• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0

Muslims are not allowed to salute any on or anything except allah

 
Subject: The crotch salute returns.......

At the Ft. Hood Memorial Service...
The Crotch Salute Returns



I am sorry folks, but is this the MAGGOT that was elected President of our country? You know, the United States of America .

I do believe that saluting the flag goes with that, as does respecting and honoring the service members who have died.

Does this pompous ass believe he is above that gesture? He can shower us all with flowery words (via teleprompter) and dazzle us with his B.S., but actions speak louder.

This sucks!
EVERYONE needs to see this Pic!







--
Government is a great fiction where everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else.

Federico Bastia

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Monday, August 1, 2011
Bush 2.0: 100 Ways Barack Obama Is Just Like George W. Bush
Wes Messamore

The election of President Obama was in no small part, a referendum on the administration of George W. Bush, and his victory was interpreted as a sound rebuke to eight years of open ended warfare, a vast and growing police state, the destruction of civil liberties, disregard for the Constitution, unchecked executive power, lies and broken promises, hypocrisy and arrogance, a lack of transparency in government, out-of-control federal spending, fever-pitch fearmongering, rampant corruption, and some really stupid gaffes. But what have we gotten instead?

More of the same. A LOT more of the same. In fact, every negative aspect of the Bush Administration has come back with a vengeance in the presidency of Barack H. Obama. Everything the American people detested so strongly about Bush has not only characterized the presidency of his successor, it's gotten much worse. Don't believe me? The following is a list of 100 ways President Obama is just like President Bush. We might as well consider it a third Bush term on steroids, or call Mr. Obama "Bush 2.0." If you honestly didn't like Bush, you can't possibly justify liking Obama, not unless you ignore the facts:

(I swear if this doesn't hit the front page of Reddit and every other social media website out there, I'll punch the next kitten I see in the face.)

UPDATE: AUG 5, 2011 ...but I'll "settle" for a mention at the Lew Rockwell blog! Hi LRC visitors! A tip of my hat to ya, Charles Burris. You just saved a kitten a traumatic experience.


Open Ended Warfare

One of the most disastrous and destructive aspects of the Bush Administration was a ramping up of the military-industrial complex to a level unprecedented in U.S. history. Bush's Global War on Terror worried critics because of its lack of clear objectives, no set timeline, and no specific enemy (as terror is a tactic, not an enemy). Along with it came the Bush Doctrine of preemptive warfare against countries that had not attacked the United States, which formed the foundation-- along with a few lies and sketchy intelligence-- for the massive, costly, and deadly war in Iraq.

The antiwar movement in America reached a fever pitch under President Bush, and rightly so, but has Obama put an end to this tragic era in American history? He could be forgiven if he had merely taken some time to draw down troops in the Middle East and abroad, but instead, within his first term Obama has actually taken Bush's war machine and put it in overdrive, sending significantly more troops to fight overseas, spending more money on "defense" than even Bush, and engaging the U.S. in even more conflicts on more fronts, sometimes even ignoring the Constitutional separation of powers (i.e. breaking the law) in order to pursue warfare on a level unmatched by the worst excesses of the Bush Administration:

1. Iraq - We should have known in 2008 that we wouldn't see any real change from the Obama Administration. Despite campaigning for the U.S. Senate in 2004 on a platform of voting against Bush's war budgets, when he became a Senator, Obama voted for every single one of Bush's requests to continue funding war in the Middle East. Apparently, his streak of broken promises started long before campaigning for the White House (and we'll get to those later down the list).

Then right off the bat in February of 2009, a mere month into his administration, President Obama revealed a phony withdrawal plan that would take three months longer than promised, and leave a whopping 50,000 troops in Iraq (out of the 135,000 that were there when Obama assumed office). Eight months later in October 2009, 131,000 troops remained in Iraq, and Obama sent another 1000 at the request of theater commanders in Iraq. Seriously.

2. First Surge in Afghanistan - Think Iraq was bad? It gets better! Mr. (Blind) Hope and (Regime) Change kicked off his presidency with a 17,000 troop surge to Afghanistan in February of 2009. 17,000! Don't defend him. Don't say it was necessary to help win the war there. You would not have defended Bush and you know it. Mr. Obama started his presidency by radically escalating Bush's war.

3. Second Surge in Afghanistan - But wait- there's more! By December of 2009, less than a year into his presidency, Obama decided to outdo even himself and send another whopping 30,000 troops to Afghanistan! By this point, Al-Qaeda was scattered and devastated. Our troops were overseas fighting someone else's civil war, not defending our freedoms or our safety.

4. Phony Afghan Withdrawal - In June of 2011, Obama announced a "troop withdrawal" from Afghanistan, and true to form, it was as phony as his Iraq withdrawal. Even if he stays on schedule and makes the most "radical" withdrawal on the table by the end of 2012-- 30,000 troops-- there would still be more than twice as many troops as there were in January 2009 when Obama took office. Only in the Orwellian world of U.S. foreign policy could something like that be called a withdrawal.

5. The Rise of Drone Warfare - The Obama Administration's continued and extensive use of weaponized aerial drones to bomb enemy targets in countries throughout the Middle East (sometimes resulting in the deaths of dozens of civilians at a time when the drone operators or intelligence make a mistake) has touched off a drone arms race with the rest of the world, most notably China. Great. Just great.

6. Bombing Campaign in Yemen - Bush bombed in Yemen, but Obama's really been stepping it up.

7. Bombing Campaign in Somalia - In Somalia too!

8. Bombing Campaign in Pakistan - Under Obama, there have been more drone strikes in Pakistan than there ever were under Bush, and they're also claiming more civilians lives, Pakistanis claim, leading the country into uproar and protest against the United States.

9. Bombing Campaign in Libya - In March of 2011, President Obama took America to war in an entirely new country, Libya, taking sides with insurgents in a civil war against a dictator that Washington has supported for years up until now. Expanding Bush's old wars wasn't enough it would seem; Obama had to start some new ones of his own, against a country that had not attacked us and did not threaten us. And get this: in all likelihood, we've been fighting on the same side as Al-Qaeda in Libya's civil war!

10. Defense Spending Levels - "Defense" spending has only gone up during President Obama's first term from $616 billion under Bush in 2008 to $768 billion in 2011, and Obama still wants even more. We were promised change. Why are we spending even more on bombs and bullets?

11. Record Casualty Levels - Under Obama, the wars haven't just gotten bigger, more numerous, and even more legally dubious than under Bush (more on that later)-- they've gotten deadlier. According to the most up-to-date figures as of this publication, under Obama, the U.S. casualty rate in Afghanistan is five times greater than it was under Bush.

12. "Overseas Contingency Operations" - Despite ramping the Global War on Terror up to unprecedented levels as detailed above, the Obama Administration decided to seriously downplay its title by renaming it "Overseas Contingency Operations." Chillingly Orwellian, isn't it? And quite typically Obama: make no substantive changes at all (other than to make things worse and accelerate the damage done by Bush), but do make a big deal about changing a name or a logo!

