Check out the front page of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel today - lots of good stuff there for conservatives

http://www.jsonline.com/

Sarah Palin looks fantastic - hard to believe that she is almost
50. She just looks so beautiful and happy. Good to see that the House
approved Ryan's 2012 budget. Now if the Senate can just surprise us and
also support it - probably won't happen but it would look great if they did.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Einstein,

Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).

On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful
> capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> feel.
>
> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you
> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last
> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of
> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things
> along by talking-up my document on the NET.  — John A. Armistead —
> Patriot
>
> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hey John!
>
> > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > > or otherwise stupid.  —  John A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  — John
> > > > A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.).  I'm thrilled that
> > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple things can
> > > > turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> > > > business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> > > > doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin didn't give a
> > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> > > > > millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > > citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  — J. A. A.
> > > > > —
>
> > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > > > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >  John,
>
> > > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> > > differs
> > > > > > > from yours. How fascist of you!
>
> > > > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > No, Jonathan!  Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> > > > > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> > > > > > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> > > great
> > > > > > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did.  Barbara Walters, a
> > > > > > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> > > > > > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> > > > > > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> > > > > > > street?  As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> > > a
> > > > > > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> > > their
> > > > > > > network closed.  Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> > > game
> > > > > > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> > > > > > > polls.  Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> > > > > > > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
> > > candidate
> > > > > > > say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the
> > > > > > > people!  —  J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > > >   On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > >  John,
>
> > > > > > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> > > > > > > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
>
> > > > > > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their
> > > > > > > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean
> > > when
> > > > > > > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > > a
> > > > > > > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the
> > > > > > > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more
> > > influence
> > > > > > > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic).  Of course,
> > > that
> > > > > > > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and
> > > democracy."
>
> > > > > > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means
> > > and why
> > > > > > > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your
> > > world.
>
> > > > > > > And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum
> > > is
> > > > > > > about up.
>
> > > > > > > On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > >  Jonathan:  Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > > a
> > > > > > > "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities
> > > > > > > vote.  The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles
> > > > > > > than the man-on-the-street.  Of course, that shift of power runs
> > > > > > > counter to principles of fair play and democracy.  The 1st
> > > Amendment
> > > > > > > says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other
> > > > > > > medium".  Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark
> > > is
> > > > > > > allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because
> > > I
> > > > > > > correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google, if
> > > Google
> > > > > > > didn't FIRE Mark, post haste!  ï¿½ J. A. A. �
>
> > > > > > >  --
>
> > > > > > >       Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> > > > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft<
> > >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> <
> > >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> > > > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft<
> > >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > *
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

This is getting just plain ridiculous now - universities are becoming ever more the repressive of speech locales in this country

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/04/universities-have-long-told-larger.html

Check the links here. The blog that gets linked is run by a
college law prof at Tennessee (Dr Glenn Reynolds) and he holds back
nothing in his contempt for the way Yale and the other universities are
dealing with these subjects.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Can Donald Trump 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?

Section 6, 7 & 8:  The House shall have the power to collect taxes,
customs duties and user fees that are due from the states and
territories, with the proviso that user fees shall not be applied to
major areas of government services so that the total cost of federal
government exceeds 15% of the previous year's GNP. 

What relation does GNP have to anything?
Why should Government spending EXCEED 15% GNP?

Additionally, the
House shall have the power to: regulate commerce with nations, among
states, and with Indian tribes; coin money and set the value of such,
and of foreign money; set standards for weights and measures; punish
counterfeiters; establish uniform rules of naturalization, but
specifically excluding destitute persons seeking jobs and benefits at
the expense of local, state or federal governments or the Citizens;
establish uniform laws on bankruptcies; establish post offices; create
tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court; punish piracies and felonies
committed at sea, and offenses against the laws of nations; declare
war and appropriate money for such, but for no longer than two years;
grant letters of marquee and reprisal and make rules concerning
capture; raise, support and maintain the Army, Navy, Marine Corp., Air
Force and Coast Guard, and make laws regulating such, as well as the
militias to uphold the laws, suppress insurrections and repel
invasions; provide for organizing, arming, disciplining and governing
those parts of the militias employed in the service of the USA—but
each state selects its militia officers.

You have lost a great deal in your translation.
You have also created a standing army -- which the Founders PROPERLY sought to avoid.
One would THINK you might have sought to CORRECT the misapplication of AIS8C3 and other enumerations.

     With assent by the apt state legislatures, the House may purchase
property for, and have continuous authority over, all needed forts,
magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and buildings.  The House determines
fair, maximum sentences for federal crimes, and defines and imposes
reasonable, uniform sanctions for non criminal violations of federal
rules and/or procedures.  The House shall make laws as necessary and
proper to execute the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by
this New Constitution of the United States of America to any
department or office thereof.

What do you imagine these 'federal crimes' to entail?

Jefferson, for instance, listed them in the Kentucky Resolution (nullification):

... the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations, and no other crimes whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the -- day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States," (and all their other acts which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution,) are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory.

What 'crimes' are you ADDING?


Regard$,
--MJ

"All States are governed by a ruling class that is a minority of the population, and which subsists as a parasitic and exploitative burden upon the rest of society. Since its rule is exploitative and parasitic, the State must purchase the alliance of a group of "Court Intellectuals," whose task is to bamboozle the public into accepting and celebrating the rule of its particular State. The Court Intellectuals have their work cut out for them. In exchange for their continuing work of apologetics and bamboozlement, the Court Intellectuals win their place as junior partners in the power, prestige, and loot extracted by the State apparatus from the deluded public." -- Murray Rothbard

Re: Can Donald Trump 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?

1.  Get our government out of the entitlement business!  Privatize
Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc.
Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in
programs from being hurt who are close to retirement.  But unlike
Republicans, once and forever, get the USA out of managing the
entitlement business!  If government pulls any of the strings, things
will start getting bad again, soon.

Please explain how one privatizes Social Security -- or why such needs to be privatized.
Similarly, do the SAME for Medicare/Medicaid, etc.
These unconstitutional programs should be abolished.

2.  Inform China and our other creditors that the USA will not be
paying them any interest on their loans.  We will repay the principal,
but only when doing so won't jeopardize our recovery.

Will have to consider what the unintended consequences might entail ...

