Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

MJ, the deranged, socialist-communist, party crasher is undeserving of
being replied to. — J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 22, 12:57 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >Folks:  Apparently, MJ is incapable of reasoning.  He supposes that
> >since my "ideal" (not mandated in my New Constitution) government
> >would have ZERO outlays to individual citizens, i.e., no SS, Medicare,
> >Medicaid, nor Unemployment, that that shows me to be a socialist.  Can
> >you believe it?!
>
> <sigh>
> How a Government programs the STEALS from person
> A in order to give to person B will be
> 'privatized' not being provided notwithstanding,
> the portion that continues to embrace socialism,
> of course, was "while continuing to "cover" only
> those older or sicker people who have no other
> means of surviving or of getting first rate
> care". Like the woman who finally agrees on her
> price being a 'prostitute', so too is yours an embrace of socialism.
>
> Sad isn't it, that Armistead is reduced to
> projecting his shortcomings onto others.
>
> It is also noted that you AVOIDED the second
> example (like the misdirection you attempt on the
> first) of your socialist tendencies.
>
> >Socialism and communism (the ideal of Barack Obama)
> >have government providing everything and controlling everything.
>
> Government 'providing' everything is not required
> for socialism's myriad of children.
>
> >  I want government to provide next to nothing and to control next to
> >nothing.
>
> Except what excerpts of your Constitution you
> have provided does not bolster such a claim.
>
> >  A properly functioning free enterprise system can do those
> >thing, AND allow the maximum FAIR prosperity for the maximum number of
> >Americans!
>
> And yet your own brand of utopian socialism raises its head again.
>
> >MJ is revealing himself to be a socialist-communist bent on retarding
> >my efforts to promote my New Constitution.  He and Jonathan Ashley
> >aren't wanting to save the USA, but to have the USA fail.  A person
> >can be either FOR me or AGAINST me.  100% of those who are against me
> >are criminal, socialist-communists like OUTLAW Barack Obama.  — John
>
> Your fantasies and fallacies may aid you in
> retaining that pleasing vision, but they do little to those who grasp reality.
>
> I certainly understand your need to pretend your
> embraces of socialism are really not. I can also
> understand your desire for baseless
> 'name-calling'. I am quite certain that OTHERS do as well.
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> Nothing in the world is more dangerous than
> sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.   -- Martin Luther King, Jr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> >On Mar 21, 10:26 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > ELSEWHERE in THIS thread:Socialism and
> > communism are the anti-thesis of a
> > representative republic or a democracy.  My New
> > Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the
> > People and will fire, jail or hang those in
> > government who support socialism and
> > communism.  When you attack my New Constitution
> > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking
> > THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties
> > person on the planet!  Get lost, Jonathan!  J.
> > A. A.And now HERE in THIS thread the same
> > person:I am personally recommending that Social
> > Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment
> > Insurance ALL be privatized—while continuing to
> > "cover" only those older or sicker people who
> > have no other means of surviving or of getting
> > first rate care. The implications are rather
> > OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see his EMBRACE of socialism.
> > > There is ALSO this from the same
> > person:Businesses or professions meeting
> > licensing standards germane to the type and
> > scope of work such perform, and being regularly
> > apprised of substantive new developments, may
> > control their own work without governmental
> > sanction, nor, once licensed, being required to
> > be other than self-trained to maintain
> > continuing competency for doing safe work
> > within their chosen type. Professionals
> > qualified by training, testing and experience
> > who perform safe and acceptable work within an
> > area of their competency shall not be
> > sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job
> > class or licensing jurisdiction—beyond fair
> > registration cost.  No more than 25% of
> > regulatory board members shall have been
> > employed in the profession or industry
> > regulated.Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.
> > > It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this
> > 'constitution' is NEVER fully presented NOR
> > that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.
> > > <sigh> Sad.
> > > Regard$,
> > > --MJThere is simply no other choice than
> > this: either abstain from interference in the
> > free play of the market, or to delegate the
> > entire management of production and
> > distribution to the government. Either
> > capitalism or socialism: there exists no middle way. -- Ludwig von Mises
>
> >--
> >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Mark, if you feel that way, then you too are a socialist-communist—or
else you can't read and comprehend. Attack me in any way, and you
attack fair, free-enterprise capitalism and having maximum civil
liberties for the vast majority of Americans. Until you can recognize
those facts, I have you correctly pegged-through-the-heart with a
sharply pointed wooden stake. — NE —
>
On Mar 22, 11:55 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kinda like you and your supposed "constitution" that goes beyond the scope
> of a REAL Constitution ie.
>
> *The fundamental law, written or unwritten, that establishes the character
> of a government by defining the basic principles to which a society must
> conform; by describing the organization of the government and regulation,
> distribution, and limitations on the functions of different government
> departments; and by prescribing the extent and manner of the exercise of its
> sovereign powers.*
> *
> *
> ***Go, get a new life. **what you are doing is a waste of your time and most
> importantly....MINE. I have to read all the drivel (your "constitution"
> posts) as well as all the meaningful stuff every day on this forum. What you
> have written and displayed so far IS A JOKE.*
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:33 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > MJ:  All of those quotations of others that you cut and paste aren't
> > increasing your status in the groups one bit.  And haven't you heard?
> > It isn't polite to YELL (use larger type size).  You are a pest on my
> > post, simply because you know I have a lot of things going for me.  In
> > the perhaps years you have "tooted" your one page constitution, you
> > haven't gotten many readers, have you.  Please make a "quote" of your
> > own worthy of being in Bartlett's.  If you can't do that, then you
> > should seriously consider getting another (pretend) hobby.  — J. A. A.
> > —
>
> > On Mar 21, 10:11 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > And yet AGAIN ... you offer a response.
> > > SADLY, you offer no support to your claims.
> > > Regard$,
> > > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual
> > legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught
> > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient
> > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the
> > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its
> > enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and
> > using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 10:06 AM
> > 3/21/2011, you wrote:Party crashers, like MJ, are undeserving of being
> > replied to.  — J. A.
> > > A. —
>
> > > On Mar 19, 9:50 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > It is my understanding that I am a member (in good standing?) of this
> > Group (PoliticalFo...@GoogleGroups.com).
> > > > I never claimed to be a moderator.
> > > > I did not request a 'discussion'.
> > > > I did, however, ask for YOU to support YOUR assertion and explain:
> > > >   What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine 'run counter' when you
> > claim, "sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients
> > and their families"
> > > > Apparently you cannot support your claim(s) which is why you resort to
> > spewing fallacy when anyone responds to your posts.
> > > > Regard$,
> > > > --MJ"Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a
> > right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the
> > right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are
> > evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of
> > self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature." -- Samuel
> > Adams, November 20, 1772At 05:42 PM 3/18/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ:  You are a
> > rude party crasher, not a moderator.  I am not
> > > > interested in having a discussion with anyone regarding the specifics
> > > > of my New Constitution.  As for science, I am the King of the Hill of
> > > > patriotic Americans!  — J. A. Armistead —
>
> > > > On Mar 17, 8:45 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > >In medical facilities all across the country, "medical protocol"
> > > > > >sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients
> > > > > >and their families.
>
> > > > > What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine to have 'run counter'?
> > > > > Please cite some examples.
>
> > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > --MJ
>
> > > > > Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it
> > > > > cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on
> > > > > the government, not on private individuals -- that it does not
> > > > > prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the
> > > > > government -- that it is not a charter _for_ government power, but a
> > > > > charter of the citizen's protection _against_ the government. --
> > > > > Alyssa Rosenbaum
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> *
> *
> *Fila Coffee*
> *www.filacoffee.com*