13. God and War Rhetoric - To wrap up Obama's continuation of Bush's foreign policy, I give you none other than Jon Stewart, marveling at how similar Obama's war rhetoric is to Bush's, even to the point of invoking God in our fight against other countries, and "refusing to apologize" for our way of life (which apparently includes bombing everybody else):

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-january-20-2009/changefest--09---obama-s-inaugural-speech

Bush critics consider his presidency to have inaugurated an era unprecedented in U.S. history for violations of civil liberties, privacy, and the constitutional amendments that protect Americans from unwarranted police actions by the government. The creation of a vast, "national security" state has alarmed critics as something more akin to fascist dictatorship than American republicanism. Yet all of Bush's worst and most tyrannical abuses have not only been continued by the Obama Administration, but taken to a whole new level:

14. The Patriot Act - A favorite target of Bush critics, the Patriot Act violates the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments of the Constitution. Passed and renewed over and over again with little debate or deliberation, this gargantuan bill gave the federal government sweeping new powers to police its citizenry while ignoring the constitutional restrictions our Founding Fathers created to protect us from tyranny.

It should be no surprise that after the failed efforts of one honest Republican senator to prevent its passage, Obama renewed the Patriot Act (from across the Atlantic Ocean by autopen) as president-- he voted for its renewal as a senator. On one of the most important issues of our era, Obama is indistinguishable from Bush. He supports the (un)Patriot(ic) Act.

15. The TSA - Created by an act of Congress during the Bush Administration, and organized within the Department of Homeland Security, the TSA has been annoying and harassing passengers at airports for a decade now. But under President Obama, it has become more aggressive and oppressive than it ever was under Bush, with the installment of dozens of radiation-emitting "naked body scanners" throughout the country and directives from the DHS to use "enhanced" pat downs that many critics say amount to sexual assault. Under Bush, the TSA was merely annoying. Under Obama, it is horrifyingly out of control.

16. The War on Drugs - The decades-long "War on Drugs" has been a spectacular failure of public policy, resulting in billions of wasted dollars, record levels of incarceration, higher rates of drug fatalities, and the creation of a violent international criminal drug cartel that thrives on continued prohibition. The 2009 Ogden Memo signaled that Obama might change course in the failed "War on Drugs." Nope. In July 2011, the Justice Department published a new memo indicating that things would stay just the same as they were under George W. Bush.

17. CIA Rendition - The CIA's "extraordinary rendition" program consists of seizing "terror suspects," detaining them without warrant or trial, and sending them offshore to outsource their "interrogation" to third world countries where they are tortured for information and confessions. Seriously. Torture was one of the big criticisms faced by the Bush Administration, and in February 2009, the Obama Administration wasted no time in quietly retaining the practice of rendition.

18. Habeas Corpus - The Obama Administration also continued Bush's suspension of the long-standing legal tradition of habeas corpus, insisting that it has the right to detain suspected terrorists indefinitely without trial.

19. You Do Not Have The Right To Remain Silent - The Obama Administration actually had the gall to ask "the Supreme Court to overrule long-standing law that stops police from initiating questions unless a defendant's lawyer is present, another stark example of the White House seeking to limit rather than expand rights."

20. ...or Test Genetic Evidence Used Against You -The Obama Administration has also limited "the rights of prisoners to test genetic evidence used to convict them."

21. The DHS and Swine Flu - The Obama Administration further empowered the growing police state and set a chilling precedent when it let the Department of Homeland Security manage a health issue, a strain of flu referred to as "swine flu." the DHS declared a state of emergency in the U.S. and got out in front of the (manufactured) swine flu "crisis."


Disregard for the Constitution and Unchecked Executive Power

President Bush will be forever remembered by critics for his "imperial presidency," his usurpation of power from the other branches of government in violation of the Constitution. Instead of a nation guided by laws, under Bush our country descended even further into the lawless anarchy of executive tyranny, unchecked by the other branches of government and unrestrained by the Constitution. An autocrat, Bush did as he pleased, whether the law permitted it or not. Obama has been no different. Actually, he's been worse:

22. Faith-Based Initiatives - Obama curiously continued Bush's unconstitutional faith-based initiatives (ever heard of the First Amendment?).

23. Signing Statements - On the campaign trail, Obama called presidential "signing statements" (letters of interpretation and recommendations attached to Congressional legislation) unconstitutional and promised not to use them... then attached a signing statement to a $410 billion spending bill as president. If you want to know why this is a dangerous usurpation of power by the executive, click that first link above and Obama will it explain it to you himself. This also counts as a broken promise, which you'll read plenty more of soon.

24. Hillary Clinton Appointment - Unconstitutional. If you think I'm splitting hairs, you can bite me.

25. War in Libya - We already touched on this as one of Obama's expansions to Bush's open-ended warfare, but I didn't mention one key thing: this was was completely unconstitutional. Obama went to war in Libya without a formal declaration from Congress-- without even consulting Congress-- and according to both the War Powers Resolution and the U.S. Constitution itself, it is only the people's representatives in Congress that can take our nation to war, not the president alone.

Even Obama's own defense secretary said that America faced no imminent threat from Libya. Here are Obama's own words on the matter back when he was a senator:

"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."


26. Czars - One significant change that will forever characterize the Obama administration is its radical and unprecedented expansion of a policy that started in the Nixon administration-- the unconstitutional appointment of "czars" as "principle officers" of policy within the administration who answer solely to the president without the advice and consent of Congress. By most recent estimates, Obama has appointed 41 of these "czars" to high level posts within his administration.

It is exactly this kind of centralization of executive power, isolated from the advice, consent, and oversight of the people via their representatives that worried Democrats about President George W. Bush. Before he died, even the Democrats' most senior senator, Robert Byrd, condemned Obama "czar strategy" as an unprecedented and illegal power grab that centralizes power in the executive, evades congressional oversight, and violates the separation of powers required by law in the Constitution.

27. Distribution of TARP funds - Though you'll read about several broken promises in a minute, one promise Obama has kept is his distribution of TARP II funds to non-financial institutions, which is contrary to the stated intention of those funds in the legislation passed by Congress, making his action illegal, unconstitutional, and an expansion of unlimited executive power.

28. Converting federal loans to common stock - In a sneaky, underhanded, unconstitutional power play, Obama moved to convert U.S. Federal loans to banking institutions into common stock, effectively nationalizing major portions of the U.S. banking industry.

29. Health provisions in the stimulus bill - Though hardly mentioned by the news media, the health provisions in the 2009 stimulus package passed by Obama represent a giant leap towards fascist medicine in this country. Details here.

30. Census Bureau Grab - Obama's move of the United States Census out of the Department of Commerce and under the direct control of the White House was unconstitutional, politically motivated, and a dangerous, undemocratic expansion of executive power.

31. Forcing US banks to accept TARP money - What's worse than bailing out wealthy banks with money taken from poor and middle class Americans? Forcing wealthy banks to take the bailout money against their will.

32. Rebuking SCOTUS - This was extremely unusual and entirely unseemly for a President of the United States to do during a State of the Union Address.


Lies and Broken Promises

Lies, lies, lies. The Bush Administration was marred by lies and broken campaign promises. His administration looked nothing like the promises he made during the 2000 Presidential Campaign. The Obama Administration has been no different.

33. Non-Emergency Legislation - Obama promised to "publish all non-emergency legislation to the website for five days... before the President signs it," then broke that promise over and over again. (This is also a big transparency problem... more of those later.)

34. Lobbyists - Despite promising to keep lobbyists out of his administration, Obama broke his word again and again (making 17 exceptions to this promise in his first two weeks as president).

