From: Lucky <luckypig@infionline.net>
Date: Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:48 PM
Subject: [TruthSeekersElection2004] Evidence: Denver and DC Quakes Caused by Nukes
To: !TheMulti-D <TheMulti-DimensionalNewsPortal@yahoogroups.com>
Click the link to view the images/access the links.
http://pesn.com/2011/09/18/9501916_Evidence_Denver_and_DC_Quakes_Caused_by_Nukes/
Evidence: Denver and DC Quakes Caused by Nukes
The sudden spike shown in both the very unusual DC and Denver earthquakes on August 23 are consistent with an explosion from a sub-surface nuclear bomb. A recent interview of Benjamin Fulford by David Wilcock gives some intriguing possibilities about a counter coup, and hope for release of suppressed energy technologies.
by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News
Today I've received a phone call and a number of emails from people referring to an interview that David Wilcock conducted recently with Benjamin Fulford, who asserts that the recent DC and Denver Quakes were spurred by underground nukes wiping out two of the New World Order bunkers by "white hat" elements in the U.S. Pentagon, signaling the end of days for the dark cabal that have been running the planet for millennia. The interview concludes with a discussion about how with this victory over the dark elements of the former powers-that-be, that many hitherto suppressed energy technologies will soon be released.
It's all a bit difficult to believe, and I probably wouldn't be mentioning it to you were it not for some hard facts that support the key points about the earthquakes not being natural. They have the same seismological signature as what accompanies a nuclear blast detonated a few miles below the Earth's surface.
Here is a government website that gives a comparison of a nuclear test and an earthquake on seismograph. Here is a comparison they show between the May 11, 1998 Indian Nuclear Test, and the April 4, 1995 earthquake in Pakistan.
It explains:
Livermore seismologist Bill Walter explains that the differences in seismic P- and S-wave energy provide one method of discriminating explosions from earthquakes. Seismic P waves are compressional waves, similar to sound waves in the air. Shear (S) waves are transverse waves, like those that propagate along a rope when one end is shaken. Because underground explosions are spherically symmetric disturbances, they radiate seismic P waves efficiently. In contrast, earthquakes result from sliding or rupture along a buried fault surface and strongly excite the transverse motions of S waves. Thus, we expect that explosions will show strong P waves and weak S waves and that earthquakes will show weak P waves and strong S waves, as seen in Figure 2.
With that in mind, now look at this image of the seismic signature of the DC quake as shown at NBC17:
Readings from a seismograph at Washington and Lee University, about 85 miles southwest of the earthquake's epicenter in Mineral.
Does that seismograph depict a natural quake or a nuke or explosion-induced quake?
Could it be any more blatant?
Its as obvious as Building 7 being brought down by pre-placed demolition charges on 9/11.
Here's the seismograph from the August 23 Denver quake that same day, as published by the Denver Post.
A seismogram of the Trinidad earthquake as recorded on the Kent Denver School seismograph.
Again, the immediate onset of the large quake at the bottom right is indicative of an explosion-induced quake, not a natural quake.
In poking around a little bit, I found an August 24 story from the Canadian PressCore, titled: Seismic evidence reveals underground nuclear detonation south of Washington DC. The author says that he was put onto this possibility by an unusual email he received from someone who apparently was a whistleblower.
I was pointed to this overlooked piece of evidence by someone who claimed to be with the United States Air Force. The story submission appeared to be sent by mistake as nothing was visible in the body of the submission. Instead of sending it to the trash I thought I would apply an old intelligence trick I was taught back in 1989. I right clicked my mouse on the body of the submission and selected all, then copy. I then opened up the notepad and selected paste from the menu. You would expect nothing to be pasted as there was nothing in the body of the submission but, just as I thought, a paragraph was pasted into the notepad. What was revealed was 1 paragraph whereby who ever sent it stated he was a member of the United States Air Force. He stated that the Virginia 5.8 magnitude earth "wasn't a natural earthquake and not a HAARP earthquake". He told me to find a seismograph of the Washington DC area earthquake and compare it to a past earthquake. Then he
stated that I should Google DUMB or Deep Underground Military Bases. He ended by stating "the ABC warnings are real". I tried to trace the IP of the submission but they don't exists.
Air Force tunnel boring machine links deep underground military bases across U.S.
In the introduction to his interview with Fulford about the Denver and D.C. earthquakes not only being nuke-induced, but that they were used to destroy two underground New World Order bunker cities (of possibly 30,000 people each), Wilcock says:
I started to contact my own sources, which have been built up over being a public figure on the Internet since 1999 – and gaining the trust of many people in various classified programs. I was absolutely astonished when I started to ask around and found out that everyone I know, with one exception who probably wasn't on a need-to-know basis, confirmed that this attack did happen.
I'm familiar with the underground bunkers and cities that the black ops have been building. The best documentary I know on this was done by Jesse Ventura in his "Conspiracy Theory" series. I built a feature page on the 2012 episode in which the last half of the program was devoted to the underground bunkers that have quietly been built by dark elements in the U.S. Government looking out for their own survival with no thought for informing or preparing the population at large.
