| Having trouble viewing this email? Click here |
|
|
 | Right before the 10th Anniversary of 9/11, Mayor 'Dhimmi' Bloomberg will light up the Empire State Building in Islamic 'green'barenakedislam | August 28, 2011 at 3:49 AM | Categories: EnemyWithin-American | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-ySJ |
Mayor Bloomberg is banning all clergy and first responders from the Tenth Anniversary Ceremony for 9/11, but you can be sure he'll invite a bunch of Muslims there to celebrate their triumph. By lighting up the Empire State Building in green for Ramadan every year , it's as if he's telling Muslims which building they [...]
 | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
![[]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/69/First_Peanuts_comic.png)
| -------Original Message-------
| ||
| |
A message to all members of Tea Party Nation
Visit Tea Party Nation at: http://www.teapartynation.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network
To control which emails you receive on Tea Party Nation, click here |
Obama bailed out Soros, Clinton, Gore and himself with our tax dollars
If there's any doubt that Biggest Most Popular Leaders ripping off the USA ,
here's a scandal too big to be reported in the media or investigated by the Congress.
When they are mentioned, they are referred to as politcally powerful connections,
not invested owner! Hundreds of thousands of bail out dollars went to Obama, Soros, Clinton, algore, etal
THE MONEY TRAIL OF THE CAP & TRADE BILL
http://forpressfound.livejournal.com/46667.html
I've got an opinion, but don't believe me.
Look at he evidence. Come to your own conclusion.
Each one of these searches will bring to you many links, both pro and con.
A small bank in Chgo had some interesting investors.
Google: obama gore soros shore bank investor
The bank was going to be the sole trading site for Global warming, Cap and Trade "carbon credits" in the USA . When the legislation failed, the bank went belly up and the FDIC took over the assets on Aug 20 last year.
Google: FDIC shore bank chicago
When a bank goes South, it's Holding Company normally folds up within days. The South Shore Bank Holding company did not. It's investors arranged to be bailed out by the USG even tho there was no bank to bail out!
Google: obama gore soros shore bank bail out
http://nlpc.org/stories/2010/08/27/did-green-shorebank-escape-bankruptcy
Remember, investors include Obama, Soros, Clinton, etal
This was on national cable TV. It is well known .
http://wn.com/OBAMA_THE_SHOREBANK_CORRUPTION_TIES__BAILOUT_MONEY_GOING_TO_HELP_OBAMA_FRIENDS
Obama's Cap and Trade "commissions " will be held in trust for him at the JOYCE FOUNDATION.
Google: obama george soros shore bank malkin
When the plan to rip off energy consumers fell thru, the "investors" turned their efforts to recover their losses on the backs of the taxpayers.
Somebody should tell Rep Ron Paul about this before people think he's part of the problem.
"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or to abolish it…"
Declaration of Independence, 1776 – today.
We the People
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The Looking Spoon Blog |
| The Question Is Not How It Got There, But How Do We Get It Out... Posted: 27 Aug 2011 11:00 AM PDT This was emailed to me, and it makes an excellent point... ----------
|
| You are subscribed to email updates from Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
From three-time Democratic presidential nominee and Woodrow Wilson Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan to powerful Montana Democratic Senator Burton K. Wheeler to FDR's ex-vice presidential nominee Henry Wallace to the 1968 anti-war presidential candidacy of Minnesota Democratic Senator Eugene McCarthy to 1972 Democratic presidential nominee (and Henry Wallace delegate in 1948) George McGovern, non-interventionists have held prominent positions in the American Left that was and is the Democratic Party.(emphasis added)
What was unique about Wallace's 1948 Progressive Party campaign was how it was completely controlled by the secret Communist Party agents that surrounded Wallace, despite the fact that he was not a Communist. Lillian Hellman, who despite her denials was indeed a secret member of the Communist Party, admitted as much in her 1976 book Scoundrel Time:
During the early autumn of 1948, four or five of us [leaders of the Progressive Party campaign] were eating lunch together on the day of a large evening rally. When lunch was finished Wallace suggested that he and I take a walk. … When we had walked for a while, he asked me if it was true that many of the people, the important people, in the Progressive Party were Communists. It was such a surprising question that I laughed and said most certainly it was true.