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Ferris Bueller’s Teacher Wakes Up

Ferris Bueller's Teacher Wakes Up
Posted by Christopher Manion on March 22, 2011 03:23 PM

After a decade of oozing tepid treacle glorifying George W. Bush's wars, Ferris Bueller's substitute teacher trips over the Constitution, awakens from his sycophantic slumber, and says " Ouch! Omigosh­this war's unconstitutional!"

So are the other ones, Ben, but W started those, and that apparently exonerates all the guilty and absolves all their sins.

But only in the dialectic of the Manichee. The better to understand this tsunami of contradictions, read this , this, this, and this .

xxx

One World Government Obama
By Ben Stein on 3.22.11 @ 6:09AM

Maybe I missed something, but wasn't that The Constitution of the United States of America that we just laid to rest this weekend?

It was buried in a private ceremony by Mr. Barack Obama of Chicago as he silently signed America on to the One World Government some of us have been worried about for decades.

Look at it this way: Where did Mr. Obama get the authority to commit United States forces to war in Libya? There was no declaration of war. There was no authorizing resolution by Congress allowing money to be spent on a war against Col. Gaddafi. As far as I know, there was no meeting of Mr. Obama and top leaders of Congress to discuss the subject in even rough form, let alone detail. There was no lengthy buildup in which the Congress was "allowed" to express the people's opinion on whether we want to be in a third concurrent war.

There was just a vote by the United Nations Security Council, a very far from unanimous vote, and suddenly, the President's Secretary of State, Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton, solemnly announced that we were at war.

But, when did we amend the Constitution to declare that the United Nations had control over our military? When did we abolish the part of the Constitution that said Congress had the right to declare war? Now, I well know that in recent postwar conflicts, we don't have declarations of war. But we have Congressional  debates. We have funding votes. We have a sense of the Congress or some kind of resolution.

This time, zip. Nada. Nothing. Just France and the U.K. and Norway saying that it's time to go to war, and off America goes to war. And off Mr. and Mrs. Obama go to a South American "fact finding" trip for the POTUS and a fun sightseeing junket for the Obama girls.

(I wonder if there has ever before in history been a national leader who sent his country to war -- and the same day went off on vacation. Has that ever happened before? )

Something's missing here. Libya and Col. Gaddafi were and are no threat to the United States. It is sad and cruel that the Gaddafi regime was murdering its own civilians, but so do many governments all across the world, including North Korea, Iran, the Ivory Coast, Zimbabwe, and Cuba. Are we going to war with all of them, now?

