• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0




http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45928

 

The Redneck Guide to Emergency Preparedness

by Mike Piccione (more by this author)

Posted 09/06/2011 ET
Updated 09/06/2011 ET

 

Grannie

 

Hurricane Irene has crawled and doused the east coast of the United States. The aftermath of a hurricane kind of reminds me of what happens when you put a hungry baby in a strip bar: everyone ends up confused and no one gets what they wanted.

Immediately after an emergency, and you have seen this time and time again, the first people to be up and running and rescuing others are the rednecks. It's not the Harvard MBA's that are pulling people out of flooded homes with jon boats. It's the rednecks. Nope, a fancy air conditioned, Italian marbled floored, mahogany paneled office full of accountants used to chilled lobster lunches won't do anyone much good in an emergency.  Not one would know how to snare a snapping turtle, noodle a catfish or trap an opossum. For good post hurricane eating in a disaster area you need a redneck, a raccoon and a cast iron griddle.

In order to make the lofty claim that you are able to write on rednecks you have to have some redneck credentials. It took some time to find out I had redneck in me. I grew up working on farms, fishing for bullhead, the priest let me put my .22 near the front steps of the church so I didn't have to waste time going back home to get it after services. To me all this was normal. It's what kids did.

Then my self actualizing redneck awaking occurred. I was a young Marine, living is South Carolina and I was transferred to the Pentagon in Washington DC. When I arrived I rented a room in Arlington, VA with a house full of city folk. One day I was out of food and traffic was so bad I didn't want to take two hours to get to a grocery store and back just for something to eat.  So instead of going to the store, I grabbed my pellet gun, put 10 pumps into it and went outside to the street and shot a squirrel. Dressed it on the spot and a few minutes later it was frying in a pan. That's when the city folk roommates explained to me that what I just done qualified me as redneck. At least I had dinner.

When it hits the fan and there is trouble a redneck will always come out on top of the situation. What is their secret? Preparedness. And this is how they do it…

A Countdown of the Ten Items In Your Redneck Emergency Preparedness Kit

10. Smokes and Chew: Marlboro Lights for a category one hurricane or tornado, Marlboro Mediums for a category two or three, Marlboro Reds for a category four. You need a serious smoke for a serious hurricane. Chew is important because it counts towards your daily supply of vegetables.

9. Booze: Hide the Budweiser and have a couple cans of Milwaukee's Best incase strangers stop by or you need to barter with neighbors. Follow this safety rule for consuming alcohol in emergency situations: beer for morning and Jack Daniels for afternoon and evenings. If you are too drunk to walk then use your ATV otherwise it will take you forever to get anywhere.
8. Food: Slim Jims and if you want to live large get some mustard for dipping, beef jerky, pork rinds and anything that was on the table that the dogs didn't eat or wasn't sprayed with Raid when you were clearing cockroaches during dinner.

7. A Boat: A true redneck has a boat in his yard for years at a time without ever using it once. That's because it's for emergency purposes. I highly recommend a two-stroke motor that will always start after it's kicked a few times. Preferably that motor will be a Johnson, because jokes about your Johnson never get old.

6. Pickup Truck: A redneck is a man that has less than 50% of his vehicles running at any given time. It's easy to tell the vehicle that is driven the most by counting the 7-11 hotdog containers on the floor. But, when a hurricane hits, it's certain that a redneck in a Ford F-150 that is held together with bondo will be pulling your Lexus out of a ditch. And remember, that's not just a redneck's truck; it's where his kids were conceived so understand that bench seat is sacred ground.

5. A Dog: A dog will tell you if something is edible or not.

4. A Flashlight: You need one in addition to the light the family uses at night to go out to the bathroom. 

3. A Radio with a Powerful Speaker: That way you have something to drown out the wife, kids, mother-in-law, your sister-in-law Crystal, your sister Crystal, cousin Crystal, and your neighbor Crystal and her daughter little Crystal.

2.  Home Security System: 1. Buy a pair of size 14-16 work boots. 2. Put them on the front porch with a copy of your most recent assault charge. 3. Put some giant dog dishes next to the boots and court papers. 4. Leave this note on your door: "Jake and Buster: I went for more ammo & beer. Back soon. Don't mess with the pit bulls; they messed the mailman up bad this morning. I don't think Satan took part; hard to tell from all the blood. I locked all four of 'em in the house. Better wait outside. Be right back. The cops will be back too."

1. Guns and Ammo: I'm not talking about the magazine. Looters will be shot on sight and their loved ones can buy their watches and rings back from the pawn shop. And personally, I'd like to say that if you have a gun then squirrel is always on the menu if a disaster causes the traffic to be bad.

Get yourself prepared in case you have a shortage of rednecks in your area. Don't expect the government to be able to get to you or provide for you.  And of course, stay loaded my friends.

 






--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



9/11 'Religious' observance at the National Cathedral in Washington DC will have lots of Muslims, but no Protestants

barenakedislam | September 6, 2011 at 10:06 PM | Categories: ISLAMOBAMA | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-zfs

Did the Muslim-in-Chief think this up? I guess the head of the National Cathdral didn't get the message after it suffered the most structural damage in the recent earthquake two months after holding a quran reading with a Muslim imam within its walls. FOX NEWS  A weekend of religious-themed observances at Washington National Cathedral marking [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0




 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

"This is a significant moment in the campaign, because Ron Paul has philosophical credibility to drive home the point that Rick Perry is not a true conservative or a legitimate libertarian. I have been predicting that a debate blowup is coming between Paul and Perry, and Paul's attack ad sets the stage."

