The Patent Reform Bill

As International Law has no authority on this Nation, and Our Laws have no authority abroad, unless verified by Treaty, then the acceptance or even recognition of 'International Patents' is without the boundries of Your Jurisdiction.  This is just the FIRST thing wrong with this.  And as this is an intrigal part of the Bill, then removal of reference would cause the entire bill to fail.  I suggest you allow this failure to happen.






sign me
daniel karl seigler, born in Fort Benning, Cussetta County, Georgia, son of
Clarance Roland O'Neil Seigler, born in Ozark, Dale County, Alabama, son of
Thomas Malcolm Seigler, born somewhere in Alabama

Conservatives Don’t Hate Government

Conservatives Don't Hate Government
by Sheldon Richman, August 19, 2011

Sometimes I wonder whether the mainstream pundits listen to themselves. It's hard to believe they would say the silly things they say if they did.

For example, the talking heads on MSNBC, which works 24/7 for President Obama's reelection, like to say that conservative Republicans "hate government." "If you hate government," Chris Matthews, host of Hardball, asks, "why would you want to be the government?"

Matthews's evidence for this hatred is the conservatives' harping on the large national debt, which is about equal to the GDP, and deficit spending, which is close to half of total federal spending, and their opposition to higher taxes to shrink the deficit. To Matthews, expressing concern about those numbers and opposing further spending, borrowing, and taxing is proof of hatred for government. A devastating piece of evidence was Republican votes against raising the debt ceiling even though the package contained future spending cuts. (Of course, they were not real cuts, but merely small decreases in the rate of spending growth.) The symbol of conservative hatred for government, Matthews said, came during the last Republican presidential debate, when all the candidates raised their hands to indicate they would oppose a deficit-reduction package that contained $10 in spending "cuts" for every $1 in increased revenues.

Leaving aside the question of how sincere most Republican conservatives are when they rail against deficit spending, I would like Matthews and his ilk to answer a simple question:

How can a group of politicians and political activists be said to hate government, or "Washington," when they enthusiastically support: the U.S. government's global bullying; invasions, occupations, and endless wars; secret CIA prisons; torture as an interrogation technique; extraordinary rendition in which suspects are sent to foreign countries for torture by brutal dictatorships; support for "friendly" foreign autocrats and other oppressive regimes; the USA PATRIOT Act, including warrantless surveillance; national-security letters; the military-industrial complex; the war on drug users/sellers/makers; energy independence; intellectual-property enforcement; restrictions on immigrants and employer sanctions; consumption taxes; federal marriage regulation; and corporate welfare? I'm sure I've left some things out.

No one who embraces these liberty-killing actions can claim to be for small government, much less against government altogether. Most conservatives are as much for overpowering government as so-called liberals are. They just want the government to be overpowering in different matters, although that is less true than it once was. Conservatives have a cultural animosity to a welfare state that seems to cater to low-income people; apparently for them nothing is worse than an immigrant's going on the dole. On the other hand, they have little problem with middle-class welfare, such as Social Security and Medicare. One of their arguments against Obamacare was that it includes a half-trillion-dollar cut in Medicare. True, they sometimes talk about giving a role in these programs to private companies, but that's driven more by a pro-business orientation and a desire for efficiency than by any desire to end the programs.

So-called liberals, on the other hand, would expand all welfare- state programs while keeping the power "in-house" rather than farming it out to business ­ they prefer government bureaucrats to corporate bureaucrats. There might have been a time when "liberals" could be said to oppose the global military establishment, but those days are long gone. When did you last hear a member of President Obama's party criticize his war program, which is virtually indistinguishable from George W. Bush's?

So the two dominant forces in American politics favor domineering government and, necessarily, a smaller sphere for individual freedom and free markets. Why, then, do Matthews & Co. insist that conservatives hate government? A reasonable explanation is that this strategy is intended to scare people into thinking there is no enlightened alternative to big-government pro-empire Progressivism. They can't hit conservatives on foreign policy and civil liberties ­ because they hold the same views! So they have to convince Americans that conservatives would tear down everything they know and love. It's false, but it may be effective.