Meanwhile, again, what the heck happened to the Constitution? Is this Mr. Obama's legacy to our children? The junking of the Constitution in the middle of the night and the turnover of our sovereignty to the United Nations? (By the way, this is the same UN where Libya until recently sat on the Commission on Human Rights.) Why aren't any questions being asked? Is the Constitution that meaningless to us? Are we that pitiful now? Are we willing to toss overboard the Constitution for the writ of the United Nations? I guess so. Sad days.


http://spectator.org/archives/2011/03/22/one-world-government-obama

Re: Trouble in ObamaLand: Democrats are saying Obama launched attack on Libya...for Oil!!!

Whoa! Dennis Kucinich is talking impeachment!

On Mar 22, 2:54 pm, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Steve Lynch (D-MA), has been tearing Obama a new one for 2 days now,
> and shows no sign of slowing down
>
> On Mar 22, 1:50 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >     <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/> Trouble in
> > ObamaLand: Democrats are saying Obama launched attack on Libya...for
> > Oil!!!<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/trouble-in-obamaland-de...>
> > *Scotty Starnes
> > <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/>*| March 22,
> > 2011 at 11:30 AM | Tags: cap
> > and trade <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=cap-and-trade>,
> > Libya<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=libya>,
> > oil <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=oil>, President
> > Obama<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=president-obama>,
> > renewable energy <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=renewable-energy>,
> > Rep. Edward Markey
> > (D-Mass.)<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=rep-edward-markey-d-mass>|
> > Categories: Political
> > Issues <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?cat=35145> | URL:http://wp.me/pvnFC-4Ox
>
> > He's breaking constitutional law. He's doing it for oil. Most would think
> > his was being shouted by Republicans. However, these shouts are coming from
> > Obama's own party. Trouble in ObamaLand.
>
> > The Hill<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/151041-key-dem-attac...>
> >  reports:
>
> > The United States military action against Libya is motivated by a desire for
> > affordable and accessible oil, a top Democrat on environmental issues said
> > Monday.
>
> > *Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), the ranking member of the House Natural
> > Resources Committee, said that he agreed with President Obama's decision to
> > launch, along with allies, attacks against Libya and its leader,
> > Moammar Gadhafi. But Markey said the attacks were primarily motivated by
> > oil. *
>
> > "*We are in Libya because of oil," *Markey said on MSNBC. "It all goes back
> > to the 5 million barrels of oil we import from OPEC on a daily basis."
>
> > "I think all Americans know why the president made this strike," he said.
> > "As long as no American soldiers are on the ground ... then I think it's a
> > good decision for the president."
>
> > Markey is the same Democrat trying to push the cap-and-trade scheme.
> > Basically he is trying to say that if the U.S. had 'renewable energy,' Obama
> > wouldn't have attacked Libya. However, being a dumb Democrats, Markey
> > doesn't know that the U.S. doesn't import any oil from Libya.
>
> > Political unrest in Libya and other Middle Eastern nations with high oil
> > production contributed to higher prices per barrel of crude oil, which
> > translates to higher energy costs — particularly in gasoline. (Oil was up to
> > above $102/barrel as of midday trading on Monday.)
>
> > The increased energy prices led Obama to hold a press conference earlier
> > this month in which he renewed calls for *more production of renewable
> > energy*, and said he would consider opening the Strategic Petroleum Reserves
> > if oil prices continued to rise.
>
> > Just don't ask him to allow U.S. companies to drill for our own oil. That
> > would be common sense and go against his plans to make energy prices
> > skyrocket.
>
> > Continue reading>>><http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/151041-key-dem-attac...>
>
> > Add a comment to this
> > post<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/trouble-in-obamaland-de...>
> > <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/scottystarnes.wordpress.com...>
> > <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/scottystarnes.wordpress.co...>
> > <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/scottystarnes.wordpress.com...>
> > <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/...>
> > <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/...>
> > <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/18509/>
> > <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/1...>
>
> >   [image: WordPress]
>
> > WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/> | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
> > Manage Subscriptions<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&...>|
> > Unsubscribe<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&...>|
> > Express
> > yourself. Start a blog. <http://wordpress.com/signup/?ref=email>
>
> > *Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:*http://subscribe.wordpress.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

13 Illegal Aliens Disguised As U.S. MARINES Caught Sneaking Into America At Mexican Border

13 Illegal Aliens Disguised As U.S. MARINES Caught Sneaking Into America At Mexican Border twg2a PitBull | March 22, 2011 at 13:00 | Categories: Illegal Immigration, Military and Veterans | URL: http://wp.me/pMJTI-Ot

Clad in U.S. Marine uniforms, the illegal immigrants were apprehended at the Campo Border Patrol Westbound I-8 checkpoint at 11 p.m. on March 14 near Pine Valley, Calif., according to a March 15 report by California's El Centro Border Intelligence Center. Officials at U.S. Customs and Border Protection are investigating a report that 13 illegal [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

What does it take to over-populate the planet?

We already have too many people and are crowding it . .

One measure of that is that it is unsafe to live in the cities. When I
was a kid, we never locked the back or front door. Now, we have to
have bars on the windows and double cylinder deadbolt locks on the
doors.

What was causing the change? When the Earth becomes over-crowded, it
presses upon our natural resources and they become depleated. We sense
that over-crowding. As we all know in economics, when something
becomes too abundant, it loses value. It makes no difference what it
is; it applies to people as well as all else. As we become more
crowded, we each intuitively view the others with less compassion and
more disinterest, even hostility. We resent the hostile driver who
crowds us from behind or cuts in too close up ahead. We both feel
hostility.