35. Income Tax Cuts for Seniors - Obama promised to eliminate income taxation for seniors making less than $50,000 a year. He has broken this promise despite numerous opportunities to keep it, including the economic stimulus package and his administration's first budget proposal.

36. Tax Credit for Businesses - The President also boasted during his campaign that "During 2009 and 2010, existing businesses will receive a $3,000 refundable tax credit for each additional full-time employee hired," and has failed to keep his word.

37. Retirement Accounts - Obama made it part of his agenda to "allow withdrawals of 15% up to $10,000 from retirement accounts without penalty (although subject to the normal taxes). This would apply to withdrawals in 2008 (including retroactively) and 2009," but didn't include this measure in the stimulus package or his budget proposal.

38. The Armenian Genocide - Obama broke his promise to recognize the Armenian Genocide.

39. Tax Credit for College Tuition - On the campaign trail, Obama promised a $4000 tax credit for college tuition, but backpedaled when he signed a much smaller $2,500 college tax credit into law.

40. The Partisan Tenor - Obama promised a different tone in Washington D.C. and a move past bitter, partisan rhetoric. It took him less than a week as president to berate Republicans and sully the dignity of his office by picking a very public rhetorical fight with a private citizen, Rush Limbaugh.

41. Dog-Gone Lies - If you can't trust someone with little things, you certainly can't trust them with bigger things. Obama chose purebred dog, "Bo" for the White House family's "first dog" instead of adopting a dog from a shelter like he promised.

42. Spinning the Auto Bailout - Someone explain to me again why a supposedly "progressive" president is lying to justify a coerced (and illegal) loan to a wealthy, irresponsible corporation from hard working poor and middle class Americans?

43. Taxing Some Employee Health Benefits - "The Obama administration is signaling to Congress that the president could support taxing some employee health benefits, as several influential lawmakers and many economists favor, to help pay for overhauling the health care system. The proposal is politically problematic for President Obama, however, since it is similar to one he denounced in the presidential campaign as 'the largest middle-class tax increase in history."


Arrogance and Hypocrisy

What got critics so especially emotional in their opposition to George W. Bush was not merely his demolition job of liberty and rule of law in America, but the cowboy arrogance and shameless hypocrisy that characterized his administration. Let's see if Obama has been any better:

44. "I won." - In his first private meeting with Congressional Republicans, instead of "reaching across the aisle" and seeking earnest dialogue, Obama smugly told them that he should have his way because "I won."

45. "Don't think we're not keeping score." - Obama to Rep. Peter DeFazio, one of the Democratic congressman who voted against the stimulus package, "Don't think we're not keeping score, brother."

46. I'm smart. You're dumb. - I'm smart. You're dumb. I'm right. You're wrong. Shut up and take it. That's pretty much what Obama said when asked about public opinion against raising the debt ceiling.

47. OBL Death - Just watch this video comparing President Bush's announcement after Hussein's capture to President Obama's announcement after Osama bin Laden's death. Notice a difference? Even Bush wasn't this arrogant, and that's saying something.

48. Schooled in Hypocrisy - Obama's daughters attend a private school in Washington D.C., enjoying the freedom of educational choice that the Obama Administration has denied to poor children who live in Washington (more on that later... when you read it, you're going to flip your lid).

49. Golf - In just "ten months as U.S. President, Mr Obama has already played as much golf as George W Bush did in his entire eight years in power."

50. "Mostly basketball." - It's crap like this.

51. Inauguration Footprint - Despite claiming our environment is in a state of crisis, Obama's extravagant inauguration alone emitted over 500 million pounds of CO2.

52. Inauguration Price - Obama's lavish inauguration also cost a whopping $170 million. (This is the same man who said: "There is no doubt that we've been living beyond our means and we're going to have to make some adjustments.")

53. Thermostat - After saying "We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times... and then just expect that every country is going to say okay," journalists discovered that Obama cranks the thermostat in the Oval Office.

54. Earth Day Flights - Obama's Earth Day flights burned more than 9,000 gallons of fuel.

55. The Race Card - In 2009, Obama said: "we have to get to the point where we can have a conversation about big, important issues that matter to the American people without vitriol, without name-calling, without the assumption of the worst in other people's motives." Then in 2011, we learned that Obama has assumed the worst about the Tea Party's motives: they're racists.

56. AIG Bailout - AIG's second biggest campaign donation beneficiary: Barack Obama, who acted angry about the results of a bailout he helped to craft as U.S. Senator.

57. The Blame Game - Throughout his presidency, Obama has blamed Bush and stifled criticism by saying he inherited a mess from his predecessor. As you read through this list, however, can't you see how that might be a little bit hypocritical? Blame Bush for the wars while ramping them up and even starting new ones? Blame Bush for the deficit while spending even more than Bush did? Blame Bush for everything, while just making things worse?


Lack of Transparency

A common theme throughout Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign was transparency. Supporters wanted to see an administration that would restore some of the transparency in government that was lost during the Bush years. Unfortunately, Obama didn't deliver:

58. Closed door stimulus meetings - Within the first month of the Obama Administration, the country was rushed into accepting a multi-billion dollar stimulus package that was debated in secret, behind closed doors. The bill itself was too big for any of the congressmen themselves, much less the American people, to have an opportunity to actually read it. Then it was not published to the White House website for five days before Obama signed it despite his campaign promise to do so.

59. Closed door health care meetings (C-SPAN) - Despite Obama's promise to televise the health care debate on C-SPAN, the debate and ultimate passage of the "ObamaCare" bill happened without a public debate, behind closed doors, in secret meetings. More broken promises. Less transparency.

60. HHS "Transparency" - President Obama's rationing czar, who controls the health care of 1 in 3 Americans and has a budget larger than the freaking Pentagon's refuses to answer questions, grant interviews, or testify before Congress.

61. DC Voucher Program - The Obama Administration ended funding for Washington D.C.'s school voucher program, while suppressing a study that showed it delivered better results at a lower cost. Less transparency, lower quality education, and higher costs. Brilliant.

62. Prisoner Abuse Photos - In 2010 watchdog group, OpenTheGovernment.org found that the Obama Administration, following in the steps of the Bush Administration, continued to block the release of photos depicting prisoner abuse by American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan

63. State Secrets Privilege and CIA torture - The same group also noted that Obama's administration continued to invoke the state secrets privilege in cases involving alleged CIA torture.

64. Declassifications Drop - Further, they found that in 2009, fewer pages (28.8 million) were declassified governmentwide and the declassification rate fell significantly­from 61% of all material reviewed in 2008 to 55% in 2009.

65. Only one question - After the Department of Homeland Security circulated a memo to state police departments warning of "right-wing" terrorism, Secretary Janet Napolitano did an interview, but would only answer one question with no follow ups about the memo.

66. Tax Returns!!! - Always focusing on appearances, never substantive changes, Obama made a big flashy deal out of releasing the President's and Vice President's income tax returns (oooohh- transparency!), which every President has done for years now. The embarrassing thing is, the Obamas were totally shown up by the Bushes-- according to their respective tax returns, the Obamas gave 6.5% of their 2008 income to charity while the Bushes gave 23% of theirs to charity in 2007.

67. Most Anti-Leak Administration Ever - The Obama Administration has proven far more aggressive than the Bush Administration in seeking to punish whistle-blowers within the administration.



