--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 | TORTURE TIME: No panties on the head when Muslims are doing the torturingbarenakedislam | April 14, 2011 at 11:14 PM | Categories: Muslims vs Muslims, Persecution of Christians | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-sAK |
PALESTINIAN TORTURE: "They stuck a tube into the man's mouth and then another tube up his backside" SAUDI TORTURE: Most of these prisoners' only crime is being illegal immigrants. EGYPTIAN TORTURE: "It's the authorities themselves who leaked this video. The point is to intimidate people." PAKISTANI TORTURE: Beating up Kashmiri villagers whom militants accuse of [...]
 | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
 | Duke Lacrosse Rape-faker boyfriend dies after she stabbed him...Al, Jesse and the New Black Panthers have nothing to sayScotty Starnes | April 14, 2011 at 9:25 PM | Tags: Al Sharpton, Crystal Mangum, Duke Lacrosse team, Jesse Jackson, murder, New Black Panther Party, rape, Reginald Daye | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-53n |
Al...Jesse...I'm innocent...can't you say it was the white man who framed me?
This is what happens when you try to make anything and everything into a racial incident. The woman who accused members of the Duke Lacrosse team of rape has killed her boyfriend. Will Al, Jesse and the New Black Panther Party stand up and scream for this man's death?
The answer is no. These fools can't get their mugs on television unless race is involved. Black-on-black crime isn't profitable enough for these race hustlers.
Durham, N.C. — Family members of a man who was stabbed in his home April 3 say he died Wednesday evening. Crystal Mangum, the Durham woman who falsely accused three Duke University lacrosse players of rape in 2006, has been charged with assaulting him.
Assault? Stabbing someone is attempted murder. Will Al, Jesse and the New Black Panther Party stand by this liar again?
Durham police confirmed Thursday morning that Reginald Daye, 46, had died.
Will Al, Jesse and the New Black Panther Party attend the funeral of the man killed by a woman they supported?
"The case remains under investigation, and we do anticipate upgrading the charges. However, no new charges have been filed at this time," police spokeswoman Kammie Michael said in an e-mail to WRAL News.
Police said Mangum, 32, stabbed Daye in the torso with a kitchen knife during a dispute at 3507 Century Oaks Drive early on April 3.
Daye was taken to Duke University Hospital, and Mangum was arrested in a nearby apartment.
A man who said he was Daye's nephew called 911 to report the stabbing, saying it occurred while Daye and his girlfriend were arguing about rent money. The caller said police came to the apartment complex earlier while the couple argued, but the stabbing occurred after the officers left.
When asked for a description of the girlfriend, the caller said, "It's Crystal Mangum. THE Crystal Mangum."
He then added, "I told him she was trouble from the beginning."
Mangum was charged with assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury and was being held in the Durham County jail on a $300,000 bond.
Just another client of Al and Jesse.
| | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.). I'm thrilled that
the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
> millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! — J. A. A.
> —
>
> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > John,
>
> > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that differs
> > > from yours. How fascist of you!
>
> > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how great
> > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a
> > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> > > street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about a
> > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or their
> > > network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a game
> > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> > > polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> > > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a candidate
> > > say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the
> > > people! — J. A. A. —
>
> > > On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > John,
>
> > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> > > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
>
> > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their
> > > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean when
> > > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a
> > > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the
> > > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more influence
> > > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic). Of course, that
> > > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and democracy."
>
> > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means and why
> > > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your world.
>
> > > And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum is
> > > about up.
>
> > > On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > Jonathan: Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a
> > > "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities
> > > vote. The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles
> > > than the man-on-the-street. Of course, that shift of power runs
> > > counter to principles of fair play and democracy. The 1st Amendment
> > > says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other
> > > medium". Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark is
> > > allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because I
> > > correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google, if Google
> > > didn't FIRE Mark, post haste! � J. A. A. �
>
> > > --
>
> > > Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> <http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> > > --
> > > Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> > *
> > *
> > *
> > *
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
.Both are fanatical and both
are equally flawed and unachievable
--
no shit?
their values must be replaced
we stand or we fall by our own efforts
On Apr 14, 3:31 pm, charles <charlesbrou...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 1:24 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "That's what passes for philosophical debate between liberals and conservatives. The fight isn't over the legitimacy of the welfare-warfare state way of life. They both agree on that. The fight is over how to fund it (and, of course, which side gets to run it)."Thursday, April 14, 2010No More Statismby Jacob G. Hornberger
> > Not surprisingly, liberals are calling for tax hikes on the rich as their way to pay for the ever-burgeoning costs of the welfare-warfare state.