What's lacking is a true pro-liberty, anti-power alternative. Actually, it's not lacking. There are plenty of people promoting the libertarian vision. But the conservative and "liberal" intelligentsia have little interest in letting the American people in on it.

http://www.fff.org/comment/com1108p.asp

Cowboys and Aliens

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Ron Paul’s Exchange with Santorum Says It All

Friday, August 19, 2011
Ron Paul's Exchange with Santorum Says It All
by Jacob G. Hornberger

The exchange over Iran between Ron Paul and Rick Santorum in the recent Republican presidential debate goes a long way in explaining why the mainstream statists, including those in the Republican Party and the mainstream media, wish that libertarians would just go away.

Santorum pointed to 1979, the year of the Iranian revolution, when the Iranian people took U.S. diplomats hostage and held them in captivity for about a year. Santorum pointed to that pivotal event to show that the United States has been at war with Iran ever since.

For statists, Santorum's point is the end of the discussion. The U.S. government is good. It is innocent. It was just minding its own business when Iranian revolutionaries attacked our country without any reason whatsoever.

We saw the same phenomenon after the 9/11 attacks. "They just hate us for our freedom and values," U.S. officials cried. We were just minding our own business when the terrorists decided to kill Americans. The sentiment was the mindset of American statists.

And what happens if a libertarian says, "Wait a minute. The story isn't that simple. Let's look at what motivated these foreigners to do these things. Let's examine what the U.S. government has been doing in foreign affairs"?

Well, we all know what happens. The statists go ballistic, both in politics and in mainstream newspapers across the land. "Oh, you're blaming America! You hate our country! You must be a terrorist yourself. America, love our government or leave our country!"

In fact, Paul's exchange with Santorum wasn't the first time this has happened. Recall that famous debate exchange between Paul and Rudy Guliani four years ago. Paul pointed out that the terrorists came here on 9/11 to kill us because our government had been over there for years killing them.

Guliani went ballistic, as did his fellow statists on the stage. Their fellow statists in the mainstream media went crazy too. No one, and certainly not a presidential candidate, is supposed to say such things. It's considered beyond the pale. Everyone knows that our government is good, wise, and benevolent, believes in freedom and democracy, and would never do anything bad to foreigners.

Yet, that's actually when Ron Paul's 2008 presidential campaign took off. Tens of thousands of ordinary Americans instinctively knew that here was a man who wasn't feeding them pabulum. Here was a man who had the courage to speak the truth about U.S. foreign policy. He was willing to observe openly that the emperor wore no clothes.

And that's why the statists wish that Ron Paul would just go away. It's why they wish libertarians would just go away. That's why they resent us. We cause people to confront reality, which is sometimes not a comfortable thing to do. In a sense, we libertarians are therapists, people who help their patients confront realities that are oftentimes quite painful to face.

Look at the drug war. The statists just want to keep doing what they've been doing for 40 years -- busting drug sellers, busting drug users, and locking people up for the rest of their lives. Along come libertarians and point out the utter inanity of the whole thing. The never-ending deaths, destruction, corruption, violence, gang wars, and infringements on privacy and liberty. Libertarians say: End this idiocy by legalizing drugs.

But that's considered outside the pale for the statists. It's okay to call for reform of such programs. But abolition? "Oh my gosh! I wish those libertarians would just shut up and go away. Everything is working out so fine without them."

Look at how Ron Paul responded to Santorum. He explained to Santorum that the history of bad relations between Iran and the United States did not begin in 1979 but rather in 1953. That was the year that the CIA, the U.S. government's secret intelligence force, entered into Iran and ousted the democratically elected prime minister of the country, Mohammed Mossadegh, a man who had been named Time Magazine's "Man of the Year."

Why did the CIA do that? No, not for freedom and democracy, as the statists would like to believe. Instead, the CIA interfered with the internal affairs of Iran to retaliate for Mossadegh's nationalization of British oil concessions. Yes, the CIA's anti-democracy coup was about oil, not freedom and democracy.

In fact, having ousted a democratically elected prime minister, the CIA proceeded to install a non-elected brutal dictator, the Shah of Iran, into power. The CIA then proceeded to train and work closely with the Shah's counterpart to the CIA, his brutal and tortuous Savak intelligence force. The Shah then proceeded to impose one of the harshest dictatorial regimes in the world on the Iranian people, with the full support of the CIA and the rest of the U.S. government.

