--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
http://www.bizzyblog.com/2011/04/23/kelo-update-guess-what-new-developer-wants-to-go-forward/
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Obama reminds me of a guy named Eddie
Once upon a time, a guy named Eddie started hanging around with our teenage daughters. Not specifically but with group of High schoolers. The first time I saw them was when they came to our house. Obviously, as a father of 6, my antenaes went up. I don't know how it happened, but he won me over. He was a nice looking guy, very courteous and very comfortable to be around. It turned out he was the father of the mechanic that kept my old Cadillac running. He told me he'd make sure they didn't get in any trouble. I bought it hook-line-and-sinker.
One day he drove up while I was replacing a burned out headlight on the Caddy. He asked what I was doing and I told him I was replacing the same headlight for the 3rd time this month. He asked me if I checked the ground wire. Huh? It was simple as that.
As time went on, I heard that Eddie was a drug pusher at the local high school my daughters attended. Every lunch period he could be found across the street of the school in a small restaurant that was popular with students. I wondered how that could be true. I wondered if his father knew that.
Then one day I saw his name in the paper. Eddie was convicted of drug pushing and was sentenced to prison.
Obama's Hidden Past
(Ears on)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ko-qFqmKsYQ&feature=youtu.be
Contact Your Govt
http://www.usa.gov/Contact.shtml
Is the Constitution the Supreme Law of the Land or not?
I GUESS THE SCOTUS HAS ANSWERED THAT QUESTION
Patriot Freedom
http://www.patriotfreedom.org/battlefield.php
If a link above does not work, cut-and-paste to your browser.
Please be aware that Barack Hussein Obama's grandfather was a highly respected witch doctor with the Luo tribe. His white grandmother was VP at the Bank of Hawaii and she worked with and for Peter Geithner on other projects, Peter is the father of Timothy Geithner, Obama's choice of Treasurer of the US.
We the People
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE
This email is archived at
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en
I'M MAD, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bprelutsky/2009/07/05/im-mad-as-hell/
.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
His name in Arabic is Muʿammar al-Qaḏḏāfī.--
On 04/24/2011 08:29 PM, Mark wrote:--I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no where near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I never said I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you are going to talk about him.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein <noeinstein@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India?
Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation
destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the
USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't be
welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). — J. A. A. —
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current Events.
>
> They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the US) their
> food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown causes
> (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) is that
> nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all State functions
> still happen, all taxes are paid.
>
> One would think that something as basic as
>
> "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to survive?"
> (answer is a resounding "No")
>
> would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States and those
> Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" are left
> operating as usual.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The
> > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had
> > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food
> > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the
> > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using
> > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started
> > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't
> > survive without some the public order that is provided by well thought-
> > out and agreed-to laws.
>
> > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws
> > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will
> > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our
> > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress
> > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things.
> > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my
> > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen,
> > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government
> > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A.
> > Armistead — Patriot
>
> > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Onestone,
>
> > > At one full year with no government it is way past the "experimental"
> > stage.
> > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares. Just
> > why
> > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ?? The
> > laws
> > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs.
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > John,
>
> > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more
> > than
> > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make
> > much
> > > > > of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more
> > conservative
> > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal"
> > of
> > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead �
> > > > Patriot
> > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> John,
>
> > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> > > > > >> questions posed to you.)
>
> > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning
> > government.
> > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long
> > on
> > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist
> > constitution.
> > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist
> > system
> > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government
> > > > should
> > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you
> > even
> > > > ask
> > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining
> > 5%
> > > > are
> > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A.
> > Armistead
> > > > �
> > > > > >>>>> Patriot
> > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> John,
> > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades
> > websites
> > > > based
> > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about
> > your
> > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of
> > > > expression means.
> > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social
> > harm
> > > > to the
> > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler"
> > seems
> > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to
> > pull
> > > > off this
> > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task?
> > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American
> > multinational
> > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View,
> > California.
> > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are
> > > > very
> > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck
> > from
> > > > the
> > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who
> > commit
> > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on
> > > > moderation
> > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be
> > > > killed?
> > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who
> > > > kill
> > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans
> > have
> > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of
> > jobs
> > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has
> > > > caused
> > > > > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other
> > person
> > > > who
> > > > > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> > > > > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our
> > government
> > > > and
> > > > > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard
> > > > arrested,
> > > > > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the
> > Constitution
> > > > for
> > > > > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that
> > you,
> > > > > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's
> > > > viewed
> > > > > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect
> > you
> > > > are so
> > > > > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against
> > having a
> > > > > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get
> > some
> > > > couch-
> > > > > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Einstein,
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the
> > > > present, or
> > > > > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is
> > the
> > > > standard
> > > > > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to
> > it. It
> > > > > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under
> > US
> > > > law.
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has
> > the
> > > > > >>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their
> > law(s).
> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of
> > > > "reasoning" in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining
> > why
> > > > Jews
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to
> > be
> > > > such
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for
> > > > successful
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep
> > wounds
> > > > Muslims
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> feel.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice
> > that
> > > > the USA
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's
> > responsibility?)