Ron Paul blasts Rick Perry
By Brent Budowsky - 09/06/11 01:52 PM ET

Labor Day has passed. The campaign has begun in earnest. And Ron Paul has launched a philosophy bomb against Rick Perry, which will probably be followed by a money bomb and a debate bomb by Paul. As The Hill reports, Ron Paul is taking out ad buys in Iowa and New Hampshire for an ad blasting Perry for his staunch support of Al Gore in 1988, and comparing this to Ron Paul's early support for Ronald Reagan in 1976.

This is a significant moment in the campaign, because Ron Paul has philosophical credibility to drive home the point that Rick Perry is not a true conservative or a legitimate libertarian. I have been predicting that a debate blowup is coming between Paul and Perry, and Paul's attack ad sets the stage.

Labor Day has passed. The campaign has begun in earnest. And Ron Paul has launched a philosophy bomb against Rick Perry, which will probably be followed by a money bomb and a debate bomb by Paul. As The Hill reports, Ron Paul is taking out ad buys in Iowa and New Hampshire for an ad blasting Perry for his staunch support of Al Gore in 1988, and comparing this to Ron Paul's early support for Ronald Reagan in 1976.

This is a significant moment in the campaign, because Ron Paul has philosophical credibility to drive home the point that Rick Perry is not a true conservative or a legitimate libertarian. I have been predicting that a debate blowup is coming between Paul and Perry, and Paul's attack ad sets the stage.

Personally I think it's wonderful that Rick Perry was a strong supporter of Al Gore. But praise from me, for Perry's praise for Gore, is not the stuff that Republican nominations are made of!

Of course, the latest Perry opposes Gore, while the earlier Perry championed Gore, and the newest Perry claims to be a fiscal conservative, while the real Perry gobbled up Obama stimulus money, which the new Perry said he opposed, before the current Perry took the money!

The biggest story, in my view, is the pay-for-play Perry, who acts in the tradition of the biggest big-government believers by taking the Obama money and using it as leverage to auction off government programs and government posts to big donors.

Now Ron Paul is on the attack, and he has the credibility to pull it off. Remember Donald Trump was the polling flavor of the month once, as Rick Perry is today. Juicy media reports will be coming soon, as Perry is vetted. If Ron Paul ups the ante with more television ads in Iowa and New Hampshire comparing himself to Perry, and launches this offensive in the televised debates, the fur will fly and the polls just might change dramatically.

Remember where you heard it: Perry will self-destruct. The only question is how quickly -- and the Ron Paul offensive is a major moment in the campaign.


http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/179657-ron-paul-blasts-rick-perry

TSA Agent Threatens Woman With Defamation, Demands $500k For Calling Intrusive Search 'Rape'
from the don't-be-a-victim dept

Amy Alkon is an advice columnist and blogger who is just one of many people who has had a horrifying and traumatizing experience going through airport security lately. After being pulled aside for an "enhanced" search, she found the process to be so invasive and so in violation of her own rights that she was left sobbing. She wrote about the experience on her blog, noting that she didn't think the search was just "invasive" in the emotional sense, but flat out physically invasive:
Nearing the end of this violation, I sobbed even louder as the woman, FOUR TIMES, stuck the side of her gloved hand INTO my vagina, through my pants. Between my labia. She really got up there. Four times. Back right and left, and front right and left. In my vagina. Between my labia. I was shocked -- utterly unprepared for how she got the side of her hand up there. It was government-sanctioned sexual assault.
Upon leaving, still sobbing, I yelled to the woman, "YOU RAPED ME." And I took her name to see if I could file sexual assault charges on my return. This woman, and all of those who support this system deserve no less than this sort of unpleasant experience, and from all of us.

After investigating whether or not she could file sexual assault charges, and being told that this was probably a non-starter, she instead wrote about the experience, and named the TSA agent who she dealt with: Thedala Magee. Alkon felt that if people can't stop these kinds of searches, they should at least be able to name the TSA agents who are doing them.

Magee responded by lawyering up and threatening Alkon with defamation and asking for $500,000 and the removal of the blog post.

Alkon, with the help of lawyer Marc Randazza, has now responded, refusing to back down. Both letters are embedded below, but here are a few key quotes:
Your client aggressively pushed her fingers into my client's vulva. I am certain that she did not expect to find a bomb there. She did this to humiliate my client, to punish her for exercising her rights, and to send a message to others who might do the same. It was absolutely a sexual assault, perpetrated in order to exercise power over the victim. We agree with Ms. Alkon's characterization of this crime as "rape," and so would any reasonable juror.
Furthermore, even if your client did not actually sexually assault my client, Ms. Alkon's statements to and about Ms. Magee would still be protected by the First Amendment. The word "rape" itself has been the subject of defamation cases by far more sympathetic Plaintiffs than your client. In Gold v. Harrison, 962 P.2d 353 (Haw. 1998), cert denied, 526 U.S. 1018 (1999), the Hawai'i Supreme Court held that a defendant's characterization of his neighbors' seeking an easement in his backyard as "raping [the defendant]" was not defamatory. This speech was protected as rhetorical hyperbole. Of course, we need not seek out Hawai'i case law in order to debunk your unsupportable claims. Rhetorical hyperbole has a strong history of favorable treatment in defamation actions. See Greenbelt Cooperative Pub. Ass'n v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6, 14 (1970). This doctrine acknowledges our First Amendment right to express ourselves, even when employing literary license. Accordingly, even if your client's actions were not "rape," Ms. Alkon had every right to characterize them as such.

