• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0



Addicted to Debt: 100% of GDP!

From Agence France Presse, 2 hours ago, August 3, 2011:

US debt shot up $238 billion to reach 100% of gross domestic project after the government's debt ceiling was lifted, Treasury figures showed Wednesday.

Treasury borrowing jumped Tuesday, the data showed, immediately after President Barack Obama signed into law an increase in the debt ceiling as the country's spending commitments reached a breaking point and it threatened to default on its debt.

The new borrowing took total public debt to $14.58 trillion...putting it in a league with highly indebted countries like Italy and Belgium.

Read the rest of the article, here.

~Eowyn

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



FLIGHT 93 MEMORIAL - The name has changed but the Islamic symbolism has not

barenakedislam | August 3, 2011 at 7:16 PM | Categories: 9/11 Censored | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-xLh

The original name was Crescent of Embrace. Now it is called Broken Circle. But the memorial to Flight 93 is still a memorial to Muslim terrorists, who are depicted not only as smashing our circle of peace, but as leaving a giant Islamic crescent-and-star flag in its place. They call it a broken circle now, [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



Congressman Ron Paul Introduces H.R. 2768: Immediately Strip $1.6 Trillion From Rothschild's Federal Reserve.

Rep. Ron Paul on Monday introduced legislation that would lower the federal government's debt by canceling the roughly $1.6 trillion in debt held by the Federal Reserve. Paul has argued for the last few weeks that the idea represents a quick way to make the growing fiscal crisis more manageable. Under his bill, H.R. 2768, [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

US Muslims More Tolerant, Opposed to Violence Than Other Faiths
by Jim Lobe, August 03, 2011

Muslims in the United States express greater tolerance for members of other faiths than any other major religious group, according to a major new survey and report released Thursday by the Abu Dhabi Gallup Center.

They are also more likely than any other religious group to oppose violent or military attacks against civilians, according to the survey, "Muslim Americans: Faith, Freedom, and the Future."

Nearly four out of five (78 percent) U.S. Muslims say that military attacks against civilians can never be justified. That compares with less than two of five Protestants (38 percent) and Catholics (39 percent) and just over four out of Jews (43 percent) who take that position, the poll found.

Similarly, 89 percent of Muslims said attacks by "an individual person or a small group of individuals to target and kill civilians can never be justified." Between 71 percent and 75 percent of Christian and Jewish respondents agreed.

The survey also found that Jewish and Muslim Americans shared many views, including how best to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Eighty-one percent of Muslims and 78 percent of Jews queried by Gallup said they supported a two-state solution.

Jewish respondents were also more likely than any other group, including Muslims themselves, to believe that Muslims face prejudice in the U.S.

While 60 percent of Muslims agreed with the proposition that "most Americans are prejudiced against Muslim Americans," that was less than the 66 percent of Jews agreed with it. Protestants and Catholics, in contrast, were roughly evenly split on the question.

Jewish respondents (80 percent) were also more likely ­ besides Muslims themselves (93 percent) ­ to see Muslim Americans as being loyal to the United States, compared to less than 60 percent of Christian respondents. Conversely, more than a third of Protestant and Catholic respondents questioned Muslims' loyalty, as did 19 percent of Jews.

The survey, which was based on nearly 2,500 interviews with respondents, 475 of whom said they were Muslim, poses a major challenge to efforts, primarily by right-wing Christian and Jewish groups in the U.S., to depict Muslims ­ and Islam as a religion ­ as fundamentally alien, if not actively hostile, to "Judeo-Christian" or "Western" values and U.S. society.

Those efforts reached a high point over the past year in the form of a largely successful effort to derail the construction of a Muslim community center ­ the so-called "Ground Zero Mosque" ­ two blocks from the site of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan and an ongoing state-by-state campaign led by the neoconservative Center for Security Policy (CSP) to outlaw the application of Shariah, or Islamic law, in U.S. courts.

The latter campaign, headed by a former resident of a Jewish settlement on the occupied West Bank, has claimed that Shariah is part of plot by the Muslim Brotherhood to transform the United States into an Islamic "totalitarian" state.

Those campaigns ­ as well as congressional hearings chaired by Republican Rep. Peter King this year on threats allegedly posed by Muslim extremism in the U.S. ­ have affected the public's perceptions of U.S. Muslims. Their perceptions of the U.S. was not addressed by the survey, which is based on interviews conducted early last year and again last October, according to Mohamed Younis, a senior analyst at the Washington-based Gallup Center for Muslim Studies and main author of the survey analysis.

"I really can't speculate on the impact of those events," he told IPS.

