• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0
they teach creationism mythology
---
and the creation myths in the Qur'an are vaguer and allow for a wider
range of interpretations similar to those in other Abrahamic
religions. Most Muslims accept the scientific positions on the age of
the earth and the age of the universe.


On May 20, 4:53 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 5:50 pm, Jonathan <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, public schools are indoctrination mills. Much of what is
> > taught in public schools has nothing to do with "facts."
>
> Especially when they teach creationism mythology.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
Really:
---
yes, really

I never had sex with your mom
---
your mother said you would fuck anything, even her

On May 20, 4:30 pm, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 19, 1:44 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:> He aint no socialist you political retard!
> > ----
> > yes he is and go fuck my dead mother really hard and like it,
> > dickhead
>
> Really: I never had sex with your mom.
>
>
>
>
>
> >  Glenn Beck is Mormon!
> > ---
> > another ignorant myth believing loudmouth like myself!
>
> > On May 19, 2:56 pm, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > He aint no socialist you political retard! Glenn Beck is Mormon!
>
> > > On May 17, 10:41 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Obama is a socialist and should be removed from our government asap by
> > > > any means necessary.
>
> > > > Who can trust a man who prays with xians, jews and muzzies?
>
> > > > On May 17, 12:04 pm, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Monday, May 16, 2011
>
> > > > > Obama is So Re-elected!
>
> > > > >         The right wing should get on their knees and kiss Obama's feet!  He
> > > > > could have destroyed the Republican Party and demolished the
> > > > > conservatives for good!  But, he didn't, because he is a good man.  He
> > > > > could have taken on the Bush administration and put them on trial for
> > > > > treason and war crimes!  But, Barack was too focused on correcting and
> > > > > reforming the nation's ills.
> > > > > Like Clint Eastwood in his first Spaghetti Western, "A Fistful of
> > > > > Dollars"--the Baxter family on the right, the Rejos family on the left
> > > > > and Clint Eastwood in the middle--Obama is in the same predicament.
> > > > > The right sees him as a Viet Cong and the left sees him as a flunky
> > > > > for the corporate master.  The right says the exact same thing about
> > > > > Obama as the left said about Bush for eight years.  They even use the
> > > > > same rhetoric as the left did!  There is one important difference: the
> > > > > right makes money on "Obamaphobia."  The right sells dehydrated food
> > > > > to victims of the American dollar's drop to nothing.  They sell
> > > > > weapons so that good Americans can defend themselves against the
> > > > > roving bands of socialist Muslims in the streets!  They sell DVD's and
> > > > > books to prophesize how the terrible left will take away your flat
> > > > > screen T.V. or i-pod and put you in a communal farm!  Of course, we
> > > > > all know this is bull-crap.
> > > > > The Republican candidates for this presidential cycle are a joke!  If
> > > > > they really wanted to give Obama a run for his money they would
> > > > > nominate Hermann Cain for president.  However, their one problem with
> > > > > that?  The Republicans want their country back, not their country
> > > > > black.
> > > > >         So the Obama family will not be calling Mayflower movers for an
> > > > > estimate. They will be living there for, at least, another four years--
> > > > > unless something terrible happens.
> > > > >         I am curious about who Obama will pick for V.P.?
>
> > > > > Surfing on acid.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3Hu71RF6xw-Hidequotedtext -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
As far as PlainOl' getting it right.....Once
again Studio, you are showing your, "Cluelessness"......
----
and where did studio say anything about plainol getting it right?

would you rather be right or good?

On May 20, 1:29 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Studio,
>
> I dunno who wrote this lovely, fitting tribute to John Wesley, I'm sure that
> they had the best of intentions.  The deal with Methodists,  for "personal
> salvation" is just like the deal with Baptists,  Episcopalians, Catholics,
> (with a little variation)  and every other Christian.  Accept Christ as your
> Saviour, the Holy Trinity,  "The Father, The Son,  The Holy Ghost".
>
> No hard rules here,  no murdering in the name of Jesus,  no pop quizes,
> it's real easy.   Christianity is truly a loving giving religion.
>
> It just ain't that hard.   As far as PlainOl' getting it right.....Once
> again Studio,  you are showing your, "Cluelessness"......
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:16 AM, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 19, 6:06 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > When I was growing up, as a First Christian,  (a slightly modernized
> > version
> > > of Baptists, but not much)  and during the summer, when we had the Church
> > > Basketball games, and the proverbial, "Sunday Dinner On The Grounds";
> >  the
> > > Methodists always had the crispier fried chicken.....
>
> > Travis preferred crispy fried road kill with bacon.
>
> > Travis scribbled:
> > I resigned from the Methodist Church when I was 23 y/o.
>
> > lol...and I'm sure they've regretted it ever since.
>
> > But maybe he's a member of Methodist-lite?
>
> > But seriously, I'm sure the head of the Methodist Church could be
> > proud of Travis' writings...if he knew of them.
> > ---
>
> > Methodism insists that personal salvation always implies Christian
> > mission and service to the world. Scriptural holiness entails more
> > than personal piety; love of God is always linked with love of
> > neighbors and a passion for justice and renewal in the life of the
> > world.
> > Methodism has distinguished itself as a religious movement strongly
> > tied to social issues.
> > As father of the movement, John Wesley injected much of his own social
> > philosophy into the movement as a whole.
> > Wesley's personal social philosophy was characterized by "an
> > instructive reluctance to criticize existing institutions [which] was
> > overborne by indignation at certain abuses which cried out for
> > rectification."
> > The Methodist Church's responses to injustices in society are
> > embodiments of the Wesleyan traditions of mercy and justice.
> > ---
>
> > Yeah, that our Travis to a tee...not!
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


So Obama is a Repblitard since he has expanded us from 2 wars to 4?
 

 
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:45 PM, studio <tlack@hotmail.com> wrote:
1. for endless wars
2. for low labor wages
3. for hating the the poor
4. for kissing the asses of the rich
5. for throwing people out of their homes
6. for warrant-less search and seizure
7. for a para-military police state
8. for people not receiving food stamps
9. for sub-standard public schools
10. for throwing citizens off Medicare and Medicaid
11. for throwing people in jail for smoking a marijuana cigarette
12. for building more prisons
13. for less civil rights
14. for the abolishment of Social Security
15. for more tax breaks to the rich
16. for Creationism being taught in public schools
17. for blaming rape victims
18. for carrying guns in schools, churches, bars and political
institutions
19. for de-regulation of financial institutions
20. for enthusiastic voting for anyone who believes in any of the
above

And if you believe in all of them, then you're a Super Tard with an IQ
in the negative digits.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
President Obama
announced that the United States has officially become the largest and
most
powerful *enemy of Israel.*
----
Israel can never repay what they owe the US.

they'll either sink or swim

On May 20, 4:39 pm, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  <http://freedomtorch.com/>
>
> To all Friends of Israel:
>
> Yesterday the world witnessed a geo-political earthquake as President Obama
> announced that the United States has officially become the largest and most
> powerful *enemy of Israel.*  Not that we didn't see it coming.  In January,
> Obama actively worked to topple Israel's and America's staunch ally, Hosni
> Mubarak of Egypt, who had been a stalwart friend to both countries for more
> than 30 years.
>
> It was clear then that Obama was putting America on the side of Israel's
> (and America's) enemies.
>
> The three largest ideological threats to the American way of life are:
> secularism, Communism and Islamism.  And Barack Obama is the embodiment of
> all three.  Regardless of where he was born, he holds attitudes and beliefs
> that are completely FOREIGN to the American way of life.  He is an enemy not
> only of Israel, but to the United States itself.  He is a friend to our
> enemies and an enemy to our friends.
>
> Obama, as debka.com reported recently, has aligned the United States with
> Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood and against Israel.
> What Obama did yesterday will change the world more profoundly and more
> negatively than 9/11 did.
>
> FreedomTorch members are blogging about yesterday's political tsunami and I
> wanted to share their blogs with you.  *
>
> Jill Clayton writes about "Obama's Orwellian Agenda" and she nails him not
> only on Israel but on all the ways he is undermining America: *http://FreedomTorch.com/blogs/13996/2982/obama-s-orwellian-agenda<http://freedomtorch.com/blogs/13996/2982/obama-s-orwellian-agenda>
>
> *Bob Russell has written and posted a beautiful letter from the American
> people to Israel - which you can print, sign and mail:
> *http://FreedomTorch.com/blogs/15277/2981/a-letter-to-israel-from-we-t...<http://freedomtorch.com/blogs/15277/2981/a-letter-to-israel-from-we-t...>
>
> *Hassan Nurullah has posted a blog giving us a Biblical and historical
> perspective on the people called "Palestinians":
> *http://FreedomTorch.com/blogs/1608/2986/whencesoever-palestine<http://freedomtorch.com/blogs/1608/2986/whencesoever-palestine>
>
> And a blog I posted about a year ago gives the full story of how modern
> Israel came to exist and how NO LAND was STOLEN from anyone!  These are
> facts we should all commit to memory.*
>
> UNDERSTANDING THE MIDDLE EAST:*http://FreedomTorch.com/blogs/3/1397/understanding-the-middle-east<http://freedomtorch.com/blogs/3/1397/understanding-the-middle-east>
> *Search on the word "Appendix" and make sure you read that.  It's powerful!
> *
>
> You can comment on all blogs when you sign in.  Please share this email with
> anyone who you think may benefit from this information.
> *
> May God bless America and Israel,
>
> *Jonathan
>
> P.S. Try out *the new FreedomTorch Toolbar
> <http://freedomtorchtoolbar.ourtoolbar.com/> *and keep up with the news we
> keep up with!
> If you wish to unsubscribe, just reply to this message and type UNSUBSCRIBE
> in the subject line.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

On May 20, 5:50 pm, Jonathan <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, public schools are indoctrination mills. Much of what is
> taught in public schools has nothing to do with "facts."