Out of Control Spending

Especially during the debt ceiling debate that raged all Summer of 2011, Democrats were quick to point out the " balanced budgets" of the Clinton years. Many of Bush's critics excoriated him for wrecking America's fiscal solvency and running up federal budget deficits unprecedented in U.S. history. It was completely irresponsible. MoveOn.org even made a famous ad showing children working in factories before posing the question: "Guess who's going to pay for Bush's deficits?"

Guess who's going to pay for Obama's even bigger deficits? Those same future generations of children:

68. Spending WAY MORE than Bush - Yeah, Bush's deficits were bad. But if you really believe that, you've got to be willing to condemn Obama's even bigger deficits. Here's a pretty good look with some hard figures at just how the two presidents compare. Bush was bad. Obama has been much worse.

69. Earmarks - Obama did a shameless 180 degree turn on earmarks by sharply criticizing them (and bragging that he would pass legislation without a single one) and then signing a spending bill with literally thousands of them.

70. Stimulus Package - There went $800 billion in productive capital right down the drain.

71. Health Care Bill - Another $900 billion.

72. TARP - I know this passed while Bush was president. But guess which then-senator gets some of the blame too because he voted to send it across Bush's desk? Barack Obama. $700 billion. Gosh, all these hundreds of billions add up to trillions real fast!

73. Bailing out Greece - Meanwhile, as America faces a fiscal crisis in 2011 because of all the aforementioned spending bills in 2008 - 2009, Obama thinks we have enough money to bailout another country halfway around the world.

74. Appointing Ben Bernanke - Another continuation of Bush era economics, fiscal policy, and monetary policy: Obama's appointment of Ben Bernanke to another term as Fed Chair. Are you convinced that Mr. Obama is not so different from Mr. Bush yet?

75. Measly $100 million "cut" - But remember, this is Obama, so he's got to keep up appearances, which is why he made a big show of challenging his cabinet to cut a measly $100 million from the Federal budget (a .0027% cut in Federal spending... also, he admitted that this doesn't even represent a spending cut by saying that it will free up more money for Federal spending on other things like health and education).


Fear Mongering

One of the worst aspects of the Bush Administration (and a complicit media) was its use of fearmongering and panic to scare the American people into accepting its relentless march on our freedoms. In 2008, people clamored for a reasoned voice of hope. Instead, they got Obama:

76. Stimulus Package - Shrill: "If nothing is done, this recession could linger for years. The unemployment rate could reach double digits. For every day we wait or point fingers or drag our feet, more Americans will lose their jobs. More families will lose their savings. More dreams will be deferred and denied. And our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse."

77. Valentine's Day Vacation -And we know it was just fearmongering, because if Obama had meant the above words in earnest, then after passage of the stimulus act, he would not have taken off on a ritzy Valentine's Day vacation in Chicago for the weekend instead of signing the stimulus bill that he said needed to be passed as soon as possible to avert an irreversible economic meltdown. Also file this one under hypocrisy and lies.

78. Debt Ceiling - Obama knew full well that he was lying and fearmongering when he said that he could not guarantee Social Security checks would make it out to their beneficiaries if the debt limit wasn't raised by August 2nd. Without borrowing money, the federal government takes in $200 billion in receivables each month, plenty enough to service interest on the national debt, write Social Security checks, and continue military operations.

79. Health Care Bill - If you'll remember with me, the level of panicked rhetoric over health care in this country was at a fever pitch during the months leading up to passage of this bill. Along with the sanctimony, the secrecy, the backroom deals, the sudden changes in votes, the lack of public support, the narrow margin of passage, the size of the bill itself, and the fact that no one had actually read it before voting on it, the storyline was no different from passage of Bush's Medicare Part D (which many Democrats opposed).

80. DHS Memo - This shrill gem published in the early days of the Obama Administration instructed state police departments that both active and inactive US military personnel are potential domestic terrorists, comparing them to Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. Additional potential terrorists, according to the memo, included Tea Party protesters, anyone who vocally supports the amendments in the Bill of Rights, and anyone who is vocally pro-life.

81. Swine Flu - Jon Stewart says it best.

82. Patriot Act Renewal -It was the same old line used by the Bush Administration. We need these tools to deal with the terrorists. If we don't renew the Patriot Act, America will be less safe. Blah blah blah blah blah. Then after renewing it, of course the administration continues bombing other countries and we wonder why there are terrorists out there targeting Americans and why we feel less safe.


Corruption

I'll try to make this quick for you:

83. Joe Sestak - Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) was (illegally) offered a job by the Obama administration in exchange for dropping out of the senatorial primary against Obama supporter Sen. Arlen Specter. And Sestak's not the only one. ( Proof.)

84. Tim Geithner - Obama appointed Tim Geithner to the office of Secretary of the Treasury, even though he was a part of the problem with the economic status quo and evaded his taxes for years.

85. Annette Nazareth - Obama also selected Annette Nazareth for the position of Deputy Treasury Secretary, who withdrew after a month long probe into her taxes.

86. Tom Daschle - Next there's Tom Daschle, appointed by Obama to the Department of Health and Human Services. He had to resign his nomination for the position because of tax evasion.

87. Nancy Killefer - Obama also appointed Nancy Killefer for Chief Performance Officer, but she had to step down because-- SURPRISE-- she didn't pay her taxes either!

88. Rahm Emmanuel - There's also Rahm Emmanuel, who served as Chief of Staff even though he failed to report five years of free rent at a U.S. Congressman's property in accordance with IRS policy and congressional ethics rules.

89. Louis Susman - "Barack Obama has been embroiled in a cronyism row after reports that he intends to make Louis Susman, one of his biggest fundraisers, the new US ambassador in London. The selection of Mr. Susman, a lawyer and banker from the president's hometown of Chicago, rather than an experienced diplomat, raises new questions about Mr Obama's commitment to the special relationship with Britain."

90. Adolfo Carrion - Adolfo Carrion, Director of White House Office of Urban Affairs, " pocketed thousands of dollars in campaign cash from city developers whose projects he approved or funded with taxpayers' money."

91. "GunGate" - Obama's Iran-Contra scandal?



Really Stupid Gaffes

Who could forget Bush's gaffes? While the rest of the world rejoiced at Obama's inauguration, comedians were secretly a little disappointed. For eight years, Bush made such an easy target. Lucky for them, Obama has had plenty moments of his own:

92. Bowing - In 2009, President Obama actually bowed to a foreign monarch, King Abdullah. After a few more bowing gaffes like bowing to Japanese Emperor Akihito, it started getting weird when Obama bowed to the mayor of Tampa:

93. Lamest Gift Ever - At their first meeting, U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown's gift to Obama: "an ornamental pen holder made from the timbers of the Victorian anti-slave ship HMS Gannet," and "a framed commission for HMS Resolute and a first edition of the seven-volume biography of Churchill by Sir Martin Gilbert." Obama's gift to Brown: a box set of 25 classic American DVDs... that don't work on European DVD players. Fail.

94. England =/= UK - To make matters worse, Obama used "England" to denote the U.K. -a gaffe that people from Scotland, Ireland, and Wales don't appreciate and chalk up to American ignorance and parochialism.

95. Thanking Himself - And check out Obama thanking himself for being invited to speak with the Irish Prime Minister because he was having teleprompter troubles.

96. Arguing with a teleprompter - And it only gets better: behold the bizarre spectacle of the President "arguing with" a teleprompter during a speech.