Of course, U.S. officials didn't care one whit what the Shah was doing to the Iranian people. All that mattered was that he was "our friend."

Imagine if Savak had assassinated John Kennedy in order to get Lyndon Johnson into power. How would the American people feel about that some 50 years later? I'll tell you: the deep anger and rage would still be palpable.

Well, that's how the Iranian people felt about the U.S. government in 1979. That's why they took the U.S. officials hostage. They were still angry about the CIA's ouster of their democratically elected prime minister. They were still angry about the Iranian people who had been brutalized, incarcerated, and tortured by the Shah and his goons, with the full support and cooperation of the CIA.

That's what Santorum and his fellow statist cohorts don't want to confront. They want to continue living their blissful little lives of delusion. For them, the federal government is god. It is all-good. It is all-knowing. It is all-powerful. It doesn't support dictatorships. It believes in freedom and democracy. It never does bad things to people, not even conduct syphilis experiments on them.

That's the myth that is inculcated in every public school across America and in most government-licensed private schools. That's the mindset that is produced in people like Santorum and the other statist candidates on that stage.

It's also the mindset of the mainstream news media reporters asking the questions. That's why they feel so comfortable with the statists on stage. That's why they feel so uncomfortable whenever Ron Paul is answering their questions.

Let's face it: the statists wish that libertarians had never been born and are extremely concerned about the rising popularity of libertarianism among the American people. That's why they've done their best to lock the Libertarian Party out of the political process with their inane ballot-restriction barriers. That's why they kept Ron Paul, a long-serving congressman, out of the early presidential debates four years ago. That's why they are keeping Gary Johnson, a popular two-term governor of New Mexico, out of the current round of debates. After all, Johnson, another libertarian, is also calling for ending the drug war and bringing the troops home. Why should it surprise us that they're locking him out of the presidential debates, as they tried to do four years ago with Ron Paul?

They think that if they can just keep hewing to their little myths and delusions and keep teaching them to their children in their government-approved schools, everything will be fine. If they could only shut out those pesky libertarians who confront people with truth and reality, everything would be hunky dory.

But truth will out, which is why so many people are gravitating to Ron Paul. They instinctively know that he's speaking truth to power, and they can see that power doesn't like it.

Ron Paul summed up the problem most eloquently when, in response to Rick Santorum, he stated, "We just plain don't mind our own business. That's our problem."

Of course, that's the problem with statists. They mind everyone else's business but their own.


http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2011-08-19.asp

Solar Storm Threatens Power Cuts - TONIGHT

 

 

 

         A huge mass of electrically-charged particles thrown out by a

gigantic eruption on the Sun is due to strike the Earth tonight.

 

         Scientists expect it to trigger one of the most violent

geomagnetic storms ever recorded.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-200952/power-cuts-threat-sun-storm-hits-earth.html#ixzz1VTThDpk0

 

Power cuts threat as sun storm hits earth

Sun spots: charged particles
head for earth

A huge mass of electrically-charged particles thrown out by a gigantic eruption on the Sun is due to strike the Earth tonight.

Scientists expect it to trigger one of the most violent geomagnetic storms ever recorded.

The result could be widespread power surges and even blackouts, disrupted TV and mobile phone signals, and broken down communication satellites.

At the same time the Northern Lights, normally confined to polar latitudes, may produce dazzling displays in the skies above southern Britain.

At least one satellite has already been knocked out of action by the storm. Japan's space agency said its Kodama communications satellite had been temporarily shut down after malfunctioning.

The solar flare that caused the eruption burst out of a sunspot at 10.54am yesterday.

Experts said it was the strongest flare seen in the past 30 years. The explosion caused a coronal mass ejection (CME) which is now speeding towards Earth.

Disruption

Last week another CME only hit the Earth a glancing blow, yet was able to disrupt airline communications.

The solar flare was classified as an X18-category explosion, meaning it can trigger planet-wide radio blackouts and long-lasting radiation storms.

Although the charged particles present no direct danger to people on the ground, they could have a devastating effect on electrical equipment.