Especially when they teach creationism mythology.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Unfortunately, public schools are indoctrination mills. Much of what is taught in public schools has nothing to do with "facts."

On 05/20/2011 02:44 PM, studio wrote:
On May 20, 8:42 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote: 
Wednesday, May 18, 2010Should Public Schools Teach the Bible or the Koran? 
 No because if a parent wants their kid to learn that, they send them to their church of choice. It most definitely should not be taught in public schools... facts should be taught there.  Should churches be forced to teach evolution?  

--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.

"The great object is that every man be armed; everyone who is able may have a gun."
- Patrick Henry

On May 20, 8:42 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Wednesday, May 18, 2010Should Public Schools Teach the Bible or the Koran?

No because if a parent wants their kid to learn that, they send them
to their church of choice.
It most definitely should not be taught in public schools... facts
should be taught there.

Should churches be forced to teach evolution?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0





To all Friends of Israel:

Yesterday the world witnessed a geo-political earthquake as President Obama announced that the United States has officially become the largest and most powerful enemy of Israel.  Not that we didn't see it coming.  In January, Obama actively worked to topple Israel's and America's staunch ally, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, who had been a stalwart friend to both countries for more than 30 years. 

It was clear then that Obama was putting America on the side of Israel's (and America's) enemies. 

The three largest ideological threats to the American way of life are:  secularism, Communism and Islamism.  And Barack Obama is the embodiment of all three.  Regardless of where he was born, he holds attitudes and beliefs that are completely FOREIGN to the American way of life.  He is an enemy not only of Israel, but to the United States itself.  He is a friend to our enemies and an enemy to our friends.   

Obama, as debka.com reported recently, has aligned the United States with Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood and against Israel. 
What Obama did yesterday will change the world more profoundly and more negatively than 9/11 did. 

FreedomTorch members are blogging about yesterday's political tsunami and I wanted to share their blogs with you. 

Jill Clayton writes about "Obama's Orwellian Agenda" and she nails him not only on Israel but on all the ways he is undermining America:

http://FreedomTorch.com/blogs/13996/2982/obama-s-orwellian-agenda

Bob Russell has written and posted a beautiful letter from the American people to Israel - which you can print, sign and mail:
http://FreedomTorch.com/blogs/15277/2981/a-letter-to-israel-from-we-the-p

Hassan Nurullah has posted a blog giving us a Biblical and historical perspective on the people called "Palestinians":
http://FreedomTorch.com/blogs/1608/2986/whencesoever-palestine

And a blog I posted about a year ago gives the full story of how modern Israel came to exist and how NO LAND was STOLEN from anyone!  These are facts we should all commit to memory.

UNDERSTANDING THE MIDDLE EAST:
  http://FreedomTorch.com/blogs/3/1397/understanding-the-middle-east
Search on the word "Appendix" and make sure you read that.  It's powerful!

You can comment on all blogs when you sign in.  Please share this email with anyone who you think may benefit from this information.

May God bless America and Israel,

Jonathan



P.S. Try out the new FreedomTorch Toolbar  and keep up with the news we keep up with!  
If you wish to unsubscribe, just reply to this message and type UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.

 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Not to worry dick, he's still just as angry if not more so with
Republican'ts.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

So much for all those Republicans who promised to defend the Bill of Rights.


US To Extend Patriot Act For Four Years
Fri May 20, 2011 4:32PM

On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner came to terms on the extension of three major Patriot Act provisions until June 1, 2015, The New York Times reported.

The agreement was reached one week before key provisions of the controversial Bush-era surveillance law were set to expire. The Obama administration had asked Congress to renew the provisions.

The provisions at issue allow the US government to use roving wiretaps on multiple electronic devices; and have access to business records relevant to alleged terrorist investigations.

The third provision permits secret intelligence surveillance of non-US individuals who are not believed to be connected to any foreign power.

This comes as liberals and conservatives have criticized the increased surveillance powers of the Patriot Act. They argue that the so-called anti-terrorist law violates the privacy of citizens and prevents protection against unwarranted search and seizures.

Other opponents suggest that Congress must reconsider the law, especially after the US said it killed al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden earlier this month.

This is while some Republicans maintain that the provisions should be made permanent without any modifications.

"Now, more than ever, we need access to the crucial authorities in the Patriot Act," Attorney General Eric Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee.
--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.

"The great object is that every man be armed; everyone who is able may have a gun."
- Patrick Henry

Of course they're "The Most Trusted News Source", they said so and
took a internal poll to prove it.

And STILL people voted for Obama instead of listening to most trusted
news source... now there's news you can believe in.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
On May 20, 2:29 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Studio,
>
> I dunno who wrote this lovely, fitting tribute to John Wesley, I'm sure that
> they had the best of intentions.  The deal with Methodists,  for "personal
> salvation" is just like the deal with Baptists,  Episcopalians, Catholics,
> (with a little variation)  and every other Christian.  Accept Christ as your
> Saviour, the Holy Trinity,  "The Father, The Son,  The Holy Ghost".
>
> No hard rules here,  no murdering in the name of Jesus,  no pop quizes,
> it's real easy.   Christianity is truly a loving giving religion.

Well of course they aren't going to say they're murdering in Jesus'
name...anymore than Newt would say he's against the Ryan Plan.

Atheism and Agnosticism are just as loving and giving as far as I can
tell... at least they're not so misleading as to buy 5,000 billboards
telling people "the end is here".

> It just ain't that hard.   As far as PlainOl' getting it right.....Once
> again Studio,  you are showing your, "Cluelessness"......

Ok, but plainol is good though, right?
Go plainol, go!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
On May 19, 1:44 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> He aint no socialist you political retard!
> ----
> yes he is and go fuck my dead mother really hard and like it,
> dickhead
Really: I never had sex with your mom.
>
>  Glenn Beck is Mormon!
> ---
> another ignorant myth believing loudmouth like myself!
>
> On May 19, 2:56 pm, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > He aint no socialist you political retard! Glenn Beck is Mormon!
>
> > On May 17, 10:41 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Obama is a socialist and should be removed from our government asap by
> > > any means necessary.
>
> > > Who can trust a man who prays with xians, jews and muzzies?
>
> > > On May 17, 12:04 pm, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Monday, May 16, 2011
>
> > > > Obama is So Re-elected!
>
> > > >         The right wing should get on their knees and kiss Obama's feet!  He
> > > > could have destroyed the Republican Party and demolished the
> > > > conservatives for good!  But, he didn't, because he is a good man.  He
> > > > could have taken on the Bush administration and put them on trial for
> > > > treason and war crimes!  But, Barack was too focused on correcting and
> > > > reforming the nation's ills.
> > > > Like Clint Eastwood in his first Spaghetti Western, "A Fistful of
> > > > Dollars"--the Baxter family on the right, the Rejos family on the left
> > > > and Clint Eastwood in the middle--Obama is in the same predicament.
> > > > The right sees him as a Viet Cong and the left sees him as a flunky
> > > > for the corporate master.  The right says the exact same thing about
> > > > Obama as the left said about Bush for eight years.  They even use the
> > > > same rhetoric as the left did!  There is one important difference: the
> > > > right makes money on "Obamaphobia."  The right sells dehydrated food
> > > > to victims of the American dollar's drop to nothing.  They sell
> > > > weapons so that good Americans can defend themselves against the
> > > > roving bands of socialist Muslims in the streets!  They sell DVD's and
> > > > books to prophesize how the terrible left will take away your flat
> > > > screen T.V. or i-pod and put you in a communal farm!  Of course, we
> > > > all know this is bull-crap.
> > > > The Republican candidates for this presidential cycle are a joke!  If
> > > > they really wanted to give Obama a run for his money they would
> > > > nominate Hermann Cain for president.  However, their one problem with
> > > > that?  The Republicans want their country back, not their country
> > > > black.
> > > >         So the Obama family will not be calling Mayflower movers for an
> > > > estimate. They will be living there for, at least, another four years--
> > > > unless something terrible happens.
> > > >         I am curious about who Obama will pick for V.P.?
>
> > > > Surfing on acid.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3Hu71RF6xw-Hidequoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

rotflmao...

Ahnold, go back to Vulgaria or where ever it is your from, before
Princess Shriver unleashes the force on you! ... lmao

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

On May 20, 2:33 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You're an idiot Studio.

You can thank your daddy Bush Jr. for that.

And you pay taxes to a Socialist Government in Köln...
what's next? moving to China to help them?