He said, "Then it is true, what they're saying?"
"Yes," I said. "I thought you must have known that. The hard, dirty work in the office is done by them and a good deal of the bad advice you're getting is given by the higher-ups. I don't think they mean any harm; they're stubborn men."
"I see," he said, and that was that.
What is clear is that the Communists – who, of course, did mean harm – were able to drive the campaign of a non-Communist due to their influence. And Wallace knew it, despite his public denials. As Arthur Herman pointed out in National Review "when Hubert Humphrey complained about the prominent role Communists were playing in the election, Wallace blithely told him to go talk to the Russian embassy — it had more influence over his campaign officials than he did."
So if it can happen to Henry Wallace, why can't it happen to his Republican mirror, Ron Paul? On Thursday, Mark Levin had Jeffrey Lord on his show to talk about his article (listen to it here, here and here), where they discussed all the crackpots and "neo-confederates" that surround Ron Paul in his inner circle. What would a group like think of, say, Israel?
Well, on his own website, we find that: "On January 9, [2009] Ron Paul addressed Congress to voice his opposition to a House resolution expressing strong support for Israel in its invasion of Gaza, and branding Hamas as a terrorist organization." It goes on to proudly highlight that he went on Press TV (the Iranian state propaganda channel) and Russia Today (KGB-TV basically, with it's paid agents promoting and even doing fund-raising for Ron Paul).
Anyone who has spent time around his supporters know what they think of Israel, and likely had to hear the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that are so widespread in his little cult. What is their influence? Why doesn't he denounce them? Also, such a denunciation would have a devastating impact both the national and international crackpot communities that sustain anti-Americanism, as the great Cold War era defector and former KGB General turned American Patriot Ion Mihai Pacepa explained. Wouldn't that be in our national interest, Dr. Paul?
I await my hate mail.
--
Oddly, it was Paul's bizarre assessment of a nuclear Iran that impressed Birchers—and his many devoted supporters. "Just think of how many nuclear weapons surround Iran," said Paul. "The Chinese are there. The Indians are there. The Pakistanis are there. The Israelis are there. The United States is there. All these countries … Why wouldn't it be natural if they might want a weapon? Internationally, they might be given more respect. Why should we write people off?"
This disdain for strong action against America's enemies is nothing new for Ron Paul. A few months ago, he was asked his reaction to the elimination of Osama Bin Laden. His response? He stated that that the Navy SEAL raid on Bin Laden's hideout in Pakistan "was absolutely not necessary." Why? Because of the violation (alleged) of Pakistani sovereignty. Paul asked rhetorically "What if he [Osama] had been in a hotel in London?"
Of course, Thursday was hardly the first time the libertarian congressman went out of his way to make excuses for America's enemies, or blame America first. In 2007, when asked by Tim Russert, "How have we, the United States, provoked al-Qaeda?" Paul responded: "Well, read what the lead—the ringleader says. Read what Osama bin Laden said. We had, we had a base, you know, in Saudi Arabia that was an affront to their religion, that was blasphemy as far as they were concerned."
Funny that Congressman Paul fancies himself a new Ronald Reagan, because it was Reagan's pro-military investments which made the Bin Laden raid possible, plus much more. In fact, when Russert asked Dr. Paul about a 1988 statement made by Paul against Reagan, when Paul had proclaimed, "I want to totally disassociate myself from the Reagan administration," the congressman didn't back off. Paul declared Reagan had been "a failure."
It is distressing to see such silliness having an appeal, especially among many college students, but, alas, it does.
And yet, in an ironic twist of fate, what we as Republicans are experiencing has happened before, but it happened to Democrats. The Democrats of the post-war 1940s had to deal with their own version of Ron Paul: Henry Wallace.