3.  Bring home 90% of US troops within 90 days.  Leave 10% of the
troops in bases around the world to serve as a front guard in case
redeployment is necessary.

What happened to that Constitution thingy? Bring home 100% of the troops ... 90 days may work. Dismantle the unconstitutional standing army OR pass an amendment to keep it. IMMEDIATELY slash the so-called 'defense' budget by at least half -- further cuts to follow.

4.  Stop wasting billions and billions of dollars on political
campaigns!  That money is going into the pockets of the media.  Those
media rascals salivate over the ad money they generate by "talking up"
how 'close' the elections are going to be.  Britt Hume, though a
conservative, keeps pumping air into Obama by talking about the money
Obama can spend (waste!) to get re elected.  Barack Obama is a cash
cow for the media.  That's why no one in the media will call the
majority of Democrats CROOKS!

<sigh>
Government should spend ZERO on campaigns.
Individuals (and their created groups, etc.) have the freedom and liberty to spend as many dollars as they desire.
Remove the ability for Politicians to peddle pull (ie. follow the constitution as written) and you eliminate the bulk. If Archer Daniels Midland, for instance, does not reap zillions in subsidies and other advantages (read: regulations), they are unlikely to be concerned with pumping millions into various campaigns. If they receive nothing, who cares if they continue to give millions.

5.  'Fat cats' should stop being wimps!  Government has become no-
longer-legal STEALING from the supposed rich to give to the poor.  The
Democrats talk about how Republicans are wanting to give tax breaks to
the wealthy while denying women medical screenings.  Republicans
should be talking about how "Democrats are criminals for seeking
stolen benefits for themselves and other criminals!"

That you fail to realize that Ds and Rs are effectively the same is troubling.
The Income Tax should be abolished (thus ending the bulk of the class warfare). Required dollars should be apportioned between the Sovereign States -- with the States paying from dollars they raise as they choose (50 of them in competition for Citizens) coupled with an across-the-board 3% tariff. No borrowing is permissible EXCEPT for cash flow needs UNLESS War (in accordance with AIS8C11) and then all extra proceeds go ONLY to that cause.


1.  The Constitution does NOT allow political parties!  Those are

quasi governmental bodies which get to decide who our candidates for
public office can be, and decide who "the leaders" in Congress are.
Because our country was conceived as a Representative Republic, such
fact tacitly mandates that each representative shall have identical
power!  Seniority nor party affiliation can give more power to ANYONE!

The Constitution *does* allow Congress to make its OWN rules. Additionally PEOPLE will organize into various factions (which is their liberty to do so).
What is needed, rather, is to eliminate the various CAMPAIGN and ELECTION laws -- which have zero Constitutional basis -- which enable the Duopoly to maintain their positions.

2.  The US Senate is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL oligarchy of elitists who
effectively have been running-the-USA-into-the-ground since the birth
of this nation.  Senators aren't determined by having a parity of the
population which they each serve.  Though the Senate was begrudgingly
included in the 'words' of the Constitution, it has never been within
the SPIRIT of the Constitution!

Huh? The Senate served as the Representatives of the States -- you know, those parties to the Constitution? Those parties that put it into effect? Those parties charged with the power/authority to amend that agreement?
Amendment 17 (which is unconstitutional per Article V -- 10 states have STILL not ratified) should be rescinded/repealed/abolished.
This STATE check against Federal usurpation (along with others) need to be restored.

3.  The principle of FAIR representation makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to
allow the State of Iowa to have more "power" in determining who our
candidates for President can be.  And by the same general reasoning,
it makes the entire primary system UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because the
states with earlier-dated primaries always have the most influence in
determining who can run.

Again, this is part and parcel to the Election/Campaign laws which maintain the Duopoly along with the ability of Politicians to peddle pull.
Having some utopian same date primary changes neither.
The underlying idea of the system was to have the House choose the President from the 'search committee' provided by the various State Legislature chosen electors (remember those States who are party to that Constitution thingy). By choosing two, it was expected that the Electors would NEVER reach the required majority.
ADDITIONALLY, having the top two vote getters (presumably persons with DIFFERENT ideals/positions) restores yet ANOTHER check eliminated.

4.  Political party conventions are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because those
are "governed" by the unsanctioned and UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the
UNCONSTITUTIONAL political parties!

This is nonsensical.
Again, your problem *is* and *remains* that unconstitutional Election/Campaign laws have been made. There are no 'Federal' Elections. The ONLY thing the Congress *is* charged with concerning such is that they may set a uniform date as to when the Electors are to be chosen and other time/dates associated with those electors.

5.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow any
individual or group to have more influence on the outcome of an
election or referenda than one-person-one vote.  That criminalizes
entertainment or media celebrities who use their influence to garner
votes for any candidate.  And it makes any group—such as labor unions—
who seek more 'power' than could ever be manifested by just their
members' votes, criminals.  Labor unions and other unconstitutional
group influences, effectively, have been blackmailing candidates by
implying… "You vote for 'us' or you won't get elected."  Since the
latter is a SUBVERSION of the Constitution that shifts the par of
power away from individuals and toward specific groups, the leaders of
such groups are guilty of TREASON!

More nonsensical bullshit.
As noted previously, Government becomes important SOLELY because Government has dictated rules, regulations, advantage, etc. which people seek to influence. It is GOVERNMENT which should be prohibited (which they largely are already according to the Constitution as written) from providing advantage to some at the expense of everyone else (which LIMITS Government to securing the (natural) right of ALL <period>). As long as the Government provides advantage, people will be trying to influence that process.

6.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to give equal
time to discuss any socialist idea!  Since socialism and communism
aren't fair, then it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow democrats to
represent anyone in Congress!

Who is 'giving' this equal time? Individuals may do with their property as they choose -- if they wish to shout 'socialism' and 'communism', such is most certainly their prerogative.
It is not 'unconstitutional' for the (socialist) democrats to represent anyone any more than the (socialist) republicans.

<snip> too much deluded silliness

Section 9 & 10:  Other than the President or his agents, no person,
news medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
while such are in Washington.  However, invited persons or groups can
make scheduled depositions provided they don't communicate with the
representatives otherwise.  A representative's constituents shall be
allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
only while they are in their home states or districts.