> > > > saying
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by
> > my
> > > > New
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his
> > job.
> > > > If you
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm
> > > > saying,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New
> > > > Constitution has
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to
> > read.
> > > > The last
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted
> > > > heads
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> with,
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.Catch weekly reviews of the hottest games on such video games consoles as the
Xbox 360, Playstation 3, Nintendo Wii, PSP, PS2, PC and DS. Only on Mevio!
http://click.lavabit.com/niokzbqzpot4mt4jwf7xtuz5zdh74b74tbewzonxrofxi3m8tfrb/
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no where near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I never said I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you are going to talk about him.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein <noeinstein@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India?
Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation
destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the
USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't be
welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). — J. A. A. —
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current Events.
>
> They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the US) their
> food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown causes
> (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) is that
> nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all State functions
> still happen, all taxes are paid.
>
> One would think that something as basic as
>
> "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to survive?"
> (answer is a resounding "No")
>
> would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States and those
> Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" are left
> operating as usual.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The
> > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had
> > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food
> > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the
> > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using
> > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started
> > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't
> > survive without some the public order that is provided by well thought-
> > out and agreed-to laws.
>
> > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws
> > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will
> > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our
> > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress
> > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things.
> > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my
> > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen,
> > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government
> > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A.
> > Armistead — Patriot
>
> > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Onestone,
>
> > > At one full year with no government it is way past the "experimental"
> > stage.
> > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares. Just
> > why
> > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ?? The
> > laws
> > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs.
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > John,
>
> > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more
> > than
> > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make
> > much
> > > > > of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more
> > conservative
> > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal"
> > of
> > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead �
> > > > Patriot
> > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> John,
>
> > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> > > > > >> questions posed to you.)
>
> > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning
> > government.
> > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long
> > on
> > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist
> > constitution.
> > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist
> > system
> > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government
> > > > should
> > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you
> > even
> > > > ask
> > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining
> > 5%
> > > > are
> > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A.
> > Armistead
> > > > �
> > > > > >>>>> Patriot
> > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> John,
> > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades
> > websites
> > > > based
> > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about
> > your
> > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of
> > > > expression means.
> > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social
> > harm
> > > > to the
> > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler"
> > seems
> > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to
> > pull
> > > > off this
> > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task?
> > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American
> > multinational
> > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View,
> > California.
> > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are
> > > > very
> > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck
> > from
> > > > the
> > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who
> > commit
> > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on
> > > > moderation
> > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be
> > > > killed?
> > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who
> > > > kill
> > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans
> > have
> > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of
> > jobs
> > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has
> > > > caused
> > > > > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other
> > person
> > > > who
> > > > > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> > > > > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our
> > government
> > > > and
> > > > > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard
> > > > arrested,
> > > > > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the
> > Constitution
> > > > for
> > > > > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that
> > you,
> > > > > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's
> > > > viewed
> > > > > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect
> > you
> > > > are so
> > > > > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against
> > having a
> > > > > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get
> > some
> > > > couch-
> > > > > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Einstein,
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the
> > > > present, or
> > > > > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is
> > the
> > > > standard
> > > > > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to
> > it. It
> > > > > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under
> > US
> > > > law.
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has
> > the
> > > > > >>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their
> > law(s).
> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of
> > > > "reasoning" in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining
> > why
> > > > Jews
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to
> > be
> > > > such
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for
> > > > successful
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep
> > wounds
> > > > Muslims
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> feel.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice
> > that
> > > > the USA
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's
> > responsibility?)
> > > > saying
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by
> > my
> > > > New
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his
> > job.
> > > > If you
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm
> > > > saying,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New
> > > > Constitution has
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to
> > read.
> > > > The last
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted
> > > > heads
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> with,
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.Catch weekly reviews of the hottest games on such video games consoles as the
Xbox 360, Playstation 3, Nintendo Wii, PSP, PS2, PC and DS. Only on Mevio!
http://click.lavabit.com/niokzbqzpot4mt4jwf7xtuz5zdh74b74tbewzonxrofxi3m8tfrb/
Mark: Please find yourself a history buff. I'm not the least
interested in anarchy, in Belgium or anywhere! — J. A. A. —
On Apr 22, 4:33 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And it still functions without the lawmakers.... Go figure.
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > "In terms of comparative social spending on welfare-related programs as a> > On Apr 21, 9:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP), Denmark ranks first,
> > spending more than 29 percent of GDP on its welfare-related programs. Next
> > is Sweden (nearly 29 percent), followed by France, Germany, Belgium,
> > Switzerland, Austria, and Finland. The United Kingdom ranks in the middle of
> > the pack in 13th place (nearly 22 percent of GDP). The United States ranks
> > near the bottom, in 26th place (out of 29), spending less than 15 percent of
> > its GDP on social welfare programs. The United States ranks just ahead of
> > Ireland, Mexico, and South Korea."