No free woman should endure what your client did to Ms. Alkon. Fortunately, Ms. Alkon is capable of recognizing injustice, and for the good of us all, she had the courage to speak out on this matter of public concern of the highest order. After Magee's assault on Ms. Alkon's vagina and dignity, Ms. Alkon exercised her First Amendment right to recount this incident to others in person and through her blog. This was not only her right -- it was her responsibility.

I honestly don't know if this reaches the "technical" definition of rape, but I am massively troubled, if not horrified, by the idea that a woman who feels sexually assaulted based on what happened above ends up being threatened for saying she felt violated. Talk about adding insult to injury.

letters at link

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110906/11065015824/tsa-agent-threatens-woman-with-defamation-demands-500k-calling-intrusive-search-rape.shtml



Liberal Civility: Liberals Create "Tea Party Zombies Must Die" Video Game

Scotty Starnes | September 6, 2011 at 4:10 PM | Tags: civility, Fox News, Koch brothers, liberals, murder, tea party, zombies | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-5Nz

This is the brand of civility, most of us who have dealt with liberals, are use to. The video game is titled "Tea Party Zombies Must Die" and shows the 'zombies' they would love to kill.

From the video game, one can see that liberals are calling for the death of Fox News opinion show hosts Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and Brit Hume. Then you have the Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann zombies.

This is the new era of civility brought to you by far-left liberals with murdering blood lust.

H/T to Pundit Press

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
((  Yeah!  Like a re-cycled corn flake.  ))



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
The Koch Brothers, Richard Million Scaif, Pete Coors! The Walton
Family! Goodbye you Aryan rich pigs!!!!!!! Wheeeee!!!!!!!!!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0

My Proposed 9-11 Research Project
Gary North
Sept. 2, 2011

On August 30, I posted an article, "World Trade Center Building 7 and Conspiracy Theories." http://www.garynorth.com/public/8431.cfm

As a trained historian, I am interested in lots of major events in history that served as national or worldwide turning points. I ask the following questions:

1. What happened?
2. How do we know what happened?
3. What led up to the event?
4. How did the government report the event?
5. How did it subsequently explain the event?
6. How did the major media handle the government's explanation?
7. Who has benefited from the event?
8. Who has benefited from the official government explanation?
9. What are the alternative explanations?
10. Who would benefit if any of them became widely accepted?

These are all legitimate questions. The toughest one to answer is #1. You might not think that this is the case, but it is.

Let's consider the collapse of the North tower, the second to collapse.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoAa_B2kRuo&feature=player_embedded

The narrator does not notice the steel pillar. The person who edited the video added a call-out to show us what the narrator missed. The narrator was watching the falling building. He did not notice the pillar and its strange disappearance.

The pillar seems to disintegrate into dust. In any case, it does not topple. It falls straight down.

Into what?

There are extended debates over what happened to the non-New York City planes. Where is the wreckage?

Here is the problem: there is no agreement about what happened. Where there is evidence of unexplainable events, the information does not get out. Only because of video sites has this ignored information reached a small segment of the population.


AN OUTLINE OF A 9-11 PROJECT

If a rich person or organization gave me a large amount of money to investigate 9-11, what would I do with it?

First, I would hire a lawyer to see what control the donor would have over the results. If I trusted him, I would advise him to set up the funding from a trust on the Isle of Man. That is because I would assume that the results would be damaging to the U.S. government and representatives of the government on 9-11.

Second, I would hire two or three programmers skilled at creating interactive Wikipedia-type sites. These sites would be the central resources of the project.

The most important resource for comprehending 9-11 (or any other complex historical event) is the division of labor. Wikis are the chief tools of this process. Wikipedia has taught us this.

I would begin with two sites: (1) a timeline site; (2) an engineering site. I would ask for submissions on two topics: (1) when did each part of the sequence take place? (2) What could not have taken place according to physics?

I would not ask how 9-11 was organized or why. I would ask only when events happened, where they happened, and what could not possibly have happened.

Why create these two sites? To shut down rabbit trails.

If you do not know the sequence of events, you cannot explain them accurately. Second, if you know what is impossible, you limit the number of false explanations. False explanations are rabbit trails leading away from the truth.

The timeline site would have subsites: each of the four flights. But these would feed into a single vertical timeline (Eastern Daylight Time). Click any entry on a timeline -- horizontal line with an ID box -- and it takes you to an entry on a separate Wiki.

It would be a long and growing timeline. I might need more Wiki site programmers.

I would have these sites hosted in Switzerland or another neutral country that would resist interference from the U.S. government. I would have lots of backup hosts. I would have the programmers write manuals on how to create a secondary site.