I chose this randomly to illustrate the absolute STUPIDITY of this approach -- it is no wonder that you refuse to post the entire waste of three decades or whatever it was you constantly blather.
HERE is what will occur under your delusion: Factions will CONTINUE to exist, only they will be 'unnoticeable'. Communication will continue to occur -- as your verbiage is written, it is COMPLETELY 'legal' for the Representative to contact anyone he chooses, for his staff to do the same AND for the staff to be contacted. Oops.

It is far simpler.
Congress may do A, B and C <period> -- where A, B and C serve to secure the (natural) rights of all. Since the Congress can do NOTHING else, of what concern is it that Congressman X freely associates with G? That some group gives Congressman X zillions of dollars in pursuit of the seat? That Congressman X has been in office 97 years? Your approach curtails and restricts liberties and freedoms.

This one sentence summarizes the SPIRIT of both the original
Constitution and my New Constitution: "Fair play and democracy shall
have supremacy in the USA!"  Long shall the USA survive and prosper!

What is 'fair' and why should 50%+1 force 50%-1 to do as they desire?

Trump? Really?

I can already summize the fallacy spew that will follow. A true pity.


Regard$,
--MJ

"[T]he notion that the alleged incompetence of the individual is a basis for turning responsibility over to the collective reduces to the absurdity that those who are incompetent to run their own lives, in which everything is at stake for them, are thereby qualified to run the lives of others, in which virtually nothing is at stake for them." -- George Reisman

Re: This congressman asks an important question and the EPA guy is looking really stupid on this one

we all have imagination
that  can never be labeled God is king  not a  political  czar  a  father  teaching  all  to  prosper as  inspired    with  no  type of dictator

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashleyii@lavabit.com> wrote:

Sounds very socialistic/communistic to me. How was this right to a part-time job fulfilled before there were jobs?

On 04/16/2011 06:20 PM, noelle finnerty wrote:

every individual must declair for them self the value of every moment of their time  a individual must define what the job they personaly desire is so all jobs to suit each person can be financed on a individual basis   all people need at least one part time job with a guarantee this is a basic need and a right.

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:49 PM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:

    I agree with the congressman that it is ridiculous to consider that you have done a complete economic analysis when you have not considered the impact on jobs.  How can you even begin to support that one.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHlWdZgJcRY&feature=youtu.be

This guy does not give up and the EPA guy is stuck for a good answer.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
yorkton environment directorate

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Find: Culinary Arts Schools. Review & Compare!
http://click.lavabit.com/g8pnd8rswh8bdp5kqz8473d435upknn3u1888d84b1jy1dwddmob/

--

Freedom Is Always Illegal.

Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
yorkton environment directorate

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: This congressman asks an important question and the EPA guy is looking really stupid on this one

Sounds very socialistic/communistic to me. How was this right to a part-time job fulfilled before there were jobs?

On 04/16/2011 06:20 PM, noelle finnerty wrote:

every individual must declair for them self the value of every moment of their time  a individual must define what the job they personaly desire is so all jobs to suit each person can be financed on a individual basis   all people need at least one part time job with a guarantee this is a basic need and a right.

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:49 PM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:

    I agree with the congressman that it is ridiculous to consider that you have done a complete economic analysis when you have not considered the impact on jobs.  How can you even begin to support that one.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHlWdZgJcRY&feature=youtu.be

This guy does not give up and the EPA guy is stuck for a good answer.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
yorkton environment directorate

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Find: Culinary Arts Schools. Review & Compare!
http://click.lavabit.com/g8pnd8rswh8bdp5kqz8473d435upknn3u1888d84b1jy1dwddmob/

--

Freedom Is Always Illegal.

Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft

Re: This congressman asks an important question and the EPA guy is looking really stupid on this one

every individual must declair for them self the value of every moment of their time  a individual must define what the job they personaly desire is so all jobs to suit each person can be financed on a individual basis   all people need at least one part time job with a guarantee this is a basic need and a right.

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:49 PM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:

    I agree with the congressman that it is ridiculous to consider that you have done a complete economic analysis when you have not considered the impact on jobs.  How can you even begin to support that one.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHlWdZgJcRY&feature=youtu.be

This guy does not give up and the EPA guy is stuck for a good answer.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
yorkton environment directorate