The survey also didn't break down differences of views ­ based on ethnicity or other factors ­ among U.S. Muslims who make up the most racially diverse religious community in the country.

Asian Muslims, who comprise about 18 percent of the total Muslim population, enjoy particularly high incomes on average, for example, while African-American Muslims ­ about 35 percent of the total ­ are least well off, according to the last major Gallup survey, "Muslim Americans: A National Portrait," published in 2009.

Overall, Muslim Americans expressed more optimism about their lives, including their economic well-being, than all the other major religious groups, according to the survey.

They felt especially positive about President Barack Obama, the first president with Muslim roots. Eighty percent said they approved of his performance, compared to 65 percent of Jews and only 37 percent of Protestants.

On the more negative side, nearly half of all Muslim respondents (48 percent) said they had experienced discrimination over the past year, compared to an average of 20 percent of Protestants, Catholics, and Jews, and 31 percent of Mormons.

And while, of all religious groups, Muslim respondents were most likely to express confidence in the honesty of elections (57 percent), they were the least likely be registered to vote (65 percent) and to express confidence in the military (70 percent) and in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (60 percent), no doubt because they have been the target of repeated investigations, especially since 9/11.

Four out of five Muslims said they do not believe it is possible to profile a terrorist based on his or her gender, age, ethnicity, or other demographic traits. Slightly less than half of the other major religious groups agree with that view.

According to a "religious tolerance index" devised by Gallup, in which respondents assess how strongly they identify with other religions, the survey found that Muslims and Mormons were the most accepting or "integrated" ­ defined as going "beyond a live-and-let-live (or 'tolerant') attitude [to] actively seek to know more about and learn from others of different religious traditions."

Forty-four percent of Muslim respondents fit that definition, compared to 34 percent of Catholics, 35 percent of Protestants, and 36 percent of Jews.

Asked whether U.S. Muslims were sympathetic to al-Qaeda, 92 percent of Muslim respondents, 70 percent of Jews, 63 percent of Catholics, and 56 percent of Protestants responded negatively. Nonetheless, about one third of Christian respondents did not dismiss the possibility of Muslim Americans holding some sympathy for al-Qaeda.

On foreign policy in the Muslim world, U.S. Muslims tended to be more skeptical than other religious groups. Eighty-three percent of Muslims said they thought the Iraq war was a mistake, compared to 74 percent of Jews and an average of 47 percent of Christian respondents. Muslim Americans (47 percent) were also the most likely to see U.S. military action in Afghanistan as mistaken, compared to about one third of Jews and Catholics and 29 percent of Protestants.

While most respondents of all religious groups said the U.S. suffered a negative image in Muslim world, Muslim Americans (65 percent) were the only group that attributed it to "what the U.S. has done," as opposed to "misinformation … about what the U.S. has done." Seventy percent of Catholics, 65 percent of Protestants, and 55 percent of Jews attributed Washington's negative image to misinformation.

http://original.antiwar.com/lobe/2011/08/02/us-muslims-more-tolerant/

'Science' and America's Police State
Phony scientist rationalizes latest TSA outrage
by Justin Raimondo, August 03, 2011

So, you're sick and tired of being hassled by Transportation "Security" Administration (TSA) thugs, who fondle your "junk" and force 95-year-old grandmothers to take off their adult diapers?

Well, that's tough – because it's about to get worse.

Since 2006, the TSA has been developing a $1 billion program called " Screening Passengers by Observation Techniques" [.pdf] (SPOT) whose proponents – notably, one Rafi Ron, an Israeli airline security "expert" – claim it enables screeners to detect dangerous passengers via nonverbal signals, including facial expressions. The program is undergoing a test run, starting today [Tuesday] at Boston's Logan airport. So before you wrinkle your nose at that Epsilon-Minus Semi Moron rifling through your suitcase, please be aware that the " micro-expressions" you exhibit can and will be held against you.

As the TSA gropers assaulted Americans at airports, the outraged response of the public was taken up by some conservatives, who promptly declared that we need to organize our air safety campaign along Israeli lines – and now they've gotten their wish. Which just goes to underscore the old aphorism about being careful what you wish for.

Because what the Israelis do is pry and probe into every aspect of every airline passengers' life: questions about their politics as well as their itinerary, about personal issues – you name it. Indeed, every passenger aboard the El Al state-owned Israeli airline is subjected to an extensive interrogation, but it's hard to see how the relatively small-scale Israeli operation is going to be implemented in the US, which deals with multi-millions of airline passengers every day. The Boston Herald, however, gives us a preview:

"Under the SPOT program, as passengers hand over their boarding passes and identification, specially trained agents will ask three to four questions ­ from 'Where have you been?" to "Do you have a business card?" and "Where are you traveling?" ­ while looking for "micro expressions," such as lack of eye contact, that might hint at nefarious intent.