Third, I would hire at least two historians noted for their expertise in historical sequencing. I would have them create videos and manuals four researchers on how to evaluate evidence regarding time. This is not an easy process. It involves the sifting of evidence. Not everything in life is time-stamped. Not everything that is time-stamped was time-stamped accurately, especially if a government agency had first dibs on the evidence. (The words "birth certificate" come to mind.)

I would then hire them to moderate the timeline site.

I would tell them to begin here

Fourth, I would hire eight experts: two jet fuel chemists, two experts on the physics of skyscrapers, two experts on flying commercial jetliners, and two experts on plane crash sites. Their initial job would be to produce manuals and videos on conducting such research.

I would hire them moderate the "what could not have happened" site.

Fifth, I would hire an expert in website marketing and email list development. I would provide a list-rental budget. His job would be to get the word out to as many interested researchers as possible. The goal is to get people volunteering.

I would start with ongoing groups of the relatives of those who died in the crashes and the towers. They want to get to the bottom of this. They have an incentive to volunteer time.

Sixth, I would hire an expert in DimDim, the software that allows large group meetings on the Internet. I would do my best to host meetings, as well as get the other experts involved in discussion forums.


CONCLUSION

Until we know what happened and in what sequence, we should not expect to discover the truth about who did it, why they did it, and why the United States government has actively suppressed certain lines of inquiry.

Therefore, I would adopt this rule: no theories on what motivated the participants. Offering theories of why events happened should be attempted only by researchers after they know what happened and when.

In the old list -- what, where, when, who, and why -- I would rule out "why."

I would also rule out any consideration of the statistical results of Princeton University's Global Consciousness Project's report on 9-11. Some things are just too far out, epistemologically speaking, even though they are measurable and refuse to go away.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itQMALL__bE&feature=player_embedded

http://www.garynorth.com/public/8442.cfm
0


---------
 

 
Obama tells Students: "It's true I'm not American"... " I come from KENYA" <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zsQ-v7kD5Q&feature=share>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
"... a cut in the rate of any tax -- payroll, income, sales, excise, property, or otherwise -- is always a good thing for liberty and limited government. It may be a bad thing for government revenue, but why should a fiscally conservative, limited-government, budget-cutting Republican have a problem with that?"

Why Do Republicans Want to Raise Taxes?
by Laurence M. Vance, September 6, 2011

True or false: Barack Obama wants to raise taxes and Republicans in Congress want to cut them. The surprising answer is, False. Although it can usually be said that the president never met a tax hike or spending increase he didn't like, such is not the case right now.

One does not have to be a fan of Obama or his motives to recognize a good deal for the American people and applaud him for proposing it. It seems that the president wants to extend the payroll-tax cut that is set to expire at the end of this year.

It hasn't even been a year since Republicans fought for, and obtained, an extension of the Bush tax cuts for two years. Yet now they are opposing the proposed extension of the payroll-tax cut that was part of the deal to extend the Bush tax cuts.

There are two types of payroll taxes: Social Security taxes and Medicare taxes.

Social Security taxes were instituted in 1937 as part of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal. The original rate was 2 percent. Then, as now, half the tax is paid by the employer and half the tax is paid by the employee. By 1960, the rate had tripled. Since 1990, it has been 12.4 percent. Social Security taxes were originally levied only on the first $3,000 of yearly income. That threshold is now up to $106,800. That means that the maximum amount one could conceivably pay in Social Security taxes for one year is $6,621.60, with one's employer paying the same amount.

Payroll-tax deductions for Medicare were instituted in 1966. The original rate was .7 percent, again, divided between employer and employee. Since 1986, the rate has been 2.9 percent. After 1993, the taxable threshold was eliminated. Thus, unlike Social Security taxes, Medicare taxes are levied on every dollar of earnings.

The Bush tax-cut extension that was enacted last year included a reduction in the employee's share of Social Security tax rate from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent. The employer's share remains the same. A cut in the Medicare tax rate was not included.

A reduction in the Social Security tax rate greatly benefits those who need it most ­ the poor and middle class. But unlike a refundable tax credit, the extra 2 percent of their income that Americans are now allowed to keep in their pocket and out of the hands of the government is not a subsidy or income transfer payment ­ it is their money.

In one of his recent weekend radio addresses, Obama proposed extending the temporary payroll-tax cut: "There are things we can do right now that will mean more customers for businesses and more jobs across the country. We can cut payroll taxes again, so families have an extra $1,000 to spend."

Yet Republicans in Congress generally oppose extending the cut in Social Security taxes.

A spokesman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said that "all tax relief is not created equal." He maintains that Cantor believes "there are better ways to grow the economy and create jobs than temporary payroll-tax relief." House budget guru Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) termed the tax-cut extension "sugar-high economics." The office of the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee (the committee that writes the tax laws), David Camp (R-Mich.), who is also a member of the new congressional "supercommittee," issued a statement saying that tax reductions, "no matter how well-intended," will increase the deficit.

Over in the Senate, Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) objected as well: "We don't need short-term gestures. We need long-term fundamental changes in our tax structure and our regulatory structure that people who create jobs can rely on."

Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) also opposes extending the temporary payroll-tax cut. Candidate Mitt Romney said that he "would prefer to see the payroll-tax cut on the employer side."

Why do Republicans want to raise taxes?

Can it be that their reputation as tax cutters is not so deserved? The only Republican in Congress that I am aware of who has called for the complete elimination of the income tax and not replacing it with anything is Ron Paul. And the same goes for the Republican presidential candidates. After all, it was under Republican idol Ronald Reagan that Social Security tax rates increased from 10.16 to 12.12 percent and Medicare tax rates increased from 2.1 to 2.9 percent.

For Republicans to claim that the payroll tax cut extension should be rejected because it is shortsighted or will increase the deficit is ludicrous, considering that only last year they fought for an equally shortsighted and deficit-increasing measure -- the extension of the Bush tax cuts.

But letting the Social Security tax-rate cut expire is not the only way that Republicans are willing to effectively raise taxes. Out of one side of their mouths they are saying that they will not vote to raise taxes, but out of the other side they are talking about closing tax loopholes, ending tax shelters, and reforming tax deductions and credits. Those measures raise taxes as surely as a rate increase, but they allow the Republicans to pose as being for tax and budget cuts.

Regardless of the president's ulterior motives, his other horrible policies, his plans to increase income taxes on the "rich," his nanny-state philosophy of government, his poor understanding of economics, and his belief in the redistribution of wealth, a cut in the rate of any tax -- payroll, income, sales, excise, property, or otherwise -- is always a good thing for liberty and limited government. It may be a bad thing for government revenue, but why should a fiscally conservative, limited-government, budget-cutting Republican have a problem with that?

http://www.fff.org/comment/com1109e.asp



MUSLIM ASSLIFTERS fouling the air at the end of Ramadan using OUR national monuments, stadiums, and other public arenas

barenakedislam | September 5, 2011 at 9:38 PM | Categories: Islam in America | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-zee

Why do muslims have to pray for our deaths in public places? Don't they have enough of their own Goddamn mosques in this country? You can blame the Muslim in the White House for this middle finger to all non-muslims. Here are just a few examples of this horror: US CAPITOL BUILDING, WASHINGTON DC ILLINOIS [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

Perry Used To Be a Democrat
Posted on September 6, 2011 by LHR Jr.

HuffPo on the RP campaign's new 60-second attack ad, which is to be run extensively in IA and NH, and on the web.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUHlIPJTMIg&feature=player_embedded #!
0








 

cid:3A3B9F93C44647EE886F4BC6900B0451@mckeown

In honor of the 44th President of the United States, Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream has introduced a new flavor:

"Barocky Road"

Barocky Road is a blend of half vanilla, half chocolate,

And surrounded by nuts and flakes.

The vanilla portion of the mix is not openly advertised and usually denied as an ingredient.

The nuts and flakes are all very bitter and hard to swallow.

The cost is $82.84 per scoop...

.so out of a hundred dollar bill you are at least promised some CHANGE..!

When purchased it will be presented to you in a large beautiful cone,

But after you pay for it,

The ice cream is taken away and given to the person in line behind you at no charge.

You are left with an empty wallet,

Holding an empty cone with no hope of getting any ice cream.

Are you stimulated?

 

 

 

 

 



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0




WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Bachmann on Dictators and Socialized Medicine
Posted by Laurence Vance on September 6, 2011 07:19 AM

Michele Bachmann, when recently speaking in South Carolina about the requirement in Obama's health care bill that mandates Americans purchase health insurance, said that the federal government "will become a dictator over our lives." Is that so? But what about the federal government mandating that you cannot buy, sell, possess, and smoke marijuana­a plant? I guess the federal government is not a dictator over our lives when it tells us what we can and can't buy, sell, possess, and smoke? Bachmann, like all the major Republican Party presidential candidates (except Ron Paul), believes in selective liberty; that is, the government, including a government controlled by Republicans, should select certain liberties that Americans are allowed to have.

When Bachmann comes out for full legalization of drugs and raw milk then I will cut her some slack. But she will then still be a horrible warmonger, and still unworthy of support.

She also said this about the same subject: "This is the foundation for socialized medicine." No, Michele, the foundation for socialized medicine is Medicare, which Republicans have supported for years, expanded under George Bush, and currently want to save.
0

I.H.T. Op-Ed Contributor
9/11 Blowback
By H.D.S. GREENWAY
Published: September 1, 2011

Historians will label the events of that September morning 10 years ago as the most destructive act of terrorism ever committed up to that time. But I suspect they will also judge America's last decade as one of history's worst overreactions.

Of course overreaction is what terrorists hope to provoke. If judged by that standard, 9/11 was also one of history's most successful terrorist acts, dragging the United States into two as yet unresolved wars, draining the treasury of $1 trillion and climbing, as well as damaging America's power and prestige. These wars have empowered our enemies and hurt our friendships, and have almost certainly generated more terrorists than they have killed.

Like other victims of terrorism, the United States believed that somehow the answer could be found in brute force. But ideas seldom yield to force, and militant Islam is an idea. The result has been the militarization of U.S. foreign policy.

The brief war to topple the Taliban and rid Afghanistan of Osama bin Laden was admirably executed, using air power, Northern Alliance allies, and a few C.I.A. agents on horseback to achieve a specific goal. The failure to nab Bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, to let them escape from Tora Bora where they were cornered, was a spectacular failure.