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Jonathan: I write essays. You write one-line wise-cracks! — J. A.
A. —
>
On Apr 16, 4:34 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> Why wait until tomorrow. Let's start now:
>
>     *New Constitution:
>     Armistead's pervasive acts
>     of iniquity.*
>
> On 04/16/2011 01:17 PM, Keith In K�ln wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hey John!
> > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and
> > MJ are already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and
> > one of them maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack
> > Literal Truth might even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading
> > your next missive!
>
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> > <mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net>> wrote:
>
> >     Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> >     explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> >     processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> >     or otherwise stupid.  ï¿½  John A. Armistead �  Patriot
>
> >     On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> >     <mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net>> wrote:
> >     > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.
> >      The
> >     > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> >     > (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> >     > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By
> >     adapting
> >     > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  ï¿½
> >     John
> >     > A. Armistead �  Patriot
>
> >     > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest
> >     Distance;
> >     > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.).  I'm thrilled that
> >     > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> >     > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> >     > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple
> >     things can
> >     > turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> >     > business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> >     > doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> >     > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> >     <mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net>> wrote:
>
> >     > > Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open
> >     mind,
> >     > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin
> >     didn't give a
> >     > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> >     > > millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm
> >     ordinary
> >     > > citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  ï¿½ J. A. A.
> >     > > �
>
> >     > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com
> >     <mailto:markmka...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >     > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> >     > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> >     > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com
> >     <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>> wrote:
> >     > > > >  John,
>
> >     > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an
> >     opinion that differs
> >     > > > > from yours. How fascist of you!
>
> >     > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >     > > > > No, Jonathan!  Celebrities in the media and in
> >     entertainment simply
> >     > > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any
> >     MEDIUM.
> >     > > > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk
> >     about how great
> >     > > > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did.  Barbara
> >     Walters, a
> >     > > > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported
> >     Barack Obama.
> >     > > > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the
> >     right to
> >     > > > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the
> >     man on the
> >     > > > > street?  As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one
> >     joke about a
> >     > > > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be
> >     fired or their
> >     > > > > network closed.  Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor
> >     is it a game
> >     > > > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and
> >     prove-nothing
> >     > > > > polls.  Those who would like our government to be run the
> >     way the
> >     > > > > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse
> >     a candidate
> >     > > > > say, should rally behind my New Constitution�a document
> >     for the
> >     > > > > people!  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
>
> >     > > > >   On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley
> >     <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com
> >     <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>>
> >     <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>>
> >     > > > > wrote:
>
> >     > > > >  John,
>
> >     > > > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in
> >     freedom, but
> >     > > > > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
>
> >     > > > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to
> >     voice their
> >     > > > > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what
> >     you mean when
> >     > > > > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media
> >     celebrities, have a
> >     > > > > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the
> >     > > > > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have
> >     more influence
> >     > > > > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic).  Of
> >     course, that
> >     > > > > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and
> >     democracy."
>
> >     > > > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play"
> >     means and why
> >     > > > > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play"
> >     in your world.
>
> >     > > > > And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on
> >     this forum is
> >     > > > > about up.
>
> >     > > > > On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >     > > > >  Jonathan:  Entertainment celebrities, like media
> >     celebrities, have a
> >     > > > > "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the
> >     celebrities
> >     > > > > vote.  The means celebrities would have more influence at
> >     the poles
> >     > > > > than the man-on-the-street.  Of course, that shift of
> >     power runs
> >     > > > > counter to principles of fair play and democracy.  The 1st
> >     Amendment
> >     > > > > says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press
> >     or other
> >     > > > > medium".  Having a pro-democracy press means that no one
> >     like Mark is
> >     > > > > allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening
> >     me because I
> >     > > > > correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google,
> >     if Google
> >     > > > > didn't FIRE Mark, post haste!  ï¿½ J. A. A. �
>
> >     > > > >  --
>
> >     > > > >       Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> >     > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity
> >     Theft<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
> >     <http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> >     > > > > --
> >     > > > > Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> >     > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity
> >     Theft<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> >     > > > > --
> >     > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >     > > > > For options & help
> >     seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >     <http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum>
>
> >     > > > > * Visit our other community
> >     athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.PoliticalForum.com/>
> >     > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >     > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >     > > > --
> >     > > > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> >     > > > *
> >     > > > *
> >     > > > *
> >     > > > *
>
> >     --
> >     Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >     For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >     * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >     * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >     * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> > Find: Online Dating. Review & Compare!
> >http://click.lavabit.com/kbx556bon7s99ymng5qitnpz4mc5htn33o5garh7upe9...
>
> --
>
>       Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft
> <http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
feel.

Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
along by talking-up my document on the NET. — John A. Armistead —
Patriot

On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey John!
>
> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > or otherwise stupid.  —  John A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  — John
> > > A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.).  I'm thrilled that
> > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple things can
> > > turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> > > business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> > > doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin didn't give a
> > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> > > > millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  — J. A. A.
> > > > —
>
> > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > > > >  John,
>
> > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> > differs
> > > > > > from yours. How fascist of you!
>
> > > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > No, Jonathan!  Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> > > > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> > > > > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> > great
> > > > > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did.  Barbara Walters, a
> > > > > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> > > > > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> > > > > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> > > > > > street?  As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> > a
> > > > > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> > their
> > > > > > network closed.  Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> > game
> > > > > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> > > > > > polls.  Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> > > > > > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
> > candidate
> > > > > > say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the
> > > > > > people!  —  J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > >   On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > >  John,
>
> > > > > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> > > > > > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
>
> > > > > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their
> > > > > > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean
> > when
> > > > > > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > a
> > > > > > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the
> > > > > > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more
> > influence
> > > > > > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic).  Of course,
> > that
> > > > > > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and
> > democracy."
>
> > > > > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means
> > and why
> > > > > > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your
> > world.
>
> > > > > > And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum
> > is
> > > > > > about up.
>
> > > > > > On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > >  Jonathan:  Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > a
> > > > > > "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities
> > > > > > vote.  The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles
> > > > > > than the man-on-the-street.  Of course, that shift of power runs
> > > > > > counter to principles of fair play and democracy.  The 1st
> > Amendment
> > > > > > says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other
> > > > > > medium".  Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark
> > is
> > > > > > allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because
> > I
> > > > > > correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google, if
> > Google
> > > > > > didn't FIRE Mark, post haste!  ï¿½ J. A. A. �
>
> > > > > >  --
>
> > > > > >       Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> > > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft<
> >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> <
> >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> > > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft<
> >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Be interesting to see how Zero handles this one - seems like it explicitly disallows the funding of even one cent to these positions

http://www.bizzyblog.com/2011/04/16/obama-channels-nixon-you-cant-legislate-my-czars-away-because-i-am-the-president/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

This congressman asks an important question and the EPA guy is looking really stupid on this one

    I agree with the congressman that it is ridiculous to consider that you have done a complete economic analysis when you have not considered the impact on jobs.  How can you even begin to support that one.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHlWdZgJcRY&feature=youtu.be

This guy does not give up and the EPA guy is stuck for a good answer.

Re: Can Donald Trump 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?

Fascism, Anyone?
By Michael Hurd
13 April 2011

If Barack Obama hammered the nails in the coffin of the American republic, it will be Donald Trump who buries it.

In a recent article, I wrote that Donald Trump would not be a President who restored capitalism and individual rights, but would be a President who would initiate fascism. If his attitudes and beliefs about the cult of personality applied to government don't convince you, then consider some of his policy positions reported in a recent interview Trump gave to the conservative publication, "Human Events."

Donald Trump favors protectionism. In other words, he advocates "free trade, but also fair trade." This is what socialists and fascists say; it's not what proponents of capitalism say. He wants a 25 percent tax on all products and services that come from China.

Who does this punish? People who want products and services from China.

Who does this reward? People who will have to work less hard to charge more for items that China can no longer sell in the U.S.

What seems on the surface like it's harming a fascist country -- by making America more socialist and fascist itself -- actually hurts consumers in the free country. If Trump wants to hurt China, he shouldn't hurt the American consumer. He should lift all the taxes, regulations and other socialist policies hampering American business. Restoring capitalism in the United States is the way to defeat the fascist-socialist Chinese.

