDED the words, concepts and ideas presented ... choosing instead to obfuscate and posit MORE fallacy?

Regard$,

--MJ

News flash: Republican statists take control of the House over Democrat statists. Prepare for more socialism, interventionism & imperialism. -- Jacob Hornberger

At 03:30 PM 5/16/2011, you wrote:

Michael,

 

So, once again, let's review:

 

It's okay if the purported "Fallacy spew"  comes from the likes of Justin Raimondo,  Lew Rockwell,  Laurence Moonbat,   Bill Maher,  or some other crackpot,  but when a man who has in fact fought the battle for thirty years for limited government makes a speech that is out of line with what a majority Democratic Party Congress voted for, and that he was in fact a member of, and voted against,  this somehow makes the  man non-credible?

 

I think I got it now.

--

Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

 

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/

* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.

* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.