Geomagnetic storms are classified on a scale of one to five. Initial indications are that the looming storm could reach the highest G5 level and last for 24 hours.

Northern Lights

The most obvious manifestation of the storm is likely to be glorious auroras lighting up the night sky.

Usually the Northern Lights, or aurora borealis, is only visible in Britain from northern Scotland. The Earth's magnetic field channels the solar particles that cause auroras towards the poles.

But experts say that over the next two days the Northern Lights may be seen at latitudes as low as Florida and Texas - and even south enough to cover the whole of Europe.

 

         Power companies prepare as solar storms set to hit Earth

 

         http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/06/us-utilities-noaa-solarstorms-idUSTRE7746UA20110806

 

 

Power companies prepare as solar storms set to hit Earth

·          

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Three large explosions from the Sun over the past few days have prompted U.S. government scientists to caution users of satellite, telecommunications and electric equipment to prepare for possible disruptions over the next few days.

"The magnetic storm that is soon to develop probably will be in the moderate to strong level," said Joseph Kunches, a space weather scientist at the Space Weather Prediction Center, a division of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

He said solar storms this week could affect communications and global positioning system (GPS) satellites and might even produce an aurora visible as far south as Minnesota and Wisconsin.

An aurora, called aurora borealis or the northern lights in northern latitudes, is a natural light display in the sky in the Arctic and Antarctic regions caused by the collision of energetic charged particles with atoms in the high altitude atmosphere.

Major disruptions from solar activity are rare but have had serious impacts in the past.

In 1989, a solar storm took down the power grid in Quebec, Canada, leaving about six million people without power for several hours.

The largest solar storm ever recorded was in 1859 when communications infrastructure was limited to telegraphs.

The 1859 solar storm hit telegraph offices around the world and caused a giant aurora visible as far south as the Caribbean Islands.

Some telegraph operators reported electric shocks. Papers caught fire. And many telegraph systems continued to send and receive signals even after operators disconnected batteries, NOAA said on its website.

A storm of similar magnitude today could cause up to $2 trillion in damage globally, according to a 2008 report by the National Research Council.

"I don't think this week's solar storms will be anywhere near that. This will be a two or three out of five on the NOAA Space Weather Scale," said Kunches.

SOLAR SCALE

The NOAA Space Weather Scale measures the intensity of a solar storm from one being the lowest intensity to five being the highest, similar to scales that measure the severity of hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes.

The first of the three solar explosions from the sun this week already passed the Earth on Thursday with little impact, Kunches said, noting, the second was passing the Earth now and "seems to be stronger."

And the third, he said, "We'll have to see what happens over the next few days. It could exacerbate the disturbance in the Earth's magnetic field caused by the second (storm) or do nothing at all."

Power grid managers receive alerts from the Space Weather Prediction Center to tell them to prepare for solar events, which peak about every 12 years, Tom Bogdan, director of the center said.

He said the next peak, called a solar maximum, was expected in 2013.

"We're coming up to the next solar maximum, so we expect to see more of these storms coming from the sun over the next three to five years," Bogdan said.

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

NASA Warns of Earth's Destruction By Aliens if You Don't Jump Aboard the Anthropogenic Global Warming Bandwagon

Liberals are already destroying the planet with their out-of-this-world idiotic ideas.

NASA Warns of Earth's Destruction By Aliens if You Don't Jump Aboard the Anthropogenic Global Warming Bandwagon doctorbulldog | 19 August, 2011 at 12:09 pm | Categories: Global Warming, Insanity, Obama Sucks, politics, Science, Technology | URL: http://wp.me/p1NPg-7iC

Is it just me, or is the AGW crowd getting even more insane?:

"Ack-ack-ack ack!!!" Translation: "Reduce your emissions or die!!!!"

Pay Your Carbon Taxes To Al Gore Or Space Aliens Will Attack
Global warming alarmists invent new hoax after failing with everything else

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, August 19, 2011

Having failed with drowning polar bears, global superstorms, rising sea levels and a myriad of other manufactured hoaxes, global warming alarmists have invented a new threat to try and persuade us to pay carbon taxes directly to Al Gore and the global elite – vengeful environmentalist extraterrestrials from outer space.