Donald Trump says that protectionism is the solution to the exploding federal deficit. He doesn't care about cutting programs the government has no business funding. He does care about restraining trade with other countries because, in his mind, this will improve the economy and eliminate the need to cut spending. He says that the budget deficit isn't caused by less productive Americans mooching off more productive ones; he says it's caused by "freeloading" foreign countries. There's no talk of reducing or eliminating foreign aid, however. He wants to punish American business and the American consumer -- all in the "American interest."

Donald Trump personally likes and gets along with liberals such as Senators Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, and John Kerry. He expects Republicans to view this as a good thing. If he can get along with such people, then "things will get done." But what exactly will get done? The kind of things that John Kerry, Chuck Schumer and John Kerry want to get done? Things like trying terrorists in civilian courts, raising taxes, using the FCC to restrain freedom of speech, and socializing medicine?

These are the sorts of things these men strongly and seriously support.

What does it say about Donald Trump that he personally likes and enjoys spending time with such men? By the way, public records indicate that 60% of Donald Trump's campaign donations go to Democrats. If their views are his views, what do people who support opposite policies have to gain by supporting Donald Trump?

Trump reversed his views on abortion, from pro-choice to "pro-life" only after switching parties from Democrat to Republican in 2009. No real reason is given, other than that's what you have to do to be a Republican. What does this say about his devotion to principle -- any principle at all? In fact, pro-choice is one of the only issues about which Democrats are right. How does it benefit a rational voter -- who wants freedom in the bedroom as well as in the bank account -- to support a man who reversed course in the wrong direction, on this issue?

What does this say about how seriously he takes the principle that church and state should be separate?

Trump insists that government spending is the means to greatness: "I want to build our highways. When I look at airports in China, at airports in Abu Dhabi and Qatar and the different places, [and then] you land in New York, at LaGuardia Airport, at Kennedy Airport, it's like a Third World airport system." For his entire adult life, Trump has operated in the private sector of business. He has accomplished a great deal, and made a lot of money. Doesn't this suggest the private sector is where the best, brightest and the most capable flourish? Well, for him maybe. But not when it comes to any future growth. In the past, a private sector was needed so that Donald Trump could flourish under capitalism. Now that Donald Trump is to be our leader -- well, the public sector is all we need to rebuild roads and airports. The government sector is infamous for its inefficiency, bureaucracy and lack of incentive due to the absence of profit and loss. Somehow, with Trump in charge, all will be different. The nature of the public/government sector will magically become different from what it inherently is -- if only Trump is in charge. Like Hitler and Mussolini, the planes and the trains will run on time. That is, once the great Donald Trump controls everything.

Trump says: "When this country becomes profitable again, we can take care of our sick; we can take care of our needy. We don't have to cut Social Security; we don't have to cut Medicare and Medicaid. We can take care of people that need to be taken care of. And I'll be able to do that." With whose money, Donald? If you mean your own money, you don't need to be President to take care of people. Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are bottomless pits. The more free money the government sends out, the more demand there is for still more. The demand for entitlement programs exceeds demand for anything private business could ever produce. Yet it's the private and productive sector that subsidizes this endless and bottomless pit. Many Republicans and even a few Democrats understand this. If Donald Trump doesn't, then how can he expect to lead Americans in facing the reality that entitlement programs are by their very nature unsustainable?

Donald Trump shares the delusional thinking of all fascists. "If only I were in charge, all would be fine." The laws of nature do not apply, if Trump is in charge. And individual rights don't really matter, if only Trump is in charge.

Ready for fascism, America? Ready for the Trump form of socialism? Trump stands ready to impose it. Barack Obama has the ideology of a fascist. Trump has the style and the policies to make it really happen. If Barack Obama hammered the nails in the coffin of the American republic, it will be Donald Trump who buries it.

http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/politics/elections/6369-fascism-anyone.html

On 04/16/2011 01:34 PM, NoEinstein wrote:

Can Donald Trump "Fix" the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on? The contrast is striking between the potential presidential candidacy of The Donald and every other might-be candidate mentioned.  For one thing, if The Donald says he can fix something—like our broke economy— you can damn-well take him seriously!  Some of you may recall that a certain new ice skating rink in New York's Central Park started leaking water and couldn't be used.  That work had been done by three or four labor unions with each one pointing the fingers at the other. After millions of dollars had been wasted on attempted patches, The Donald took over the entire job and had happy skaters out on that ice before long.  Every day when I realize how much labor unions of all kinds are effectively screwing the US economy and preventing our having a really 'free' free enterprise system, I think of The Donald.  He has been able to find considerable success working in the morass of labor unions and government regulations that are found in NYC.  That man THRIVES on being able to get the disparate powers-that-be to get the job done!  Part of the secret is his charisma.  But most of it is because he is a trustworthy man-of-his-word.  He makes sure that all those involved in a project realize just what their responsibilities are, and what they are expected to do if there are any glitches.  In short, The Donald is one of the top businessmen in the country of all time.  His executive experience probably exceeds that of the governors of most states.  Under him people do their jobs and do them well. Just having The Donald as the head man improves the quality of projects, because it's an honor just to be associated with one of his projects!  Obviously, Donald Trump is politically conservative.  But he doesn't owe-his-soul to the Republican Party like most of his would-be rivals do even without realizing that they do.  The USA has been hamstrung trying to avoid looking like a colonialist aggressor every time we 'invade' other nations to help the oppressed. The reason oil fields get set on fire is because those people suppose we are there… just for their oil.  By destroying the oil, they believe we will simply go away.  The blind-leading-the-blind in our government think that the USA has the financial wherewithal to finance long wars, and will have enough wherewithal remaining to rebuild the busted infrastructure of the invaded countries; train the new armies; and care for those "poor" people till they are back on their feet.  All of that is being done like forced charity from the big-hearted American People whose standards of living keep dropping, because of the explosion in the size and the over-control of our government.  If The Donald can get us trillions of dollars worth of oil to repay the American Taxpayers for our sacrifices, I'll vote for him!  Some good news is that Republicans now have trillions of dollars in 'possible' budget cuts that might save this country.  The bad news is that those takes-too-long-to-happen cuts will still leave the never- should-have-been-there-in-the-first-place entitlement programs being run by government.  After the nearly 15 years that I've spent penning and polishing my New Constitution, I have better than average ideas how to fix our government, fast.  The following 5 things aren't written into the New Constitution, but are of fundamental importance:  1.  Get our government out of the entitlement business!  Privatize Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc. Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in programs from being hurt who are close to retirement.  But unlike Republicans, once and forever, get the USA out of managing the entitlement business!  If government pulls any of the strings, things will start getting bad again, soon.  2.  Inform China and our other creditors that the USA will not be paying them any interest on their loans.  We will repay the principal, but only when doing so won't jeopardize our recovery.  3.  Bring home 90% of US troops within 90 days.  Leave 10% of the troops in bases around the world to serve as a front guard in case redeployment is necessary.  4.  Stop wasting billions and billions of dollars on political campaigns!  That money is going into the pockets of the media.  Those media rascals salivate over the ad money they generate by "talking up" how 'close' the elections are going to be.  Britt Hume, though a conservative, keeps pumping air into Obama by talking about the money Obama can spend (waste!) to get re elected.  Barack Obama is a cash cow for the media.  That's why no one in the media will call the majority of Democrats CROOKS!  5.  'Fat cats' should stop being wimps!  Government has become no- longer-legal STEALING from the supposed rich to give to the poor.  The Democrats talk about how Republicans are wanting to give tax breaks to the wealthy while denying women medical screenings.  Republicans should be talking about how "Democrats are criminals for seeking stolen benefits for themselves and other criminals!"  Be it known:  1.  The Constitution does NOT allow political parties!  Those are quasi governmental bodies which get to decide who our candidates for public office can be, and decide who "the leaders" in Congress are. Because our country was conceived as a Representative Republic, such fact tacitly mandates that each representative shall have identical power!  Seniority nor party affiliation can give more power to ANYONE!  2.  The US Senate is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL oligarchy of elitists who effectively have been running-the-USA-into-the-ground since the birth of this nation.  Senators aren't determined by having a parity of the population which they each serve.  Though the Senate was begrudgingly included in the 'words' of the Constitution, it has never been within the SPIRIT of the Constitution!  3.  The principle of FAIR representation makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow the State of Iowa to have more "power" in determining who our candidates for President can be.  And by the same general reasoning, it makes the entire primary system UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because the states with earlier-dated primaries always have the most influence in determining who can run.  4.  Political party conventions are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because those are "governed" by the unsanctioned and UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL political parties!  5.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow any individual or group to have more influence on the outcome of an election or referenda than one-person-one vote.  That criminalizes entertainment or media celebrities who use their influence to garner votes for any candidate.  And it makes any group—such as labor unions— who seek more 'power' than could ever be manifested by just their members' votes, criminals.  Labor unions and other unconstitutional group influences, effectively, have been blackmailing candidates by implying… "You vote for 'us' or you won't get elected."  Since the latter is a SUBVERSION of the Constitution that shifts the par of power away from individuals and toward specific groups, the leaders of such groups are guilty of TREASON!  6.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to give equal time to discuss any socialist idea!  Since socialism and communism aren't fair, then it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow democrats to represent anyone in Congress!  7.  Because socialism and communism are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, it is similarly UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow a "President", like Barack Obama— who has been masquerading as president—to remain in the White House! And it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for our taxpayer-financed Secret Service to give that socialist-communist bastard protection, when they should be arresting Obama and everyone on his White House staff for TREASON!  8.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow the US Supreme Court to decide any issue in lieu of citizen-approved legislation!  And it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for any President to nominate justices who share socialist-communist ideals—like both of Barack Obama's nominees do.  9.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to continue to use the now-outmoded Electoral College System for determining who our President and Vice President can be.  There shall be ONLY a single, national popular vote tally!  If such had been used in 2008, Hillary Rodham Clinton would now be President.  As it is, she will be fighting- for-her-life for accepting bribes from Obama for "her support" in exchange for… 'vice president' or 'Secretary of State'.  Hillary's glowing endorsement of Obama at that UNCONSTITUTIONAL 2008 Democratic Convention is a big part of the reason we now have an OVERT TRAITOR to the USA residing in the White House!  10.  It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for any state government, such as Arizona, to defer to the rules, regulations, or judicial decisions of our obviously corrupt Federal Government.  The Constitution, both in its spirit and by the 10th Amendment gives states the RIGHT to run things within their borders, when the federal government has obviously run amuck.  That includes arresting Barack Obama for TREASON the next time he bounces down the stairs of Air Force One!  The Donald impressed me when he said he will run as an independent (if not a Republican).  My New Constitution MANDATES that all candidates be disassociated from any political party!  The candidates won't be narrowed-down in UNCONSTITUTIONAL primaries.  Read the following to understand how it will be done:  "Article 1:  Section 1 & 2:  Legislative power shall be vested in the House of Representatives.  Members shall be Citizens at least 25 years old who have been residents of their respective states for 7 or more years and for the entire year prior to election.  