Can't you move and work in low-tax country like Argentina, or maybe a
nice Italian province like San Marino ... you can join your buddy Gaar
there after he got beat-up by me here.
Well, he said he was going to move there anyway, but it's probably
just another Republican't lie.
I mean, Republican't lie so much, I don't know how they keep all the
lies in order?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

X-Account-Key: account1
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path: <claguerra245@aol.com>
Received: from mx-harris.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.167])
by mdl-creeping.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id 1qnwZf7pp3Nl34t1; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.146])
by mx-harris.atl.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1qnwZf5cz3Nl36v0
for <rhomp2002@earthlink.net>; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtaomg-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.200])
by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p4KLBmnf001767
for <Rhomp2002@earthlink.net>; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:11:48 -0400
Received: from core-mdc002b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mdc002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.45.133])
by mtaomg-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id F3570E000089
for <Rhomp2002@earthlink.net>; Fri, 20 May 2011 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
References: <8CDE5493792EDBD-1910-2B4FC@webmail-d016.sysops.aol.com>
To: Rhomp2002@earthlink.net
Subject: OBAMA'S CON JOB
X-AOL-IP: 24.215.190.236
In-Reply-To: <8CDE5493792EDBD-1910-2B4FC@webmail-d016.sysops.aol.com>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: claguerra245@aol.com
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--------MB_8CDE549AA1C871B_1910_496E1_webmail-d016.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33668-STANDARD
Received: from 24.215.190.236 by webmail-d016.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.31) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 20 May 2011 17:11:47 -0400
Message-Id: <8CDE549AA0E3ED5-1910-2B687@webmail-d016.sysops.aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: [24.215.190.236]
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 17:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:406631040:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 4
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33c84dd6d91330d5
X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0;
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=0b; sbw=000;

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
----------MB_8CDE549AA1C871B_1910_496E1_webmail-d016.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


=20
=20

=20
Obama's "Con" Job

Posted by Jay Tea
Published: May 20, 2011 - 11:30 AM =
Yesterday, I half-listened to Pr=
esident Obama's speech on the Middle East -- his voice has a droning quali=
ty that leave me MEGO (My Eyes Glaze Over) if I listen to it too much. But=
then he used one word that my ears have been trained to listen for whene=
ver someone discusses the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

That word is "contiguous."

Obama's words:

The Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves, and reach=
their full potential, in a sovereign and contiguous state.

Currently, the Palestinians have a bisected land. The West Bank and the Ga=
za Strip are separated by Israel. "Contiguous" means that they are not se=
parated, but connected. And that ain't gonna happen unless you 1) bisect I=
srael and give the Palestinians a corridor through the heart of Israel, or=
B) run a Palestinian territory down to the Red Sea and back up to Gaza, d=
epriving Israel of its Red Sea port.

At that point, I decided that the whole section of the speech needed some a=
ttention. Because if there's this one incredibly dumb thing, there are almo=
st certainly more dumb things in it.

And hoo boy, are there.

Israeli settlement activity continues. Palestinians have walked away from =
talks.

Gee, all those Palestinian terror attacks? Rockets, mortars, suicide bomber=
s? Never mind those.

Provisions must also be robust enough to prevent a resurgence of terrorism=
, to stop the infiltration of weapons, and to provide effective border se=
curity.
Barack Obama, border security expert and hawk. Oh, that's rich.


The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coord=
inated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sov=
ereign, non-militarized state.

Gosh, why hasn't that been tried before? It's so simple, so obvious.

Oh, that's right. It was. In Gaza. And we all know how well that worked out=
.

Boiled down, it's the same old same old crap we hear from the anti-Israel =
side. A healthy dose of moral equivalence between the Israelis an Palesti=
nians, followed by insistence that both sides much make concessions. The I=
sraelis must give up land and ease security restrictions and, in general, =
make it much easier for them to be attacked; the Palestinians must make pr=
omises to try to cut down on terrorism and think about recognizing Israel'=
s right to exist.

And even when the Palestinians make those promises, they never keep them. A=
nd no one ever holds them to them.

Obama is fixated on the "Palestinians must recognize Israel's right to exi=
st" element. And from I've read, the Israelis don't really care that much =
about it.

As I understand it, the Israeli attitude is "hey, we exist. We're here. We=
ain't going anywhere. Get used to it." They don't need validation from th=
e Palestinians -- or anyone -- to be a legitimate nation, the homeland of =
the Jewish people. They simply bring up the issue as a way of pointing out=
the absurdity of it -- what's the point of opening negotiations with some=
one who pretends the Israelis essentially don't exist? Further, so what if=
the Palestinians say it -- they have a very, very lengthy history of goin=
g back on promises and pledges and concessions.

To Israel, the recognition issue isn't a demand. It's a prerequisite. It's=
a precondition -- how the hell can we negotiate with someone who pretends=
we don't exist? As such, it needs no concessions, is nothing Israel shoul=
d bargain over.

Here's an idea: tell the Palestinians that if they can go a certain period=
of time (say, six months) without any attacks on Israel, and recognize th=
at Israel exists and will continue to exist, then we'll start negotiating.=
What we don't do is start equating killing people with building houses, e=
quate fences that keep people out with fences that keep people in, and sof=
t-selling the calls for (and attempts to carry out) genocide -- which is t=
he end result of the "from the river to the sea, Paleastine will be free."=
(The River being the Jordan and the sea the Mediterranean, meaning that t=
he area will be rendered Judenfrei.)

At this moment, President Obama is meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu. =
And in that meeting, I strongly suspect that Obama is telling Netanyahu t=
hat he really needs to trust the Palestinians, that they won't pull the fo=
otball away, and he needs to make a few more concessions as "good will ges=
tures" to get the peace process going.

What he won't be saying is what concessions he's going to pressure the Pal=
estinians to make, what promises and pledges he will extract from them, to=
get them to demonstrate their sincerity.

Which I can kind of respect -- I see it as a recognition of reality. The P=
alestinians won't be making any concessions, will be very reluctant to mak=
e any promises, and won't keep them anyway.

This is not a good time for Israel. And not a good time for those of us wh=
o believe in her right to exist, and think that the world is a far, far be=
tter place with Israel in it.
.
Update: NRO covers much of the same ground, but in some ways better.

=20

----------MB_8CDE549AA1C871B_1910_496E1_webmail-d016.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<font color=3D'black' size=3D'2' face=3D'Courier New, Courier, mono'><font =
face=3D"Courier New, Courier, mono" color=3D"black" size=3D"2">

<div> </div>

<div> <br>

</div>

<div style=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica;font-size:10pt;color:black"><br>

<div id=3D"AOLMsgPart_1_c7d09be5-f746-4c1e-a438-3caeecdb4c16"><font face=3D=
"Courier New, Courier, mono" color=3D"black" size=3D"2"><font face=3D"Couri=
er New, Courier, mono" color=3D"black" size=3D"2">
<div>=20


<div class=3D"bgColoredPost">


<div style=3D"font-size: 12px; font-family: Courier New; font-weight: bold;=
"><a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://wizbangblog.com/content/2011/05/20/ob=
amas-con-job.php
" title=3D"http://wizbangblog.com/content/2011/05/20/obamas=
-con-job.php
" alt=3D"http://wizbangblog.com/content/2011/05/20/obamas-con-j=
ob.php
">Obama's "Con" Job</a><span><br>


<br>


Posted by <a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://wizbangblog.com/author/Jay%20=
Tea" title=3D"http://wizbangblog.com/author/Jay%20Tea" alt=3D"http://wizban=
gblog.com/author/Jay%20Tea">Jay Tea</a><br>


Published: May 20, 2011 - 11:30 AM</span>&nbsp;
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbs=
p; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &n=
bsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; =
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Yesterday, I half-listened to President=
&nbsp; Obama's speech on=20
the Middle East -- his voice has a droning quality&nbsp; that leave me MEGO=
=20
(My Eyes Glaze Over) if I listen to it too much. But&nbsp; then he used one=
=20
word that my ears have been trained to listen for&nbsp; whenever someone=20
discusses the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.<br>


<br>


That word is "contiguous."<br>


<br>


Obama's words:<br>


<br>


The&nbsp;
Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves, and reach&nbs=
p;
their full potential, in a sovereign and contiguous state.<br>


<br>


Currently,&nbsp;
the Palestinians have a bisected land. The West Bank and the Gaza=20
Strip&nbsp; are separated by Israel. "Contiguous" means that they are not&n=
bsp;=20
separated, but connected. And that ain't gonna happen unless you 1)&nbsp;=
=20
bisect Israel and give the Palestinians a corridor through the heart of&nbs=
p;
Israel, or B) run a Palestinian territory down to the Red Sea and back&nbs=
p;
up to Gaza, depriving Israel of its Red Sea port.<br>


<br>


At that point, <a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://www.realclearpolitics.co=
m/articles/2011/05/19/obamas_speech_on_the_middle_east_109920.html" title=
=3D"http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/19/obamas_speech_on_t=
he_middle_east_109920.html
" alt=3D"http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article=
s/2011/05/19/obamas_speech_on_the_middle_east_109920.html
">I decided that t=
he whole section of the speech needed some attention.</a> Because if there'=
s this one incredibly dumb thing, there are almost certainly more dumb thin=
gs in it.<br>


<br>


And hoo boy, are there.<br>


<br>


&nbsp;Israeli settlement activity continues. Palestinians have walked away =
from talks.<br>


<br>


Gee, all those Palestinian terror attacks? Rockets, mortars, suicide bomber=
s? Never mind those.<br>


<br>


Provisions&nbsp;
must also be robust enough to prevent a resurgence of terrorism, to&nbsp;=
=20
stop the infiltration of weapons, and to provide effective border&nbsp;=20
security.<br>


Barack Obama, border security expert and hawk. Oh, that's rich.<br>


<br>


<br>


The&nbsp;
full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be&nbsp;=20
coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility&nbsp=
;=20
in a sovereign, non-militarized state.<br>