"It may not rank as the most compelling reason to curb greenhouse gases, but reducing our emissions might just save humanity from a pre-emptive alien attack, scientists claim," according to a Guardian report.

A new study conducted by researchers at Nasa's Planetary Science Division posits that "green" ETs might get angry at Bubba driving his gas-guzzling SUV and respond by wiping humankind off the face of the earth to "protect other civilizations".

"Green" aliens might object to the environmental damage humans have caused on Earth and wipe us out to save the planet. "These scenarios give us reason to limit our growth and reduce our impact on global ecosystems. It would be particularly important for us to limit our emissions of greenhouse gases, since atmospheric composition can be observed from other planets," the authors write.

Is it really any wonder why polls show belief in global warming is collapsing? A recent Rasmussen survey found that 69 per cent of Americans believed scientists had likely falsified climate change data to push their agenda.

They've fed us with drowning polar bears, overpopulation paranoia, global superstorms and all manner of manufactured lies in an effort to terrify people into accepting the hoax and blithely handing over their carbon taxes to Al Gore and the Rothschilds, but none of it has worked. Gore's Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) has all but collapsed. The fact that they have now resorted to playing the "alien invasion" card illustrates how desperate and discredited the climate change cult has become.

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Joke

I am a socialist! You must become a socialist like me. Give me all
your money!
After you give me all your money
Then I will arrest you and put you in a debtors prisons. Then i'll
hang you for your revolutionary crimes. I'll be bloody rich and you'll
be dead...and that my friends is how capitalism works.
Wheeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

How the Left Harm America's Moral Character

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Fellowship of the Minds <no-reply@wordpress.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:29 PM
Subject: [New post] How the Left Harm America's Moral Character
To: baconlard@gmail.com

How the Left Harm America's Moral Character Eowyn | August 19, 2011 at 11:29 am | Tags: big government, Dennis Prager, entitlement, equality, family, morality, narcissism, pacifism, self-reliance, voluntary associations, welfare state, West Europe, youth | Categories: Children, Culture War, Economy, Liberals, Military, United States | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-8za

Dennis Prager has an excellent article that perfectly explains why liberals are narcissists -- a conclusion I've arrived at from experience and observation.

~Eowyn

The liberal entitlement mentality

Ten Ways Progressive Policies Harm Society's Moral Character

Dennis Prager - July 19, 2011

While liberals are certain about the moral superiority of liberal policies, the truth is that those policies actually diminish a society's moral character. Many individual liberals are fine people, but the policies they advocate tend to make a people worse. Here are 10 reasons:

1. The bigger the government, the less the citizens do for one another. If the state will take care of me and my neighbors, why should I? This is why Western Europeans, people who have lived in welfare states far longer than Americans have, give less to charity and volunteer less time to others than do Americans of the same socioeconomic status.

The greatest description of American civilization was written in the early 19th century by the Frenchman Alexis de Tocqueville. One of the differences distinguishing Americans from Europeans that he most marveled at was how much Americans -- through myriad associations -- took care of one another. Until President Franklin Roosevelt began the seemingly inexorable movement of America toward the European welfare state -- vastly expanded later by other Democratic presidents -- Americans took responsibility for one another and for themselves far more than they do today. Churches, Rotary Clubs, free-loan societies and other voluntary associations were ubiquitous. As the state grew, however, all these associations declined. In Western Europe, they have virtually all disappeared.

2. The welfare state, though often well intended, is nevertheless a Ponzi scheme. Conservatives have known this for generations. But now, any honest person must acknowledge it. The welfare state is predicated on collecting money from today's workers in order to pay for those who paid in before them. But today's workers don't have enough money to sustain the scheme, and there are too few of them to do so. As a result, virtually every welfare state in Europe, and many American states, like California, are going broke.

3. Citizens of liberal welfare states become increasingly narcissistic. The great preoccupations of vast numbers of Brits, Frenchmen, Germans and other Western Europeans are how much vacation time they will have and how early they can retire and be supported by the state.

4. The liberal welfare state makes people disdain work. Americans work considerably harder than Western Europeans, and contrary to liberal thought since Karl Marx, work builds character.