Except for military service, a representative shall not have held any full-time public office nor government employment, nor shall he or she be sponsored by a political party.  Representatives' districts shall have clearly defined, regular- shaped geographical boundaries drawn without regard to the race, creed, age, nor political ideology of the residents therein. Boundaries may be redrawn from time to time, but the number of representatives shall not exceed 500.  When vacancies happen in the representation from a state, the executive authority thereof shall issue writs of election to fill such.  The House shall choose its speaker and other officers without regard to political affiliation, seniority nor ideology.  With the assent of 33% it can impeach and try impeachment.  With the assent of 67%, it can convict and remove the one tried from office, who is still liable and subject to other lawful indictments, trials, judgments and punishments.      Representatives shall be elected to two year terms by the vote of the People of their districts on the first Tuesday in November of even number years, and shall fairly represent all blocs of their electorate, or face expulsion.   The House shall meet at the same times and for no less than three months, nor more than six months of each year, except that in times of war or internal crisis, such time may be extended on a monthly basis with the assent of 60% of the members.  No House member shall serve more than 10 years in office, but existing representatives with 6 plus years in office may seek one additional two year term beyond the initial two year grace period allowed for all existing House members.  Section 3, 4 & 5:  The House shall judge its members on the appropriateness of their districts' boundaries and population thereof, and shall enumerate and fairly adjudge members' qualifications without discrimination due to sex, race, creed, nor political ideology.  The House makes the rules for its proceedings, punishes disorderly members, and with the assent of 60% can expel a member for a violation.  But no rule shall be made that concentrates power in any individual(s) beyond his or her one vote.  55% attendance is a quorum.  Those present may compel absent members to attend, or penalize non attendance.  Written, audio and video record shall be made of all House proceedings.  Master records shall not be destroyed, and copies shall be made readily available to any Citizen for a nominal fee.      House salaries shall not be increased for the present term. Except for military service, no representative shall hold other civil office nor government job—local, state nor federal—while being a representative, nor hold such office or job during an interim period prior to seeking re election.  Representatives shall not intentionally communicate with any news medium whose coverage area is predominately outside of their home district.  Nor shall they, or any government official, cultivate a media personae, or make petty public speeches, introductions or comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any civil or private projects or those responsible.  Comments to media by representatives or government employees shall be germane to pending legislation, or to the exercise of their jobs.  The media shall not solicit public officials' opinions over those of the People.  The American Flag shall be red, white, and readily discernable blue.  Only when the President or Secretary of State are addressing the nation or appearing before or receiving foreign dignitaries shall the American Flag, bunting, or flag-color drapes be used as a backdrop.  No other public official nor candidate shall use such.  Flags shall not be displayed in or outside of government buildings other than: public schools, post offices, military bases, memorials, the White House, the Pentagon, and outside of the Capital or other government seats.  Use this public oath: "I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Democracy-on-demand Republic for which it stands.  We're One Nation of individuals who champion fair play, maximum civil liberties, the Right of Self-determination, and having an efficient, unobtrusive and deferential government."  Governments aren't graders of performance, style, art, design, history, nor social significance, and shall make no law, proclamation, stamp or other acclaim recognizing any persons, organizations or events in history. Public officials shall make judgments within their expertise or shall poll unbiased experts, or the Citizens, and defer to the opinions of such.      The federal government's only revenue tax shall be a single item tax of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15% of the previous year's gross national product.  The tax rate shall be uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such receive greatly reduced services.   The House authors bills of revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made without 55% of the voters so approving on election day, and no increase beyond 15% of the previous year's gross national product shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in a referendum by 75% of the People voting.  Accounting methods for determining gross national product shall be consistent and un tampered- with for any purpose of tax increase.  Government shall function within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency. The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private sector.*  The House shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, the President shall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if overruled by a 60% vote of the House.  12 years from the adoption of this New Constitution, and following a successful two year test in two or more states, taxation in the USA shall be changed to sales tax only—at a maximum conglomerate rate per annum of 35% of the GNP—home food and medicines excluded.*  Section 6, 7 & 8:  The House shall have the power to collect taxes, customs duties and user fees that are due from the states and territories, with the proviso that user fees shall not be applied to major areas of government services so that the total cost of federal government exceeds 15% of the previous year's GNP.  Additionally, the House shall have the power to: regulate commerce with nations, among states, and with Indian tribes; coin money and set the value of such, and of foreign money; set standards for weights and measures; punish counterfeiters; establish uniform rules of naturalization, but specifically excluding destitute persons seeking jobs and benefits at the expense of local, state or federal governments or the Citizens; establish uniform laws on bankruptcies; establish post offices; create tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court; punish piracies and felonies committed at sea, and offenses against the laws of nations; declare war and appropriate money for such, but for no longer than two years; grant letters of marquee and reprisal and make rules concerning capture; raise, support and maintain the Army, Navy, Marine Corp., Air Force and Coast Guard, and make laws regulating such, as well as the militias to uphold the laws, suppress insurrections and repel invasions; provide for organizing, arming, disciplining and governing those parts of the militias employed in the service of the USA—but each state selects its militia officers.      With assent by the apt state legislatures, the House may purchase property for, and have continuous authority over, all needed forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and buildings.  The House determines fair, maximum sentences for federal crimes, and defines and imposes reasonable, uniform sanctions for non criminal violations of federal rules and/or procedures.  The House shall make laws as necessary and proper to execute the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this New Constitution of the United States of America to any department or office thereof.      Unless public safety is jeopardized, the right to writ of habeas corpus prevails.  No law shall favor the ports of one state over another.  Ships going to or from a state shall not be obliged to enter, clear, or pay duties in another.  Laws of appropriation shall precede withdrawal of treasury money, and an accounting report shall be published quarterly.  No office holder, without House assent, shall accept any present, emolument, office or title from any king, prince, person, group or nation.  No state shall: enter into a treaty, alliance, confederation, agreement or compact with another state or nation; grant letters of marquee and reprisal; coin money, emit bills of credit, or use anything but gold or silver coins or other legal tender controlled by the USA for the payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor law impairing the obligation of easily understood, non-coerced, signed contracts; grant any title of nobility, nor engage in war unless invaded or in imminent danger of such.  Without House assent no city, county nor state shall lay tariffs, imposts or duties on goods or tonnage transported to or from such, but if apt, nominal inspection fees may be charged.  With House assent the federal government may collect reasonable and prudent tariffs, duties and imposts on international shipments.  No city shall require obtaining a business license before allowing a business— located outside of that city—to transport goods into such city. Except as allowed elsewhere in this constitution, there shall be no taxes, fees, licenses or other payments that are prorated based on income or personal property; nor taxes on the free transfer of estates to rightful heirs and/or assigns.  Without a signed sales order coerced, baited or unsolicited goods are free to the addressee.  