And it is a hostility that grows. Now, we see "the too-many other
people" as having less value. What will it be like in years or decades
to come when we become even more crowded? We will see "the other
people" as having zero value. But it follows that things can grow even
more crowded. Then we must reach the point where we see "the other
people" as having NEGATIVE VALUE. Is that improbable?

It is already happening! Why else do people break down emotionally
under the strain, pick up a weapon and go out seeking to kill as many
people as they can? They are so stressed that they have no further
interest in living and want to die wrecking as much vengence as
possible on "the others" (society) which they blame (not unjustly) for
their misery.

Anyone interested in broadening their information on this subject can
find it in the the science of social evolution available by way of:
civilization-overview dot com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: Atlas Shrugged Movie

You can also use this to "demand" it be shown anywhere

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As many of you are probably aware, Atlanta did NOT make the list of cities where the Atlas Shrugged movie will be initially released. I know--I'm as baffled as you are.

It's a little thing, but we can show the movie producers we'd like to see their movie by using the Demand It! feature at Eventful.

Click this link:  http://is.gd/M5fwSi

(Note: I have no idea if you'd need to register in order to vote--I'm already registered at Eventful so I can't tell. Will someone let me know if registration is a requirement?)

Maybe it'll work; maybe not. But it only takes a second, so why not? 

~Jenn

-- 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Restaurant Owner Says Angry Internal Affairs Cop Hit Him With Car

Restaurant Owner Says Angry Internal Affairs Cop Hit Him With Car
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2011/03/20/restaurant-owner-says-angry-internal-affairs-cop-hit-him-with-car/

"Morgan says he was given the last name of his alleged assailant—Epps—and told that he was from internal affairs. A man who said he was Epps' superior tried to broker a peace, says Morgan. The owner told the official he wouldn't press charges if Epps apologized. But Epps absolutely refused, and even though Morgan asked that he be charged, the official let him drive off. 'If I did that as a citizen I'd be in jail,' says Morgan. Morgan and two of his neighbors say they were asked to fill out 119s (witness statements). That's as far as things went. The proprietor says police left without providing him with a police report number."

---

Never, ever interact with a government official without having a recorder running.

Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft

The Left's Economic Terrorism Playbook: Coalition too Destroy US Capitalism and Redistribute Wealth (Video)

The Left's Economic Terrorism Playbook: Coalition too Destroy US Capitalism and Redistribute Wealth (Video) Scotty Starnes | March 22, 2011 at 2:25 PM | Tags: capitalism, Cloward-Piven strategy, community organizers, economic terrorism, Frances Fox Piven, JP Morgan, liberal students, radical leftists, redistribute the wealth, SEIU, Stephen Lerner, stock market, unions | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-4OK

watch?v=GgOEraouhxU&feature=player_embedded

From the usual suspects: Radical Leftists, Union goons, community organizers and weak-minded liberal students who want to take down capitalism to redistribute the wealth. Sounds like someone we have sitting in the White House.

What these lefties are speaking about is equivalent to economic terrorism. If they bring down Wall Street, the US economy would collapse. What these idiots don't realize is the rich will not be affected. They have money. The poor would be the group to suffer the greatest from such a left-wing scheme.

Notice the dolts speaking about Frances Fox Piven, one of the c0-creators of the Cloward-Piven Strategy? This is the same strategy they want to use to bring down the U.S. economy. Overwhelm the system so it crashes. Then rebuild it. What's the opposite of capitalism? SOCIALISM.

The man speaking on the tape is former SEIU goon Stephen Lerner.The Business Insider has more:

A former official of one of the country's most-powerful unions, SEIU, has a secret plan to "destabilize" the country. The plan is designed to destroy JP Morgan, nuke the stock market, and weaken Wall Street's grip on power, thus creating the conditions necessary for a redistribution of wealth and a change in government.

The former SEIU official, Stephen Lerner, spoke in a closed session at a Pace University forum last weekend.

The Blaze procured what appears to be a tape of Lerner's remarks. Many Americans will undoubtely sympathize with and support them. Still, the "destabilization" plan is startling in its specificity, especially coming so close on the heels of the financial crisis.

Lerner said that unions and community organizations are, for all intents and purposes, dead. The only way to achieve their goals, therefore--the redistribution of wealth and the return of "$17 trillion" stolen from the middle class by Wall Street--is to "destabilize the country."

Lerner's plan is to organize a mass, coordinated "strike" on mortgage, student loan, and local government debt payments--thus bringing the banks to the edge of insolvency and forcing them to renegotiate the terms of the loans.  This destabilization and turmoil, Lerner hopes, will also crash the stock market, isolating the banking class and allowing for a transfer of power.

Lerner's plan starts by attacking JP Morgan Chase in early May, with demonstrations on Wall Street, protests at the annual shareholder meeting, and then calls for a coordinated mortgage strike.

Lerner also says explicitly that, although the attack will benefit labor unions, it cannot be seen as being organized by them. It must therefore be run by community organizations.