97. Special Olympics - Yikes, Barack: "I've been practicing bowling. I bowled a 129. It was like the Special Olympics or something." -Obama on The Tonight Show

98. All 57 states! - This one is sooo Bush-like.

99. Terrorizing NYC - Post 9-11, this is about the least sensitive, most stupid thing you could do: Airforce 1 panics New York City residents with extremely low flight plan for photo op and no public announcement.

100. Gulf Oil Spill - Okay, this one isn't really a gaffe, just a long nightmare for everybody that lasted all summer back in 2010. It didn't really fit into any of the other categories, but this was Obama's Katrina for sure. That oil just kept flowing, and Obama just kept golfing.



Conclusion

Anybody who voted for Obama want to fess up and admit they made a mistake?


http://www.humblelibertarian.com/2011/08/bush-20-100-ways-barack-obama-is-just.html

Creating Evidence Where There Is None
by Paul Craig Roberts

The New Yorker has published a story planted on Nicholas Schmidle by unidentified sources who claim to be familiar with the alleged operation that murdered Osama bin Laden.

There is no useful information in the story. Its purpose seems simply to explain away or cover up holes in the original story, principally why did the Seals murder an unarmed, unresisting Osama bin Laden whose capture would have resulted in a goldmine of terrorist information and whose show trial would have rescued the government's crumbling 9/11 story?

The gullible Schmidle tells us: "'There was never any question of detaining or capturing him – it wasn't a split-second decision. No one wanted detainees,' the special-operations officer told me." In other words, the SEALs murdered bin Laden, because the US government did not want detainees, not because trigger-happy stupid SEALs destroyed a font of terrorist information.

Why did the SEALS dump bin Laden's body in the ocean instead of producing the evidence to a skeptical world? No real explanation, just that SEALS had done the same thing to other victims. Schmidle writes: "All along, the SEALs had planed to dump bin Laden's corpse into the sea – a blunt way of ending the bin Laden myth." But before they did so, the US checked with an unidentified Saudi intelligence operative, who allegedly replied, "Your plan sounds like a good one."

I mean, really.

After all of Sy Hersh's New Yorker revelations of US government lies and plots, one can understand the pressure that might have been applied to the New Yorker to publish this fairy tale. But what is extraordinary is that there was a real story that Schmidle and the New Yorker could have investigated.

In the immediate aftermath of bin Laden's alleged murder by the SEALs, Pakistani TV interviewed the next door neighbor to bin Laden's alleged compound. Someone supplied the video with an English translation running at the bottom of the video.

According to the translation, the next door neighbor, Mr. Bashir, said that he watched the entire operation from the roof of his house. There were 3 helicopters. Only 1 landed. About a dozen men got out and entered the house. They shortly returned and boarded the helicopter. When the helicopter lifted off it exploded, killing all aboard. Mr.

Bashir reports seeing bodies and pieces of bodies all over.

The US government acknowledges that it lost a helicopter, but claims no one was hurt.

Obviously, as there were no further landings, if everyone was killed as Mr. Bashir reports, there was no body to be dumped into the ocean.

A real investigation would begin with Mr. Bashir's interview. Was he actually saying what the English translation reported? I have not been able to find the interview with the English translation, but I believe this is the interview that I saw.

Surely there is a qualified interpreter who can tell us what Mr. Bashir is saying. If the English translation that I saw is not a hoax, then we are presented with a story totally different from the one the government told us and repeated again through Mr. Schmidle.

If the English translation of Mr. Bashir's interview is correct, one would think that there would be some interest on the part of US news organizations and on the part of the intelligence committees in Congress to question Mr. Bashir and his neighbors, many of whom are also interviewed on Pakistani TV saying that they have lived in Abbottabad all their lives and are absolutely certain that Osama bin Laden was not among them.

Mr. Schmidle goes to lengths to describe the SEALs' weapons, although his story makes it clear that no weapons were needed as bin Laden is described as "unarmed" and undefended. The "startled" bin Laden didn't even hear the helicopters or all the SEALs coming up the stairs. In addition to all his fatal illnesses which most experts believe killed him a decade ago, bin Laden must have been deaf as neighbors report that the sound of the helicopters was "intense."

When Pakistanis on the scene in Abbottabad report a totally different story from the one that reaches us second and third hand from unidentified operatives speaking to reporters in the US who have never been to Abbottabad, shouldn't someone qualified look into the story?

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Creating-Evidence-Where-Th-by-paul-craig-roberts-110805-618.html



America's next war might be at home

Ronin | 5 August, 2011 at 3:46 pm | Categories: Bad Journalism, By Ronin, criminal activity | URL: http://wp.me/p1NPg-7hF

By Ronin, 5 Aug, 2011
You will have to look hard to find it in what passes for the media in the US but hundreds of black teens rioted yesterday in Wisconsin. Serous injuries resulted when whites were attacked leaving the state fair. Thugs attacked whites, drug them from vehicles and beat them. The teens continued to beat both white men and women even when they were unconscious and unable to defend themselves.

Some of the injuries are serious and I am guessing that the same media that ignored the story will somehow miss the follow up stories about medical costs and recovery. To be fair, a few local channels and Drudge did carry the story but most large outlets did not.

Search a little harder and you will find out that this type of black violence is not uncommon in American cities, mob attacks by black teens is a new trend. Their targets are usually white.

So far, these attacks seem random, unorganized and unrelated. I say so far, because I am on the fence with this one. Some of the violence can be chalked up to gang members teaching others that mob attacks work, they are easy to do and the chance of getting away without getting arrested is almost 100% and since mob robberies and mob assaults are both taking place. It is hard to say what the motivation is racial violence, robbery or both.

With all the government race-baiting going on in the media, these attacks should surprise no one. Rich whites and Tea Party "terrorists" are supposed to be behind all our economic and social problems. Those news articles are easy to find.

It is strange the black on white violence seems to have snuck right past reporters. I am guessing that the first white non-victim to pull a concealed weapon and drop a few of these thugs will not only be condemned in the media as a violent racist but calls to disarm whites, new rules for carrying concealed firearms and forced firearm registration will be the headlines across America.

The Milwaukee Police Department, West Allis Police Department and Milwaukee County Sheriff Department all responded but there were few arrests. Several officers were injured and some of them were serious. I suspect that they will be out in force over the weekend.

The sad reality is that in a mob situation, the chance of help coming to your aid before you require serous medical help is about the same as striking oil in your flower garden.

I would like to see black civic leadership condemn these attacks, hold fundraisers to help the victims with the medical costs and blacks that know who these criminals are and that can identify them, turn them in. I would like those things but they are about as likely as obama admitting that his stimulus package has failed.

What I will see, is black civic leaders explain that these young black men are just angry, they are the real victims as they need jobs and education. Those things will stop all these attacks. How do I know? Simple, every time we see muslim youth attack in packs, islamic civic leadership pulls the same scam. Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0



From the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel:

 

Friday  August 5, 2011

 

Black thugs riot at Wisconsin State Fair

 

Gov. Scott Walker has ordered the Wisconsin State Patrol to provide additional law enforcement help at the Wisconsin State Fair after several incidents involving rampaging youths broke out on the fairgrounds and on the streets outside Thursday night.