"Suspicious individuals will be pulled aside for more questioning, full-body scans and pat-downs. If the encounter escalates, agents will call in state police."


If you fail to look that plug-ugly TSA moron in the face, and meet his beady-eyed gaze head on, you can look forward to a full-scale assault, which – don't forget – could "escalate" if you bat an eyelid, in which case the Fullerton Police Department will be called in to do to you what they did to Kelly Thomas.

Oh, but don't worry, folks:

"At Logan, about 70 agents ­ all with college degrees ­ are undergoing training by an international consulting firm that includes a four-day classroom course and 24 hours of on-the-job experience, said TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis."

College degrees? Well, then, never mind: it's all going to be okay.

Speaking of college degrees, the "theory" behind this nonsense is based on the work of Paul Ekman, a clinical psychologist, who originated the SPOT training program. According to Ekman, human facial expressions are not learned behavior, but innate reactions – instincts – which are universal. He's got it narrowed down to expressions signaling anger, disgust, sadness, joy, fear, and surprise. Wikipedia notes that "findings on contempt are less clear, though there is at least some preliminary evidence that this emotion and its expression are universally recognized." Contempt is the reaction of most scientists to the Ekman theory, exemplified by the authors of this scientific paper, who debunked Ekman's claims and averred that one would get better results "flipping a coin" than utilizing Ekman's methods. With Dr. Maureen O'Sullivan, Ekman initiated the so-called Wizards Project, which "tested" 20,000 people, concluding that only 50 of them were what Ekman calls "Truth Wizards," i.e., those who have the natural ability to spot liars without going through his training program.

C'mon, all you Truth Wizards out there – there's a job at the TSA waiting for you!

Ekman's "Facial Action Coding System" is just the sort of scientistic mysticism governments are inherently in favor of: its presumption of certainty and schematic reductionism is typical of the sort of "systems" favored by government bureaucrats, who love to believe – have to believe – they can understand the infinite complexity of human beings – when in fact they don't have a clue. Just as some addle-brained "economist" of the modern school thinks he can reduce human economic interactions to a few mathematical formulas, so the "scientists" over at the TSA think they can map the human mind with a glance and a few impertinent questions. Such "scientific" hocus-pocus is laughable – and you're paying for it, in more ways than one.

Until and unless the United States government stops killing, torturing, and otherwise enraging the world outside our borders, we will be forced to subject ourselves to increasingly intrusive police state tactics by our own "protectors" every time we get on a plane, a train, or, indeed, travel anywhere further than the corner store. Of course, Washington will never give up its prerogative to invade and slaughter overseas, so we'll be treated like cattle here on the home front – and don't you dare complain about those cattle prods.

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/08/02/science-and-americas-police-state/
Now watch him run for mayor again.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0









Transcribed from the Judge's program. He perfectly describes what happened with the debt debacle.


Judge Andrew Napolitano
Fox News Freedom Watch
Monday, August 1, 2011

Congressional leaders reached a deal that pleases almost no one, and displeases just about everyone. Basically, the "weak knee" compromisers who run the Congress did come to a meeting of the minds with the socialist impulses of the White House and agree there are probably enough votes in the Congress to permit the Treasury Department to add 2.4 Trillion dollars to the national debt, driving it from 14.3 Trillion to 16.7 Trillion. Put into perspective, that means President Obama will have added nearly 7 Trillion dollars to the government debt during just one term in office. And during that term, unemployment has gone from 7 percent to 9.2 percent. And, milk, cotton and gasoline have gone up over 40 percent. Government borrowing is the principle reason we have such high unemployment and such growing inflation in basic goods that we use all day. We can't pay back 14.3 Trillion. How can we pay back 16.7 Trillion? I guess they haven't thought about that; some people never learn.

When government borrows, it does so from two sources - from the Federal Reserve and investors. When the FED loans money to the Treasury, it prints the money that it is loaning, thus increasing the money supply, and thus increasing the cost of nearly everything. That's not good! When private investors loan money to the Treasury, they have just that much less money to invest in private productive ventures. That's not good, either! Remember, private investments produces wealth while public expenditures consume wealth.

Last night, the leaders of both parties from both houses agreed with President Obama that the Treasury should just keep doing what it does best, borrow and spend. This is crazy! Einstein has reputed to have reminded us that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. Are members of Congress, who vote to borrow at the rate of 1.6 Trillion dollars a year, year after year, and expect a different result at higher unemployment, and higher inflation insane? You decide the answer to that question.

Many members of Congress are telling you today that this is the best deal they could have gotten. Speaker Boehner even told a conference call last night that he got 98 percent of what he wanted. Well, he may be right. Apparently he did want to dig the hole of debt deeper, because that is what this bill does. Apparently he did want to increase spending every year for the next 10 years, because that is what this bill permits. Apparently he wanted to shift the burden of paying for all of this to a generation of tax payers that's yet unborn just like LBJ and his cronies shifted the burden of paying for all their borrowing to us because that is what this bill accomplishes. Yet, the Republicans claim success, and the Democrats complain of failure that this bill cuts either a Trillion, or 2.4 Trillion from spending over the next 10 years. They are misleading you.

Fact! In every year, government spends more money that it did in the previous year.

Fact! The FEDS expect to spend more in 2011 than they did in 2010, and more in 2012 than they would have spent in 2011.

Fact! What they mean by cut is that the rate of increase in spending will be cut, not the amount of spending. The amount of spending will continue to increase every year because of this borrowing.

So, did those who promised to shrink the government when they had the golden opportunity actually do so? No!

Did those who promised to stop borrowing when they had a great moment in history at which to do so actually stop it? No!

Did they get a balanced budget amendment, or an iron clad reduction in actual spending? No!

Did the President get his 2.4 Trillion in borrowed money? Yes!

Should we re-elect these people to Congress? Of course not.

--

 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
Yep...nobody is showing up! Don'tcha just love it? Wisconsin? Workers
are rising up to the rich pigs! My! My! It's a American Spring!
Wheeeee!!!!!!!1

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5yxFtTwDcc&feature=player_embedded

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0


BBC 2 August 2011

 

Keynes v Hayek: Two economic giants go head to head

John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich August Hayek were two prominent economists of the Great Depression era with sharply contrasting views. The arguments they had in the 1930s have been revived in the wake of the latest global financial crisis.
The contemporary relevance of their ideas has even been debated in a rap video. More than 1,000 people attended a BBC Radio 4 debate at the London School of Economics to hear supporters of the two economists argue their case.

PROFESSOR GEORGE SELGIN ON FRIEDRICH HAYEK

Hayek addresses a class at LSE in 1948 Friedrich Hayek did not believe it was possible to spend your way out of an economic crash
When discussing Hayek it is important to correct a misconception: Hayek's is not a "do nothing" theory.
It does not deny that we should maintain spending when boom turns to bust. But it goes further.
Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

Professor George Selgin
The economy is like a drunk throwing up the morning after the night before "
End Quote Prof George Selgin University of Georgia
Unlike Keynes, Hayek believed that genuine recovery from a post-boom crash called not just for adequate spending, but for a return to sustainable production - production purged of boom-era distortions caused by easy money.
Hayek was dismissed as someone who wanted to "liquidate labour, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers," and so on.
But an unsustainable boom is one after which some things really do need liquidating. The straightforward recipe for the revival of healthy investment following the 2008 crisis was to liquidate.
Liquidate Bear Stearns! Liquidate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac!
Liquidate, in short, the whole sub-prime bubble-blowing apparatus that was nurtured by easy monetary policy.
That would have meant letting insolvent banks that lent or invested unwisely go bust.
But instead our governments chose to keep bad banks going and that is why quantitative easing has proven a failure.
Quantitative easing failed because almost all the new money the government created has gone to shore up the balance sheets of irresponsible bankers.
Continue reading the main story

Friedrich August Hayek

Friedrich August Hayek was born on 8 May 1899 in Austria-Hungary. The economist and philosopher, who taught at the LSE, is best known for his defence of free-market capitalism.
Hayek served in World War I, and said the experience led him into his career in the hope that he could help society avoid the same mistakes that led to the war.
The global Great Depression was the backdrop against which Hayek formulated many of his theories - especially those which were opposed to Keynes.
After the British depression of the 1920s, Hayek promoted the idea that private investment, rather than government spending, would promote sustainable growth.
In 1974 Hayek won the Nobel Prize for Economics for his pioneering work in the theory of money and economic fluctuations.
Hayek lived in Austria, Great Britain, the United States and Germany, and became a British subject in 1938.
Now those banks sit on piles of idle cash while other businesses starve or cannot get started for want of credit.
The economy is like a drunk throwing up the morning after the night before.
It is disgorging itself - or trying to disgorge itself - of bad investments it was tempted to undertake largely because of easy money.
Giving it still more money will not prevent the inevitable suffering.
It might mask or delay it somewhat, but only at the cost of more suffering later.
This is not the sort of advice that governments welcome.
They want a painless, easy cure like the one Keynesians offer.
But, as Hayekians warned again and again, there is no painless recovery from an unsustainable boom.
The only way to have no pain is to avoid the boom itself.

LORD ROBERT SKIDELSKY ON JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES

John Maynard Keynes John Maynard Keynes would argue that the cuts implemented by the Coalition government will not aid the UK's economic recovery
Keynes's theory was forged in the Great Depression of 1929-1932 - the biggest economic collapse of modern times.
As their economies contracted, governments responded to their mounting budget deficits by raising taxes and cutting spending.
Continue reading the main story

"Start Quote

Lord Robert Skidelsky
You can't cut your way out of a slump; you have to grow your way out. "
End Quote Lord Robert Skidelsky University of Warwick
The Great Depression bottomed out at the end of 1932, with British unemployment having reached 20%, American unemployment even higher.
Keynes wrote the General Theory in 1936 to explain why the recovery was so feeble.
His revolutionary proposition was that following a big shock - usually a collapse in investment - there were no automatic recovery forces in a market economy.
The economy would go on shrinking until it reached some sort of stability at a low level.
Keynes called this position "under-employment equilibrium".
The reason was that the level of activity - output and employment - depended on the level of aggregate demand or spending power.
If spending power shrank, output would shrink.
In this situation it was the government's job to increase its own spending to offset the decline in public spending - that is by running a deficit to whatever extent necessary.
 

John Maynard Keynes

John Maynard Keynes was born on 5 June 1883. An Old Etonian, he excelled academically at Cambridge University - where he later taught.
During World War I, Keynes joined the Treasury, and in the wake of the Versailles peace treaty, he criticised the exorbitant war reparations demanded from Germany, which he said would not only harm Germany's economy but that of other countries as Germany would not be able to afford to buy foreign exports.
In 1944, he led the British delegation to the Bretton Woods conference in the United States. At the conference he played a significant role in the planning of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
Keynes advocated that governments could control the business cycle, and his theories proved very popular with western economies in the 1950s and 1960s.
He died on 21 April 1946.
To cut government spending was completely the wrong policy in a slump.
When an economy is booming, a hair shirt at the Treasury is the right policy, when it is stagnating it is the wrong policy.
Keynes's message was: you cannot cut your way out of a slump; you have to grow your way out.
Eighty years on we have still not fully learnt the lesson.
Three years after the collapse of 2008, our economy is flat: there are no signs of growth, nor can the Osborne policy of a thousand cuts produce any.
It was Friedrich Hayek, who represented the orthodox theories which Keynes attacked.
According to Hayek the main cause of slumps was excessive credit creation by the banks leading to overspending.
The boom was the illusion; the slump the reality.
The situation following an injection of money by the banking system would be similar to that of a people on an isolated island, if, after having partially constructed an enormous machine… they found they had exhausted all their savings before the new machine could turn out its products.
They would then have no choice but to abandon, temporarily, the work on the new process and to devote all their labour to producing their daily bread without any capital.
That is, go back to growing their own food - much as the Russians did when their economy collapsed in the early 1990s.
Keynes was scathing in his comment on Hayek's book, Prices and Production, which he called "one of the most frightful muddles I have ever read".
"It is an extraordinary example of how, starting with a mistake, a remorseless logician can end in Bedlam."
Hayek gave up serious economics, though not serious writing.
He and Keynes developed a wary respect, and even liking, for each other. "We get on very well in private life", Keynes wrote. "But what rubbish his theory is."
Keynes's magnetism made a deep impression on Hayek, but he never stopped believing that his influence on economics was "both miraculous and tragic".
The Keynes vs Hayek debate will be broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on Wednesday, 3 August at 20:00 BST and will repeated on Saturday, 6 August at 22:15 BST. You can listen again via the BBC iPlayer or by downloading the Analysis podcast.
Share your thoughts on the Keynes vs Hayek debate on Twitter using #lsehvk

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
some interesting new data from NASA throws doubt on the whole basis of the global warming data. 


Thanks to Ezra Levant for an interesting interview with Dr. Tim Paul. A real live climatologist that worked at NASA. And gave in interesting inside view on how the computer models were flawed from the start. And designed to give the alarmist outcome. 


Bear


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/uks-national-health-it-programme-unworkable/53844?tag=nl.e550

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/08/if-we-were-really-domestic-terrorists.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0


 
 
 
To: Subject: White House Top 20 Pay Raises

 

 

 


 


How did  your social security increase work out for you this year? Was it comparable at all to the increases that Nobama gave his staff during this difficult financial period?  Top pay raise of + 86% increase was to the Director of African-American Media.  What the Hell is that?  The guy must have done a great job doing whatever the Director of African-American Media does these days. Your tax dollars at work.

 

Kevin Lewis is 26 years old I am sure he has a lot of experience


--
Government is a great fiction where everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else.

Federico Bastia

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VtVbUmcQSuk&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param
name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param
name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VtVbUmcQSuk&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"
allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.




Ohio: 18 church web sites hacked telling Christians to convert to Islam

via Church Web sites hacked to push conversion to Islam - Toledo Blade. h/t Religion of Peace A computer hacker took control of more than a dozen church Web sites hosted by a Perrysburg designer this week, replacing their regular content with an appeal that Christians convert to Islam. The Rev. Vinnie Dauer of Fallen [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0




 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


Posted on July 31, 2011
8 Reasons Young Americans Don't Fight Back: How the US Crushed Youth Resistance
By Bruce E. Levine

Traditionally, young people have energized democratic movements. So it is a major coup for the ruling elite to have created societal institutions that have subdued young Americans and broken their spirit of resistance to domination. 

Young Americans—even more so than older Americans—appear to have acquiesced to the idea that the corporatocracy can completely screw them and that they are helpless to do anything about it. A 2010 Gallup poll asked Americans "Do you think the Social Security system will be able to pay you a benefit when you retire?" Among 18- to 34-years-olds, 76 percent of them said no. Yet despite their lack of confidence in the availability of Social Security for them, few have demanded it be shored up by more fairly payroll-taxing the wealthy; most appear resigned to having more money deducted from their paychecks for Social Security, even though they don't believe it will be around to benefit them. 

How exactly has American society subdued young Americans?

1. Student-Loan Debt. Large debt -- and the fear it creates -- is a pacifying force. There was no tuition at the City University of New York when I attended one of its colleges in the 1970s, a time when tuition at many U.S. public universities was so affordable that it was easy to get a B.A. and even a graduate degree without accruing any student-loan debt. While those days are gone in the United States, public universities continue to be free in the Arab world and are either free or with very low fees in many countries throughout the world. The millions of young Iranians who risked getting shot to protest their disputed 2009 presidential election, the millions of young Egyptians who risked their lives earlier this year to eliminate Mubarak, and the millions of young Americans who demonstrated against the Vietnam War all had in common the absence of pacifying huge student-loan debt.

Today in the United States, two-thirds of graduating seniors at four-year colleges have student-loan debt, including over 62 percent of public university graduates. While average undergraduate debt is close to $25,000, I increasingly talk to college graduates with closer to $100,000 in student-loan debt. During the time in one's life when it should be easiest to resist authority because one does not yet have family responsibilities, many young people worry about the cost of bucking authority, losing their job, and being unable to pay an ever-increasing debt. In a vicious cycle, student debt has a subduing effect on activism, and political passivity makes it more likely that students will accept such debt as a natural part of life.

2. Psychopathologizing and Medicating Noncompliance. In 1955, Erich Fromm, the then widely respected anti-authoritarian leftist psychoanalyst, wrote, "Today the function of psychiatry, psychology and psychoanalysis threatens to become the tool in the manipulation of man." Fromm died in 1980, the same year that an increasingly authoritarian America elected Ronald Reagan president, and an increasingly authoritarian American Psychiatric Association added to their diagnostic bible (then the DSM-III) disruptive mental disorders for children and teenagers such as the increasingly popular "oppositional defiant disorder" (ODD). The official symptoms of ODD include "often actively defies or refuses to comply with adult requests or rules," "often argues with adults," and "often deliberately does things to annoy other people."

Many of America's greatest activists including Saul Alinsky (1909­1972), the legendary organizer and author of Reveille for Radicals and Rules for Radicals, would today certainly be diagnosed with ODD and other disruptive disorders. Recalling his childhood, Alinsky said, "I never thought of walking on the grass until I saw a sign saying `Keep off the grass.' Then I would stomp all over it." Heavily tranquilizing antipsychotic drugs (e.g. Zyprexa and Risperdal) are now the highest grossing class of medication in the United States ($16 billion in 2010); a major reason for this, according to theJournal of the American Medical Association in 2010, is that many children receiving antipsychotic drugs have nonpsychotic diagnoses such as ODD or some other disruptive disorder (this especially true of Medicaid-covered pediatric patients).

3. Schools That Educate for Compliance and Not for Democracy. Upon accepting the New York City Teacher of the Year Award on January 31, 1990, John Taylor Gatto upset many in attendance by stating: "The truth is that schools don't really teach anything except how to obey orders. This is a great mystery to me because thousands of humane, caring people work in schools as teachers and aides and administrators, but the abstract logic of the institution overwhelms their individual contributions." A generation ago, the problem of compulsory schooling as a vehicle for an authoritarian society was widely discussed, but as this problem has gotten worse, it is seldom discussed.

The nature of most classrooms, regardless of the subject matter, socializes students to be passive and directed by others, to follow orders, to take seriously the rewards and punishments of authorities, to pretend to care about things they don't care about, and that they are impotent to affect their situation. A teacher can lecture about democracy, but schools are essentially undemocratic places, and so democracy is not what is instilled in students. Jonathan Kozol in The Night Is Dark and I Am Far from Home focused on how school breaks us from courageous actions. Kozol explains how our schools teach us a kind of "inert concern" in which "caring"—in and of itself and without risking the consequences of actual action—is considered "ethical." School teaches us that we are "moral and mature" if we politely assert our concerns, but the essence of school—its demand for compliance—teaches us not to act in a friction-causing manner. 

4. "No Child Left Behind" and "Race to the Top." The corporatocracy has figured out a way to make our already authoritarian schools even more authoritarian. Democrat-Republican bipartisanship has resulted in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, NAFTA, the PATRIOT Act, the War on Drugs, the Wall Street bailout, and educational policies such as "No Child Left Behind" and "Race to the Top." These policies are essentially standardized-testing tyranny that creates fear, which is antithetical to education for a democratic society. Fear forces students and teachers to constantly focus on the demands of test creators; it crushes curiosity, critical thinking, questioning authority, and challenging and resisting illegitimate authority. In a more democratic and less authoritarian society, one would evaluate the effectiveness of a teacher not by corporatocracy-sanctioned standardized tests but by asking students, parents, and a community if a teacher is inspiring students to be more curious, to read more, to learn independently, to enjoy thinking critically, to question authorities, and to challenge illegitimate authorities.

5. Shaming Young People Who Take Education -- But Not Their Schooling -- Seriously. In a 2006 survey in the United States, it was found that 40 percent of children between first and third grade read every day, but by fourth grade, that rate declined to 29 percent. Despite the anti-educational impact of standard schools, children and their parents are increasingly propagandized to believe that disliking school means disliking learning. That was not always the case in the United States. Mark Twain famously said, "I never let my schooling get in the way of my education." Toward the end of Twain's life in 1900, only 6 percent of Americans graduated high school. Today, approximately 85 percent of Americans graduate high school, but this is good enough for Barack Obama who told us in 2009, "And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It's not just quitting on yourself, it's quitting on your country."

The more schooling Americans get, however, the more politically ignorant they are of America's ongoing class war, and the more incapable they are of challenging the ruling class. In the 1880s and 1890s, American farmers with little or no schooling created a Populist movement that organized America's largest-scale working people's cooperative, formed a People's Party that received 8 percent of the vote in 1892 presidential election, designed a "subtreasury" plan (that had it been implemented would have allowed easier credit for farmers and broke the power of large banks) and sent 40,000 lecturers across America to articulate it, and evidenced all kinds of sophisticated political ideas, strategies and tactics absent today from America's well-schooled population. Today, Americans who lack college degrees are increasingly shamed as "losers"; however, Gore Vidal and George Carlin, two of America's most astute and articulate critics of the corporatocracy, never went to college, and Carlin dropped out of school in the ninth grade.

6. The Normalization of Surveillance. The fear of being surveilled makes a population easier to control. While the National Security Agency (NSA) has received publicity for monitoring American citizen's email and phone conversations, and while employer surveillance has become increasingly common in the United States, young Americans have become increasingly acquiescent to corporatocracy surveillance because, beginning at a young age, surveillance is routine in their lives. Parents routinely check Web sites for their kid's latest test grades and completed assignments, and just like employers, are monitoring their children's computers and Facebook pages. Some parents use the GPS in their children's cell phones to track their whereabouts, and other parents have video cameras in their homes. Increasingly, I talk with young people who lack the confidence that they can even pull off a party when their parents are out of town, and so how much confidence are they going to have about pulling off a democratic movement below the radar of authorities?

7. Television. In 2009, the Nielsen Company reported that TV viewing in the United States is at an all-time high if one includes the following "three screens": a television set, a laptop/personal computer, and a cell phone. American children average eight hours a day on TV, video games, movies, the Internet, cell phones, iPods, and other technologies (not including school-related use). Many progressives are concerned about the concentrated control of content by the corporate media, but the mere act of watching TV—regardless of the programming—is the primary pacifying agent (private-enterprise prisons have recognized that providing inmates with cable television can be a more economical method to keep them quiet and subdued than it would be to hire more guards).

Television is a dream come true for an authoritarian society: those with the most money own most of what people see; fear-based television programming makes people more afraid and distrustful of one another, which is good for the ruling elite who depend on a "divide and conquer" strategy; TV isolates people so they are not joining together to create resistance to authorities; and regardless of the programming, TV viewers' brainwaves slow down, transforming them closer to a hypnotic state that makes it difficult to think critically. While playing a video games is not as zombifying as passively viewing TV, such games have become for many boys and young men their only experience of potency, and this "virtual potency" is certainly no threat to the ruling elite.

8. Fundamentalist Religion and Fundamentalist Consumerism. American culture offers young Americans the "choices" of fundamentalist religion and fundamentalist consumerism. All varieties of fundamentalism narrow one's focus and inhibit critical thinking. While some progressives are fond of calling fundamentalist religion the "opiate of the masses," they too often neglect the pacifying nature of America's other major fundamentalism. Fundamentalist consumerism pacifies young Americans in a variety of ways. Fundamentalist consumerism destroys self-reliance, creating people who feel completely dependent on others and who are thus more likely to turn over decision-making power to authorities, the precise mind-set that the ruling elite loves to see. A fundamentalist consumer culture legitimizes advertising, propaganda, and all kinds of manipulations, including lies; and when a society gives legitimacy to lies and manipulativeness, it destroys the capacity of people to trust one another and form democratic movements. Fundamentalist consumerism also promotes self-absorption, which makes it difficult for the solidarity necessary for democratic movements. 

These are not the only aspects of our culture that are subduing young Americans and crushing their resistance to domination. The food-industrial complex has helped create an epidemic of childhood obesity, depression, and passivity. The prison-industrial complex keeps young anti-authoritarians "in line" (now by the fear that they may come before judges such as the two Pennsylvania ones who took $2.6 million from private-industry prisons to ensure that juveniles were incarcerated). As Ralph Waldo Emerson observed: "All our things are right and wrong together. The wave of evil washes all our institutions alike."

Bruce E. Levine is a clinical psychologist. His Web site is www.brucelevine.net.

http://bit.ly/p2bscg
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/charlie-miller-battery-hack-security,2996.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw&feature=player_embedded


To quote Margaret Thatcher: "I hate Communists".
I'm a bohemian, preppy Republican, I love my dogs, my capitalist
Republican politics & fine wine. What you see is what you get. Don't
like it? Not my problem.


I love this!!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
*Top 25 Quotes of Margaret Thatcher*

When Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979, Britain was a dump, "the
sick man of Europe" and on the brink of total economic collapse. When
she left power in 1990, it was the one of the financial capitals of the
world. She is associated with her political philosophy of Thatcherism,
based on low taxation, low public spending, free markets and mass
privatization. I, personally, love Margaret Thatcher for her honesty,
bluntness, strength of character and her radicalism. Many others hate
her, though, mainly on the left of politics who believed that she
destroyed workers rights and slashed public spending. During her tenure
she had to deal with mass unemployment, out of control inflation,
endless strikes, a war with the Falklands and an attempted assassination
by the IRA. In February 2007, she became the first British Prime
Minister to be honoured with a statue in the House of Commons while
still alive; a testament to her incredible legacy.


1. Pennies don't fall from heaven – they have to be earned here on earth.
2. No one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good
intentions; he had money as well.
3. Economics are the method; the object is to change the heart and soul.
4. My policies are based not on some economics theory, but on things I
and millions like me were brought up with: an honest day's work for an
honest day's pay; live within your means; put by a nest egg for a rainy
day; pay your bills on time; support the police.
5. Defeat? I do not recognise the meaning of the word.
11. For every idealistic peacemaker willing to renounce his self-defence
in favour of a weapons-free world, there is at least one warmaker
anxious to exploit the other's good intentions.
12. Constitutions have to be written on hearts, not just paper.
13. If you want something said, ask a man. If you want something done,
ask a woman.
11. For every idealistic peacemaker willing to renounce his self-defence
in favour of a weapons-free world, there is at least one warmaker
anxious to exploit the other's good intentions.
12. Constitutions have to be written on hearts, not just paper.
13. If you want something said, ask a man. If you want something done,
ask a woman.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.