Lerner was ousted from SEIU last November, reportedly for spending millions of the union's dollars trying to pursue a plan like the one he details here.  It is not clear what, if any, power and influence he currently wields. His main message--that Wall Street won the financial crisis, that inequality in this country is hitting record levels, and that there appears to be no other way to stop the trend--will almost certainly resonate.

Continue reading the transcript>>>

It is amazing that these leftist goons are telling their followers to stop paying their mortgages and student loans as President Obama is trying to force banks to help delinquent borrowers. It also makes sense because the Obama regime has also taken over the college loan market.

People need to wake up and realize that we have an enemy worse than al-Qaeda. It is the radical leftists and union goons who would love to destroy the economy.

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Trouble in ObamaLand: Democrats are saying Obama launched attack on Libya...for Oil!!!

Steve Lynch (D-MA), has been tearing Obama a new one for 2 days now,
and shows no sign of slowing down

On Mar 22, 1:50 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>     <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/> Trouble in
> ObamaLand: Democrats are saying Obama launched attack on Libya...for
> Oil!!!<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/trouble-in-obamaland-de...>
> *Scotty Starnes
> <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/author/scottystarnes/>*| March 22,
> 2011 at 11:30 AM | Tags: cap
> and trade <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=cap-and-trade>,
> Libya<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=libya>,
> oil <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=oil>, President
> Obama<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=president-obama>,
> renewable energy <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=renewable-energy>,
> Rep. Edward Markey
> (D-Mass.)<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?tag=rep-edward-markey-d-mass>|
> Categories: Political
> Issues <http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/?cat=35145> | URL:http://wp.me/pvnFC-4Ox
>
> He's breaking constitutional law. He's doing it for oil. Most would think
> his was being shouted by Republicans. However, these shouts are coming from
> Obama's own party. Trouble in ObamaLand.
>
> The Hill<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/151041-key-dem-attac...>
>  reports:
>
> The United States military action against Libya is motivated by a desire for
> affordable and accessible oil, a top Democrat on environmental issues said
> Monday.
>
> *Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), the ranking member of the House Natural
> Resources Committee, said that he agreed with President Obama's decision to
> launch, along with allies, attacks against Libya and its leader,
> Moammar Gadhafi. But Markey said the attacks were primarily motivated by
> oil. *
>
> "*We are in Libya because of oil," *Markey said on MSNBC. "It all goes back
> to the 5 million barrels of oil we import from OPEC on a daily basis."
>
> "I think all Americans know why the president made this strike," he said.
> "As long as no American soldiers are on the ground ... then I think it's a
> good decision for the president."
>
> Markey is the same Democrat trying to push the cap-and-trade scheme.
> Basically he is trying to say that if the U.S. had 'renewable energy,' Obama
> wouldn't have attacked Libya. However, being a dumb Democrats, Markey
> doesn't know that the U.S. doesn't import any oil from Libya.
>
> Political unrest in Libya and other Middle Eastern nations with high oil
> production contributed to higher prices per barrel of crude oil, which
> translates to higher energy costs — particularly in gasoline. (Oil was up to
> above $102/barrel as of midday trading on Monday.)
>
> The increased energy prices led Obama to hold a press conference earlier
> this month in which he renewed calls for *more production of renewable
> energy*, and said he would consider opening the Strategic Petroleum Reserves
> if oil prices continued to rise.
>
> Just don't ask him to allow U.S. companies to drill for our own oil. That
> would be common sense and go against his plans to make energy prices
> skyrocket.
>
> Continue reading>>><http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/151041-key-dem-attac...>
>
> Add a comment to this
> post<http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/03/22/trouble-in-obamaland-de...>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/scottystarnes.wordpress.com...>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/scottystarnes.wordpress.co...>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/scottystarnes.wordpress.com...>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/...>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/...>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/18509/>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/scottystarnes.wordpress.com/1...>
>
>   [image: WordPress]
>
> WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/> | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
> Manage Subscriptions<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&...>|
> Unsubscribe<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&...>|
> Express
> yourself. Start a blog. <http://wordpress.com/signup/?ref=email>
>
> *Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:*http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Sounds to me like this Wisconsin judge should have recused herself from her decision on the Walker law that was passed

Sounds like she has a wee bit of a dog in the hunt on stopping that
law from what I can see. She should have recused herself under these
circumstances.

http://www.bizzyblog.com/2011/03/22/overnight-engine-starter-wis-judge-sumis-conflicts-of-interest/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Gotta love socialized medicine - from Canada

    http://www.bizzyblog.com/2011/03/22/positivity-but-for-how-long/


The point he makes about Obamacare sounds about right to me.

A Challenge to Representative William Lacy Clay

Monday, March 21, 2011
A Challenge to Representative William Lacy Clay
by Bob Wenzel

When Congressman Ron Paul, as chairman of the House Financial Services subcommittee on Monetary Policy, held the first hearing on the Federal Reserve, Congressman William Lacy Clay, who is heavy on the payroll of the banksters, made wild statements about Thomas DiLorenzo, absurdly implying that DiLorenzo, who is a libertarian and who has exposed President Lincoln's racist views, was somehow anti-black, and that therefore he did not want to hear anything DiLorenzo had to say about the Fed.