Like Dr. Paul, Wallace was a man of many great ideas. He was, in the words of Cold War historian Ronald Radosh, "an agricultural genius—a man who believed in the concept of scientific agriculture, and in the diligent agronomic use of statistical research; and in the diligent agronomic use of statistical research; and a scientist whose own research led him to develop and spread the process of hybrid corn—a process that revolutionized the yield of corn and led to an agricultural revolution."
In short, agriculture was to Wallace what monetary policy is to Paul.
Wallace served as secretary of agriculture and later vice president in the Roosevelt administration; that is, he did so until his weirdness and remarkable reverence for Stalin's Soviet Union prompted FDR to switch him with Harry Truman in the 1944 election, making Wallace his secretary of commerce.
After FDR died, the new president, Truman, kept Wallace as secretary of commerce. With the war over, however, Wallace found himself in a tough spot. Troubled by the onset of the Cold War, he was driven to speak out on September 1946, and denounce the new threat to world peace: that is, the threat posed by America and Truman to that amiable peacenik Joe Stalin. Shortly thereafter, Wallace was removed from his position.
Importantly, Wallace was far from finished. Like Ron Paul, Wallace steadily denounced American foreign policy, as pursued by both Democrats and Republicans—and he pursued the presidency.
Like Ron Paul, Wallace would not let those World War III seeking "Imperialists" working in the interests of "British Colonialism" get off easy. (For Paul today, replace the words "Imperialists" with "Neo-cons" and "British Colonialism" with "Israel.") And when Stalin would do something unpleasant, such as take over Czechoslovakia in February of 1948, Wallace would explain that it was Truman's fault. Wallace blamed America first, in spite of the blatantly aggressive actions of an obvious external enemy.
Thus, Wallace and some of his old friends from the Department of Agriculture started their own version of Paul's "Campaign for Liberty." They called themselves "Progressive Citizens of America." Wallace's supporters believed that the U.S. government was behind a conspiracy to create worldwide crises in order to subvert and dominate other nations for American imperial purposes. They insisted that "innocent" people, like Alger Hiss, were being unjustly persecuted. This group later morphed into the Progressive Party, from which Wallace would challange Truman for the presidency in 1948.
In 1948, presidential candidate Wallace proclaimed: "There is no real fight between a Truman and a Republican. Both stand for a policy which opens the door to war in our lifetime and makes war certain for our children. … The American people read of the fantastic appropriations that are being made for military adventures in Greece, Turkey, China—and billions for armaments here at home. … Two years ago I denounced those who were talking up World War III as criminals. Of course, the bulk of our people are not criminals, but it is possible for a little handful of warmongers to stampede them."
And with his comrades, men like Harry Magdoff, Victor Perlo, and Charles Kramer, Wallace set out to win the presidency in 1948. His comrades failed to disclose to Wallace their other names, to wit: KANT (Magdoff), RAIDER (Perlo), and PLUMB (Kramer)—their code names as Soviet agents.
If it isn't obvious by now, what had happened was that Wallace had been duped, and much to most of his party was controlled or influenced by the Communist Party. It took Wallace two more years after suffering a humiliating defeat in that election, and watching as the so-called Progressive Party backed the communists against American troops in Korea, for him to realize what was going on, whereby he denounced his own party and resigned.
But the impact of that campaign went far beyond its time. In a review on the back cover of a first edition copy of Curtis Macdougall's "Gideon's Army," a KGB-published book (1965) about the Progressive Party, radical left-wing academic Staughton Lynd wrote: "There might have been no Bay of Pigs, no Vietnam, no Santo Domingo if the ideas of the third party of 1948 had prevailed … those ideas of 1948 are alive today." Just as Ron Paul, when asked by Tim Russert, "Under President Paul, if North Korea invaded South Korea, would we respond?" Paul promised he would not have. "Why should we unless the Congress declared war?" responded Paul. "I mean, why are we there? South Korea, they're begging and pleading to unify their country, and we get in their way. They want to build bridges and go back and forth. Vietnam, we left under the worst of circumstances. The country is unified. They have become Westernized. We trade with them. Their president comes here. And Korea, we stayed there and look at the mess."