>
> >http://pagerankstudio.com/Blog/2011/03/what-is-welfare-state/
>
> > ------------------------------
> > On 04/22/2011 08:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > On average, yes they are! Few in Belgium look to government for
> > handouts. In the USA, close to 45% want a government handout.
> > Anything over 5% is excessive. But that's why I've written my New
> > Constitution—to get government out of the hand-out, pull-the-strings
> > business! — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > wrote:> > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>
> > So, you're saying the People of Belgium are better People than those in
> > the United States?
>
> > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> > in civil war... � J. A. A. �
> > wrote:> > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>
> > John,
>
> > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more than
> > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make much
> > of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
> > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of
> > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> > wrote:> > On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>
> > John,
> > Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> > anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> > questions posed to you.)
> > On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> > suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
> > Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> > your own. � J. A. A. �
> > wrote:> > On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>
> > But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
> > On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> > that made this country great; and by supposing that government should
> > control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even ask
> > that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> > socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% are
> > just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead �
> > Patriot
> > On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com> <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:> > wrote:
>
> > John,
> > That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites based
> > on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> > credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression means.
> > That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the
> > USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> > ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off this
> > tremendous task?
> > On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> > Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> > World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> > naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> > noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> > TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> > someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> > Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> > their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> > resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> > more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> > ever lived, including Hitler.
> > Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> > in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> > tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> > giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> > Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> > you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> > screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> > better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> > time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
>> > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > Einstein,
> > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
>> > On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com> <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> > nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> > capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> > feel.
> > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> > is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> > that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> > now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> > with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> > of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> > But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> > a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> > country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> > along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. Armistead �
> > Patriot
>> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> > Hey John!
> > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
> > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>> > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
>> ...
> > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
> > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
> > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
> > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! � John
> > A. Armistead � Patriot
> > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). I'm thrilled that
> > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
> > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
> > turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
> > business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
> > doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
> > On Apr 11, 2:36 am,
>
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India?
Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation
destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the
USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't be
welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). — J. A. A. —
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current Events.
>
> They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the US) their
> food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown causes
> (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) is that
> nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all State functions
> still happen, all taxes are paid.
>
> One would think that something as basic as
>
> "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to survive?"
> (answer is a resounding "No")
>
> would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States and those
> Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" are left
> operating as usual.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The
> > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had
> > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food
> > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the
> > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using
> > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started
> > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't
> > survive without some the public order that is provided by well thought-
> > out and agreed-to laws.
>
> > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws
> > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will
> > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our
> > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress
> > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things.
> > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my
> > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen,
> > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government
> > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A.
> > Armistead — Patriot
>
> > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Onestone,
>
> > > At one full year with no government it is way past the "experimental"
> > stage.
> > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares. Just
> > why
> > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ?? The
> > laws
> > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs.
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > John,
>
> > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more
> > than
> > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make
> > much
> > > > > of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more
> > conservative
> > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal"
> > of
> > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead �
> > > > Patriot
> > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> John,
>
> > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> > > > > >> questions posed to you.)
>
> > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning
> > government.
> > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long
> > on
> > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist
> > constitution.
> > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist
> > system
> > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government
> > > > should
> > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you
> > even
> > > > ask
> > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining
> > 5%
> > > > are
> > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A.
> > Armistead
> > > > �
> > > > > >>>>> Patriot
> > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> John,
> > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades
> > websites
> > > > based
> > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about
> > your
> > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of
> > > > expression means.
> > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social
> > harm
> > > > to the
> > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler"
> > seems
> > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to
> > pull
> > > > off this
> > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task?
> > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American
> > multinational
> > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View,
> > California.
> > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are
> > > > very
> > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck
> > from
> > > > the
> > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who
> > commit
> > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on
> > > > moderation
> > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be
> > > > killed?
> > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who
> > > > kill
> > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans
> > have
> > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of
> > jobs
> > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has
> > > > caused
> > > > > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other
> > person
> > > > who
> > > > > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> > > > > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our
> > government
> > > > and
> > > > > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard
> > > > arrested,
> > > > > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the
> > Constitution
> > > > for
> > > > > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that
> > you,
> > > > > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's
> > > > viewed
> > > > > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect
> > you
> > > > are so
> > > > > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against
> > having a
> > > > > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get
> > some
> > > > couch-
> > > > > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Einstein,
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the
> > > > present, or
> > > > > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is
> > the
> > > > standard
> > > > > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to
> > it. It
> > > > > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under
> > US
> > > > law.
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has
> > the
> > > > > >>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their
> > law(s).
> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of
> > > > "reasoning" in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining
> > why
> > > > Jews
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to
> > be
> > > > such
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for
> > > > successful
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep
> > wounds
> > > > Muslims
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> feel.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice
> > that
> > > > the USA
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's
> > responsibility?)
> > > > saying
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by
> > my
> > > > New
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his
> > job.
> > > > If you
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm
> > > > saying,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New
> > > > Constitution has
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to
> > read.
> > > > The last
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted
> > > > heads
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> with,
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