Well, if that's what was really Representative Clay's reason for not wanting to listen to DiLorenzo, then let's find someone to testify, who is clearly not anti-black and has a studied understanding of the Federal Reserve. I challenge Representative Clay to call Louis Farrakhan as a witness to the next hearing of the Monetary Policy subcommittee.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pVq7BZj3aU&feature=player_embedded

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2011/03/challenge-to-representative-william.html

US Justice Department logic: Bernanke is a domestic terrorist

US Justice Department logic: Bernanke is a domestic terrorist
by Simon Black
March 21, 2011
Denver, Colorado, USA

The United States Department of Justice delivered a very clear and unfortunate message on Friday:

"Attempts to undermine the legitimate currency of this country are simply a unique form of domestic terrorism.  While these forms of anti-government activities do not involve violence, they are every bit as insidious and represent a clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country."

These remarks were released by the US Attorney's office in the western district of North Carolina following the conviction of one Bernard von NotHaus, the creator of the ill-fated Liberty Dollar.

As you likely recall from a few years ago, Liberty Dollars were privately minted gold and silver rounds. Paper certificates, akin to warehouse receipts were also issued, effectively giving the bearer a right to claim a certain amount of gold or silver at the group's warehouse in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.

This is traditionally how the system of money used to function– precious metals would be stored in private, secure storage facilities, and paper certificates were issued as a medium of exchange that entitled the bearer to redeem metal from the vault.  Liberty Dollars represented a return to that system.

Clearly, the Justice Department feels otherwise… instead viewing these silver rounds as an attempt by terrorists to undermine the US dollar.

Interesting choice of words.  Undermine? "verb [transitive]. to erode the base or foundation of something. to damage or weaken, especially gradually. "

Funny, this sounds a lot more like quantitative easing than anything else.  Ben Bernanke, in creating trillions of new dollars and debasing the value thereof, is guilty of the same insidious acts, and similarly, he represents a clear and present danger to the economic stability of the United States.

Somehow, though, I doubt that Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano or Attorney General Eric Holder will end up labeling Mr. Bernanke as a domestic terrorist.

Von NotHaus faces up to 15 years in prison on one count and 5 years on two others. Punitively, this is more serious than engaging in female genital mutilation (5-years, section 116 of Title 18, US Code), certain types of assault (as little as six months, section 113), or, ironically, bank robbery (10-years, section 2113b).

The US government obviously has its priorities straight.

As for the total amount of Von NotHaus' gold and silver booty? A whopping $7 million, roughly .000083% of Bernanke's $8.4 trillion money supply.  Von NotHaus was so insignificant he wasn't even in the ballpark of a rounding error.  By definition, this couldn't possibly constitute a danger to the economy.

Realistically, the government's 6-year effort to bring him down had one single purpose: to send a message. Uncle Sam is telling us very clearly, "You WILL use our rapidly depreciating dollars… and anything we don't like in our sole discretion, we will label as domestic terrorism."

If safeguarding the purchasing power of savings is considered domestic terrorism, what else is considered terrorism? I think this also begs the question of whether gold and silver confiscation is on the table… I'd love to hear your thoughts.

http://www.sovereignman.com/expat/bernanke-terrorist

Couple good comments by Jim Miller on Politics re corruption in states in the Midwest

   

Meanwhile, Back In Barack Obama's Illinois (6):  A reformer, a real reformer, is giving up.  Here's a little about his long fight againstcorruption.

When Roger and Tina Keats drive away from their Sheridan Road home in Wilmette for the last time in a few weeks and head for their new home in Texas, they will be leaving behind a formidable political legacy.

Keats, who served as the Republican state senator for much of the North Shore from 1978 to 1992, worked closely with Harold Washington to enact legislation that adopt judicial sub-circuits for Cook County and cleared the way for minorities and Republicans to hold judgeships.

The reform, fought by many Democrats, was an integral part of the cleanup of corruption in the Cook County court system that was uncovered by Operations Greylord and Gambat.

And here's the letter he sent to explain why he is leaving

As we leave Illinois for good, I wanted to say goodbye to my friends and wish all of you well.   I am a lifelong son of the heartland and proud of it.  After 60 years, I leave Illinois with a heavy heart.  BUT enough is enough!  The leaders of Illinois refuse to see we can't continue going in the direction we are and expect people who have options to stay here.  I remember when Illinois had 25 congressmen.  In 2012 we will have 18.  Compared to the rest of the country we have lost 1/4rd of our population.  Don't blame the weather, because I love 4 seasons.
. . . 
We live in the most corrupt big city, in the most corrupt big county in the most corrupt state in America.  I am sick and tired of subsidizing crooks.  A day rarely passes without an article about the corruption and incompetence.  Chicago even got caught rigging the tests to hire police and fire!  Our Crook County CORPORATE property tax system is intentionally corrupt.  The Democrat State Chairman who is also the Speaker of the Illinois House and the most senior alderman in Chicago each make well over a million dollars a year putting the fix in for their client's tax assessments.

Barack Obama could have worked with people like Roger and Tina Keats to bring about much-needed reforms in Illinois — but chose not to.

(By way of the Washington Examiner.  Unfortunately, there are a couple of errors in their piece; Roger Keats was not elected Cook County Board President, though he ran for the office, and Illinois's population is declining relative to the rest of the United States, not absolutely.)

- 7:56 AM, 22 March 2011   [link]

Senator McCaskill Will Be Paying Some Back Taxes:  After making a couple of completely understandable mistakes.

Ah Senators, they're just like you and me!  Who among us hasn't forgotten to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes on our private aircraft, after billing the government to use it 88 times?  But because McCaskill is getting folksy with her admission of wrongdoing -- she said the word 'damn,' so clearly she takes this matter very seriously -- all is forgiven, right?

This all came out because McCaskill, accidentally I am sure, billed the federal government for a political trip.  (She's already reimbursed the taxpayers for that little $88,000 mistake.)

McCaskill is a Democrat so her mistakes have gotten surprisingly favorable coverage.  Or, perhaps I should say, unsurprisingly favorable coverage.   (For example.)

At best, the mistakes show incompetence.  And surprising incompetence in someone who served as Missouri's state auditor.

(There may be another scandal or two to investigate in her family finances.  Her husband, Joe Shepard, owns "dozens" of "affordable-housing" companies.  Typically, that kind of housing is heavily subsidized, and there are many opportunities for abuse, as Obama's former friend and ally, Tony Rezko, could tell you.)

- 6:58 PM, 22 March 2011   [link]

A Brief History of the United States -- From Beginning to End

The following is from: http://fredoneverything.net/AmericanHistory.shtml

---

A Brief History of the United States

From Beginning to End

March 21, 2011

In 1492 Columbus rediscovered America, and the settlers, destructively exploiting its vast resources, achieved a success which they attributed to their own near-miraculous virtues, some of which they actually had: courage, rude vigor, industry, and an independent spirit. Shortly after, they emerged from WWII unscathed due to the military genius embodied in two oceans while competitors—Europe, Russia, China, and Japan—lay prostrate. America’s intact military and an economy up and running allowed the establishment of a fairly benign empire and an astonishing commercial dominance, both being attributed to near-miraculous virtues and regarded as permanent.

They didn’t see it coming.

Japan revived and began producing something it called a Toyota while Detroit, sure of its market, manufactured lousy cars that arrived falling apart, final assembly by owner. Germany revived. Communism still protected America from China, and no one foresaw that this would change. Airbus Industries appeared, but no one believed that it could compete with American know-how and engineering. It did. One by one American manufacturers of airliners took shelter in the military market until only Boeing was left, more or less equal to Airbus. But Americans knew that Europe was socialist and had no work ethic.

Before long Japan had completely devoured the market for consumer electronics, cameras, and suchlike. Ship-building went, except for builders catering to the captive military market. The steel industry left for foreign shores. Few noticed. Americans knew that their prosperity sprang from their near-miraculous virtues, which foreigners could never achieve.

Eventually China gave up on communism and became 1.3 billion smart, hard-working people who saw nothing wrong with the idea of becoming the world’s dominant power. Brazil began making airliners and American airlines began buying them. Even India showed signs of life. Americans didn’t worry because they knew that these funny countries couldn’t compete with America’s democratic values.

Manufacturing jobs began flowing to Asia, first a trickle and then a torrent. Americans didn’t pay attention, not knowing exactly where Asia was. Anyway, those foreigners were comic little people with squinty eyes and ate with sticks. Who could take them seriously? Then design work and programming began emigrating eastward. American had invented the Internet and now would pay the price. Intellectual capital had broken free from physical capital. Oops.

American industry largely ceased to exist, or at least ceased to be American. The big companies became free-floating international entities, adventitiously putting down roots wherever taxes were low and labor cheap, which wasn’t America. An HP laptop now consisted of a CPU from Intel but made perhaps in Ireland, the motherboard, hard drive, power supply and case made in Taiwan, RAM and screen from Samsung, assembled in Taiwan or China, but the label said HP, so it was American.

The trade balance went sour, and then very sour. The country had long since become captive to consumerism both national and individual, “He who dies with the most toys wins” being a bumper-sticker anthem. At every level America began living on credit, but America’s credit was good, which American’s attributed to near-miraculous virtues which they no longer had, if they had ever had them.

As the economy invisibly declined, the military’s budget grew and grew. The country could no longer afford it, but the Pentagon was so deeply embedded in the economy and Congress that the country couldn’t stop affording it. The five-sided money hole spent on, an aging kept woman with no obvious purpose since, with the fall of the Soviet Union, America had no military enemies.

Consequences sometimes arrive tardily. After WWII, Zionists had conquered Palestine and begun mistreating its people in the manner of white South Africans at their worst. Moslems, of whom it later turned out there were quite a few, came to hate Zionists and, by extension, all Jews. Since America supplied the bombs that Israel used to kill Moslems, these came to hate the US. Thus 9/11. This was used as a pretext for war by hawkish wimps, now called Neocons. The conflicts were  embraced by the Pentagon, which needed a raison d’etre in the face of the lack of enemies. The ensuing wars were enthusiastically supported by evangelicals, more Zionists, confused patriots, imperialists, military industry, and those who just wanted to kill some Arabs, any Arabs. President W. Bush with his eternal martial priapism and yokel grasp was just the man. The military budget now was about a trillion a year in a country that owed more money than it could ever repay.