Cullen Werwie, Walker's spokesman, said the governor made the decision after reviewing the events from Thursday night, in which at least 24 people were arrested.

"We will continue to evaluate the situation and make any adjustments necessary to ensure a successful and safe event. We will be doing everything in our power to ensure that parents feel that it is safe to bring their children to the world's best fair," Werwie said in a statement.

Also, Rick Frenette, CEO of the fair, announced that, because of the violence overnight, the fair would immediately implement a policy in which no youths under 18 years of age would be allowed onto the grounds after 5 p.m. without a parent or guardian who is at least 21 years of age. There will be no changes at the Midway.

Frenette, a veteran of 40 years in the fair management business, said he had never implemented such a policy before. The International Association of Fairs and Expositions said there is only one other fair in the country -- the South Carolina State Fair -- that has such a policy.

On Friday afternoon, Mayor Tom Barrett announced an increase in police presence at community events planned for the week. He said there would be no tolerance for violence at festivals and that perpetrators will be prosecuted -- regardless of race.

"Two years ago I was a victim of a random attack at State Fair… last night's events took place at State Fair that I don't believe are random," he said at a City Hall news conference.

Barrett didn't indicate if he believed the events were racially charged.

Barrett said this weekend is of special importance because of the Historic Third Association Jazz festival, the African World Festival and the Milwaukee Comedy Festival in addition to the fair. He said police presence will be increased at all events.

Alds. Bob Donovan and Joe Dudzik issued a joint statement in reaction to the violence: "Let's face it, it also has much to do with a deteriorating African American culture in our city. Are large groups of Hispanics or Hmong going out in large mobs and viciously attacking whites? No."

On Friday, police from three jurisdictions - West Allis, Milwaukee and Wisconsin State Fair - were piecing together a series of incidents late Thursday night at the fair in which large groups of youths rampaged through the midway and outside the grounds after closing. At least 24 were arrested, and seven officers were hurt, a State Fair official said.

Tom Struebing, chief of the State Fair Police, said two of the seven injured officers were hospitalized. One was hit in the face with an improvised weapon; the other suffered a concussion.

Struebing said the fights that broke out in the midway area involved black youths fighting other black youths. He said those fights were not racially motivated.

The incidents at the fair also caused confusion among police agencies. Anne E. Schwartz, the Milwaukee police spokeswoman, said West Allis police did not request mutual aid from the Milwaukee Police Department.

Schwartz said Milwaukee police responded to four incidents connected to the fair incidents, but those came from citizens calling police directly. She said one person was arrested by Milwaukee police on a warrant.

Officials could not say what started what witnesses said was a series of racially charged incidents that apparently began as early as 7 p.m. in the midway. The midway is located just east of the Pettit National Ice Center and adjacent to the Hank Aaron State Trail.

Milwaukee police confirmed there were assaults outside the fair as the fair was closing down. The fair closes at 11 p.m.

A State Fair official said most of those arrested were cited for disorderly conduct.

Milwaukee Police Chief Edward Flynn scheduled a news conference later Friday afternoon to discuss the incidents and his department's involvement. He is expected to be joined by officials of the NAACP and the Historic Third Ward Association, which is sponsoring Saturday's Historic Third Ward Jazz Festival.

Common Council President Willie Hines said he was at the fair Thursday night and witnessed black on black crime, but did not see any blacks attack whites.

He said that if there was, those individuals should be charged with the crime as well as a hate crime.

"They should be penalized for the prime incident and we should have a racial enhancer," Hines said.

Hines said State Fair Police acted appropriately and professionally. "They were working hard to control the chaos," Hines said.

He said there may have been some coordination problems with other police departments outside the grounds of the fair.

Witnesses report attacks

Witnesses told WTMJ-AM (620) that dozens to hundreds of young black people were beating white people as they left the fair late Thursday night. Patrice Harris, a spokeswoman for the fair, said a police alert she was given indicated four people were hurt.

"It looked like they were just going after white guys, white people," Norb Roffers of Wind Lake told WTMJ. He said he left the State Fair entrance near the corner of S. 84th St. and W. Schlinger Ave. in West Allis.

One eyewitness, a concession worker who works near the midway area, told the Journal Sentinel that large groups of African-American youths ran through the midway area, knocking over young children and adults, disrupting midway rides and tearing signs up.

"I have never seen anything like it," the worker said. "It was mob mentality."

The concession worker said the incidents began at 7 p.m. "All of a sudden a wave of kids were running through the midway," he said.

The worker said there was police, including officers on horseback, as well as other security, but it was not enough.

"All of a sudden we were hearing whistles," the worker said.

A 34-year-old Muskego man said he was riding on the Ferris wheel in the midway with one of his children when he heard shouts of "fight."

"The trouble really started somewhere between 7 and 8 p.m.," said the man, who did not want to be identified because he was worried about the safety of his family. "We just heard this roar start. It was almost like you're at a football game and a touchdown is scored and you just hear the crowd start roaring."

"I've never seen anything like this in my life. There were hundreds - like 200 to 300 would be my guess. It wasn't like 10 or 20. There was definitely a fight going on in the middle. There were so many people you couldn't see who was fighting. There was just this big group that kept growing and chanting, 'fight, fight, fight.' "

"That lasted for one to two minutes. Then when security showed up blowing some whistles, all of this mob started running. It was like a herd of cattle," he said.

The man described the crowd gathered around the fight as African-American, predominantly male and mainly 15- to 20-year-olds.

Fights break out

Another eyewitness, a Children's Hospital of Wisconsin worker who was with his wife, a daughter, a friend of his daughter's, a brother and a sister-in-law, said they arrived at the midway at 9:15 p.m.

At about 9:40 p.m., he said he saw the first of two fights break out.

"I couldn't see who was fighting but there was an incredible mob mentality," he said. The eyewitness estimated the mob at between 30 to 50 black youths.

"We felt threatened. Without a doubt," the eyewitness said.

He said a game-booth operator allowed his group to seek shelter in the booth while fights broke out.

"Fortunately, the police on horses arrived quite quickly," the eyewitness said.

The eyewitness said he was the recipient of several racially charged comments from the black youths. At one point, he said, he approached a security guard and told him he had better get more security to the scene. He said he told the security officer that "trouble was brewing."

"The scariest part is that we were trapped between the midway and the exits by the mob, we had no way out. It was very frightening," the hospital worker said. "It was glaringly obvious something was going to happen long before it did," the hospital worker said.

One woman, a Marquette University employee, had left the fair with a friend. She said they had just turned onto S. 84th St., across the street from the fair and were headed north toward I-94 when they saw young black youths running between cars on the street.

"Then groups of kids began surging, all running at cars," she said. "Some kids ran up on the hood of the car in front of us, bounced on it and jumped off. That guy looked like he got out of the car. When he came back his face was bloody."

She said she wasn't sure if the man was able to get medical attention. "I saw somebody in the car with cellphones, probably calling police."

"It was scary and it was confusing," she added. "We didn't know what was happening. We didn't see any law enforcement officer."

She said she and her friend were concerned that somebody would try to break into their car. "There were so many people coming at you. Yes, it was scary."

Another woman said she and her boyfriend were leaving the fair on a motorcycle about 11:30 p.m. Thursday when she saw a "mob of black teens picking on a very tall white teen" around S. 84th St. and W. Greenfield Ave.