5. Nothing more guarantees the erosion of character than getting something for nothing. In the liberal welfare state, one develops an entitlement mentality -- another expression of narcissism. And the rhetoric of liberalism -- labeling each new entitlement a "right" -- reinforces this sense of entitlement.

6. The bigger the government, the more the corruption. As the famous truism goes, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Of course, big businesses are also often corrupt. But they are eventually caught or go out of business. The government cannot go out of business. And unlike corrupt governments, corrupt businesses cannot print money and thereby devalue a nation's currency, and they cannot arrest you.

7. The welfare state corrupts family life. Even many Democrats have acknowledged the destructive consequences of the welfare state on the underclass. It has rendered vast numbers of males unnecessary to females, who have looked to the state to support them and their children (and the more children, the more state support) rather than to husbands. In effect, these women took the state as their husband.

8. The welfare state inhibits the maturation of its young citizens into responsible adults. As regards men specifically, I was raised, as were all generations of American men before me, to aspire to work hard in order to marry and support a wife and children. No more. One of the reasons many single women lament the prevalence of boy-men -- men who have not grown up -- is that the liberal state has told men they don't have to support anybody. They are free to remain boys for as long as they want.

And here is an example regarding both sexes. The loudest and most sustained applause I ever heard was that of college students responding to a speech by President Barack Obama informing them that they would now be covered by their parents' health insurance policies until age 26.

9. As a result of the left's sympathetic views of pacifism and because almost no welfare state can afford a strong military, European countries rely on America to fight the world's evils and even to defend them.

10. The leftist weltanschauung [worldview] sees society's and the world's great battle as between rich and poor rather than between good and evil. Equality therefore trumps morality. This is what produces the morally confused liberal elites that can venerate a Cuban tyranny with its egalitarian society over a free and decent America that has greater inequality.

None of this matters to progressives. Against all this destructiveness, they will respond not with arguments to refute these consequences of the liberal welfare state, but by citing the terms "social justice" and "compassion," and by labeling their opponents "selfish" and worse.

If you want to feel good, liberalism is awesome. If you want to do good, it is largely awful.

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

I came up with a NEW TERM – Islamoblow

http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=90015&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Iowntheworldcom+%28IOwntheWorld.com%29

 

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

The Donuts Prayer

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Destroy all socialists today!!!!!!!!!

Some stupid thoughts
The Fox News talking heads on are now telling us Tea Baggers what we
want to hear
in the upcoming elections and pointing out and denigrating those that
do not comply with their appointed political guidelines. (Perry
comment on the traitorous actions of himself)
What I want to hear is a candidate that has brains that has at
least a modicum of smarts and will help return the US to a more
democratic,
constitutionally compliant Government; One that recognizes the
true Sovereignty of Native American land.
Let's start with the Farmers watering down of the Marijuana crops and
what made
them so special.
Each right wing idiot has different table manners, underpants and sit-
com ideals. They gathered in clumps like that and immigrated to
specific areas of the nation in order to live freely in
a like-minded community with its own outhouses geared to those
ideals. The
idea of the corporate government and those that find one gay bar was/
is
somehow different, better or worse than another was and is to kill
Now that is really tough, Rhode Island is all about foreclosures and
Iowa
is all about Swedish fags; not only are there differences but for each
to do
what it does best there must be differences in all aspects of life
and
accepted practices. The Koch Brothers and those elected Republicans
seem to think that this
is just not so.
The white slave owners knew it had to be so.
To point this out and name the names that think otherwise is no
longer
considered good driving skills. It is considered to be anti-white as
if
there is a single definition as to what a white man is…. there is
not.
In all the history of the USA the ONLY time that right wing idiots
seem to
agree on everything is when their wives find out they been to a strip
bar This was true until the US decided to enter into a NASCAR event
on
a regular basis, now that which once made the USA multi-racial and a
beacon
to homeless people. It is considered unpatriotic and un-American to
think for yourself.
What we will soon have is "no laws, no nations, no air force" that
will
preclude any common sense. What we will have is a lack of
competition between men with small dicks for commerce and ideas; what
we will
have is just another homo country that loses its edge as it
slips into a Fascist quagmire.
What we are doing is losing that very identity that made the USA the
great and desired example it once was. That's my Glenn Beck Paranoid
Remember…States have no rights!!!!!!!!!!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: Celeb’s Hollywood Pedophilia Stunner Met With Media Whimper

Apparently MSM has no problem with child abuse.