<br>


Gosh, why hasn't that been tried before? It's so simple, so obvious.<br>


<br>


Oh, that's right. It was. In Gaza. And we all know how well that worked out=
.<br>


<br>


Boiled&nbsp;
down, it's the same old same old crap we hear from the anti-Israel&nbsp;=
=20
side. A healthy dose of moral equivalence between the Israelis an&nbsp;=20
Palestinians, followed by insistence that both sides much make&nbsp;=20
concessions. The Israelis must give up land and ease security&nbsp;=20
restrictions and, in general, make it much easier for them to be&nbsp;=20
attacked; the Palestinians must make promises to try to cut down on&nbsp;=
=20
terrorism and think about recognizing Israel's right to exist.<br>


<br>


And even when the Palestinians make those promises, they never keep them. A=
nd no one ever holds them to them.<br>


<br>


Obama&nbsp;
is fixated on the "Palestinians must recognize Israel's right to=20
exist"&nbsp; element. And from I've read, the Israelis don't really care th=
at
much&nbsp; about it.<br>


<br>


As I understand it, the Israeli attitude is=20
"hey, we&nbsp; exist. We're here. We ain't going anywhere. Get used to it."=
=20
They don't&nbsp; need validation from the Palestinians -- or anyone -- to b=
e a
legitimate&nbsp; nation, the homeland of the Jewish people. They simply=20
bring up the&nbsp; issue as a way of pointing out the absurdity of it --=20
what's the point&nbsp; of opening negotiations with someone who pretends th=
e=20
Israelis&nbsp; essentially don't exist? Further, so what if the Palestinian=
s=20
say it --&nbsp; they have a very, very lengthy history of going back on=20
promises and&nbsp; pledges and concessions.<br>


<br>


To Israel, the recognition issue isn't a <em>demand</em>. It's a <em>prereq=
uisite</em>.&nbsp; It's a <em>precondition</em>&nbsp;
-- how the hell can we negotiate with someone who pretends we don't&nbsp;=
=20
exist? As such, it needs no concessions, is nothing Israel should&nbsp;=20
bargain over.<br>


<br>


Here's an idea: tell the Palestinians that if they&nbsp;
can go a certain period of time (say, six months) without any attacks&nbsp=
;=20
on Israel, and recognize that Israel exists and will continue to exist,&nbs=
p;
then we'll start negotiating. What we don't do is start equating=20
killing&nbsp; people with building houses, equate fences that keep people o=
ut
with&nbsp; fences that keep people in, and soft-selling the calls for (and=
=20
attempts&nbsp; to carry out) genocide -- which is the end result of the "fr=
om
the&nbsp; river to the sea, Paleastine will be free." (The River being the=
=20
Jordan&nbsp; and the sea the Mediterranean, meaning that the area will be=
=20
rendered <em>Judenfrei.</em>)<br>


<br>


At&nbsp; this moment, President Obama is
meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu.&nbsp; And in that meeting, I strong=
ly
suspect that Obama is telling Netanyahu&nbsp; that he really needs to trus=
t=20
the Palestinians, that they won't pull the&nbsp; football away, and he need=
s=20
to make a few more concessions as "good&nbsp; will gestures" to get the pea=
ce
process going.<br>


<br>


What he won't be&nbsp; saying is what concessions he's
going to pressure the Palestinians to&nbsp; make, what promises and pledge=
s=20
he will extract from them, to get them&nbsp; to demonstrate their sincerity=
.<br>


<br>


Which
I can kind of respect -- I&nbsp; see it as a recognition of reality. The=
=20
Palestinians won't be making any&nbsp; concessions, will be very reluctant =
to
make any promises, and won't&nbsp; keep them anyway.<br>


<br>


This is not a=20
good time for Israel. And not a&nbsp; good time for those of us who believe=
=20
in her right to exist, and think&nbsp; that the world is a far, far better=
=20
place with Israel in it.<br>


<strong>.</strong><em><strong><br>


Update:</strong> <a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://www.nationalreview.com=
/corner/267673/three-reasons-obamas-speech-will-worry-jewish-community-tevi=
-troy" title=3D"http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/267673/three-reasons-o=
bamas-speech-will-worry-jewish-community-tevi-troy
" alt=3D"http://www.natio=
nalreview.com/corner/267673/three-reasons-obamas-speech-will-worry-jewish-c=
ommunity-tevi-troy
">NRO covers much of the same ground, but in some ways be=
tter.</a></em></div>


</div>

</div>

</font></font>
</div>

<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_1_c7d09be5-f746-4c1e-a438-3caeecdb4c16 -->

</div>
</font></font>
----------MB_8CDE549AA1C871B_1910_496E1_webmail-d016.sysops.aol.com--

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
On May 20, 5:04 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a fact plain-ol-idiot.
> Dumbass, when you hit a deer, it's not your fault.
> ----
> fuck you and your dead mother really hard, asshole
>
> that you personally attack me says tons about your intellect
>
> bring your favorite weapons and your will

I bring it right here and beat you senseless every time.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

On May 20, 11:11 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's amazing how many Americans are so out of touch with their own Nation,
> and here I am, 4,000 miles away,  seeing a much clearer picture.....

Must be that liberal news you get over there.

> The Democratic Party is broken beyone repair.  

And yet people still chose that party over "the other party" to lead,
and will do so again in 2012.

> I genuinely don't think that it
> will ever be able to recover after the Obama debacle...

You mean after he made Republican't Birthers look like the fools they
always were?

> It is literally Anti-American to belong to the Democratic Party.

This from a guy living in Köln Germany, paying taxes to a socialist
government that provides free health care and public schooling.
You really are very funny Keither.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0



BAGHEAD BITCH FEST in FRANCE

barenakedislam | May 20, 2011 at 12:36 PM | Categories: Women | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-ufk

The French burqa ban is a wonderful thing. It reduces visual pollution by keeping the bagheads off the streets. Now, if they could only keep them out of France.

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
"This entire area provides a dividing line between libertarians and statists. Libertarians hold that a person should be free to engage in any conduct whatsoever without the interference of the state, so long as the conduct is peaceful. In fact, Christian libertarians believe that this is what God's great gift of free will is all about -- the freedom to choose between sin and righteous conduct, so long as there is no force initiated against another human being (e.g., murder, theft, rape, etc.)."

Thursday, May 19, 2010
Should Schwarzenegger and Strauss-Kahn be Prosecuted for Adultery?
by Jacob G. Hornberger

One of the silliest and not-thought-out arguments that drug-war proponents make against libertarians is the following: "Since you favor drug legalization, that means that you favor drug abuse." The accusation is a perfect example of the mindset that public-schooling produces within people, one that examines matters in a purely superficial way, one in which there is no analytic or critical thinking involved.

The fact that someone does not wish to criminalize some particular conduct does not necessarily mean that he favors the commission of the conduct. He might, but not necessarily.

Libertarians favor drug legalization first and foremost as a matter of individual freedom. Under fundamental principles of freedom, people have the right to ingest harmful substances, even if everyone else disagrees with the choice. Second, libertarians point to the horrific consequences of the drug war -- violence, gangs, cartels, corruption, robberies, muggings, etcetera -- as a secondary reason for calling for drug legalization.

Within this context, I can't help but wonder how many statists would like to see former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger criminally prosecuted for adultery.

Adultery? Yes, adultery.

You might respond, "Jacob, that would be ridiculous. Adultery is a breach of private marital obligations and a violation of the Ten Commandments. That's no business of the state and it certainly shouldn't be a criminal offense."

Yet, the person with a drug-war mentality might well respond, "Oh, so you favor adultery? Anyone who favors the legalization of adultery must favor the commission of the act itself."

I think it's easy to see that that, again, is ridiculous, superficial thinking. People might well believe that adultery is no business of the state but, at the same time, not feel that it is morally right or appropriate behavior.

One reason that statists are not clamoring for prosecuting Schwarzenegger for adultery is that it isn't a criminal offense in California. But it is in 19 other states, including New York. That's the state in which former IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn is being held on criminal charges of rape and sexual abuse of a hotel chambermaid.

Why might the New York adultery statute become relevant in Strauss-Kahn's case? His lawyers are insinuating that he did in fact engage in sex with the chambermaid but that the relations were consensual. Such being the case, Strauss-Kahn might well be confessing to the crime of adultery while defending himself against the other charges. The reason he might be willing to take such a chance is that adultery in New York is a misdemeanor while the other charges are felonies.

This entire area provides a dividing line between libertarians and statists. Libertarians hold that a person should be free to engage in any conduct whatsoever without the interference of the state, so long as the conduct is peaceful. In fact, Christian libertarians believe that this is what God's great gift of free will is all about -- the freedom to choose between sin and righteous conduct, so long as there is no force initiated against another human being (e.g., murder, theft, rape, etc.).

Statists, on the other hand, while oftentimes giving lip service to freedom of choice and free will, in practice condemn such ideas. They feel that God was wrong to trust man with so much freedom and that when free to make such choices, most people will choose wrongly. Therefore, statists say, the coercive apparatus of the state should punish people when they make these types of immoral, harmful, or sinful choices.

Thus, it is not surprising that statists favor criminal laws that punish people for such peaceful and consensual acts as gambling, prostitution, adultery, drug possession, drinking, and smoking. It is also not surprising that there are horrible consequences when they do.

No, neither Schwarzenegger nor Strauss-Kahn should be prosecuted for adultery, any more than drug users, gamblers, prostitutes, drinkers, smokers should be prosecuted for their acts. Adultery is a matter for God and the people involved to resolve, not Caesar.

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2011-05-19.asp

Welfare Is Corrupt Always and Forever
Thursday, May 19, 2011
by Gary Galles

After reports that millions of dollars in California cash welfare benefits given via debit cards were withdrawn at casinos, strip clubs, and other places "inconsistent with the intent" of the aid, states have been moving to restrict such usage. Now, leaders of the Senate Finance Committee have introduced a bill to ban such uses nationwide. As co-author Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), put it "This bill will hopefully put an end to egregious abuses that have happened in many states, not just California."

Unfortunately, preventing substantial diversions of funds from donors' intended purposes to others that recipients choose is impossible. Every government transfer program allows resources given for one purpose to have far different effects than intended. Examples include not only cash aid (e.g., you can easily gamble with cash withdrawn from an ATM outside a casino if you can't access one inside) but also food stamps and other in-kind transfer programs, municipal bond issues, lottery funds for education, humanitarian foreign aid, and more. In each case, earmarked expenditures replace dollars that would have been spent in the same areas, freeing them to be spent however recipients choose.

Food stamps (renamed CalFresh benefits in California) suffer the same fate as cash aid, even though they can only be spent directly on food. The reason is that the subsidy is equivalent to a cash transfer for almost all recipients, because the vast majority would purchase more food than their benefit allotments. The benefits simply replace money recipients would have spent on food anyway, freeing that cash to use as they wish. So, if low-income families spent 25 percent of their income on food, $100 of food stamps would increase their food purchases by only $25, with $75 spent in other areas not intended by the program.

The same issue faces other in-kind programs as well, such as housing and winter heating subsidies. To the extent that subsidies replace money that would have been spent on those items, earmarked funds can be diverted to whatever uses recipients select. This undermines the efficacy of earmarking the funds, while multiplying the costly bureaucracies necessary to administer multiple different programs.

Similar problems haunt bond measures to fund particular government spending programs, such as for schools. Diversions of such funds to uses different than those advertised have been so common that citizen oversight boards are now created (with limited effect) to convince voters of public-agency trustworthiness to get bond issues passed.

Other examples include state lotteries promoted to supplement education funds. Politicians, taking into account those additional funds, pare other budgetary support for education. The dollars released are then spent however the state government decides, just as if the lottery proceeds went directly into its general fund. As professors Patrick Pierce and Don Miller concluded in a study of education funding, "Regardless of the state, the educational spending rate declined once a state lottery went into operation."

The same sort of diversions can hobble the effectiveness of humanitarian foreign aid. The aid frees up resources otherwise required to buy such supplies, allowing them to be spent wherever the recipient government chooses. As a result, much is lost to corruption or converted to other uses, including military spending, often used by recipient governments to terrorize those the aid was intended to help, or to threaten neighboring countries.

With so many government assistance programs' goals undermined by diverted resources, one wonders why relatively small diversions of cash welfare grab headlines, but much larger diversions in multiple transfer programs throughout the country get little notice. Perhaps only those diversions that become infamous enough to threaten public support are addressed ­ while many others are ignored ­ to maintain the illusion that government programs are more effective in achieving their goals than they are in fact.



Gary M. Galles is a professor of economics at Pepperdine University.

http://mises.org/daily/5287/Welfare-Is-Corrupt-Always-and-Forever
0
We ain't talking about the AQ Chicken House either.






Zawahiri "elected" head of AQ
Filed under: TI: External - by Jane Novak at 2:43 pm on Friday, May 20, 2011
http://armiesofliberation.com/archives/2011/05/20/zawahiri-elected-head-of-a
q/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ArmiesOfLibera
tion+%28Armies+of+Liberation%29&utm_content=Google+Reader


Does anyone else notice the irony of the anti-democracy death cult electing
its leader? Abu Fida, bin Laden's matchmaker and presidential adviser said
in 2008 that UBL wanted his son Hamza to be the new chief. Hamza was the
only one who escaped the recent SEAL raid in Pakistan. Zawahiri of course
has very close contacts in Yemen and a working relationship with President
Saleh:

       MVDG This is breaking news: Ayman al-Zawahiri has officially been
named 'emir' of Al Qaeda. This makes him the successor of Obama bin Laden,
who was taken out by a team of Navy Seals earlier this month.

       (The best) Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf reports that it has read
classified documents from the Dutch secret intelligence organization (AIVD).

        According to the documents, Al-Zawahiri was appointed as Al Qaeda's
new leader during a meeting on May 9, a week after the death of OBL.

        "On May 9, the leadership of Al Qaeda elected Al-Zawahiri during a
meeting in the tribal areas, between Afghanistan and Pakistan", an
intelligence source told the newspaper.

        And that's not all: according to Dutch intelligence, the monster
from Maadi (Egypt) himself proposed to elect Sa'ad bin Laden, one of Bin
Laden's sons. He refused, however. Al Qaeda's leaders then proceeded to
appoint Al-Zawahiri.
















--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
It is a fact plain-ol-idiot.
Dumbass, when you hit a deer, it's not your fault.
----
fuck you and your dead mother really hard, asshole

that you personally attack me says tons about your intellect

bring your favorite weapons and your will

On May 19, 9:41 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 18, 11:09 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Remember, you have to PROVE you had an accident, AND that it wasn't
> > your fault in order to collect.
> > ----
> > hogwash
> > do you really expect people to accept this as a fact?
>
> It is a fact plain-ol-idiot.
>
> > reality check ...
> > I barely missed a deer last year, wrecked, didn't call the police
> > because it's not required in a single vehicle accident, called my
> > insurance company the next day ... they paid 4k for the damages
> > without questioning a thing
>
> Well how convenient...let's make all car accidents "single vehicle
> accidents".
>
> Dumbass, when you hit a deer, it's not your fault.
>
> > maybe you should find another insurance company
>
> I'm just glad you aren't a car insurance salesman.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
And who gets to decide who needs it and on what basis. That is the
problem. What you are doing is setting up the population to either plan
for their retirement and pour money down a hole they will never see with
the SS payments that you require or the population don't pay any
attention to the future and expect that those who are prudent will take
care of them instead. Neither is something that should be recommended.
Why should those who do plan and save for their future have to take care
of those who do not. You are penalizing the prudent ones and giving the
ones who are not prudent a gift just so you can feel good about
yourself. You still have no good answer for why there should be means
testing if those who have the means have no way of opting out of the
whole ponzi scheme.

On 05/20/2011 04:47 PM, studio wrote:
> On May 20, 1:00 pm, frankg<fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Studio,
>>
>> "You won't receive your car or home insurance back just because you
>> paid in either retard."
>>
>> Your analogy is seriously flawed.
> Nothing flawed about it, other than the comprehension levels of some
> of the people reading it.
>
>> Wealthy or poor, if you drive a car
>> you have the potential to have an accident and need insurance.
> True. So...
>
>> However, if Social Security worked as you propose, then someone
>> meeting your definition of wealth would have no chance of ever
>> collecting.
> And so do you think they would rather have the Social Security instead
> of the wealth?
>
>> So, really, what you're suggesting is that someone who
>> doesn't drive should still be paying car insurance to help pay for the
>> insurance of those who do.
> No, what I'm suggesting is *everyone* who works, pay insurance for
> *everyone* who works.
> Then the insurance be paid out to those who need it, instead of those
> who don't.
>
> You can't collect Social Security if you have never worked, or paid
> in.
> So your analogy is false.
>
> Keith in Köln
>
>> Geesh Frank!
>> That made sense! Do you expect a Moonbat to comprehend or understand
>> this? Studio is looking like a deer in the headlights right now!!
> It's better than that; a deer that's driving the semi that's gonna run
> some weasels over.
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

On May 20, 8:59 am, Coach <coachl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's see, House has 240 repubs, 192 dems, and 3 open seats, yup dems
> will be "holding" onto the House, gotta luv it!

Ok, so I had the current makeup backwards...
I still have no doubt the Republican'ts will lose control of the
House, if not in 2012, then 2014.

I don't care what it is you "luv", the facts are I've been correct in
predicting outcomes far more than any of the Republican'ts here.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

she's no more qualified than rahm was as chief of staff

it's who you know

On May 20, 2:05 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Article updated: 5/16/2011 1:19 PM
> The questions that Emanuel's press secretary won't answer
> Article
> Comments (28)
> text size:
> A
> A
> A
> Share
> Facebook
> Twitter
> E-mail
> Order reprint
> Print
>
> By Chuck Goudie
>
> Once Rahm Emanuel takes the oath and becomes Chicago' s mayor today, you
> will be hearing and seeing a lot more of a young woman named Tarrah
> Cooper. She is beginning the job of a lifetime, even though she doesn't
> have much life time behind her.
>
> Ms. Cooper (who pronounces her first name as Tair-uh, not Tahr-uh) is
> going to be the face of the Chicago mayor's office, as Mr. Emanuel's
> newly anointed press secretary. At the tender age of 25, she is
> certainly a fresh face.
> Advertisement
>
> Never having heard of Cooper before Emanuel returned to the Chicago
> political scene last fall, I was curious to find out about this person
> who would be responsible for espousing the positions and platforms of
> Chicago's first new administration in two decades; would be the go-to
> contact for information about important daily news stories; or, heaven
> forbid, be the public source in the office if there was a calamity of
> some kind.
>
> Last month, after learning that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
> Commission had issued a scathing report against Mr. Emanuel's school
> superintendent to-be, I contacted Ms. Cooper for a response. The EEOC in
> Rochester, N.Y., where Jean-Claude Brizard had been running the public
> schools, determined that he had an age, race and gender bias when firing
> a top administrator.
>
> I asked Cooper whether this had been known to Rahm Emanuel and why he
> nevertheless selected Brizard? Had Emanuel not known? Was Brizard's job
> offer being revoked?
>
> In our very first conversation, rather than simply answer the questions,
> Ms. Cooper stated that she wished to speak off the record. I informed
> her that I wouldn't have such a conversation, especially not with
> someone who is in the business of providing public information.
> Seemingly frustrated by that, she said that she'd have to call back.
>
> During a series of subsequent calls and emails, Ms. Cooper waged a
> relentless, several-hour campaign to convince me that such a finding by
> a federal panel against their choice to run the Chicago schools was not
> a news story. Sounding like a robocall, she persisted in the theme that
> this isn't a story.
>
> As we prepared the report for broadcast, Cooper also sent two emails
> containing misleading and false information. First she stated that an
> independent investigation found that Mr. Brizard did nothing wrong. But
> that report was prepared by a firm hired by Brizard's school board and
> hardly independent.
>
> Next she wrote that a court of law has proved that he did not do
> anything wrong.
>
> That was completely false. A civil suit is still in the early stages.
> Ms. Cooper, who did not respond to several requests for comment on this
> column, just graduated from the famous University of Missouri journalism
> school in 2008, so what she learned should still be fresh.
>
> She worked as a reporter on Mizzou's TV station and interned at MTV in
> New York.
>
> Before joining the Emanuel for Mayor campaign, she worked at the U.S.
> Department of Homeland Security in Washington, D.C., where her bio
> states she helped to manage the Department's messaging, priorities and
> actions for numerous national incidents including the H1N1 epidemic, the
> December 25th and Times Square attempted bombings, the Haitian
> earthquake and the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Based on DHS alerts,
> it seems she spent considerable time processing forms submitted by
> reporters to attend agency events.
>
> At city hall, she succeeds longtime mayoral press secretary Jackie
> Heard, who was paid a salary of nearly $180,000 per year. On April 23, I
> sent Ms. Cooper a number of questions for this column. They included:
>
> Is there a set of written guidelines or protocols that you are working
> from in dealing with reporters and news organizations?
>
> How involved is Mr. Emanuel in setting the tone for dealing with the
> press and in what manner? Does each story inquiry get run by him?
>
> Which of these best describes your view as press secretary in dealing
> with Chicago's major newspapers and TV and why: Tools for getting out
> message as we see it; aimed at embarrassing or uncovering negative
> aspects of the administration; a necessary evil that has to be controlled.
>
> How will your cooperation with news organizations be based on the
> nature and tone of their day-to-day coverage?
>
> Does your youthfulness and lack of experience symbolize what seems to
> be administration focused on hiring managers under 35?
>
> What qualifies you to be press secretary for the mayor of the
> third-largest city?
>
> How much will you be paid?
>
> What are your career aspirations?
>
> In more than three weeks she has yet to answer any of the questions.
> After asking a few times to meet me off the record, which I declined,
> Tarrah Cooper has stopped replying.
>
> It is interesting that the mayor's new press secretary felt no
> inhibition about displaying hundreds of personal photos on her public
> Facebook page, showing her partying with friends, in beach attire and at
> a slot machine.
>
> When you are 25, apparently some things are OK to be put on the record.
>
> Chuck Goudie, whose column appears each Monday, is the chief
> investigative reporter at ABC 7 News in Chicago. The views in this
> column are his own and not those of WLS-TV. He can be reached by email
> at chuckgou...@gmail.com and followed at twitter.com/ ChuckGoudie.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
On May 20, 1:00 pm, frankg <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Studio,
>
> "You won't receive your car or home insurance back just because you
> paid in either retard."
>
> Your analogy is seriously flawed.

Nothing flawed about it, other than the comprehension levels of some
of the people reading it.

> Wealthy or poor, if you drive a car
> you have the potential to have an accident and need insurance.

True. So...

> However, if Social Security worked as you propose, then someone
> meeting your definition of wealth would have no chance of ever
> collecting.

And so do you think they would rather have the Social Security instead
of the wealth?

> So, really, what you're suggesting is that someone who
> doesn't drive should still be paying car insurance to help pay for the
> insurance of those who do.

No, what I'm suggesting is *everyone* who works, pay insurance for
*everyone* who works.
Then the insurance be paid out to those who need it, instead of those
who don't.

You can't collect Social Security if you have never worked, or paid
in.
So your analogy is false.

Keith in Köln

> Geesh Frank!
> That made sense! Do you expect a Moonbat to comprehend or understand
> this? Studio is looking like a deer in the headlights right now!!

It's better than that; a deer that's driving the semi that's gonna run
some weasels over.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Obama Israel Policy
----
Obama to AIPAC:
The speech comes the day after he secured enough delegates to clinch
the Democratic nomination. In these prepared remarks provided by his
campaign, Obama tries to allay doubts that some Jewish voters have
expressed about his candidacy.

It's great to see so many friends from across the country. I want to
congratulate Howard Friedman, David Victor and Howard Kohr on a
successful conference, and on the completion of a new headquarters
just a few blocks away.

Before I begin, I want to say that I know some provocative e-mails
have been circulating throughout Jewish communities across the
country. A few of you may have gotten them. They're filled with tall
tales and dire warnings about a certain candidate for president. And
all I want to say is — let me know if you see this guy named Barack
Obama, because he sounds pretty frightening.

But if anyone has been confused by these e-mails, I want you to know
that today I'll be speaking from my heart, and as a true friend of
Israel. And I know that when I visit with AIPAC, I am among friends.
Good friends. Friends who share my strong commitment to make sure that
the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable today,
tomorrow and forever.

One of the many things that I admire about AIPAC is that you fight for
this common cause from the bottom up. The lifeblood of AIPAC is here
in this room — grass-roots activists of all ages, from all parts of
the country, who come to Washington year after year to make your
voices heard. Nothing reflects the face of AIPAC more than the 1,200
students who have traveled here to make it clear to the world that the
bond between Israel and the United States is rooted in more than our
shared national interests — it's rooted in the shared values and
shared stories of our people. And as president, I will work with you
to ensure that this bond is strengthened.

I first became familiar with the story of Israel when I was 11 years
old. I learned of the long journey and steady determination of the
Jewish people to preserve their identity through faith, family and
culture. Year after year, century after century, Jews carried on their
traditions, and their dream of a homeland, in the face of impossible
odds.

The story made a powerful impression on me. I had grown up without a
sense of roots. My father was black; he was from Kenya, and he left us
when I was 2. My mother was white; she was from Kansas, and I'd moved
with her to Indonesia and then back to Hawaii. In many ways, I didn't
know where I came from. So I was drawn to the belief that you could
sustain a spiritual, emotional and cultural identity. And I deeply
understood the Zionist idea — that there is always a homeland at the
center of our story.

I also learned about the horror of the Holocaust, and the terrible
urgency it brought to the journey home to Israel. For much of my
childhood, I lived with my grandparents. My grandfather had served in
World War II, and so had my great-uncle. He was a Kansas boy who
probably never expected to see Europe — let alone the horrors that
awaited him there. And for months after he came home from Germany, he
remained in a state of shock, alone with the painful memories that
wouldn't leave his head.

You see, my great-uncle had been a part of the 89th Infantry Division
— the first Americans to reach a Nazi concentration camp. They
liberated Ohrdruf, part of Buchenwald, on an April day in 1945. The
horrors of that camp go beyond our capacity to imagine. Tens of
thousands died of hunger, torture, disease, or plain murder — part of
the Nazi killing machine that killed 6 million people.

When the Americans marched in, they discovered huge piles of dead
bodies and starving survivors. Gen. Eisenhower ordered Germans from
the nearby town to tour the camp, so they could see what was being
done in their name. He ordered American troops to tour the camp, so
they could see the evil they were fighting against. He invited
congressmen and journalists to bear witness. And he ordered that
photographs and films be made. Explaining his actions, Eisenhower said
that he wanted to produce "firsthand evidence of these things, if
ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these
allegations merely to propaganda."

I saw some of those very images at Yad Vashem, and they never leave
you. And those images just hint at the stories that survivors of the
Shoah carried with them. Like Eisenhower, each of us bears witness to
anyone and everyone who would deny these unspeakable crimes, or ever
speak of repeating them. We must mean what we say when we speak the
words "never again."

It was just a few years after the liberation of the camps that David
Ben-Gurion declared the founding of the Jewish State of Israel. We
know that the establishment of Israel was just and necessary, rooted
in centuries of struggle and decades of patient work. But 60 years
later, we know that we cannot relent, we cannot yield, and as
president I will never compromise when it comes to Israel's security.

Not when there are still voices that deny the Holocaust. Not when
there are terrorist groups and political leaders committed to Israel's
destruction. Not when there are maps across the Middle East that don't
even acknowledge Israel's existence, and government-funded textbooks
filled with hatred toward Jews. Not when there are rockets raining
down on Sderot, and Israeli children have to take a deep breath and
summon uncommon courage every time they board a bus or walk to school.

I have long understood Israel's quest for peace and need for security.
But never more so than during my travels there two years ago. Flying
in an [Israeli Defense Forces] helicopter, I saw a narrow and
beautiful strip of land nestled against the Mediterranean. On the
ground, I met a family who saw their house destroyed by a Katyusha
rocket. I spoke to Israeli troops who faced daily threats as they
maintained security near the blue line. I talked to people who wanted
nothing more simple, or elusive, than a secure future for their
children.

I have been proud to be a part of a strong, bipartisan consensus that
has stood by Israel in the face of all threats. That is a commitment
that both John McCain and I share, because support for Israel in this
country goes beyond party. But part of our commitment must be speaking
up when Israel's security is at risk, and I don't think any of us can
be satisfied that America's recent foreign policy has made Israel more
secure.

Hamas now controls Gaza. Hezbollah has tightened its grip on southern
Lebanon, and is flexing its muscles in Beirut. Because of the war in
Iraq, Iran — which always posed a greater threat to Israel than Iraq —
is emboldened and poses the greatest strategic challenge to the United
States and Israel in the Middle East in a generation. Iraq is
unstable, and al-Qaida has stepped up its recruitment. Israel's quest
for peace with its neighbors has stalled, despite the heavy burdens
borne by the Israeli people. And America is more isolated in the
region, reducing our strength and jeopardizing Israel's safety.

The question is how to move forward. There are those who would
continue and intensify this failed status quo, ignoring eight years of
accumulated evidence that our foreign policy is dangerously flawed.
And then there are those who would lay all of the problems of the
Middle East at the doorstep of Israel and its supporters, as if the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the root of all trouble in the region.
These voices blame the Middle East's only democracy for the region's
extremism. They offer the false promise that abandoning a stalwart
ally is somehow the path to strength. It is not, it never has been,
and it never will be.

Our alliance is based on shared interests and shared values. Those who
threaten Israel threaten us. Israel has always faced these threats on
the front lines. And I will bring to the White House an unshakeable
commitment to Israel's security.

That starts with ensuring Israel's qualitative military advantage. I
will ensure that Israel can defend itself from any threat — from Gaza
to Tehran. Defense cooperation between the United States and Israel is
a model of success, and must be deepened. As president, I will
implement a Memorandum of Understanding that provides $30 billion in
assistance to Israel over the next decade — investments to Israel's
security that will not be tied to any other nation. First, we must
approve the foreign aid request for 2009. Going forward, we can
enhance our cooperation on missile defense. We should export military
equipment to our ally Israel under the same guidelines as NATO. And I
will always stand up for Israel's right to defend itself in the United
Nations and around the world.

Across the political spectrum, Israelis understand that real security
can only come through lasting peace. And that is why we — as friends
of Israel — must resolve to do all we can to help Israel and its
neighbors to achieve it. Because a secure, lasting peace is in
Israel's national interest. It is in America's national interest. And
it is in the interest of the Palestinian people and the Arab world. As
president, I will work to help Israel achieve the goal of two states,
a Jewish state of Israel and a Palestinian state, living side by side
in peace and security. And I won't wait until the waning days of my
presidency. I will take an active role, and make a personal commitment
to do all I can to advance the cause of peace from the start of my
administration.

The long road to peace requires Palestinian partners committed to
making the journey. We must isolate Hamas unless and until they
renounce terrorism, recognize Israel's right to exist, and abide by
past agreements. There is no room at the negotiating table for
terrorist organizations. That is why I opposed holding elections in
2006 with Hamas on the ballot. The Israelis and the Palestinian
Authority warned us at the time against holding these elections. But
this administration pressed ahead, and the result is a Gaza controlled
by Hamas, with rockets raining down on Israel.

The Palestinian people must understand that progress will not come
through the false prophets of extremism or the corrupt use of foreign
aid. The United States and the international community must stand by
Palestinians who are committed to cracking down on terror and carrying
the burden of peacemaking. I will strongly urge Arab governments to
take steps to normalize relations with Israel, and to fulfill their
responsibility to pressure extremists and provide real support for
President Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad. Egypt must cut off the
smuggling of weapons into Gaza. Israel can also advance the cause of
peace by taking appropriate steps — consistent with its security — to
ease the freedom of movement for Palestinians, improve economic
conditions in the West Bank, and to refrain from building new
settlements — as it agreed to with the Bush administration at
Annapolis.

Let me be clear. Israel's security is sacrosanct. It is non-
negotiable. The Palestinians need a state that is contiguous and
cohesive, and that allows them to prosper — but any agreement with the
Palestinian people must preserve Israel's identity as a Jewish state,
with secure, recognized and defensible borders. Jerusalem will remain
the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided.

I have no illusions that this will be easy. It will require difficult
decisions on both sides. But Israel is strong enough to achieve peace,
if it has partners who are committed to the goal. Most Israelis and
Palestinians want peace, and we must strengthen their hand. The United
States must be a strong and consistent partner in this process — not
to force concessions, but to help committed partners avoid stalemate
and the kind of vacuums that are filled by violence. That's what I
commit to do as president of the United States.

The threats to Israel start close to home, but they don't end there.
Syria continues its support for terror and meddling in Lebanon. And
Syria has taken dangerous steps in pursuit of weapons of mass
destruction, which is why Israeli action was justified to end that
threat.

I also believe that the United States has a responsibility to support
Israel's efforts to renew peace talks with the Syrians. We must never
force Israel to the negotiating table, but neither should we ever
block negotiations when Israel's leaders decide that they may serve
Israeli interests. As president, I will do whatever I can to help
Israel succeed in these negotiations. And success will require the
full enforcement of Security Council Resolution 1701 in Lebanon, and a
stop to Syria's support for terror. It is time for this reckless
behavior to come to an end.

There is no greater threat to Israel — or to the peace and stability
of the region — than Iran. Now this audience is made up of both
Republicans and Democrats, and the enemies of Israel should have no
doubt that, regardless of party, Americans stand shoulder to shoulder
in our commitment to Israel's security. So while I don't want to
strike too partisan a note here today, I do want to address some
willful mischaracterizations of my positions.

The Iranian regime supports violent extremists and challenges us
across the region. It pursues a nuclear capability that could spark a
dangerous arms race and raise the prospect of a transfer of nuclear
know-how to terrorists. Its president denies the Holocaust and
threatens to wipe Israel off the map. The danger from Iran is grave,
it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.

But just as we are cleareyed about the threat, we must be clear about
the failure of today's policy. We knew, in 2002, that Iran supported
terrorism. We knew Iran had an illicit nuclear program. We knew Iran
posed a grave threat to Israel. But instead of pursuing a strategy to
address this threat, we ignored it and instead invaded and occupied
Iraq. When I opposed the war, I warned that it would fan the flames of
extremism in the Middle East. That is precisely what happened in Iran
— the hard-liners tightened their grip, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was
elected president in 2005. And the United States and Israel are less
secure.

I respect Sen. McCain, and look forward to a substantive debate with
him these next five months. But on this point, we have differed, and
we will differ. Sen. McCain refuses to understand or acknowledge the
failure of the policy that he would continue. He criticizes my
willingness to use strong diplomacy but offers only an alternate
reality — one where the war in Iraq has somehow put Iran on its heels.
The truth is the opposite. Iran has strengthened its position. Iran is
now enriching uranium and has reportedly stockpiled 150 kilos of low
enriched uranium. Its support for terrorism and threats toward Israel
have increased. Those are the facts, they cannot be denied, and I
refuse to continue a policy that has made the United States and Israel
less secure.

Sen. McCain offers a false choice: stay the course in Iraq, or cede
the region to Iran. I reject this logic because there is a better way.
Keeping all of our troops tied down indefinitely in Iraq is not the
way to weaken Iran — it is precisely what has strengthened it. It is a
policy for staying, not a plan for victory. I have proposed a
responsible, phased redeployment of our troops from Iraq. We will get
out as carefully as we were careless getting in. We will finally
pressure Iraq's leaders to take meaningful responsibility for their
own future.

We will also use all elements of American power to pressure Iran. I
will do everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a
nuclear weapon. That starts with aggressive, principled diplomacy
without self-defeating preconditions, but with a cleareyed
understanding of our interests. We have no time to waste. We cannot
unconditionally rule out an approach that could prevent Iran from
obtaining a nuclear weapon. We have tried limited, piecemeal talks
while we outsource the sustained work to our European allies. It is
time for the United States to lead.

There will be careful preparation. We will open up lines of
communication, build an agenda, coordinate closely with our allies,
and evaluate the potential for progress. Contrary to the claims of
some, I have no interest in sitting down with our adversaries just for
the sake of talking. But as president of the United States, I would be
willing to lead tough and principled diplomacy with the appropriate
Iranian leader at a time and place of my choosing — if, and only if,
it can advance the interests of the United States.

Only recently have some come to think that diplomacy by definition
cannot be tough. They forget the example of Truman, and Kennedy and
Reagan. These presidents understood that diplomacy backed by real
leverage was a fundamental tool of statecraft. And it is time to once
again make American diplomacy a tool to succeed, not just a means of
containing failure. We will pursue this diplomacy with no illusions
about the Iranian regime. Instead, we will present a clear choice. If
you abandon your dangerous nuclear program, support for terror, and
threats to Israel, there will be meaningful incentives — including the
lifting of sanctions, and political and economic integration with the
international community. If you refuse, we will ratchet up the
pressure.

My presidency will strengthen our hand as we restore our standing. Our
willingness to pursue diplomacy will make it easier to mobilize others
to join our cause. If Iran fails to change course when presented with
this choice by the United States, it will be clear — to the people of
Iran, and to the world — that the Iranian regime is the author of its
own isolation. That will strengthen our hand with Russia and China as
we insist on stronger sanctions in the Security Council. And we should
work with Europe, Japan and the Gulf states to find every avenue
outside the U.N. to isolate the Iranian regime — from cutting off loan
guarantees and expanding financial sanctions, to banning the export of
refined petroleum to Iran, to boycotting firms associated with the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard, whose Quds force has rightly been labeled
a terrorist organization.

I was interested to see Sen. McCain propose divestment as a source of
leverage — not the bigoted divestment that has sought to punish
Israeli scientists and academics, but divestment targeted at the
Iranian regime. It's a good concept, but not a new one. I introduced
legislation over a year ago that would encourage states and the
private sector to divest from companies that do business in Iran. This
bill has bipartisan support, but for reasons that I'll let him
explain, Sen. McCain never signed on. Meanwhile, an anonymous senator
is blocking the bill. It is time to pass this into law so that we can
tighten the squeeze on the Iranian regime. We should also pursue other
unilateral sanctions that target Iranian banks and assets.

And we must free ourselves from the tyranny of oil. The price of a
barrel of oil is one of the most dangerous weapons in the world.
Petrodollars pay for weapons that kill American troops and Israeli
citizens. And the Bush administration's policies have driven up the
price of oil, while its energy policy has made us more dependent on
foreign oil and gas. It's time for the United States to take real
steps to end our addiction to oil. And we can join with Israel,
building on last year's U.S.-Israel Energy Cooperation Act, to deepen
our partnership in developing alternative sources of energy by
increasing scientific collaboration and joint research and
development. The surest way to increase our leverage in the long term
is to stop bankrolling the Iranian regime.

Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of
military action on the table to defend our security and our ally
Israel. Sometimes there are no alternatives to confrontation. But that
only makes diplomacy more important. If we must use military force, we
are more likely to succeed, and will have far greater support at home
and abroad, if we have exhausted our diplomatic efforts.

That is the change we need in our foreign policy. Change that restores
American power and influence. Change accompanied by a pledge that I
will make known to allies and adversaries alike: that America
maintains an unwavering friendship with Israel, and an unshakeable
commitment to its security.

As members of AIPAC, you have helped advance this bipartisan consensus
to support and defend our ally Israel. And I am sure that today on
Capitol Hill you will be meeting with members of Congress and
spreading the word. But we are here because of more than policy. We
are here because the values we hold dear are deeply embedded in the
story of Israel.

Just look at what Israel has accomplished in 60 years. From decades of
struggle and the terrible wake of the Holocaust, a nation was forged
to provide a home for Jews from all corners of the world — from Syria
to Ethiopia to the Soviet Union. In the face of constant threats,
Israel has triumphed. In the face of constant peril, Israel has
prospered. In a state of constant insecurity, Israel has maintained a
vibrant and open discourse, and a resilient commitment to the rule of
law.

As any Israeli will tell you, Israel is not a perfect place, but like
the United States it sets an example for all when it seeks a more
perfect future. These same qualities can be found among American Jews.
It is why so many Jewish Americans have stood by Israel, while
advancing the American story. Because there is a commitment embedded
in the Jewish faith and tradition: to freedom and fairness; to social
justice and equal opportunity. To tikkun olam — the obligation to
repair this world.

I will never forget that I would not be standing here today if it
weren't for that commitment. In the great social movements in our
country's history, Jewish and African Americans have stood shoulder to
shoulder. They took buses down south together. They marched together.
They bled together. And Jewish Americans like Andrew Goodman and
Michael Schwerner were willing to die alongside a black man — James
Chaney — on behalf of freedom and equality.

Their legacy is our inheritance. We must not allow the relationship
between Jews and African Americans to suffer. This is a bond that must
be strengthened. Together, we can rededicate ourselves to end
prejudice and combat hatred in all of its forms. Together, we can
renew our commitment to justice. Together, we can join our voices
together, and in doing so make even the mightiest of walls fall down.

That work must include our shared commitment to Israel. You and I know
that we must do more than stand still. Now is the time to be vigilant
in facing down every foe, just as we move forward in seeking a future
of peace for the children of Israel, and for all children. Now is the
time to stand by Israel as it writes the next chapter in its
extraordinary journey. Now is the time to join together in the work of
repairing this world.d.

On May 20, 2:12 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:        Ed Koch Slams Obama Israel Policy, Threatens to Back GOP in 2012
> Date:   Fri, 20 May 2011 18:47:45 GMT
> From:   Newsmax.com <news...@reply.newsmax.com>
>
> Reply-To:       news...@reply.newsmax.com
> To:     rhomp2...@earthlink.com <rhomp2...@earthlink.com>
>
> Newsmax.com
>
> *Breaking from Newsmax.com*
>
> *Koch: Israel Facing 'Most Dangerous and Critical Period' Ever *
>
> Democratic senior statesman Ed Koch says Israel is facing its �most
> dangerous and critical period� and he is ready to break with his party
> in the next presidential election over President Barack Obama policies
> on the Middle East.
>
> In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV, the former New York City
> mayor said, "Mitt Romney correctly summed it up when he said that
> President Obama has once again thrown Israel under the bus."
>
> *Editor's Notes:*
>
> *The Healing Powers of Vinegar*
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?KK4D.iVx..-vlbcKBcYNVfOmkRrztfU1K&https://ww...>
>
> *Prostate Woes: Doctor Discovered Weird �Rogue Testosterone� *
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?KK4DaiV3Y--H3NcK6CMrVfJmGYlktfR1K&http://www...>
>
> He added, �I believe this is the most dangerous and critical period that
> Israel has ever faced and regrettably it does not have the support of
> the president of the United States, which in past difficult situations
> it could count on.�
>
> Koch, who crossed party lines to support President George W. Bush
> against John Kerry in 2004 due to his foreign policy stance, said he
> would do it again. All it would take is the right candidate.
>
> �I�m a Democrat. I support the Democratic domestic philosophy and
> policies and will always be supportive of them,� said Koch, mayor of
> America�s largest city from 1978-89. �But I have no hesitation in
> crossing party lines when I think America�s interests demand that I
> cross party lines.
>
> �I supported President Obama, believing he would be good on foreign
> policy, particularly with respect to the support of Israel. It turned
> out badly.�
>
> But 86-year-old Koch said that no �decent� Republican candidate has yet
> come forward � �their efforts to privatize Social Security and Medicare
> and Medicaid absolutely turn me off,� he said.
>
> �Now if a Republican candidate were to appear who was good on Medicare
> and Social Security and Medicaid and support of Israel, I wouldn�t
> hesitate to cross party lines.�
>
> Koch was speaking in the light of Obama�s Thursday speech on the Middle
> East in which the president called for a two-state solution to the
> Israel/Palestine gridlock with borders that were in place before 1967.
>
> Koch said he believes the president took the position because �he thinks
> it�s more important that America have the support of the Arab nations as
> opposed to the support of what we heretofore have said was our ally in
> the Mideast � the only democratic state there.�
>
> But he said he has doubts that the speech will affect the support that
> Jewish voters have traditionally given Democratic presidential candidates.
>
> �Regrettably the Jewish vote has been tied to the Democratic Party since
> FDR. No matter who�s running for president, many Jews think it�s still FDR.
>
> �That�s been harmful to the Jewish community supporting the State of
> Israel.�
>
> � Newsmax. All rights reserved.
>
> *Additional Links:*
>
> *Can Prayer Heal You? Dr. Crandall Discovered the Truth.*
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K646.cVxw--6lroK68WbXGLhDYlzxJUAK&https://ww...>
>
> *Suzanne Somers Discovered the Secret to Defeat Cancer *
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K646acV3w.7Krkoq3iWrVGJ7GRrkxfR1K&https://ww...>
>
> Forward to a Friend
> <http://news.newsmax.com/default.aspx?KZ4Dacyx.076jr9q6iYkxGLmDQrktfUAK>
>
> This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. You have received this *Newsmax*
> e-mail because you subscribed to it or someone forwarded it to you. To
> opt out, see the links below.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *TO ADVERTISE*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For information on advertising, please contact Newsmax Advertising Sales
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?KKC6acVx.0aKrbctBcWNxGJ7kQlztJUAK&http://w3....>
> via e-mail.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *TO SUBSCRIBE*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If this e-mail has been forwarded to you and you would like to sign up,
> please click here
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K6C6.iVxtM7HjkitBiYNVGJ7kXlztfU1K&http://w3....>.
>
> Remove
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K6CDaiyxwM.v3k9qDiWkVnL7DQrktJU1K&http://w3.newsma x.com/emails/profile/index.cfm?email_address=rhomp2...@earthlink.com&esp_job_id=1166542>
> your e-mail address from our list or modify
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K6CDaiyxwM.v3k9qDiWkVnL7DQrktJU1K&http://w3.newsma x.com/emails/profile/index.cfm?email_address=rhomp2...@earthlink.com&esp_job_id=1166542>
> your profile. We respect your right to privacy. View
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K6C6.iVxtM7HjkitBiYNVGJ7kXlztfU1K&http://www...>
> our policy.
>
> This e-mail was sent by:
> *Newsmax.com*
> 4152 West Blue Heron Blvd., Ste. 1114
> Riviera Beach, FL 33404 USA
>
> 1166542
> C4E5-1

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.