"I stated to my boyfriend that there is going to be problems over there and I hope the cops are watching this and within seconds I saw the white teen attempting to punch his way out of a circle of black teens," the woman said in an e-mail to the newspaper. "My heart just fell for him. As we turned, I saw security at the entrance to the State Fair and I yelled get over there! They are beating up a kid! We turned, as we went toward the expressway we then had to witness the police involved in multiple stops and incidents down 84th."

Harris said Friday that police officers were involved in breaking up numerous fights at the midway. She could not immediately provide a number, but said a number of arrests were made. Most of the arrests were for disorderly conduct.

"Throughout the night we had fights, but that's not atypical," Harris said.

Rick Pries of Milwaukee had spent the entire day at the fair with a friend and her two grandchildren.

"We were in the midway and it was very crowded. While the kids were waiting in line I noticed large groups of black males running through the very crowded midway, yelling there was a fight," Pries said. "There were several of these large groups all converging to this location."

Pries said he decided to take the two children he was watching out of a line they were waiting in and leave the fair.

"There was very little security," he said. "And the few that were there would have been overwhelmed by the sheer number of troublemakers," Pries said.

The concession worker said he was not personally hassled, but he was concerned the youths would attempt to take his cash register. He closed his concession stand early for safety reasons.

"I was planning to take my kids to the fair tonight," he said Friday morning. "I definitely won't now."

The Wisconsin State Fair is located in different jurisdictions. The north side of the fairgrounds from the Hank Aaron State Trail north is in the city of Milwaukee. The rest of the fair is in West Allis. Adding to the confusion is that the Wisconsin State Fair Park police has jurisdiction only on the fairgrounds, not outside of it.

Similar disturbances

The fair incidents are similar to mob-like disturbances that occurred over the Fourth of July weekend in Milwaukee.

About 60 young people beat and robbed a smaller group that had been watching fireworks from Kilbourn Reservoir Park. The injured people were white; the attackers were African-American, witnesses said.

Another group looted a convenience store at a gas station at the corner E. North Ave. and N. Humboldt Blvd.

The incidents Thursday night come as the State Fair board over the last decade has worked to increase diversity at the annual fair, expanding its entertainment lineup and marketing to appeal to a younger, more multicultural audience. Diversity was a priority for State Fair Park Chairman Martin Greenberg, who spoke often of making it "truly the people's park" - a "place of inclusion, not exclusion."

Thursday night's Main Stage performer was rapper MC Hammer, but a number of people who attended the concert said the show wasn't to blame at all for the disturbances at the fair. One woman said the crowd watching Hammer was mostly white and adult and any children there seemed to be with parents.

Another woman said the concert was "very laid back and had no craziness that we witnessed at all. The craziness was in the midway," she said.

 

Forwarded by:
 
Dr. E.A. Richards, P.E.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.








TWA 800 was a dry run…SAM launched from Iranian cargo ship.

 

B

 

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/580528/201108041828/Iran-Plans-For-A-World-Without-America.htm

 

Iran Plans For A World Without America

 Posted 08/04/2011 06:28 PM ET

Defense: Tehran's navy deploys ships to the Atlantic capable of launching long-range missiles. This is not a joke. This is a dress rehearsal for the day an EMP attack ends our way of life.

'Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism?" Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad asked at "The World Without Zionism" Tehran conference in 2005. "But you had best know that this slogan and this goal are attainable, and surely can be achieved." He added that Iran had a "war preparation plan" for, as he put it, "the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization."

Electromagnetic pulse, or EMP, is not a subject familiar to most Americans. But it's quite familiar to the Iranian military.

It's been practicing for the day when an Iranian missile tipped with a nuclear warhead lifts off from a vessel parked in international waters off our shores, the warhead detonating high above the American heartland, sending electromagnetic waves rippling across the American landscape, frying every electronic circuit within range.

In a July 18 statement, Rear Adm. Habibollah Sayyari said the Iranian navy plans on deploying warships in the Atlantic Ocean as part of a program to ply international waters.

Two days later, another Iranian rear admiral, Seyed Mahmoud Mousavi, revealed for the first time that his navy has equipped a number of its logistic vessels and units with long-range missiles.

The squadron will be equipped with the Nur missile, which is based on China's long-range Silkworm C-802 anti-ship cruise missile and has a 125-mile range and 365-pound warhead.

It is not these ships and their missiles that threaten us, but what comes later as they use these forays to gain experience operating far from Iranian shores.

A simple Scud missile, with a nuclear warhead, could be fired from an inconspicuous freighter in international waters off our coast and detonated high over the U.S.

It would wreak devastation on America's technological, electrical and transportation infrastructure. Masked as a terrorist attack, Iran would have plausible deniability of any responsibility.

Iran has practiced launching and detonating Scuds in midflight, launched from ships in the Caspian Sea. It's also tested high-altitude explosions of its Shahab-3 ballistic missile, a test consistent with an EMP attack.

The warhead need not be of a staggeringly high yield — nor must the missile have an intercontinental range.

"One nightmare scenario posed," according to Peter Vincent Pry, an expert on EMP who sits on a congressional panel looking into the threat of such a weapon, "was a ship-launched EMP attack against the U.S. by Iran, as this would eliminate the need for Iran to develop an ICBM to deliver a nuclear warhead against the U.S. and could be executed clandestinely, taking the U.S. by surprise."

 



 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0






NMA Blog: 2011 Jaguar XK Review


2011 Jaguar XK Review

Posted: 04 Aug 2011 06:54 AM PDT


By Eric Peters, Automotive Columnist

Beauty can be more than skin deep — just take a look at the 2011 Jaguar XK.

Heavily updated in all the right places — and left alone were it was already right — it's now one of the smartest choices in its segment, in addition to being one of the easiest to fall in love with.

WHAT IT IS

The XK is an ultra-luxury GT coupe/convertible. It has four seats but it's really got room for just two plus some overnight bags in the back.

Base price is $83,000 for the XK coupe; an XK convertible starts at $89,000. Supercharged XKR versions of both are available, with prices starting at $96,125 for the XKR coupe and $102,25 for the XKR convertible.

A 75th Anniversary special edition has been added to the lineup, too — with a starting price of $104,625.

Just 175 of these will be made.

WHAT'S NEW FOR 2011

A much more powerful 5.0 liter V-8 (with or without supercharger) replaces the previous 4.2 liter V-8.

The traditional — but quirky — Jaguar dog-leg shift lever has been replaced with a fully electronic rotary knob controller similar to the one used in the XF sedan.

All trims get heated windshields (a feature inspired by Jaguar's corporate partner, Land Rover) and also a new Adaptive cruise control system that automatically adjusts vehicle speed in relation to the ebb and flow of surrounding traffic.

WHAT'S GOOD

Performance is now appropriate to price. The previous XF looked like a six-figure supermodel — but its 0-60 time was on par with Mere Ordinaries such as $26k Mustang GTs.

More sporting than overheavy competitors like the Mercedes-Benz SL.

More elegant than a Porsche 911 — and easier to get into, too.

A relative steal compared to both of them.

WHAT'S NOT SO GOOD

It's almost too pretty to take out into the world. You feel nervous leaving it parked unattended.

It'd be nice if you could get a manual transmission — especially in the supercharged XKR.