> > Conservatives pretend to oppose tax hikes. Their preferred method of funding the welfare-warfare state is through the Federal Reserve, whose job is to provide the money and credit needed to fund excess federal spending without the need to raise income taxes.
> > That's what passes for philosophical debate between liberals and conservatives. The fight isn't over the legitimacy of the welfare-warfare state way of life. They both agree on that. The fight is over how to fund it (and, of course, which side gets to run it).
> > The controversy perfectly reflects how different we libertarians are from statists. We libertarians don't argue over whether the welfare-warfare state should be funded by income taxation or inflation. Our position is: Immediately repeal all welfare-state programs (beginning with the crown jewels of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid), repeal all interventionist and regulatory programs (beginning with the drug war), and dismantle the U.S. government's military empire, close the bases, and discharge the troops into the private sector.
> > Oh, and abolish the IRS and the income tax, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid taxes, and the Federal Reserve.
> > In other words, leave people free to accumulate unlimited amounts of wealth, leave people free to do whatever they want with their own money, leave people free to make whatever choices they want in life so long as their conduct is peaceful, and depend on a well-armed, self-trained citizen soldiery that would be ready to voluntarily come to the defense of our country in the extremely unlikely event of an invasion.
> > With major exceptions like slavery and tariffs and many minor exceptions, the libertarian position was the position of America's Founding Fathers. They abhorred the statist philosophy that has now held our nation in its grip for many decades.
> > With the exception of President Lincoln's unconstitutional imposition of an income tax to fund his war against the seceding states, the United States had no income taxation or IRS from the nation's founding in 1787 to the early part of the 20th century. Americans were free to keep everything they earned.
> > When the federal government didn't tax income, lots of poor people became wealthy. Even more entered the ranks of the middle class.
> > For most of that entire time, there was no central bank, paper money, or legal-tender laws. (Again, Lincoln's tenure was a big exception.) Americans used gold and silver coins as their official money, which is what the Constitution required. When government was unable to debase the currency, the result was the greatest buildup of productive capital that people had ever seen.
> > The massive buildup of capital, in turn, made workers more productive. More productivity meant higher revenues. Higher revenues brought higher wages for the workers.
> > For the first time in history, masses of poor people were breaking free of the chains of poverty, which is precisely why thousands of penniless immigrants were fleeing the European and Asian lands of statism to come to a land of no welfare-warfare state. (Did I mention that America had no immigration controls during most of that period as well?)
> > Our American ancestors also detested militarism, standing armies, conscription, and empires. After all, they had rebelled against an empire, together with the ever-burgeoning taxes, debt, and inflation needed to fund it. Many of them had immigrated to America to escape conscription and perpetual war.
> > Charity was entirely voluntary for more than 100 years. By and large, Americans were a religious people. The thought of using the power of Caesar to interfere with the exercise of God's great gift of free will was anathema to our ancestors. People had the moral right to decide what to do with their own money, they firmly believed. That's what freedom of choice is all about. They would never have tolerated mandatory government-enforced "charity" in the form of such things as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, grants, and subsidies.
> > Today, the federal government is mired in ever-increasing spending, debt, taxes, and inflation. How can that surprise anyone? Americans have abandoned the founding principles of their nation in favor of the statism from which our American ancestors rebelled or fled.
> > Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, subsidies, grants, income taxation, IRS, the drug war, the DEA, the Federal Reserve, a thousand foreign military bases, the CIA, the NSA, the TSA, occupations of foreign countries, undeclared wars of aggression, standby conscription, kidnapping, torture, Gitmo, secret prison camps, invasions of privacy, unreasonable searches and seizures, torture, and assassination.
> > It's all part and parcel of the statism that now afflicts our land. That's the root of America's economic and social woes. There is only one way to restore freedom, peace, prosperity, and harmony to our land, and it lies not in figuring out how to fund the welfare-warfare state way of life. It lies in rejecting the welfare-warfare state way of life in favor of the libertarian principles that guided the founding of our nation no income tax, no IRS, no Federal Reserve, no Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or other welfare, no drug war, no militarism, no empire.