---

From: "john robertson" <lawjkr@me.com>
To: "ellen robertson" <ellenarobertson@yahoo.com>, "Tracey home" <droblaw@comcast.net>, "Philip O'Halloran" <editrel@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:05:04 PM
Subject: Fwd: Celeb's Hollywood Pedophilia Stunner Met With Media Whimper

Begin forwarded message:

From: anne m simoneau <annemsimoneau@gmail.com>

Date: August 18, 2011 8:19:25 PM EDT

To: Theresa Mary <gaines.seven@yahoo.com>

Subject: Celeb's Hollywood Pedophilia Stunner Met With Media Whimper

Celeb's Hollywood Pedophilia Stunner Met With Media Whimper

Not the Catholic Church?

- August 2011 -

 

Appearing in an interview on ABC's "Primetime Nightline" last week (Thu., 8/10/11), Hollywood actor Corey Feldman aired a truly brave and shocking claim:

"I can tell you that the No. 1 problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia. That's the biggest problem for children in this industry ... It's the big secret."

It was not Feldman's only stomach-turning assertion. He also claimed that the "casting couch," the sick Hollywood legend by which roles are given in exchange for sex, even applies to children.

In addition to saying that he himself had been molested as a boy by "vultures" in show business, Feldman went on to claim that the demise of the late actor Corey Haim was precipitated by "a Hollywood mogul" abusing him as a boy. Feldman added:

"There was a circle of older men who surrounded themselves with this group of kids. And they all had either their own power or connections to great power in the entertainment industry …

"[T]here's a lot of good people in this industry, but there's also a lot of really, really sick, corrupt people. And there are people in this industry who have gotten away with it for so long that they feel they're above the law, and that's got to change. That's got to stop."

So here is a claim of massive abuse and cover-ups happening in Hollywood. Where is the major media on this?

Nearly a week after the episode aired, the response to Feldman's alarming claims has been almost non-existent in the major media. While the Boston Globe and the New York Times have hyperventilated over decades-old allegations of abuse by Catholic priests (many of which were all-too-true), neither paper dedicated even a drop of ink to Feldman's shocker.

Could it be that major media folks do not wish to dig too deep into this story and upset one of their largest sources of income?

The Catholic League uncovered exactly one newspaper in the entire United States that reported Feldman's claims: The International Business Times.

When it comes to the awful abuse of children, it sure seems like the media doesn't get too worked up unless the word Cardinal, bishop, or priest is in someone's job title.


-- Dave Pierre is the author of the book, Double Standard: Abuse Scandals and the Attack on the Catholic Church. Dave is also the creator of TheMediaReport.com and is a contributing writer to NewsBusters.org, the popular media-bias blog of the Media Research Center. 

WARNING*** Skank Alert ****WARNING

WARNING*** Skank Alert ****WARNING catscanner150 | August 18, 2011 at 6:57 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-8NF

Janeane Garofalo's 'Racist Dogwhistle' Tells Us Herman Cain Doesn't Have a Mind of His Own

by                   John Nolte  

Thanks to Barack Obama's failed presidency, the desperate Left is left with nothing to defend and can only personally destroy, and so they've created a world where the words "basketball," "clouds" and "food stamps" are all racist. The only thing that's not racist, however, is actual racism, especially when that racism is directed at a Black Republican.

Case in point: The Miserable Janeane Garofalo:

Garofalo also said successful businessman Herman Cain is either being paid to run or is suffering from Stockholm syndrome because he is a "person of color" running as a Republican in the party's presidential primary.

"[He's] in this presidential race because he deflects the racism that is inherent in the Republican party, the conservative movement, the Tea Party certainly. [In] the last 30 years the Republican party has been moving more and more to the right, but also race-baiting more. Gay-baiting more. Religion-baiting more," Garofalo said.

"But, Herman Cain, I feel like, is being paid by somebody to be involved and to run for president so that you go like 'I love that, that can't be racist. He's a black guy, a black guy asking for Obama being impeached.' Or 'it's a black guy whose anti-Muslim. It's a black guy who is a Tea Party guy.'"