UNDER THE HOOD

The XF comes standard with a 5.0 liter V-8 featuring direct injection that produces 385 horsepower — 85 horsepower more than the previous 4.2 liter V-8. Step up to the XKR and you get a supercharged version of the 5 liter V-8 that produces 510 hp, 90 horsepower more than the previous supercharged 4.2 liter V-8.

While the 4.2-powered XK was not a slow car, its 0-60 time of about 6 seconds flat wasn't quite exotic. For a car pushing six figures, acceleration was something of a letdown.

The new 5 liter V-8 fixes this.

The 0-60 time with the standard engine drops to just over 5 seconds. With the optional supercharged engine, the XKR can get there in about 4.5 seconds.

That's supercar quick — and enough to pester 911s with.

The standard transmission with either engine is a six-speed automatic with Sport and Winter modes as well as driver-selectable manual control of gear changes via steering wheel mounted paddle shifters.

All versions of the XK are rear-wheel-drive.

Fuel efficiency — not that it matters — is 16 city, 24 highway for the non-supercharged XK coupe, 15 city, 22 highway for the supercharged XKR convertible.

Those figures are actually pretty respectable given the power/perfomance this car offers. For perspective, there isn't a single '60s-era big block V-8 muscle car that can touch the Jag's 0-60 time (let alone its top speed) and those cars were lucky to make 10 MPGs while idling.

ON THE ROAD

The XF's genius is that it can run with a BMW 6-Series (including the ultra-performance M6) or Porsche 911 yet it's as comfortable to cruise around in as a Benz SL550. This arguably makes it a superior everyday car — one that will satisfy the enthusiast driver's need for speed and handling while maintaining a level of comfort and drawing room elegance that very few similarly powerful cars can match.

The 5 liter V-8 has immense power. Pushing down on the gas pedal results in a sensation that's like the roll-on of a big commercial jet with an ex-military pilot at the controls. You feel a swell of thrust as you ease into the throttle. Suddenly, you're doing 90.

And that's the standard, non-supercharged engine.

It is worth mentioning that the XKR's supercharged 5 liter V-8 produces 10 more horsepower than the BMW M6′s 5 liter V-10 — and it does it for $6,225 less, too ($96,125 vs. $102,350).

I'd personally enjoy a manual transmission but the Jag's six-speed automatic is impossible to fault. In Sport mode it not only becomes more aggressive, it intuits your intentions — for example, holding a lower gear for an anticipated fast pass you haven't actually begun to make yet. It is a "smart" transmission with its own computer brain that judges how it ought to behave based on how you're driving, including factors such as the aggressiveness of throttle inputs and steering angles.

The only thing it doesn't do is chirp the tires on the 1-2 upshift.

Probably, this could be adjusted.

Handling feel is superb in part because the car is not unreasonably heavy — about 3,800 pounds for the coupe. Compare this with the hulking Benz SL550, which weighs more than 4,200 pounds. Even with driver and passenger aboard, the Jag is under two tons — while the SL550 with driver and passenger on board will be tipping the scales at about the same weight as a mid-sized V-8 SUV.

The Jaguar XK coupe is also lighter than the BMW M6 coupe (3,909 lbs.).

All thanks to its mostly aluminium (as the Brits say) body.

Add an auto-adjusting suspension and you've got a car that is as ideal for a lazy drive all the way from LA to San Francisco on Pacific Coast Highway as it is capable of keeping up with a BMW M6 — or even a 911 Porsche — when the pace picks up.

AT THE CURB

The XF is a stunning car — a machine you can spend many happy hours viewing from different angles, each of them immensely pleasing to the eye. Though the styling is modern, it is still clearly a Jaguar — the iconic lineage of drophead coupes and E-types mirrored in the curves.

One design touch that helps give the car its slinky proportions is the ratio of length to width and height. The XK is a full 3 inches wider than the Benz SL550 (and an inch-and-a-half wider than the BMW 6). It also rides on a long 108.3 inch wheelbase, similar to the BMW 6 (109.4 inches) but it rides about two inches lower to the ground.

The end result is a car that's feline in its gracefulness and poise; an aluminum-paneled incarnation of its namesake.

The only thing I'm not a huge fan of is the Jaguar rotary controller for the transmission. It's definitely nothing like the old dog-leg design that everyone complained about — but whether the knob is an improvement is debatable because it makes what ought to be a simple function overly complicated.

Here's the process: You get in, key the engine to life by pushing the start button on the dash. This causes the rotary knob on the center console to gently (and slowly) rise up to meet your hand. This takes a second or three.

Only now, you can rotate the knob to the desired range — Drive, Reverse and so on.

It's neat to watch, no doubt — but if you are someone who likes to jump into your car and just go you may be irritated by the slight delay you have to wait through before the system will let you put the car into gear. It's like those auto-closing tailgates many SUVs have. They take seemingly forever; so much simpler to just yank the gate closed by hand — or throw the transmission into gear.

Plus, when — not if — the system develops a problem, the car will be stuck — and probably very expensive to repair. The latter may not matter to the clientele in this price range, but hassle is hassle no matter you're net worth.

No one likes to be stuck by the side of the road waiting for a tow.

In Jaguar's defense, all the cars in this price range have something similar. BMW, for example, has that infernal iDrive mouse; Mercedes its aneurism-inducing COMAND interface.

It's partly due to the tech-lust of some buyers and partly due to the manufacturer's perceived need to make their six-figure cars different in every conceivable way from $20k Prolemobiles, many of which now come with or offer many formerly high-end-only features, including remote/keyess start, GPS and automatic climate control.

Regardless, the fact remains that pulling on a shift handle to place the transmission in Drive or Reverse works. It is straightforward; it gets the job done. Why fool with it?

Other small things:

The XK's back seats are Not Fit For People — even kids. There is literally zero clearance between the backs of the front seats and the seat bottoms of the back seats — so no place for legs at all. To sit back there, you'd need to assume the fetal position, with your knees tucked up against your chest.

On the other hand, the fact that there is at least some potential cargo space back there makes the XK more everyday useable than two-seaters like the Benz SL550 or Porsche 911.

Another plus: The XK's actually got a bigger trunk than the hefty Benz SL — 12 cubic feet vs. 10 for the Benz.

The BMW 6 is bigger inside and out (including trunk space-wise) than either.

THE REST

It used to be said in defense of Jaguar's historically iffy reliability that a Jag still looked better on a mechanic's lift than most cars do on the road. The good news is that after Jaguar partnered with Ford (since divorced) the quality control at Jaguar factories improved geometrically. Today's Jags are on par, quality and reliability-wise, with comparable models from other high-end manufactures like BMW and Benz — both of which have had their own troubles, including BMW's iDrive controller and the buggy software that runs it.

The Jag's also a relative bargain, especially when stacked up against the Benz SL550 — which starts at $102,600. Thats nearly $20,000 more than the base price of an XK coupe.

Even if you assume the Jag will need service more often, you could use the leftover $20k for a pair of first-class, round trip tickets to Europe.

By the time you get back, your Jag will surely have been tuned-up, waxed and gassed.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Buying a Jaguar used to be mostly an emotion-driven experience that sometimes came with a few headaches later on.

You can still get just as carried away — but now you won't regret it in the morning.

Comments?
www.epautos.com

Are You A NMA Member? If not, read about the benefits and then join!



2011 Jaguar XK Review

Further Reading:
You are subscribed to email updates from National Motorists Association Blog
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.