> > In other words, the key to our nation's future well-being lies with no more statism.http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2011-04-14.asp
>
> Certainly, the reason the govenment---or "BIG Government as Big
> business likes to call it---is wasting our tax money because Big
> business bribes congressmen to get big subsidies and tax loop-hole
> concessions.
>
> The Founding Fathers were not Libertarian! They WERE government;
> governnent! Governments are never against themselves! Government is
> all the common people have to defend themselves against the monstrous
> legal entities set up by government and called corporations. We with
> our government created these corporate entities which are now taking
> over and establishing the corporate state. Von Mises and his ideas
> are as destructive and impossible as those of Karl Marx. Each is only
> just a mirror image one of the other. . .Both are fanatical and both
> are equally flawed and unachievable.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
| | Democratic Senators Press Obama to Delay Deportation of Young Undocumented Democrats...err...Illegal ImmigrantsScotty Starnes | April 14, 2011 at 8:40 PM | Tags: Backdoor Amnesty, Democratic Senators, Democrats, illegal immigrants, immigration laws, President Obama | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-53e |
Those who break the law tend to vote for Democrats and Democrat tend to defend these criminals tooth and nail. Here's more proof.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Twenty-two Senate Democrats are pressuring President Barack Obama to delay deportations of certain young immigrants in the U.S. illegally.
The senators ask in a letter for deferrals of any deportations of the young immigrants brought to the U.S. by parents who arrived or stayed illegally.
This is the backdoor amnesty plan of Democrats.
The senators also suggest smaller steps the president can take to help the young immigrants, such as making sure they know they can request deportation delays.
Yes, tie up the court system and cost the taxpayers even more money.
In the letter sent Wednesday, the senators acknowledge that Obama must enforce the law but say exercising prosecutorial discretion has a long history in the U.S. and is consistent with the rule of law.
Democratic hypocrisy 101. On one hand they claim Obama must enforce the law but on the other they want him to ignore these laws. All to keep criminals in the U.S. so they can vote for Democrats.
| | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
| | MUSLIM OUTRAGE over alleged qur'an desecration at Minnesotastan prisonbarenakedislam | April 14, 2011 at 8:59 PM | Categories: Islam in America | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-sAm |
A 31-year-old Federal Medical Center Rochester inmate who leads Muslims in prayer says a prison officer "defiled and defamed" another detainee's Quran last month. Post Bulletin --Inmate Dwayne Travoy Dillard sent letters to officials at the prison, as well as U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison of Minneapolis, (Oh, that should prompt a federal inquiry, maybe even a [...]
| | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
 | National Speak Out Against Homosexuality Day.Ronin | 14 April, 2011 at 7:28 pm | Categories: Abuse of Power, By Ronin, Education, Freedom of Speech, Indoctrination | URL: http://wp.me/p1NPg-71i |
On 15 April, the homosexuals and the pro homosexuals are holding their annual day of silence to support their unnatural and disgusting lifestyles. They are doing this in school, a place that should be free of indoctrination and political agendas.
I wanted to give the rest of us a chance to practice our right of free speech by speaking out against these perverts and their supporters. Your first choice should be to remove your child for the day and spend some quality family time discussing why homosexuality is un-natural and supporting it is wrong but if that is not possible. Peacefully, use your rights and passively resist the efforts of a few to decide what the rest of us should believe and how we should act.
Speak to your children, friends, co-workers, even your crazy neighbor that you usually avoid. Explain to them all what you are doing and why. Encourage them to pick a side, I am willing to gamble that the vast majority of Americans do not know about, approve of or support the homosexual agenda.
If necessary, remind them that other "alternative lifestyles" are not pampered, sheltered and considered to sacred to discuss, they also do not use American schools to push agendas. Schools are support to educate and not indoctrinate. No special interest group is beyond reproach.
At the very least, if you do nothing else, call your school and ask if they let the students openly support homosexuality and if so, demand equal time to promote the traditional lifestyle. By drawing attention to the gay agenda, these groups should expect a reasonable and equal reaction to the outrageous use of schools time to support a single point of view.
Doing nothing is passive support and passive support is still support.
| | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