Our 10-year occupation, and our off-and-on-again attempts at nation building, have been a disaster. At first Afghanistan was starved for resources, taking a back seat to the ill-planned, and ill-advised attack on Iraq. When, at last, Afghanistan became a priority, the moment for success had already passed.

Today the Afghan war has morphed into a war against the Pashtuns ­ perhaps the most war-like people on earth, whom two great empires before us, the Russian and the British, failed to subdue. One could not possibly find a worse place to fight, or a less likely people on whom to impose our will. The Pashtun tribes have risen to the call of Jihad for centuries, and their prowess at battling foreigners is unmatched.

Despite a heavy propaganda campaign to suggest otherwise, the subjugation of the Taliban has been a failure. Counterinsurgency ­ protecting the people and winning their support ­ never really got off the ground. Our strategy seems to be that if we can only kill enough Pashtuns somehow they will agree to surrender.

It is true that the Pashtun tribes and clans have traditionally been willing to switch allegiances when the incentives were sufficiently attractive, so the idea of winning over some groups who are now fighting against us was not totally out of the question.

But so far it has simply not worked, and General David Petraeus fell into the trap into which so many generals before him have fallen: He believed that what he learned in one war, the Iraq war, could be replicated in the next: Afghanistan.

Our British allies made the same mistake, believing that what had succeeded in bringing peace to Northern Ireland could apply to Afghanistan.

As for Iraq, if ever there was an intellectuals' war, it was Iraq. Neoconservative theorists, who knew nothing about Iraq , believed that the transformational power of democracy could change the Middle East ­ make Arabs more like Americans.

But what happened was that Iraq became more like the Middle East, and, although violence has slowed, it has by no means been brought to any semblance of normalcy. None of the underlying questions, the balance of power between Sunnis and Shiites, what should be the relations of Kurdistan to the rest of the country, have been settled.

In the meantime, the Iraq war has greatly empowered Iran, and the reaction of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki in backing Syria's Bashir al-Assad at Iran's bidding speaks for itself.

The Bush-Cheney years saw a remarkable abrogation of civil liberties in the name of fighting terrorism, and the descent into torture showed how easily fear can bring even a modern democracy over to the dark side.

Although Al Qaeda was remarkably successful at linking together so many of the Muslim world's pockets of grievances, mastering the techniques of the Internet, the fact of the matter is that most Muslims would rather not live under the extreme Wahhabism that Al Qaeda preachs. Bin Laden's ideas about his faith were to Islam what Pol Pot's were to socialism.

But the sad and counterproductive rise of anti-Muslim attitudes in both Europe and the United States since 9/11 testify that Bin Laden was not entirely unsuccessful in driving a wedge between the Islamic world and the West.


A version of this op-ed appeared in print on September 2, 2011, in The International Herald Tribune with the headline: 9/11 Blowback.
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/opinion/02iht-edgreenway02.html?_r=1


----------
 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Objectivist Answers
Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Subject: OA: Daily digest
To: Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com>


<http://objectivistanswers.com/upfiles/oalogo17.png> <http://objectivistanswers.com>
________________________________

Hello Bruce Majors,

This is a brief summary of what's going on in the Objectivist Answers community since our last update.

1 new questions <http://objectivistanswers.com/questions/?sort=latest> were posted since our last update.

We think you might be interested in these questions:

Should Objectivists be either pro or anti-Israel? <http://objectivistanswers.com/questions/3650/should-objectivists-be-either-pro-or-anti-israel>

Thanks,
Objectivist Answers

P.S. You can always fine-tune which notifications you receive here <http://objectivistanswers.com/users/151/bruce-majors/subscriptions/>.

________________________________

__._,_.___
Reply to sender <majors.bruce@gmail.com?subject\x3dRe%3A%20OA%3A%20Daily%20digest> | Reply to group <whateverreturns@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dRe%3A%20OA%3A%20Daily%20digest> | Reply via web post <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/whateverreturns/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJyMTIzdnB0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTE4BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4Mzc2NARtc2dJZAM0OTk0OARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNycGx5BHN0aW1lAzEzMTUzMDg5Nzk-?act=reply&messageNum=49948> | Start a New Topic <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/whateverreturns/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOHJhODhxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTE4BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4Mzc2NARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzMTUzMDg5Nzk->
Messages in this topic <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/whateverreturns/message/49948;_ylc=X3oDMTM3b2IwbGo3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTE4BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4Mzc2NARtc2dJZAM0OTk0OARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzMTUzMDg5NzkEdHBjSWQDNDk5NDg-> (1)
Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/whateverreturns;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMWYyNGd1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTE4BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4Mzc2NARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzMTUzMDg5Nzk->
Please follow Yahoogroups TOS http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message
is distributed under fair use without profit or payment
For non-profit research and educational or criticism purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Music we send is from our personal collections.
We are sharing it with you for your listening pleasure. 
Please support the Artists by purchasing their albums.

Groups Of Interest:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GaysUnited
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SayitloudgayandProud
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Comeventwithme
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ProJewishProZionistGroup
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stillnotjustmusicanymore
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/whateverreturns


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Politics_Dailly/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/House_Of_Trolls
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/The_Free_Abortion_Debates
MARKETPLACE
A bad score is 596. A good idea is checking yours at freecreditscore.com. <http://global.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15ofjcrpo/M=791726.14847541.14590405.10835568/D=groups/S=1705083764:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1315316180/L=70c839a6-d87c-11e0-b8ff-0b0efbd2953b/B=SOSoMEoGYvY-/J=1315308980105193/K=.8Vtyswz3QukHw48zX4Fdw/A=6475084/R=0/SIG=1304f1scb/*http://www.freecreditscore.com/dni/default.aspx?SiteVersionID=997&sc=671266&bcd=YGROUPS_Bad596>
________________________________

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now. <http://global.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15o54evor/M=493064.14543979.14562481.13298430/D=groups/S=1705083764:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1315316180/L=70c839a6-d87c-11e0-b8ff-0b0efbd2953b/B=SeSoMEoGYvY-/J=1315308980105193/K=.8Vtyswz3QukHw48zX4Fdw/A=6060255/R=0/SIG=1194m4keh/*http://us.toolbar.yahoo.com/?.cpdl=grpj>

<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlOXFxbnI5BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTE4BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4Mzc2NARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTMxNTMwODk3OQ-->
Switch to: Text-Only <whateverreturns-traditional@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional>, Daily Digest <whateverreturns-digest@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest> • Unsubscribe <whateverreturns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dUnsubscribe> • Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
.
__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
A new round just waltzed in slowtard

Often by taking out republicrat incumbents

On Monday, September 5, 2011, John Stroebel <john.stroebel@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
> Brucie Majors, neocon hit man. He clears the way for a new round of
> Republicans to waltz in.
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com <majors.bruce%40gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> ---------
>>
>>
>> Gore admits policy mistake
>>
>> AUGUSTA, Ga. —Former Vice President Al Gore now admits that growing corn
>> for
>> ethanol is a huge mistake.
>>
>> "The energy conversion ratios are at best very small," he told a "green"
>> energy business conference in Greece. In other words, the process consumes
>> about as much energy as it produces.
>>
>> And in 2009, the U.S. spent about $7.7 billion in tax money subsidizing the
>> process — which also drives up food prices: Ethanol eats up about 40
>> percent
>> of the U.S. corn supply, about 15 percent of the world's crop.
>>
>> Consumption, prices
>>
>> Ethanol's consumption of that much corn "definitely has an impact on food
>> prices," Gore acknowledges.
>>
>> "It is not a good policy to have these massive subsidies for
>> first-generation ethanol," he says.
>>
>> It would be an interesting viewpoint coming from Mr. Environmentalist under
>> any circumstances — but since he was the tie-breaking vote in the Senate in
>> 1994 that mandated the use of ethanol, you might think it more
>> enlightening.
>>
>> Yet, you'll really love his stated reason for having voted that way:
>>
>> "One of the reasons I made that mistake is that I paid particular attention
>> to the farmers in my home state of Tennessee, and I had a certain fondness
>> for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for
>> president."
>>
>> : Gore foisted mandatory ethanol production on America — which he now
>> admits
>> was a mistake — .
>>
>>
>>
>> <http://cdn.doubleverify.com/ObaCairo/Icons/ForwardIFull_0.png>
>> <
>>
>> http://speed.pointroll.com/PointRoll/Media/banners/trans.gif?PRAd=1508058&PRCID=1508058&PRplcmt=1364556&PRPID=1364556
>> >
>>
>> <
>>
>> http://widgets.fccinteractive.com/verticals/jobshq.com/images/featured-title.png
>> >
>>
>> <http://assets.jobshq.com/dynamic/logos/large/bremerbank.png> <
>> http://www.jobshq.com/employers/page/profile/employer/2639/>
>>
>> <
>>
>> http://widgets.fccinteractive.com/verticals/jobshq.com/images/employerspromo.png
>> > <https://secure.jobshq.com/myhq/page/loginEmployer/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> __._,_.___
> Reply to sender <john.stroebel@gmail.com?subject\x3dRe%3A%20%5BLibertarian%20Republicans%5D%20Billions%20later%2C%20Gore%20admits%20policy%20mistake <http://john.stroebel@gmail.com?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20%5BLibertarian%20Republicans%5D%20Billions%20later%2C%20Gore%20admits%20policy%20mistake> <http://john.stroebel@gmail.com?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20%5BLibertarian%20Republicans%5D%20Billions%20later%2C%20Gore%20admits%20policy%20mistake> <http://john.stroebel@gmail.com?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20%5BLibertarian%20Republicans%5D%20Billions%20later%2C%20Gore%20admits%20policy%20mistake>> | Reply to group <libertarianrepublicans@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dRe%3A%20%5BLibertarian%20Republicans%5D%20Billions%20later%2C%20Gore%20admits%20policy%20mistake <http://libertarianrepublicans@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20%5BLibertarian%20Republicans%5D%20Billions%20later%2C%20Gore%20admits%20policy%20mistake> <http://libertarianrepublicans@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20%5BLibertarian%20Republicans%5D%20Billions%20later%2C%20Gore%20admits%20policy%20mistake> <http://libertarianrepublicans@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20%5BLibertarian%20Republicans%5D%20Billions%20later%2C%20Gore%20admits%20policy%20mistake>> | Reply via web post <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarianrepublicans/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxYzU2anFnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzUzNzA1NDkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYwMTc1BG1zZ0lkAzU1NjE4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTMxNTI1MDM3Ng--?act=reply&messageNum=55618> | Start a New Topic <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarianrepublicans/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlN241MTg5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzUzNzA1NDkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYwMTc1BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTMxNTI1MDM3Ng-->
> Messages in this topic <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarianrepublicans/message/55614;_ylc=X3oDMTM2NTBtc2Z2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzUzNzA1NDkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYwMTc1BG1zZ0lkAzU1NjE4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTMxNTI1MDM3NgR0cGNJZAM1NTYxNA--> (2)
> Recent Activity:
>
> Visit Your Group <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarianrepublicans;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaG81OGdkBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzUzNzA1NDkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYwMTc1BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTMxNTI1MDM3Ng-->
> MARKETPLACE
>
> Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now. <http://global.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15o84v978/M=493064.14543979.14562481.13298430/D=groups/S=1705060175:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1315257576/L=fe764754-d7f3-11e0-9c8a-c7b50e4e9ad1/B=DWAjQtBDRyU-/J=1315250376802092/K=4waflPs8_FNw995G.XxEkg/A=6060255/R=0/SIG=1194m4keh/*http://us.toolbar.yahoo.com/?.cpdl=grpj>
>
> <http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=fe764754-d7f3-11e0-9c8a-c7b50e4e9ad1&T=1c1451pso%2fX%3d1315250376%2fE%3d1705060175%2fR%3dgroups%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d1751815582%2fH%3dY29udGVudD0iUG9kY2FzdHM7U3BvcnRzO0VkdWNhdGlvbjtOZXdzO1RWO1dpZGdldHM7UGVvcGxlO1RpY2tldHM7RXZlbnRzO0FsZXJ0czsiIGRpc2FibGVzaHVmZmxpbmc9IjEiIHNlcnZlSWQ9ImZlNzY0NzU0LWQ3ZjMtMTFlMC05YzhhLWM3YjUwZTRlOWFkMSIgc2l0ZUlkPSI0NDUyNTUxIiB0U3RtcD0iMTMxNTI1MDM3NjczMDc3MyIg%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d9E238962&U=13cshc5pr%2fN%3dDWAjQtBDRyU-%2fC%3d493064.14543979.14562481.13298430%2fD%3dMKP1%2fB%3d6060255%2fV%3d1>
> ________________________________
> A bad score is 598. A bad idea is not checking yours, at freecreditscore.com. <http://global.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15ovaetrt/M=791726.14847541.14590405.10835568/D=groups/S=1705060175:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1315257576/L=fe764754-d7f3-11e0-9c8a-c7b50e4e9ad1/B=DGAjQtBDRyU-/J=1315250376802092/K=4waflPs8_FNw995G.XxEkg/A=6449876/R=0/SIG=130kfcsn4/*http://www.freecreditscore.com/dni/default.aspx?SiteVersionID=997&sc=671020&bcd=YGROUPS_Bad598><http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=fe764754-d7f3-11e0-9c8a-c7b50e4e9ad1&T=1c1fbeer9%2fX%3d1315250376%2fE%3d1705060175%2fR%3dgroups%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d1579883221%2fH%3dY29udGVudD0iUG9kY2FzdHM7U3BvcnRzO0VkdWNhdGlvbjtOZXdzO1RWO1dpZGdldHM7UGVvcGxlO1RpY2tldHM7RXZlbnRzO0FsZXJ0czsiIGRpc2FibGVzaHVmZmxpbmc9IjEiIHNlcnZlSWQ9ImZlNzY0NzU0LWQ3ZjMtMTFlMC05YzhhLWM3YjUwZTRlOWFkMSIgc2l0ZUlkPSI0NDUyNTUxIiB0U3RtcD0iMTMxNTI1MDM3NjczMDc3MyIg%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d9E238962&U=13cltmjg4%2fN%3dDGAjQtBDRyU-%2fC%3d791726.14847541.14590405.10835568%2fD%3dMKP1%2fB%3d6449876%2fV%3d1>
> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif> <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkMjFmcWk2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzUzNzA1NDkEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYwMTc1BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMzE1MjUwMzc2>
> Switch to: Text-Only <libertarianrepublicans-traditional@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional <http://libertarianrepublicans-traditional@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional> <http://libertarianrepublicans-traditional@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional> <http://libertarianrepublicans-traditional@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional>>, Daily Digest <libertarianrepublicans-digest@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest <http://libertarianrepublicans-digest@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest> <http://libertarianrepublicans-digest@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest> <http://libertarianrepublicans-digest@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest>> • Unsubscribe <libertarianrepublicans-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dUnsubscribe <http://libertarianrepublicans-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dUnsubscribe> <http://libertarianrepublicans-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dUnsubscribe> <http://libertarianrepublicans-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dUnsubscribe>> • Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> .
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=5370549/grpspId=1705060175/msgId=55618/stime=1315250376/nc1=5522132/nc2=5191954/nc3=3848627>
> __,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.