• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0
Hi...I am a bit tired so hopefully I will make some sense.  I am not sure that I can confess being a beneficiary of much while there.  I went to Sweden because I wanted to work in socialized medicine and the culture and allocation of the funding they had seemed to suit my idealistic views at the time. The benefits from living there were the decompressed schedule, affordable childcare and relaxed environment.  What i ran into (which could fill volumes),  I did not expect.  I do not particularly follow one political ideology over the other and lean to a more social liberal view with a fiscal conservative spin-but that was in the day when I thought that the two could co-exist.  I do not profess to know all there is in the current world of politics as I was pretty isolated with my job and a young child while in Sweden.  I do know that there are different parts of what work in europe and apply it here in the US without compromising anyones political views-for example: pharmacies have drugs prepackaged in 1 or 3 month supplies, they are bar coded.   You go to the pharmacy give them the prescrition,and in 15 minutes (max for me-4 meds) you have your drugs and they are triple bar coded so that no labeling error occurs.  It cuts out a lot of middle men, pill counting and errors as well as save time and money.  Bringing it across the atlantic would mean loss of jobs (wealthy distributors and warehouses) but the cost gets passed on to the consumer.  Also, the ergonomics in the work place are brilliant there...I sit at a microscope for hours a day- here after 2 hrs I am a hurting unit, there I could sit for ten hrs and no fatigue.  So it does not always have to do with ideology to share and learn from one another, it had a lot to do with finding what can work and apply it.
 
Sharon

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:07 PM, studio <tlack@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 11, 9:40 am, Sharon Fuentes <oneforentr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well said Keith....
>
> I lived in Sweden and there are some similarities with Germany.  The racism
> in Sweden is often subtle because the Swedes like to be percieved as
> progressive and "tolerant".  Every time I needed assistance they assumed I
> was from the Middle East and was systematically treated like a second class
> citizen even though i paid a huge amount in taxes (40% income alone).
> Living in Europe has its advantages as you have pointed out but they come at
> a high cost and I too  had private insurance but was funneled into the
> public system for things such as an MRI and that took 5 months.  I do not
> know how much longer Sweden can sustain its economy where the taxes are so
> high, there is basically economic heterogeneity with minimal real and
> obtainable wealth.  Those with the most money are either from old money
> before the push for a true social deomcracy or damn clever/lucky to have a
> successful start up.  Any person who is a professional; lawyers, doctors,
> engineers etc-are paid less than American standards.
>
> Unless someone has been in a culture or an environment speculation about the
> realities are best laid to rest because it is to complex and the percieved
> reality that many have about Europe (Sweden) are often wrong.  Many people
> are enamoured when I say  I lived there but they are shocked when I tell
> them what it was really like.

Sharon, that's all fine and dandy, but you have zero idea of how these
"free market types" want to actually run the US economy.... or should
I say plunder it?

You talk about how you had to wait 5 months for an MRI ... how about
just not having one unless you can pay for it?

You talk about subtle racism in Sweden ... how about it being open and
not serving anyone they deem not worthy?

Because that's what it's really all about with these people.

You. and even they, may have some good points, the problem is; you
have to buy into the whole social conservative philosophy that effects
everyone, and not just the little part that you think benefits just
you.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Jun 11, 9:40 am, Sharon Fuentes <oneforentr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well said Keith....
>
> I lived in Sweden and there are some similarities with Germany.  The racism
> in Sweden is often subtle because the Swedes like to be percieved as
> progressive and "tolerant".  Every time I needed assistance they assumed I
> was from the Middle East and was systematically treated like a second class
> citizen even though i paid a huge amount in taxes (40% income alone).
> Living in Europe has its advantages as you have pointed out but they come at
> a high cost and I too  had private insurance but was funneled into the
> public system for things such as an MRI and that took 5 months.  I do not
> know how much longer Sweden can sustain its economy where the taxes are so
> high, there is basically economic heterogeneity with minimal real and
> obtainable wealth.  Those with the most money are either from old money
> before the push for a true social deomcracy or damn clever/lucky to have a
> successful start up.  Any person who is a professional; lawyers, doctors,
> engineers etc-are paid less than American standards.
>
> Unless someone has been in a culture or an environment speculation about the
> realities are best laid to rest because it is to complex and the percieved
> reality that many have about Europe (Sweden) are often wrong.  Many people
> are enamoured when I say  I lived there but they are shocked when I tell
> them what it was really like.

Sharon, that's all fine and dandy, but you have zero idea of how these
"free market types" want to actually run the US economy.... or should
I say plunder it?

You talk about how you had to wait 5 months for an MRI ... how about
just not having one unless you can pay for it?

You talk about subtle racism in Sweden ... how about it being open and
not serving anyone they deem not worthy?

Because that's what it's really all about with these people.

You. and even they, may have some good points, the problem is; you
have to buy into the whole social conservative philosophy that effects
everyone, and not just the little part that you think benefits just
you.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/06/not-only-do-electric-vehicles-produce.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0




Congress In A Can
 
Now you can spray your congresscritter anywhere you need.  Like in the garbage can, under the sinks, in the toilet, on the dog poop.
 
There are limitless uses for Congress In A Can. 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Jun 11, 5:53 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stu-Stu-Studio!

Ka-Ka Keith...

> You are a Moonbat, and so out of touch with reality, that I don't even know
> where to start with addressing your message.  If you want to focus on one
> legitimate issue to discuss,  I'm all for it.  

Right Keith.
Face it, you don't know where to start addressing my message because
you can't fight facts with your BS political spin forever.
The facts are 80% of the American people could give a rats ass how
much lower you can make the lowest tax rates paid since 1942, while
investing and creating jobs in every country on earth except the US.

> Don't sling a bunch of far left socialistic/Bolshevik rhetoric and spin at me, and expect me to respond
> without slinging nasty barbs right back!

Nasty barbs?
You must not have read any of plainolidiots barbs at me... as if.

Sir, I have not even begun slinging nasty barbs at you.
If you think I'm afraid of some wealthy briefcase carrying lawyer,
you're more stupid than I would have thought.
How much do you have to lose?
The barbarians are at the gate stupid....and they ain't going to be
going after someone with nothing to lose lawyerboy.

* "We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we
created them". - A. Einstein

Yet that's exactly what the Conservitards would have you believe.

And the Tea Bagger Party... these idiots are no better than the
Taliban ...both seek to turn the clock backwards to what they perceive
as "simpler times".
But it's what they don't tell you that will hurt you.

* "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler". -
Albert Einstein

We live in a complex world, a nuclear world, not some sticks and
stones barbaric draconian religious mythological militaristic kingdom
the way Conservitards would have you believe was SO much better.

* "You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in
common, they don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the
facts to fit their views, which can be uncomfortable, if you happen to
be one of the facts that needs altering."-- Doctor Who, THE FACE OF
EVIL

And that's precisely what Conservitards want, to alter facts to fit
their views.

* "Math is just logic with numbers attached, and success with it
requires the ability to reason effectively.
But children are taught "what" to think, and not "how" to think.
That's why so many adults live in a state of perpetual
misunderstanding about the world". –Marilyn Vos Savant

A perpetual misunderstanding of the world is precisely where
Conservitards live and want others to live with them.
Conservitards are anti-science, unless it's the science of murder,
kill, death.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Tinkle Toes loves Obarfo.



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.




WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Who won the GOP debate? The audience thought Ron Paul did
By Luke Broadwater
4:00 p.m. EDT, June 14, 2011

Who won last night's Republican presidential debate on CNN?

It's a question a lot of pundits have been asking -- and there seems to be some consensus forming among the analysts: Former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney and Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann.

But judging by the reaction of the audience in New Hampshire, a different candidate carried the night and he's a candidate many analysts are saying emerged as a loser.

That candidate? Congressman Ron Paul of Texas.

An analysis of audience reaction shows Paul was applauded twice as much as any other candidate on stage.

Throughout the two-hour debate, Paul was applauded 11 times. Romney, Bachmann, and former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty were each applauded five times. Former House speaker Newt Gingrich and businessman Herman Cain were each applauded four times. Former Pa. Senator Rick Santorum was applauded the least amount of times: Three.

After a slow start, Paul earned applause throughout the debate, on a variety of issues, including his opposition to "government assistance to private enterprise," his belief that people should be able to "opt out" of Medicare, his views on the separation of church and state, and his opposition to the United States' various wars.

"I'd bring them home as quickly impossible," he said of U.S. troops. "I'd quit bombing Yemen and Pakistan."

Romney scored with the audience for his opposition of "too big too fail" economic policies, for his comments about scaling down the war in Afghanistan and for his attacks on Obama. Bachmann earned applause when she announced her candidacy for president and when she called Obama "a one-term president." Pawlenty scored applause with his comments about right-to-work legislation and when he praised the Christian faith. Cain was cheered for his comments regarding government bailouts, his statement regarding the strength of the GOP field and his opposition to Sharia law. Gingrich also pleased the crowd on this issue and for his comments on securing the border. 

In terms of other audience reaction, Romney earned the most laughs: Twice his comments brought the crowd to laughter (though one was a slip-up about the Taliban). Paul, Santorum, Gingrich, and Pawlenty each earned laughter from the crowd on one occasion.

I thought each candidate had his moments. Gingrich gave the best intro; Cain overall was the best orator; Santorum was the most combative on the president's economic policies; Romney was the most presidential; Paul the most principled; Bachmann perhaps the most exciting; and Pawlenty perhaps the nicest (he refused to criticize Romney to his face). Even Santorum showed he can have a sense of humor.

What's strange, though, is how uniformly pundits' opinions have been in favor of Romney and Bachmann -- and how different their reaction is to that of the audience in New Hampshire. (A poll of so-called "GOP Insiders" revealed party establishment minds believe Paul finished last. View that poll here.)

Now, I realize Paul's supporters tend to be louder and more enthusiastic than other candidates' and the amount of applause is hardly a scientific way to judge a debate. But to not even consider as a potential debate winner the person who was applauded more than twice as much as any other candidate strikes me as strange.

Maybe it shows a vast separation between the media and the beliefs of grassroots GOP activists? Maybe it shows that Paul's supporters are simply more enthusiastic, though not larger in number? I don't know.

What I do know is this: People don't cheer things they don't support. They don't laugh at jokes that aren't funny. They don't cry during movies that aren't sad.

Paul's large advantage in applause shows that a number of Republicans want smaller government, less foreign wars, no financial bailouts and freedom in their personal lives. He may not be the favorite in the GOP race, but the pundits could at least acknowledge the vocal and growing support within the Republican party on these issues.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/bthesite/the-ridiculous-report-blog/bal-who-won-the-gop-debate-the-audience-thought-ron-paul-did-20110614,0,419922.story?track=rss
0

New Video on Legal Plunder
Posted by Jacob Huebert on June 14, 2011 10:04 AM

The Foundation for a Free Society has another good video to introduce people to libertarian ideas, this one on "legal plunder."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJIMqwJI2uI&feature=player_embedded
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/once-again-weiner-proves-size-matters/

Once Again, Weiner Proves, Size Matters
Conservatives should thank him for making the case for smaller government.
June 10, 2011 - 7:41 am - by Scott Ott
       

Constitutional Conservatives should sit down this day and write a “thank you” letter to Rep. Anthony Weiner (NY-9th) for proving, once again, that size matters.

Rep. Weiner, through his scandalous, adulterous, perverted, deceptive, and slanderous behavior, dramatized the wisdom of the Constitutional doctrines of enumerated powers and checks and balances more effectively than any think-tank white paper, talk show rant, or polemical essay could do.

Like the prophet Isaiah, walking about naked to foreshadow the coming exile of the Egyptians and the folly of Israel’s trust in her opportunistic ally, Rep. Weiner’s self-disclosure has graphically illustrated the need for smaller, limited government.

However, while Rep. Weiner should become a poster-child for the battle against large, centralized, unaccountable, bureaucratic government, he must not become an isolated exception. He’s not a freak. He’s the norm.

You see, the great risk to the Right in the midst of this sumptuous feast of Schadenfreude is that we would see it merely as Weiner’s problem, or as simply indicative of the moral vacuity of the Democrats or of the Left. It’s much more important than that. Weiner has a handicap that is shared by every lawmaker, and every voter.

Weiner is not an aberration. He typifies Congress, because he is human. And for that reason, we must move rapidly to restrain his ilk from the dangers posed by their restless, reckless, covert humanity … and by ours.

There’s nothing like a Constitutional Convention to convince men of the need to check the power of government, and to strictly limit its scope. When 55 men from 12 states migrated to Philadelphia in the summer of 1787, they came face-to-face with the major problem of governance — how to protect the governed from their governors, and from themselves. How can one craft an energetic national government without trampling the sovereignty of the states or the rights of the people? How does one create an elected legislature that would resist the wild sweep of popular passions — the prime danger of democracy?

The debates (and dinner-table discussions at nearby City Tavern) were vigorous, and reflected not only timeless principles, but also interest-group agendas and personal needs. No angels floated just above the wooden floor of the Assembly Room that summer. These were men — extraordinary, brilliant men in many cases — yet, they were men.

To speak of what “the founders believed,” you have to speak broadly, ideologically, not monolithically. But one thing they knew, to a man, was that they were sinful men. And even those who trusted in their own rectitude, attributed depravity to others. So with each codicil of the Constitution they labored to answer the question: What would weasels do? And then they built a barrier against that tendency.

Today, as we ask “What did Weiner do?”, keep in mind that he, too, is merely a man, susceptible to the temptations to which all flesh may fall prey.

Remember, if not for Weiner’s blunder (broadcasting a private message), his perversion and deception might have remained secret for years.

Like the FBI Abscam video of the late Rep. Jack Murtha toying coyly with a bribe offer, this incident should alert us to the constant covert cloud of whispering Washington. Muffled by the mahogany, or muted by the roar of the Learjet — what we don’t hear has greater impact than what’s on C-SPAN.

Weinergate tells a cautionary tale. Men are weak, wily, wicked. Don’t give them any more power over you than absolutely necessary, and then surround those to whom you delegate authority with high walls, coils of razor wire, large snarling dogs, guard towers, and brilliant spotlights. (Of course, you could simply substitute a plain reading of, and adherence to, the U.S. Constitution.)

President Obama once bemoaned the fact that the Warren Court still saw the Constitution as “a charter of negative liberties,” a document that says “what the federal government can’t do to you.”

Mr. Obama longed for a constitution that would specify what the government “must do on your behalf.” Predictably, he wants to centralize control of our housing, banking, health care, automobile, petroleum, education, charity, and other formerly free enterprises.

As smart as Mr. Obama may be, the dullest wit in the convention of 1787 and the subsequent state-by-state ratifying conventions would put him to shame. They knew that because power is so tempting, and the concentrated consequences of transgression so devastating, we should not put all of our eggs in one basket.

By restraining the federal government to a few, specific functions, and setting it up with checks and balances, and yes, negative liberties, we mitigate the harmful effects of human nature. Smaller government is also easier to monitor, and error and evil harder to hide.

The Utopian dreams of the Left perpetually die on the altar of human frailty.

Nevertheless, they always assume that the world could be a better place if only the proper people were in charge — people like us, who would not be vulnerable to corruption or ignorance. This, in itself, is part of our human frailty — the arrogance of seeing ourselves as better than others, beyond corruption, immune to temptation.

Despite the bombast and rhetorical certitude of some in the conservative political entertainment business, the reality is that Constitutional conservatism is a humbling ideology. It is the tacit admission that, “I can’t be trusted, and so I must be constrained, limited in my authority and monitored by the public, to keep me honest. I must have the fear of electoral loss, and of legal jeopardy, continually over me, in case my personal morality should fail.”

Rep. Weiner’s “tweet seen round the world” should bolster the case for stripping the federal government of its extraconstitutional junk, for your protection.

Scott Ott co-hosts a news, commentary and humor show called Trifecta four times weekly on PJTV.com. He's now developing a series on how the U.S. Constitution came to be the way it is.
Modify message

imagine that ... an American becomes an Israeli and Governor of the
Bank of Israel then heads the IMF

na, it's a conspiracy

some don't forget


On Jun 14, 11:28 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> *Fischer's 11th-Hour Entry Adds Twist to IMF Race *http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230384810457638162288141...
>
> Is this just a coincidence? IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn gets busted
> for allegedly raping a chamber maid and Stanley Fischer enters his name
> for consideration two days after attending the Bilderberg conference.
>
> --
>
>       Freedom is always illegal!
>
> When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
> declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
> have any possibility of being free.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.




After Obama Plays Golf for 11 Straight Weekends, Michelle Says, "This Man Doesn't Take a Day Off"

doctorbulldog | 14 June, 2011 at 1:15 pm | Categories: Obama Sucks, politics | URL: http://wp.me/p1NPg-7bo

Yeah...  It's freakin' historic, Michelle...

Here's the deal:  The demands of the Office doesn't allow for any sitting President to take a day off, even when on vacation.  It's just the way it is.  EVERY President and First Lady understands this. 

So, Michelle, what's so special about your hubby?  Are you trying to say that your hubby is overworked, or something?  Well, with all the extracurricular activities, extravagant parties,  and luxurious vacations Barry has managed to squeeze in, it's certainly not a problem with being overworked, it's more like a problem of being in over his head:

After 11 Straight Golf Weekends, Michelle Says Husband 'Doesn't Take a Day Off'
FoxNews
First lady Michelle Obama on Monday told a fundraiser in Southern California of the toll the presidency has taken on her husband Barack Obama.

"I see the sadness and worry that's creasing his face," she said to a crowd of about 500 at the Pasadena luncheon organized by the Southern California Women For Obama. She described his worth ethic as "tireless," according to pool reports.

"He reads every word, every memo, so he is better prepared than the people briefing him," she said. "This man doesn't take a day off."

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



U.S. Misses Out on World Naked Bike Ride

Eowyn | June 14, 2011 at 12:44 pm | Tags: exhibitionists, London, Mexico City | Categories: Humor | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-7xt

I never knew there's an event called the World Naked Bike Ride. Did you?

Not only did I not know there's a World Naked Bike Ride, I hadn't known that the event is held in DOZENS of cities across the world and that Mexico City just had its SIXTH World Naked Bike Ride on June 12, 2011. How ignorant is that? :(

Happily, we have the UK's The Independent keeping us abreast of this important news:

Hundreds of bicyclists in their underwear, covered in body paint or wearing nothing at all have taken to the streets of Mexico City to demand respect from motorists.... Organizer Fabian Conejo said Saturday that riding nude demonstrates how vulnerable cyclists are to the millions of cars that clog Mexico City streets.

And now, what you've been waiting for....

Um, doesn't the bicycle seat get, um, kinda sticky? (London, June 11, 2011)

Calling Al Gore (London)

Ugly male exhibitionists, London

I hate to think what he's doing. (London)

Mexico, June 12, 2011

Ewwwwwww.... (Mexico)

Mexico

Doesn't it warm the cockles of your heart to see just what lengths exhibitionists go to go naked? They are Congressman Anthony Weiner's best buds!

But how did San Francisco skip out on this important event? I'm OUTRAGED, just OUTRAGED!!!

~Eowyn

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.