Needless to say, Ron Paul's commendable embrace of free-market principles in no way makes him sympathetic to Soviet communism, as was the case for Henry Wallace. Ron Paul is obviously not pro-Soviet or pro-communist—quite the contrary. The commonality is each man's breathtakingly bad positions on foreign policy and America's enemies. And unfortunately for Ron Paul, it will be that twisted view of foreign policy that forever keeps him from his party's nomination and the White House—just as it did Henry Wallace.
Spyridon Mitsotakis is a student at New York University, and an aspiring Cold War researcher.
 | 1 Mil Safety Violations Won't Keep Mexican Trucks Out Of U.S.Harold | August 27, 2011 at 7:28 am | Categories: Corruption, Criminal Activity, Executive, Government, Legislative, Mexican Government, NAU/SPP/NAFTA, Propaganda, Sovereignty, U.S. Constitution | URL: http://wp.me/pmtmV-6tv |
Judicial Watch 8/26/2011 Weeks before the Obama Administration starts letting Mexican cargo trucks travel deep into the U.S., the Texas Department of Public Safety reveals that, in the last few years, trucks coming from Mexico had more than 1 million safety violations. This is hardly earth-shattering news since Mexican trucks have long failed to meet [...]
| | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=876
| Gadhafi and sons escape to Algeria in bullet-proof Mercedes |
Algeria at odds with Libyan rebel transitional government, demanding an apology for accusing Algeria of supplying Gadhafi loyalists with troops and arms • Raging battles still taking place in Tripoli • Mass graves discovered.
Daniel Siryoti
Removing bodies of Gadhafi loyalists Saturday.
|
Photo credit: Reuters
Libyan rebels posing in a vehicle Saturday.
|
Photo credit: Reuters
| Removing bodies of Gadhafi loyalists Saturday. | Photo credit: Reuters
| ||||
|
After days of hiding following the Libyan rebels' seizure of his Bab al-Aziziya compound, former Libyan ruler Moammar Gadhafi was reportedly spirited across the Algerian border with his sons, Egyptian and Libyan news agencies said on Saturday. According to the reports, the former leader was whisked out of Libya in a convoy of bullet-proof Mercedes vehicles on Friday night.
The convoy allegedly consisted of six vehicles and was accompanied by Libyan troops loyal to Gadhafi.
Libyan and Algerian officials refused to comment on the reports.
Tension between Algerian and Libyan rebels
The Algerian government is at odds with the Libyan rebels' transitional government, demanding the rebels apologize for accusing Algeria of supplying Gadhafi loyalists with troops and arms.
In addition, an Algerian government spokesperson claimed to have evidence of Libyan rebels freeing and arming Libyan prisoners who were extradited by Algeria upon Gadhafi's request. The extradition was carried out within the framework of Gadhafi's struggle against terrorist groups with bases in Libya, including al-Qaida. According to Algerian officials, the freed prisoners joined the Libyan rebels in fighting Gadhafi.
A senior Algerian official told the Saudi Arabian daily Al Arabia that Algeria has not yet recognized the transitional Libyan government as representative of the Libyan people. "If the rebels want Algeria to recognize their rule in Libya they must present a plan of action against al-Qaida, which is active throughout North Africa, and they must commit to fighting terrorists operating from within Libya," the official said.
Mass graves discovered in Libya
Meanwhile, sporadic battles still raged on Friday and Saturday between the rebels and Gadhafi loyalists in Tripoli, even as the scale of the violence of the months-long uprising continued to unfold.
Mass graves, apparently containing bodies of opposition forces, were discovered over the weekend near a local hospital, and Sky News published photos of another mass grave found in a warehouse. The bodies found in the warehouse had been burned, but apparently were also of rebel fighters.
There were also reports of mass graves containing bodies of troops loyal to Gadhafi, who were allegedly killed by rebel forces.