(more…)

So Garbuffalo, who's the real racist here, a grass roots movement that has never made a racist comment about Obama, or a leftist goon who accuses a self made, successful black businessman of being an "uncle tom". I know who my choice would be, and it's picture is at the top of this post.

Tom in NC

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: Coil of Rage

Any thoughts?

---

From: "john robertson" <lawjkr@me.com>
To: "Tracey home" <droblaw@comcast.net>, "kevin robertson" <hakawenterprises@mac.com>, "Philip O'Halloran" <editrel@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:07:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: Coil of Rage

Begin forwarded message:

From: anne m simoneau <annemsimoneau@gmail.com>

Date: August 18, 2011 9:22:56 PM EDT

To: audrey.amberg@yahoo.com

Subject: Coil of Rage

 

-----  Coil of Rage THIS SHOULD IRRITATE SOME PEOPLE. When you've read to the end, come back and read this first paragraph again. A Coil of Rage The character of any man is defined by how he treats his mother as the years pass .... need I say more about this person below other than there is no character, no integrity but there is a ton of attitude and arrogance that defines his shallow past and hollow future..... I rest my case. I bought and read Obama's book, Audacity of Hope. It was difficult to read considering his attitude toward us and everything American. Let me add a phrase he use to describe his attitude toward whites. He harbors a "COIL OF RAGE".. His words, not mine. THIS IS OUR PRESIDENT -- HE'S RUNNING AGAIN, YOU KNOW! Is anyone out there awake? Everyone of voting age should read these two books by him: Don't buy them, just get them from the library. From Dreams From My Father: "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites." From Dreams From My Father : "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race." From Dreams From My Father: "There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of herself, maybe and white." From Dreams From My Father: "It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names." From Dreams From My Father: "I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself: the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela." And FINALLY .............. and most scary: From Audacity of Hope: "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." If you have never forwarded an e-mail, now is the time to do so!!! We have someone with this mentality running our GREAT nation! Keep your eye on him and don't blink. I don't care whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, a Conservative or a liberal; be aware of the attitude and character of this sitting President. Spread the word!

Walmart Has Added a Sign to Speed Checkout Service

Walmart Has Added a Sign to Speed Checkout Service lowtechgrannie | August 17, 2011 at 8:24 pm | Tags: Walmart | Categories: Humor | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-8Mr

H/T Kelleigh

~LTG

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Podcast interview re the aridification of the American Southwest w/ Dr. Richard Seager

Posted this morning at Electric Politics, a podcast interview about
the aridification of the American Southwest with Dr. Richard Seager of
Columbia University, a leading climate scientist who is especially
expert on the causes behind and the history of rainfall in the region.
The short version is this: People living in the American Southwest are
in for a rude shock. They're not experiencing a "drought" (and they
haven't yet even experienced the equivalent of the record-setting dry
spell of the 1950s). Instead, what's happening is that the climate in
the Southwest is permanently changing into a more arid state. Not
quite a desert, but close enough. It's one more proof, if you will, of
anthropogenic climate change. And in this case the science is
extraordinarily robust.

Policy makers in the region and in Washington had better pay attention
if they're to avoid or ameliorate vicious political struggles over
water rights, particularly between population centers and agriculture.
Most likely, however, those in power only will recognize what's
happening with 20/20 hindsight, long after the Southwest has dried up.

Thanks very much for listening! If you think the podcast is worthwhile
please forward the link.

http://www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2011/08/permanent_aridification_transf.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Political Toons 8.16.11

 

Animation: Resized to 98% (was 702 x 477) - Click image to enlarge Resized to 98% (was 705 x 987) - Click image to enlarge Resized to 98% (was 704 x 487) - Click image to enlarge Click below for related story: Resized to 98% (was 704 x 564) - Click image to enlarge Resized to 99% (was 698 x 614) - Click image to enlarge Click below for story: Click below for related story: Resized to 98% (was 700 x 249) - Click image to enlarge This Thread Brought To You By The Letters R & P: Resized to 98% (was 699 x 739) - Click image to enlarge Jay Carney "Send In the Clowns" (video) Britain To Use Extreme Force Against Rioters Click below for latest episode:

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.