Many things had changed since the arrival of Columbus and smallpox. Americans still imagined themselves as Marlboro Man, rugged individualists, though many had never actually seen a live horse. In fact the country had become a society of mass conformist consumerism with its tastes designed at corporate. America was still a land of opportunity, if you were an Ivy techy with an IQ in excess of 180, but everybody else was pretty much screwed. Most people lived in velvet serfdom, afraid of the boss and imprisoned by the retirement system. Few young males could any longer meet the physical requirements for induction. The Army softened training so they could appear to get through. So much for Davy Crockett.

Americans had become the Frightened People, afraid of terror, of Moslems, of an outside world they couldn’t find or, in many cases, spell. The government used this bounty from heaven to justify rapid elimination of civil liberties, telling the public that it was to protect them. They still prided themselves on their democracy, without any longer having one, and on being a light to the world, which hated them. “The whole world hates us. What is wrong with the whole world ?” they asked, deeply puzzled.

The looters came. In the past there had been an element of noblesse oblige, of concern for the nation, a sense among the upper classes that they ought to pay some slight attention to keeping the country alive while picking its bones.  This changed. The country was now ruled by the tightly interlocking directorates of Wall Street, Congress, the upper reaches of the executive branch, and the big corporations, none of whose members had ever worked a night shift at Walmart while living in a rented trailer. The worst and brightest went to Harvard and then into i-banking. Thus the sub-prime adventure. This catastrophe was regarded as a cyclical correction instead of as the first notes of the knell.

By this time the country was acquiring the attributes of the Third World. Impunity: financiers did not go to jail for financial crimes, nor generals for war crimes, nor congressmen for anything. National incapacity: The government handled natural disasters with the adroitness one might expect of Burundi. Intractable slums festered in the cores of its great cities. Over its age America had achieved greatly, done much that was admirable and much that wasn’t, and now, overreaching, still convinced of its miraculous virtues, was perilously close to falling on its face.

---

Never, ever interact with a government official without having a recorder running.

Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft

Trouble in ObamaLand: Democrats are saying Obama launched attack on Libya...for Oil!!!

Trouble in ObamaLand: Democrats are saying Obama launched attack on Libya...for Oil!!! Scotty Starnes | March 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM | Tags: cap and trade, Libya, oil, President Obama, renewable energy, Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-4Ox

He's breaking constitutional law. He's doing it for oil. Most would think his was being shouted by Republicans. However, these shouts are coming from Obama's own party. Trouble in ObamaLand.

The Hill reports:

The United States military action against Libya is motivated by a desire for affordable and accessible oil, a top Democrat on environmental issues said Monday.

Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), the ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee, said that he agreed with President Obama's decision to launch, along with allies, attacks against Libya and its leader, Moammar Gadhafi. But Markey said the attacks were primarily motivated by oil.

"We are in Libya because of oil," Markey said on MSNBC. "It all goes back to the 5 million barrels of oil we import from OPEC on a daily basis."

"I think all Americans know why the president made this strike," he said. "As long as no American soldiers are on the ground ... then I think it's a good decision for the president."

Markey is the same Democrat trying to push the cap-and-trade scheme. Basically he is trying to say that if the U.S. had 'renewable energy,' Obama wouldn't have attacked Libya. However, being a dumb Democrats, Markey doesn't know that the U.S. doesn't import any oil from Libya.

Political unrest in Libya and other Middle Eastern nations with high oil production contributed to higher prices per barrel of crude oil, which translates to higher energy costs — particularly in gasoline. (Oil was up to above $102/barrel as of midday trading on Monday.)

The increased energy prices led Obama to hold a press conference earlier this month in which he renewed calls for more production of renewable energy, and said he would consider opening the Strategic Petroleum Reserves if oil prices continued to rise.

Just don't ask him to allow U.S. companies to drill for our own oil. That would be common sense and go against his plans to make energy prices skyrocket.

Continue reading>>>

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Apparently I Was Wrong

 

At the Senior Citizens Center they had a contest the other day. I lost by one point. The question was where do women have the most curly hair? Apparently, the correct answer was Africa.      One of the other questions was to name two things commonly found in cells. It appears that Negroes and Mexicans is not the correct answer either.      I've heard that Apple have scrapped their plans for the new children's iPod after realizing that iTouch Kids is not a good product name.      There's a new Muslim clothing shop opened in our shopping center, but I've been banned from it after asking to look at some bomber jackets.      You can say lots of bad things about pedophiles but at least they drive slowly past schools.      A buddy of mine has just told me he's getting it on with his girlfriend and her twin. I said "How can you tell them apart?" He said "Her brother's got a mustache."      Just put a deposit down on a brand new Porsche and mentioned it on Facebook. I said, "I can't wait for the new 911 to arrive!" Next thing I know 4000 freakin' Muslims have added me as a friend!!      Being a modest man, when I checked into my hotel on a recent trip, I said to the lady at the registration desk, "I hope the porn channel in my room is disabled." To which she replied, "No, it's regular porn, you sick bastard.      The FBI have discovered how to weave Muslim prayer mats out of plastic explosives. Apparently prophets are going through the roof!!      The Red Cross have just knocked at our door and asked if we could help towards the floods in Pakistan. I said we would love to, but our garden hose only reaches the driveway.                                                                                                                                                                        ï»¿

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.