Any bank billing such goods shall pay the addressee $25.00 per instance. Persons profiting from scam; confusing promos, advertising or contracts; trickery; high-pressure sales tactics; continuing charges for difficult-to-cancel, no longer desired goods or services; or any other willful dishonesty are committing a felony.  It is a 5 year felony to dictate or authorize—for undeserved gain—the dunning, threatening or extorting of any Citizen.  Banks or businesses that loan or sell on credit shall not discriminate, nor punitively vary charges, interest rates or fees.  Section 9 & 10:  Other than the President or his agents, no person, news medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives while such are in Washington.  However, invited persons or groups can make scheduled depositions provided they don't communicate with the representatives otherwise.  A representative's constituents shall be allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes only while they are in their home states or districts. Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held accountable for the representativeness of their votes.  The solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person, organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is prohibited.  Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as above, is a felony—defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed.  It is unlawful for representatives to intentionally reveal affiliation with any political party or political activist group, whatsoever, and unlawful for representatives to assemble in such groups, or in pro or con factions, for the purpose of gaining persuasion over any vote. Such restrictions shall not be construed to limit open debate on the floor of the House or in any committees.  At risk of civil action, no person nor group shall use political or pseudo-political labels to classify any candidate or official.  Representatives shall be seated randomly regardless of their voting history and ideology.  Bills shall be sufficiently short in length and focused in subject matter so votes on such can be indicative of the representatives' true positions. Putting unassociated, disparate items into a bill to influence the passage of the whole or its parts is prohibited.  Representatives shall not be polled concerning issues up for a vote, nor shall Citizens be polled prior to any election on their support for any candidate, amendment, or referendum item.  It shall be a felony to take, or to disseminate, the results of any such poll.  But representatives shall poll those law-abiding Citizens within their districts who are most affected by any bill, and defer to the results in voting.  No release of projected election or referenda results shall be made until all polls have been closed one hour.  Votes taken on bills are final.  If there is less than a 55% yea vote, as below, no revoting on a bill, unless first substantially changed, can be taken for two years.  Passed bills that are constitutional become law, but when possible, laws shall be probationary for one year to allow more Citizen input—with no disfavor being shown toward such later input.  Laws shall be revoted and expunged if new information shows such to have been poorly conceived, or contrary to the Will of the People—especially the law-abiding Citizens most affected.  Officials not honoring the latter or acting counter to the will of or not in the best interests of their electorate shall be removed.  Except for elections or referenda, secret ballots shall not be used in governmental nor judicial proceedings, and no part of any official public meeting shall be held in private.      No bill shall become law without at least a 55% affirmative vote.  All laws on the books shall indicate vote of passage.  Laws passing by fewer than 60% of the representatives shall automatically expire every four years, but the House shall vote before such expiration date to determine if such laws are to continue in force. The casting of votes in the House shall be by a means that is simultaneous, representative specific, and secure.  Article II:  Section 1:  Executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.  Candidates for President shall be Citizens born in the USA who are at least 35 years of age.  With the exception of the incumbent President and/or VP—if eligible and seeking re election—other candidates shall, within ninety days of the date of filing as a candidate for President, have obtained the endorsement of a min. of 25,000 confirmed registered voters knowledgeable of such candidate's qualifications.  The 3rd Tuesday in July, voters of all the states and territories shall reduce the field of presidential candidates to 8, with the incumbent Pres. & VP to be included in such number, if applicable.  The 3rd Tuesday in October, voters shall reduce the field to four, with the incumbent Pres. and VP not automatically included.  The 1st Tuesday in November, each voter selects their 1st & 2nd choices—points 4 and 3 respectively.  The President and Vice President Elect receive the highest the 2nd highest total points.      If a President is removed from office, resigns, dies, or is unable to discharge the required powers and duties, the Vice President becomes President.  Then, the new President nominates a V. Pres. who, with 55% House ascent, takes office.  A President unable to discharge the required powers and duties shall notify the House Speaker in writing that the Vice President is the Acting President for up to four days, at which time—if the House concurs by a 60% vote—the Acting Pres. becomes President in 21 days, unless during such time the President has regained capacity to perform his duties.  The Order of Succession to the Presidency is: V. Pres.; Sec. of State; then, in descending order, the most senior House member who had a career in the military.  A President's salary—their only pay from the states or the USA—shall not be changed for that term.  The President's oath of office: "I solemnly affirm that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, respect, uphold and defend the New Constitution of the United States of America."  Section 2 & 3:  The President shall be Commander-in-Chief of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, Coast Guard, and of the militia of the several states when such is called into the actual service of the United States.  He may require the opinion in writing of the principal officer in each of the executive departments on any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of treason.  He shall have the power to make treaties, provided 60% of the House concurs.  He shall nominate ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, justices of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the USA whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law, but the House may by law vest the appointment of such inferior offices as they may think proper, to the President alone, to the courts of law, or to the heads of departments.  The President can fill vacancies that occur during House recess, by commissions that expire at the end of their next session.      The President shall give the House information on the state of the Union, and propose measures that he judges prudent.  He may convene and adjourn the House when he thinks proper.  He shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; take care that laws are faithfully executed; and commission all officers of the USA.  Section 4:  The President, Vice Pres., representatives, and civil officers of the USA shall be fired if they are convicted of a high crime or felony, or if they willfully violate any provision of this constitution.  Such person shall never again hold public office.  It is a felony for any of the latter to use public services, departments or resources for their personal purposes above what any Citizen can use.  No representative shall be transported nor boarded at public expense without House assent.  It is a felony to give or receive money, gifts, travel or board germane to an issue presently up for vote in the House, or knowingly, which might be voted on in the foreseeable future; or for a government official to defend unlawful acts that they or anyone they know has committed or expects to commit by targeting any Citizen or group for an investigation or suspicion of wrongdoing, or by denying to any Citizen(s) full civil and constitutional rights.  Law enforcement and the judiciary shall not favor wrongdoers—within government or without—over a plaintiff or Citizen seeking justice, and shall keep the latter up-to-date on an investigation's progress.  The former have no authority to act in the support of wrongdoing or corruption in government and shall suspicion such requests by anyone in government at personal risk of a similar penalty.  It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or media idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office or job.   Exhibiting ideological bias in a government job terminates the employment. Candidates for public office shall be disqualified for soliciting new voter registrants; and no campaign shall aid or organize the transportation of voters to the polls."  *** Folks, the MAJORITY of what is being done by our government in Washington is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, according to the Ideals of the Founding Fathers!  Over the past 14 years—with every sentence that I wrote—I asked myself: "What would the Founding Fathers think about what I'm doing?"  Each time I did, I could sense the applause and smiling faces!  This one sentence summarizes the SPIRIT of both the original Constitution and my New Constitution: "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA!"  Long shall the USA survive and prosper!   Respectfully submitted,   — John A. Armistead — Patriot  AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics news group.  Those who are interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity."  Such is available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble.  

--

Freedom Is Always Illegal.

Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft