• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
I would carry some bacon bits to sprinkle as I go. A water gun filled with red liquid should work.


Why you need to carry a sling shot or some water balloons if you visit Washington DC

barenakedislam | June 2, 2011 at 9:42 PM | Categories: Islam in America | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-uOE

You never know when you'll encounter a Muslim asslifter praying for the death of infidels in the street outside the White House. So where were the DC cops? Even worse, you might have to play whack-a-mole to get to the Capitol Building through a mob of Muslim invaders squatting on the lawn. 

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.








This is interesting......


http://tinyurl.com/3f4j5kc

Russia Says IMF Chief Jailed For Discovering All US Gold Is Gone

by TheTotalCollapse.com on May 31, 2011

WP                 Greet Box icon

X

Hello there Facebook friend! If you like this article, please help spread the word by sharing this post with your friends.

A new report prepared for Prime Minister Putin by the Federal Security Service (FSB) says that former International Monetary Fund (IMF) ChiefDominique Strauss-Kahn [photo with Putin top left] was charged and jailed in the US for sex crimes on May 14th after his discovery that all of the gold held in the United States Bullion Depository located at Fort Knox [photo 2nd left] was 'missing and/or unaccounted' for.

According to this FSB secret report, Strauss-Kahn had become "increasingly concerned" earlier this month after the United States began "stalling" its pledged delivery to the IMF of 191.3 tons of gold agreed to under the Second Amendment of the Articles of Agreement signed by the Executive Board in April 1978 that were to be sold to fund what are called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as an alternative to what are called reserve currencies.

This FSB report further states that upon Strauss-Kahn raising his concerns with American government officials close to President Obama he was 'contacted'by 'rogue elements' within the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) who provided him 'firm evidence' that all of the gold reported to be held by the US 'was gone'.

Upon Strauss-Kahn receiving the CIA evidence, this report continues, he made immediate arrangements to leave the US for Paris, but when contacted by agents working for France's General Directorate for External Security (DGSE) that American authorities were seeking his capture he fled to New York City's JFK airport following these agents directive not to take his cell-phone because US police could track his exact location.

Once Strauss-Kahn was safely boarded on an Air France flight to Paris, however, this FSB report says he made a 'fatal mistake' by calling the hotel from a phone on the plane and asking them to forwarded the cell-phone he had been told to leave behind to his French residence, after which US agents were able to track and apprehend him.

Within the past fortnight, this report continues, Strauss-Kahn reached out to his close friend and top Egyptian banker Mahmoud Abdel Salam Omar to retrieve from the US the evidence given to him by the CIA. Omar, however, and exactly like Strauss-Kahn before him, was charged yesterday by the US with a sex crime against a luxury hotel maid, a charge the FSB labels as 'beyond belief' due to Omar being 74-years-old and a devout Muslim.

In an astounding move puzzling many in Moscow, Putin after reading this secret FSB report today ordered posted to the Kremlin's official website a defense of Strauss-Khan becoming the first world leader to state that the former IMF chief was a victim of a US conspiracy. Putin further stated, "It's hard for me to evaluate the hidden political motives but I cannot believe that it looks the way it was initially introduced. It doesn't sit right in my head."

Interesting to note about all of these events is that one of the United States top Congressman, and 2012 Presidential candidate, Ron Paul [photo bottom left]has long stated his belief that the US government has lied about its gold reserves held at Fort Knox.  So concerned had Congressman Paul become about the US government and the Federal Reserve hiding the truth about American gold reserves he put forward a bill in late 2010 to force an audit of them, but which was subsequently defeated by Obama regime forces.

When directly asked by reporters if he believed there was no gold in Fort Knox or the Federal Reserve, Congressman Paul gave the incredible reply, "I think it is a possibility."

Also interesting to note is that barely 3 days after the arrest of Strauss-Kahn, Congressman Paul made a new call for the US to sell its gold reserves by stating, "Given the high price it is now, and the tremendous debt problem we now have, by all means, sell at the peak."

Bizarre reports emanating from the US for years, however, suggest there is no gold to sell, and as we can read as posted in 2009 on the ViewZone.Com news site:

"In October of 2009 the Chinese received a shipment of gold bars. Gold is regularly exchanges between countries to pay debts and to settle the so-called balance of trade. Most gold is exchanged and stored in vaults under the supervision of a special organization based in London, the London Bullion Market Association (or LBMA). When the shipment was received, the Chinese government asked that special tests be performed to guarantee the purity and weight of the gold bars. In this test, four small holed are drilled into the gold bars and the metal is then analyzed.

Officials were shocked to learn that the bars were fake. They contained cores of tungsten with only a outer coating of real gold. What's more, these gold bars, containing serial numbers for tracking, originated in the US and had been stored in Fort Knox for years. There were reportedly between 5,600 to 5,700 bars, weighing 400 oz. each, in the shipment!"

To the final fate of Strauss-Kahn it is not in our knowing, but new reports coming from the United States show his determination not to go down without a fight as he has hired what is described as a 'crack team' of former CIA spies, private investigators and media advisers to defend him.

To the practical effects on the global economy should it be proved that the US, indeed, has been lying about its gold reserves, Russia's Central Bank yesterday ordered the interest rate raised from 0.25 to 3.5 percent and Putin ordered the export ban on wheat and grain crops lifted by July 1st in a move designed to fill the Motherlands coffers with money that normally would have flowed to the US.

The American peoples ability to know the truth of these things, and as always, has been shouted out by their propaganda media organs leaving them in danger of not being prepared for the horrific economic collapse of their nation now believed will much sooner than later.

© May 31, 2011 EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com.

 

 


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
.Even Weenie Weiner would not like that.


Liberal Media Listing Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) as a Republican

Scotty Starnes | June 2, 2011 at 11:44 AM | Tags: Anhony Weiner (D-NY), MSNBC, Reuters | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-5nA

Reuters, MSNBC and Google have all painted Weiner (D-NY) as a Republican.

Since Weiner is now a "Republican," will Democrats demand he step down?

H/T to HotAir

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0










 


 


 

Gotta Love the Aussie's 


 

An Afghanand , an Arab

And an Australian Sheila

 are In the same bar.

When the Afghan Finishes his beer,


He throws his glass


In the air, pulls 
Out
His pistol, and 
Shoots


The glass 
To pieces.


He says, 'In Afghanistan ,


Our glasses are so


Cheap we don't need


To drink with the 
Same one twice.'


The Arab, obviously


Impressed by this,


Drinks non-alcohol beer


(cuz he's a Muslim!),


Throws it into the


Air, pulls out his


AK-47, and shoots


The glass to pieces.


He says, 'In the


Arab World, we have


So much sand to make


Glasses that we don't


Need to drink with


The same one twice either.'


The Aussie Sheila

Cool as a cucumber,


Picks up her beer,


Downs it in one gulp,


Throws the glass into


The air, whips out her


45, and shoots the


Afghan and the Arab.!


Catching her glass,


Setting it on the bar, and calling 
For a refill,


She says, 
'In Australia


We have so many


Illegal immigrants that


We don't have to


Drink with the same ones twice.'


God Bless Australia !!







 

 


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.








This is worth keeping an eye on.


http://tinyurl.com/43jlzlo


WHO: E. coli Outbreak Caused by New Strain

Published June 02, 2011

| Associated Press

London –  The World Health Organization said Thursday that the E. coli bacteria responsible for a deadly outbreak that has left 18 dead and sickened hundreds in Europe is a new strain that has never been seen before.

Preliminary genetic sequencing suggests the strain is a mutant form of two different E. coli bacteria, with lethal genes that could explain why the Europe-wide outbreak appears to be so massive and dangerous, the agency said.

Hilde Kruse, a food safety expert at the WHO told The Associated Press that "this is a unique strain that has never been isolated from patients before."

She added that the new strain has "various characteristics that make it more virulent and toxin-producing.

So far, the mutant E. coli strain has sickened more than 1,500 people, including 470 who have developed a rare kidney failure complication, and killed 18, including one overnight in Germany, the country hit hardest by the outbreak. Researchers have been unable to pinpoint the cause of the illness, which has hit at least nine European countries, and prompted Russia on Thursday to extend a ban on vegetables to the entire European Union.

Related Slideshow

Tips to Avoid Food-Borne Illness

Summer is prime time for food-borne illness, so Dr. Cynara Coomer offers some quick tips on how to avoid it

Kruse said it's not uncommon for bacteria to continually evolve and swap genes. "There's a lot of mobility in the microbial world," she said. Kruse said it was difficult to explain where the new strain came from but said strains of bacteria from both humans and animals easily trade genes, similar to how animal viruses like Ebola sometimes jump into humans.

"One should think of an animal source," Kruse said. "Many animals are hosts of various types of toxin-producing E. coli."

Kruse said the new bacteria strain had traits that made it more dangerous than other types of E. coli, which might explain why the outbreak is mainly striking adults, and women in particular.

Normally, severe E. coli cases are seen in children and the elderly.

But she cautioned that since people with milder cases probably aren't seeking medical help, officials don't know just how big the outbreak is. "It's hard to say how virulent (this new E. coli strain) is because we just don't know the real number of people affected."

Nearly all the sick people either live in Germany or recently traveled there. Two people who were sickened are now in the United States, and both had recently traveled to Hamburg, Germany, where many of the infections occurred. British officials announced four new cases, including three Britons who recently visited Germany and a German person on holiday in England.

German officials have warned people not to eat lettuce, tomatoes and cucumbers.

Fearful of the outbreak spreading into Russia, the country on Thursday extended its ban on vegetable imports to all of the EU. Russia had banned fresh imports from Spain and Germany on Monday.

The United Arab Emirates issued a temporary ban on cucumbers from Spain, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands. State news agency WAM said the Gulf nation's Minister of Environment and Water issued the order Wednesday based on information "from international food safety agencies and news reports."

Lyubov Voropayeva, spokeswoman for the Russian Agency for the Supervision of Consumer Rights, told the AP the Russian ban has been imposed immediately and indefinitely.

The agency's chief Gennady Onishchenko told Russian news agencies that this "unpopular measure" would be in place until European officials inform Moscow of the cause of the disease and how it is being spread.

"How many more lives of European citizens does it take for European officials to tackle this problem?" he told the state-owned RIA Novosti news agency.

No fatalities or infections have yet been reported in Russia.

The European Union argued the Russian ban was disproportionate. Frederic Vincent, a spokesman for the EU's Health and Consumer Policy Commissioner John Dalli, said Thursday that the European Commission would write to the Russian Agency for the Supervision of Consumer Rights to demand further clarification of the ban.

Meanwhile, Spain's prime minister slammed the European Commission and Germany for singling out the country's produce as a possible source of a deadly bacterial outbreak in Europe, and said the government would demand explanations and reparations.

Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero told Spanish National Radio that the German federal government was ultimately responsible for the allegations, adding that Spain would seek "conclusive explanations and sufficient reparations."

The outbreak is already considered the third-largest involving E. coli in recent world history, and it may be the deadliest. Twelve people died in a 1996 Japanese outbreak that reportedly sickened more than 12,000, and seven died in a 2000 Canadian outbreak.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/06/02/new-strain-e-coli-in-europe/#ixzz1O7xRcnSA



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/06/02/new-strain-e-coli-in-europe/#ixzz1O7xJOEiL

 



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Yep...Sara Palin wants everybody to take her seriously! But America
laughs at her! Glen Beck thinks he's funny! But nobody laughs! Don't
you just love it?
Wheeeeeeee!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
Med time
n Jun 2, 1:30 pm, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> yep...thank you for saving GM. Thank you for affordable health care!
> Thank you for halting welfare for the rich wasp, Thenk you for killing
> Islamo-Facists like Bin Laden and thank you for everything. We
> liberals are happy and rich. Tea fags are angry and broke! They blame
> everything on government! Aint that a hoot? Don't you just love it!
> Wheeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Where did you get those????

On Jun 2, 1:21 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> You cannot have freedom if you rely on government. The two terms
> contradict each other.
>
> FREEDOM, n. 1. A state of exemption from the power or control of
> another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement.
>
> GOVERNMENT, n. 1. Control; restraint.
>
> On 06/02/2011 10:00 AM, GregfromBoston wrote:
>
>
>
> > Uhm, pretty much THE job description of the government
>
> > "insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote
> > the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
> > and our Posterity"
>
> > On Jun 2, 12:41 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> You don't have freedom if you reply on government to protect you.
>
> >> On 06/02/2011 09:10 AM, plainolamerican wrote:
>
> >>> one day enough people will finally
> >>> be fed up enough that we will take our freedom back
> >>> ---
> >>> you don't have freedoms that you can't protect
> >>> On Jun 2, 11:00 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> *The Patriot Act, Fox News, the TSA and Feeling Less Free*
> >>>> 1 June 2011 by Szandor Blestman
> >>>> The Patriot Act, in my opinion, has been one of the most egregious,
> >>>> liberty violating acts that has ever been passed by congress. It was a
> >>>> knee jerk reaction to the 9/11 attacks. It is so huge and was passed so
> >>>> quickly after that event that any thinking person must realize it had to
> >>>> be written well before the attacks took place, was waiting for just such
> >>>> an attack so it could be introduced, and could not have possibly been
> >>>> read and its implications understood by anyone who voted for it. I doubt
> >>>> very much that any congress critter has yet to read it in its entirety.
> >>>> Here it is almost ten years later and it still sullies the political
> >>>> landscape of this once great republic.
> >>>> It seems that most common folk don't fully understand what the Patriot
> >>>> Act truly is. If the polls are to be believed (I personally don't trust
> >>>> most polls) then they seem to think that the Patriot Act has somehow
> >>>> made our nation more secure. They seem to believe the propaganda that is
> >>>> spewed forth from corporate establishment media giants that the Patriot
> >>>> Act has done its job and protected us. Yet it wasn't the Patriot Act
> >>>> that stopped the shoe bomber or the underwear bomber, it was the
> >>>> passengers themselves. And every time a plot is reported foiled, it is
> >>>> later determined that the plot only occurred because some federal
> >>>> security agency or another helped it along. So one might wonder, if the
> >>>> Patriot Act has been doing its job, will they finally get rid of it if
> >>>> it fails and another terrorist event occurs? I doubt that very much.
> >>>> That's too much like hoping that once Osama Bin Laden is finally and
> >>>> officially killed in some special forces raid that the wars of
> >>>> occupation will end and our troops will come home.
> >>>> Recently, three of the most soviet like, Big Brother type provisions of
> >>>> the Patriot Act were set to expire. Congress didn't want to deal with
> >>>> them earlier in the year, likely because they were worried about
> >>>> backlash. The Senate did what they so often do, put off the vote until
> >>>> the last minute and then rushed the legislation through without proper
> >>>> debate because they don't want the legislation scrutinized. They passed
> >>>> a four year extension on this monstrosity complete with its most
> >>>> controversial provisions because, in my humble opinion, they don't want
> >>>> to give up power and they'd love to be able to arrest their political
> >>>> adversaries should push come to shove.
> >>>> Rand Paul, the freshman senator from Kentucky, was the only one who
> >>>> stood up to this abuse of power. He was the only one who questioned the
> >>>> power of the party leadership, on both sides of the aisle. He merely
> >>>> asked for a debate on introducing amendments meant to protect freedoms
> >>>> we as Americans are supposed to enjoy. For all his efforts he was
> >>>> excoriated by the establishment for not following like a sheep instead
> >>>> of applauded for his stand and his most American individualist ideals.
> >>>> Now, I'm not one to watch corporate television news programs, but I came
> >>>> across a Fox program with a bunch of talking heads discussing this
> >>>> issue. I was appalled to hear them more or less condoning a police state
> >>>> in our nation. They are taking a thousand years of struggle against
> >>>> authoritarianism and throwing it away, defending a doctrine that allows
> >>>> government agents to spy on people going about their daily business
> >>>> without just cause. They are defending a doctrine that claims everyone
> >>>> is guilty until they can prove themselves innocent. It was this kind of
> >>>> tyranny that the founding fathers fought against. This kind of tyranny
> >>>> led to the writing of the Declaration of Independence. This kind of
> >>>> tyranny was the reason they included the Bill of Rights in the
> >>>> constitution. The Patriot Act is as un-American, fascist, soviet-esque
> >>>> and unpatriotic as it gets. It violates the natural rights of
> >>>> individuals in almost every way they can be violated and yet these men
> >>>> continue to support it without so much as batting an eye, and then they
> >>>> call Rand Paul extreme. To them, the senator from Kentucky is extreme
> >>>> because he values the principles America was founded upon. One can only
> >>>> assume they consider all individualists, constitutionalists,
> >>>> libertarians and anyone who wants a smaller, more accountable federal
> >>>> government as extreme. To them, an extremist is one who challenges the
> >>>> supremacy of their corporate masters.
> >>>> One of the most remarkable statements came from Charles Krauthammer. He
> >>>> claimed that all those warnings about America becoming a police state
> >>>> didn't pan out. Has he been living under a rock for the last ten years?
> >>>> He asked something along the line of is their anyone who thinks their
> >>>> freedoms have been curtailed? He suggested that he hadn't heard of
> >>>> anyone who felt that way. Well, I for one feel that way, Mr.
> >>>> Krauthammer, so now you have heard of someone.
> >>>> How about all those people who are subjected to naked body scanners at
> >>>> the airports and TSA gropings? Do you think they might feel a little
> >>>> less free? I know that I'd like to feel like I could fly places, but I
> >>>> don't want to subject myself to their intrusions. I seem to recall that
> >>>> others have even protested against such measures. How could you call
> >>>> that anything but a police state provision? It is the Patriot Act that
> >>>> has given us the TSA, and now they're coming out of the airports and are
> >>>> soon to be seen on a street, in a mall, or at a prom dance near you.
> >>>> They needed to do more than just debate amendments to the Patriot Act,
> >>>> they need to repeal the entire bill.
> >>>> How about the checkpoints that are popping up, especially in border
> >>>> states? Do you think that the people who have to pass through them feel
> >>>> less free? Do you think that they might start to have an inkling that
> >>>> something has gone wrong and this is no longer the free nation it has
> >>>> been claimed to be? How about all those people who want to drink raw
> >>>> milk? Do you think they feel less free when the Feds tell them they
> >>>> can't decide for themselves what to put in their own bodies? How about
> >>>> the peaceful Amish, do you think they might feel less free when their
> >>>> farms are raided by SWAT teams for selling the milk others ask for? How
> >>>> about the dancers at the Jefferson Memorial? Do you think they might
> >>>> feel a little less free as they were handcuffed for prancing around a
> >>>> little or gently swaying in place? These are things that have all been
> >>>> normalized because of the Patriot Act and similar legislation. It is the
> >>>> federal government that has become extreme. It is they who are cracking
> >>>> down on peaceful individuals and restricting normal human activity they
> >>>> should have no business even caring about.
> >>>> Do you like the fact that FBI agents can now write their own warrants
> >>>> without having to so much as show a judge probable cause, just like the
> >>>> king's men were able to do in the 1700s? Do you like the fact that they
> >>>> can break into anyone's home they want when no one's home and steal
> >>>> whatever they wish without a warrant, simply on a suspicion, and not
> >>>> have to be accountable to anyone? Do you think it's ok that they can
> >>>> proclaim someone an enemy combatant at anytime they wish and hold them
> >>>> indefinitely without a trial? Do you believe that I'm a little extreme
> >>>> for mentioning such provisions and that your government would never do
> >>>> such things? The Patriot Act grants government agents the legal
> >>>> authority to take such actions, and when someone has such power it is
> >>>> only a matter of time before that power is abused and some innocent
> >>>> individuals suffer because of that abuse. Besides, just because you may
> >>>> not have heard about such things happening doesn't mean such events
> >>>> haven't already occurred. You certainly can't count on the corporate
> >>>> media to inform you of such abuses when they do happen.
> >>>> There are plenty of people that feel their freedoms have been curtailed.
> >>>> There are plenty of people who feel less safe because of government
> >>>> intrusion, not more secure. Everyday more and more people become victims
> >>>> of state agents. Everyday new police brutality videos come out. Everyday
> >>>> stories of the police state grow more and more egregious. Everyday the
> >>>> politicians show us they don't give a damn about individual rights and
> >>>> care only about their own power. Everyday the corporate media shows its
> >>>> true colors by defending collectivist doctrine and the agenda of the
> >>>> power elite. I believe, however, that one day enough people will finally
> >>>> be fed up enough that we will take our freedom
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
yep...thank you for saving GM. Thank you for affordable health care!
Thank you for halting welfare for the rich wasp, Thenk you for killing
Islamo-Facists like Bin Laden and thank you for everything. We
liberals are happy and rich. Tea fags are angry and broke! They blame
everything on government! Aint that a hoot? Don't you just love it!
Wheeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

You cannot have freedom if you rely on government. The two terms contradict each other.

FREEDOM, n. 1. A state of exemption from the power or control of another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement.

GOVERNMENT, n. 1. Control; restraint.

On 06/02/2011 10:00 AM, GregfromBoston wrote:
Uhm, pretty much THE job description of the government  "insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"  On Jun 2, 12:41 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote: 
You don't have freedom if you reply on government to protect you.  On 06/02/2011 09:10 AM, plainolamerican wrote:      
one day enough people will finally be fed up enough that we will take our freedom back --- you don't have freedoms that you can't protect 
 
On Jun 2, 11:00 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote: 
*The Patriot Act, Fox News, the TSA and Feeling Less Free* 1 June 2011 by Szandor Blestman 
 
The Patriot Act, in my opinion, has been one of the most egregious, liberty violating acts that has ever been passed by congress. It was a knee jerk reaction to the 9/11 attacks. It is so huge and was passed so quickly after that event that any thinking person must realize it had to be written well before the attacks took place, was waiting for just such an attack so it could be introduced, and could not have possibly been read and its implications understood by anyone who voted for it. I doubt very much that any congress critter has yet to read it in its entirety. Here it is almost ten years later and it still sullies the political landscape of this once great republic. 
 
It seems that most common folk don't fully understand what the Patriot Act truly is. If the polls are to be believed (I personally don't trust most polls) then they seem to think that the Patriot Act has somehow made our nation more secure. They seem to believe the propaganda that is spewed forth from corporate establishment media giants that the Patriot Act has done its job and protected us. Yet it wasn't the Patriot Act that stopped the shoe bomber or the underwear bomber, it was the passengers themselves. And every time a plot is reported foiled, it is later determined that the plot only occurred because some federal security agency or another helped it along. So one might wonder, if the Patriot Act has been doing its job, will they finally get rid of it if it fails and another terrorist event occurs? I doubt that very much. That's too much like hoping that once Osama Bin Laden is finally and officially killed in some special forces raid that the wars of occupation will end and our troops will come home. 
 
Recently, three of the most soviet like, Big Brother type provisions of the Patriot Act were set to expire. Congress didn't want to deal with them earlier in the year, likely because they were worried about backlash. The Senate did what they so often do, put off the vote until the last minute and then rushed the legislation through without proper debate because they don't want the legislation scrutinized. They passed a four year extension on this monstrosity complete with its most controversial provisions because, in my humble opinion, they don't want to give up power and they'd love to be able to arrest their political adversaries should push come to shove. 
 
Rand Paul, the freshman senator from Kentucky, was the only one who stood up to this abuse of power. He was the only one who questioned the power of the party leadership, on both sides of the aisle. He merely asked for a debate on introducing amendments meant to protect freedoms we as Americans are supposed to enjoy. For all his efforts he was excoriated by the establishment for not following like a sheep instead of applauded for his stand and his most American individualist ideals. 
 
Now, I'm not one to watch corporate television news programs, but I came across a Fox program with a bunch of talking heads discussing this issue. I was appalled to hear them more or less condoning a police state in our nation. They are taking a thousand years of struggle against authoritarianism and throwing it away, defending a doctrine that allows government agents to spy on people going about their daily business without just cause. They are defending a doctrine that claims everyone is guilty until they can prove themselves innocent. It was this kind of tyranny that the founding fathers fought against. This kind of tyranny led to the writing of the Declaration of Independence. This kind of tyranny was the reason they included the Bill of Rights in the constitution. The Patriot Act is as un-American, fascist, soviet-esque and unpatriotic as it gets. It violates the natural rights of individuals in almost every way they can be violated and yet these men continue to support it without so much as batting an eye, and then they call Rand Paul extreme. To them, the senator from Kentucky is extreme because he values the principles America was founded upon. One can only assume they consider all individualists, constitutionalists, libertarians and anyone who wants a smaller, more accountable federal government as extreme. To them, an extremist is one who challenges the supremacy of their corporate masters. 
 
One of the most remarkable statements came from Charles Krauthammer. He claimed that all those warnings about America becoming a police state didn't pan out. Has he been living under a rock for the last ten years? He asked something along the line of is their anyone who thinks their freedoms have been curtailed? He suggested that he hadn't heard of anyone who felt that way. Well, I for one feel that way, Mr. Krauthammer, so now you have heard of someone. 
 
How about all those people who are subjected to naked body scanners at the airports and TSA gropings? Do you think they might feel a little less free? I know that I'd like to feel like I could fly places, but I don't want to subject myself to their intrusions. I seem to recall that others have even protested against such measures. How could you call that anything but a police state provision? It is the Patriot Act that has given us the TSA, and now they're coming out of the airports and are soon to be seen on a street, in a mall, or at a prom dance near you. They needed to do more than just debate amendments to the Patriot Act, they need to repeal the entire bill. 
 
How about the checkpoints that are popping up, especially in border states? Do you think that the people who have to pass through them feel less free? Do you think that they might start to have an inkling that something has gone wrong and this is no longer the free nation it has been claimed to be? How about all those people who want to drink raw milk? Do you think they feel less free when the Feds tell them they can't decide for themselves what to put in their own bodies? How about the peaceful Amish, do you think they might feel less free when their farms are raided by SWAT teams for selling the milk others ask for? How about the dancers at the Jefferson Memorial? Do you think they might feel a little less free as they were handcuffed for prancing around a little or gently swaying in place? These are things that have all been normalized because of the Patriot Act and similar legislation. It is the federal government that has become extreme. It is they who are cracking down on peaceful individuals and restricting normal human activity they should have no business even caring about. 
 
Do you like the fact that FBI agents can now write their own warrants without having to so much as show a judge probable cause, just like the king's men were able to do in the 1700s? Do you like the fact that they can break into anyone's home they want when no one's home and steal whatever they wish without a warrant, simply on a suspicion, and not have to be accountable to anyone? Do you think it's ok that they can proclaim someone an enemy combatant at anytime they wish and hold them indefinitely without a trial? Do you believe that I'm a little extreme for mentioning such provisions and that your government would never do such things? The Patriot Act grants government agents the legal authority to take such actions, and when someone has such power it is only a matter of time before that power is abused and some innocent individuals suffer because of that abuse. Besides, just because you may not have heard about such things happening doesn't mean such events haven't already occurred. You certainly can't count on the corporate media to inform you of such abuses when they do happen. 
 
There are plenty of people that feel their freedoms have been curtailed. There are plenty of people who feel less safe because of government intrusion, not more secure. Everyday more and more people become victims of state agents. Everyday new police brutality videos come out. Everyday stories of the police state grow more and more egregious. Everyday the politicians show us they don't give a damn about individual rights and care only about their own power. Everyday the corporate media shows its true colors by defending collectivist doctrine and the agenda of the power elite. I believe, however, that one day enough people will finally be fed up enough that we will take our freedom back. On that day, it will be remembered who supported natural individual rights and who fought for the authoritarian collectivist agenda. 
 
http://fr33agents.net/2011/06/01/the-patriot-act-fox-news-the-tsa-and... -- 
 
       Freedom is always illegal! 
 
When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free. 
 --        Freedom is always illegal!  When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.- Hide quoted text -  - Show quoted text - 
 

--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.


Uhm, that is what will occur IF/WHEN the Constitution that came next was followed.

Regard$,
--MJ

"Usurpation, the exercise of power not granted, is not legitimized by repetition" -- Raoul Berger.




At 01:00 PM 6/2/2011, you wrote:
Uhm, pretty much THE job description of the government

"insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote
the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity"

On Jun 2, 12:41 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> You don't have freedom if you reply on government to protect you.
>
> On 06/02/2011 09:10 AM, plainolamerican wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > one day enough people will finally
> > be fed up enough that we will take our freedom back
> > ---
> > you don't have freedoms that you can't protect
>
> > On Jun 2, 11:00 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> *The Patriot Act, Fox News, the TSA and Feeling Less Free*
> >> 1 June 2011 by Szandor Blestman
>
> >> The Patriot Act, in my opinion, has been one of the most egregious,
> >> liberty violating acts that has ever been passed by congress. It was a
> >> knee jerk reaction to the 9/11 attacks. It is so huge and was passed so
> >> quickly after that event that any thinking person must realize it had to
> >> be written well before the attacks took place, was waiting for just such
> >> an attack so it could be introduced, and could not have possibly been
> >> read and its implications understood by anyone who voted for it. I doubt
> >> very much that any congress critter has yet to read it in its entirety.
> >> Here it is almost ten years later and it still sullies the political
> >> landscape of this once great republic.
>
> >> It seems that most common folk don't fully understand what the Patriot
> >> Act truly is. If the polls are to be believed (I personally don't trust
> >> most polls) then they seem to think that the Patriot Act has somehow
> >> made our nation more secure. They seem to believe the propaganda that is
> >> spewed forth from corporate establishment media giants that the Patriot
> >> Act has done its job and protected us. Yet it wasn't the Patriot Act
> >> that stopped the shoe bomber or the underwear bomber, it was the
> >> passengers themselves. And every time a plot is reported foiled, it is
> >> later determined that the plot only occurred because some federal
> >> security agency or another helped it along. So one might wonder, if the
> >> Patriot Act has been doing its job, will they finally get rid of it if
> >> it fails and another terrorist event occurs? I doubt that very much.
> >> That's too much like hoping that once Osama Bin Laden is finally and
> >> officially killed in some special forces raid that the wars of
> >> occupation will end and our troops will come home.
>
> >> Recently, three of the most soviet like, Big Brother type provisions of
> >> the Patriot Act were set to expire. Congress didn't want to deal with
> >> them earlier in the year, likely because they were worried about
> >> backlash. The Senate did what they so often do, put off the vote until
> >> the last minute and then rushed the legislation through without proper
> >> debate because they don't want the legislation scrutinized. They passed
> >> a four year extension on this monstrosity complete with its most
> >> controversial provisions because, in my humble opinion, they don't want
> >> to give up power and they'd love to be able to arrest their political
> >> adversaries should push come to shove.
>
> >> Rand Paul, the freshman senator from Kentucky, was the only one who
> >> stood up to this abuse of power. He was the only one who questioned the
> >> power of the party leadership, on both sides of the aisle. He merely
> >> asked for a debate on introducing amendments meant to protect freedoms
> >> we as Americans are supposed to enjoy. For all his efforts he was
> >> excoriated by the establishment for not following like a sheep instead
> >> of applauded for his stand and his most American individualist ideals.
>
> >> Now, I'm not one to watch corporate television news programs, but I came
> >> across a Fox program with a bunch of talking heads discussing this
> >> issue. I was appalled to hear them more or less condoning a police state
> >> in our nation. They are taking a thousand years of struggle against
> >> authoritarianism and throwing it away, defending a doctrine that allows
> >> government agents to spy on people going about their daily business
> >> without just cause. They are defending a doctrine that claims everyone
> >> is guilty until they can prove themselves innocent. It was this kind of
> >> tyranny that the founding fathers fought against. This kind of tyranny
> >> led to the writing of the Declaration of Independence. This kind of
> >> tyranny was the reason they included the Bill of Rights in the
> >> constitution. The Patriot Act is as un-American, fascist, soviet-esque
> >> and unpatriotic as it gets. It violates the natural rights of
> >> individuals in almost every way they can be violated and yet these men
> >> continue to support it without so much as batting an eye, and then they
> >> call Rand Paul extreme. To them, the senator from Kentucky is extreme
> >> because he values the principles America was founded upon. One can only
> >> assume they consider all individualists, constitutionalists,
> >> libertarians and anyone who wants a smaller, more accountable federal
> >> government as extreme. To them, an extremist is one who challenges the
> >> supremacy of their corporate masters.
>
> >> One of the most remarkable statements came from Charles Krauthammer. He
> >> claimed that all those warnings about America becoming a police state
> >> didn't pan out. Has he been living under a rock for the last ten years?
> >> He asked something along the line of is their anyone who thinks their
> >> freedoms have been curtailed? He suggested that he hadn't heard of
> >> anyone who felt that way. Well, I for one feel that way, Mr.
> >> Krauthammer, so now you have heard of someone.
>
> >> How about all those people who are subjected to naked body scanners at
> >> the airports and TSA gropings? Do you think they might feel a little
> >> less free? I know that I'd like to feel like I could fly places, but I
> >> don't want to subject myself to their intrusions. I seem to recall that
> >> others have even protested against such measures. How could you call
> >> that anything but a police state provision? It is the Patriot Act that
> >> has given us the TSA, and now they're coming out of the airports and are
> >> soon to be seen on a street, in a mall, or at a prom dance near you.
> >> They needed to do more than just debate amendments to the Patriot Act,
> >> they need to repeal the entire bill.
>
> >> How about the checkpoints that are popping up, especially in border
> >> states? Do you think that the people who have to pass through them feel
> >> less free? Do you think that they might start to have an inkling that
> >> something has gone wrong and this is no longer the free nation it has
> >> been claimed to be? How about all those people who want to drink raw
> >> milk? Do you think they feel less free when the Feds tell them they
> >> can't decide for themselves what to put in their own bodies? How about
> >> the peaceful Amish, do you think they might feel less free when their
> >> farms are raided by SWAT teams for selling the milk others ask for? How
> >> about the dancers at the Jefferson Memorial? Do you think they might
> >> feel a little less free as they were handcuffed for prancing around a
> >> little or gently swaying in place? These are things that have all been
> >> normalized because of the Patriot Act and similar legislation. It is the
> >> federal government that has become extreme. It is they who are cracking
> >> down on peaceful individuals and restricting normal human activity they
> >> should have no business even caring about.
>
> >> Do you like the fact that FBI agents can now write their own warrants
> >> without having to so much as show a judge probable cause, just like the
> >> king's men were able to do in the 1700s? Do you like the fact that they
> >> can break into anyone's home they want when no one's home and steal
> >> whatever they wish without a warrant, simply on a suspicion, and not
> >> have to be accountable to anyone? Do you think it's ok that they can
> >> proclaim someone an enemy combatant at anytime they wish and hold them
> >> indefinitely without a trial? Do you believe that I'm a little extreme
> >> for mentioning such provisions and that your government would never do
> >> such things? The Patriot Act grants government agents the legal
> >> authority to take such actions, and when someone has such power it is
> >> only a matter of time before that power is abused and some innocent
> >> individuals suffer because of that abuse. Besides, just because you may
> >> not have heard about such things happening doesn't mean such events
> >> haven't already occurred. You certainly can't count on the corporate
> >> media to inform you of such abuses when they do happen.
>
> >> There are plenty of people that feel their freedoms have been curtailed.
> >> There are plenty of people who feel less safe because of government
> >> intrusion, not more secure. Everyday more and more people become victims
> >> of state agents. Everyday new police brutality videos come out. Everyday
> >> stories of the police state grow more and more egregious. Everyday the
> >> politicians show us they don't give a damn about individual rights and
> >> care only about their own power. Everyday the corporate media shows its
> >> true colors by defending collectivist doctrine and the agenda of the
> >> power elite. I believe, however, that one day enough people will finally
> >> be fed up enough that we will take our freedom back. On that day, it
> >> will be remembered who supported natural individual rights and who
> >> fought for the authoritarian collectivist agenda.
>
> >> http://fr33agents.net/2011/06/01/the-patriot-act-fox-news-the-tsa-and ...
> >> --
>
> >>        Freedom is always illegal!
>
> >> When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
> >> declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
> >> have any possibility of being free.
>
> --
>
>       Freedom is always illegal!
>
> When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
> declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
> have any possibility of being free.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Uhm, pretty much THE job description of the government

"insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote
the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity"

On Jun 2, 12:41 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> You don't have freedom if you reply on government to protect you.
>
> On 06/02/2011 09:10 AM, plainolamerican wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > one day enough people will finally
> > be fed up enough that we will take our freedom back
> > ---
> > you don't have freedoms that you can't protect
>
> > On Jun 2, 11:00 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> *The Patriot Act, Fox News, the TSA and Feeling Less Free*
> >> 1 June 2011 by Szandor Blestman
>
> >> The Patriot Act, in my opinion, has been one of the most egregious,
> >> liberty violating acts that has ever been passed by congress. It was a
> >> knee jerk reaction to the 9/11 attacks. It is so huge and was passed so
> >> quickly after that event that any thinking person must realize it had to
> >> be written well before the attacks took place, was waiting for just such
> >> an attack so it could be introduced, and could not have possibly been
> >> read and its implications understood by anyone who voted for it. I doubt
> >> very much that any congress critter has yet to read it in its entirety.
> >> Here it is almost ten years later and it still sullies the political
> >> landscape of this once great republic.
>
> >> It seems that most common folk don't fully understand what the Patriot
> >> Act truly is. If the polls are to be believed (I personally don't trust
> >> most polls) then they seem to think that the Patriot Act has somehow
> >> made our nation more secure. They seem to believe the propaganda that is
> >> spewed forth from corporate establishment media giants that the Patriot
> >> Act has done its job and protected us. Yet it wasn't the Patriot Act
> >> that stopped the shoe bomber or the underwear bomber, it was the
> >> passengers themselves. And every time a plot is reported foiled, it is
> >> later determined that the plot only occurred because some federal
> >> security agency or another helped it along. So one might wonder, if the
> >> Patriot Act has been doing its job, will they finally get rid of it if
> >> it fails and another terrorist event occurs? I doubt that very much.
> >> That's too much like hoping that once Osama Bin Laden is finally and
> >> officially killed in some special forces raid that the wars of
> >> occupation will end and our troops will come home.
>
> >> Recently, three of the most soviet like, Big Brother type provisions of
> >> the Patriot Act were set to expire. Congress didn't want to deal with
> >> them earlier in the year, likely because they were worried about
> >> backlash. The Senate did what they so often do, put off the vote until
> >> the last minute and then rushed the legislation through without proper
> >> debate because they don't want the legislation scrutinized. They passed
> >> a four year extension on this monstrosity complete with its most
> >> controversial provisions because, in my humble opinion, they don't want
> >> to give up power and they'd love to be able to arrest their political
> >> adversaries should push come to shove.
>
> >> Rand Paul, the freshman senator from Kentucky, was the only one who
> >> stood up to this abuse of power. He was the only one who questioned the
> >> power of the party leadership, on both sides of the aisle. He merely
> >> asked for a debate on introducing amendments meant to protect freedoms
> >> we as Americans are supposed to enjoy. For all his efforts he was
> >> excoriated by the establishment for not following like a sheep instead
> >> of applauded for his stand and his most American individualist ideals.
>
> >> Now, I'm not one to watch corporate television news programs, but I came
> >> across a Fox program with a bunch of talking heads discussing this
> >> issue. I was appalled to hear them more or less condoning a police state
> >> in our nation. They are taking a thousand years of struggle against
> >> authoritarianism and throwing it away, defending a doctrine that allows
> >> government agents to spy on people going about their daily business
> >> without just cause. They are defending a doctrine that claims everyone
> >> is guilty until they can prove themselves innocent. It was this kind of
> >> tyranny that the founding fathers fought against. This kind of tyranny
> >> led to the writing of the Declaration of Independence. This kind of
> >> tyranny was the reason they included the Bill of Rights in the
> >> constitution. The Patriot Act is as un-American, fascist, soviet-esque
> >> and unpatriotic as it gets. It violates the natural rights of
> >> individuals in almost every way they can be violated and yet these men
> >> continue to support it without so much as batting an eye, and then they
> >> call Rand Paul extreme. To them, the senator from Kentucky is extreme
> >> because he values the principles America was founded upon. One can only
> >> assume they consider all individualists, constitutionalists,
> >> libertarians and anyone who wants a smaller, more accountable federal
> >> government as extreme. To them, an extremist is one who challenges the
> >> supremacy of their corporate masters.
>
> >> One of the most remarkable statements came from Charles Krauthammer. He
> >> claimed that all those warnings about America becoming a police state
> >> didn't pan out. Has he been living under a rock for the last ten years?
> >> He asked something along the line of is their anyone who thinks their
> >> freedoms have been curtailed? He suggested that he hadn't heard of
> >> anyone who felt that way. Well, I for one feel that way, Mr.
> >> Krauthammer, so now you have heard of someone.
>
> >> How about all those people who are subjected to naked body scanners at
> >> the airports and TSA gropings? Do you think they might feel a little
> >> less free? I know that I'd like to feel like I could fly places, but I
> >> don't want to subject myself to their intrusions. I seem to recall that
> >> others have even protested against such measures. How could you call
> >> that anything but a police state provision? It is the Patriot Act that
> >> has given us the TSA, and now they're coming out of the airports and are
> >> soon to be seen on a street, in a mall, or at a prom dance near you.
> >> They needed to do more than just debate amendments to the Patriot Act,
> >> they need to repeal the entire bill.
>
> >> How about the checkpoints that are popping up, especially in border
> >> states? Do you think that the people who have to pass through them feel
> >> less free? Do you think that they might start to have an inkling that
> >> something has gone wrong and this is no longer the free nation it has
> >> been claimed to be? How about all those people who want to drink raw
> >> milk? Do you think they feel less free when the Feds tell them they
> >> can't decide for themselves what to put in their own bodies? How about
> >> the peaceful Amish, do you think they might feel less free when their
> >> farms are raided by SWAT teams for selling the milk others ask for? How
> >> about the dancers at the Jefferson Memorial? Do you think they might
> >> feel a little less free as they were handcuffed for prancing around a
> >> little or gently swaying in place? These are things that have all been
> >> normalized because of the Patriot Act and similar legislation. It is the
> >> federal government that has become extreme. It is they who are cracking
> >> down on peaceful individuals and restricting normal human activity they
> >> should have no business even caring about.
>
> >> Do you like the fact that FBI agents can now write their own warrants
> >> without having to so much as show a judge probable cause, just like the
> >> king's men were able to do in the 1700s? Do you like the fact that they
> >> can break into anyone's home they want when no one's home and steal
> >> whatever they wish without a warrant, simply on a suspicion, and not
> >> have to be accountable to anyone? Do you think it's ok that they can
> >> proclaim someone an enemy combatant at anytime they wish and hold them
> >> indefinitely without a trial? Do you believe that I'm a little extreme
> >> for mentioning such provisions and that your government would never do
> >> such things? The Patriot Act grants government agents the legal
> >> authority to take such actions, and when someone has such power it is
> >> only a matter of time before that power is abused and some innocent
> >> individuals suffer because of that abuse. Besides, just because you may
> >> not have heard about such things happening doesn't mean such events
> >> haven't already occurred. You certainly can't count on the corporate
> >> media to inform you of such abuses when they do happen.
>
> >> There are plenty of people that feel their freedoms have been curtailed.
> >> There are plenty of people who feel less safe because of government
> >> intrusion, not more secure. Everyday more and more people become victims
> >> of state agents. Everyday new police brutality videos come out. Everyday
> >> stories of the police state grow more and more egregious. Everyday the
> >> politicians show us they don't give a damn about individual rights and
> >> care only about their own power. Everyday the corporate media shows its
> >> true colors by defending collectivist doctrine and the agenda of the
> >> power elite. I believe, however, that one day enough people will finally
> >> be fed up enough that we will take our freedom back. On that day, it
> >> will be remembered who supported natural individual rights and who
> >> fought for the authoritarian collectivist agenda.
>
> >>http://fr33agents.net/2011/06/01/the-patriot-act-fox-news-the-tsa-and...
> >> --
>
> >>        Freedom is always illegal!
>
> >> When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
> >> declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
> >> have any possibility of being free.
>
> --
>
>       Freedom is always illegal!
>
> When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
> declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
> have any possibility of being free.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.