Here is some material that my awakened friend, Fred Burks compiled, who was formerly a translator for several U.S. Presidents:
Comparisons of seismograph readings for earthquakes with nuclear tests
https://www.llnl.gov/str/Walter.html - Comparison of a nuclear test and an earthquake on seismograph on a government website
http://www.iris.edu/hq/programs/education_and_outreach/animations/17 - Comparison of seismograph signatures for various events
Washington, DC, 5.8 earthquake on Aug 23, 2011, 1:51 PM local time
http://www2.nbc17.com/news/2011/aug/23/13/59-earthquake-rocks-virginia-ar-1324668 - Most striking seismograph of DC quake on NBC affiliate
http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Aug11/SneeEarthquake.html - Cornell University seismograph quite definitive
http://www.geol.vt.edu/outreach/vtso/2011/0823-louisa - Multiple seismographs of DC quake
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110823_175103.5.spyder - Access to hundreds more
Denver, 5.3 earthquake on Aug 22, 2011, 11:43 PM local time (roughly 12 hours before the DC quake)
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_18737351 - Denver Post seismograph showing clearly nuclear explosion signature
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110822_233020.4.spyder - Hundreds of seismograph readings
To see what seismographs look like for more normal earthquakes, click below:
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110818_153740.0.spyder - 4.6 scale Aug 18, 2011 Off the coast of British Columbia
http://www.iris.edu/cgi-bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110902_110325.7.spyder - 4.7 scale Sep 2, 2011 Utah
Both the Denver and DC earthquakes were quite shallow, with official reports giving 3.7 miles depth for the DC quake (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/se082311a.php) and 2.5 miles for Denver (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0005idz). That is well within even conventional drilling technologies these days (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole). According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake), earthquakes under 70 km (43 miles) are considered "shallow focus" earthquakes.
So I find the evidence fairly solid that both of these quakes were not natural.
I agree with Fred that there is definitely enough evidence to consider the two very unusual quakes on August 23 as probably being spurred by nukes. The question that is intriguing is why, who, and how. Though it's hard to believe all the stuff covered in the Wilcock-Fulford interview, I do think it's worth a perusal, to give you something to think about and a working hypothesis to start from. It's definitely worth our attention, especially if the release of hitherto suppressed free energy patents is one of the upshots of this recent counter coup.
What is alleged by Fulford and Wilcock is that the nukes were done by good elements in the Pentagon who are fed up with the New World Order conspirators using the US Military to enforce the spread of the police state tyranny, whose plan is to reduce the world population by 90% down to a "manageable" 500,000,000.
I personally am greatly encouraged by the possibility that there is that high a level of resistance from within the ranks of what used to be nearly totally controlled by the conspirators. It's a rebellion from within what used to be something they controlled.
The two underground cities were probably two key bunkers where the New World Order conspirators thought they could go run and hide while they bring destruction to the inhabitants on the surface. But now they have been sent a message: "We're all in this together here on planet Earth; what you do to others you do to yourself, so stop the destruction."
Hanks Mills comments....
On September 17, 2011 11:43 PM, my associate Hank Mills added:
Elected government officials are not the only individuals who control the course of human events. There exists powerful individuals from the realms of banking, finance, secretive extra-government agencies, and the military-industrial complex, who manipulate the strings that make the puppets in official elected offices do their bidding. This tangled web of the ultra elite power barons is not easy to sort through. I do not think anyone fully understands the true structure of these organizations, and their true motivations. What we do know, is that these institutes and families of power have suppressed exotic technologies and the truth about extraterrestrial activity on our planet. This suppression has been on going since before the crash of an extraterrestrial space craft near Roswell, NM in the year 1947.
If a nuclear attack did take place on one or more underground bases, this would be a clear indication of dissension in the ranks of the "powers that be." This whole situation reminds me -- to a certain extent --of the situation in the fictional series Stargate SG1. In that fictional series, a highly secret, ultra black-budget military organization exists called, "Stargate Command." The leadership of this organization have the task of trying to protect our planet from extraterrestrial threats, exploring the galaxy by traveling through "stargates" which allow near instantaneous travel to other worlds, and maintaining the secrecy of their program. Those working for Stargate Command are portrayed as being the "good guys", despite the fact they suppress exotic technologies, withhold fundamental information about the universe from the public, and often take it upon themselves to make decisions that impact the entire human race -- mostly with little supervision
from elected authorities.
In this same fictional series, there are rouge groups, agencies, and organizations that compete with the Stargate program. Some of these entities claim to be opposed to Stargate Command's secrecy and track record of sometimes putting humanity at risk, but in reality have their selfish motivations. Of course there are groups of extraterrestrials in this fictional series that have their own desires and interests. Some of these groups of extraterrestrials are benevolent, others are opportunistic, and still others are hostile. Although communicating with these species have often benefited Stargate Command's efforts to protect humanity, interaction with them have often created troublesome situations or threats to Earth.
The simple fact is that in the fictional series of Stargate and in our reality, it is not always easy to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys. Even the attack on the underground bases may (or may not) have prevented some sinister plot, this does not mean those who launched the attack were "good." They may not be heroes, or on the side of the billions of people on this planet. Their motivation for the attack may not be as simple and pure as we may hope.
If these apparent earthquakes were actually attacks on underground bunkers, thousands of people may have died. Many of these people probably were not evil, sinister individuals plotting for the eradication of 90% of the population, but could have simply been engineers and scientists working jobs, to earn a paycheck. The majority of those employed by these bases may have had no political agenda at all, and simply were thrilled to work on exotic technologies -- or needed to find a way to pay their mortgage!
For example, NASA has naysayed alternative energy and alternative propulsion technologies for decades. The space agency has also belittled and mocked the incontrovertible evidence that unknown craft are visiting our planet. Regardless what we think of those who have actively participated in suppression, we cannot forget that the majority of people at NASA have had nothing to do with it. To think that everyone at NASA is in a plot to suppress information that could change our world is simply implausible beyond measure. Most of those individuals working at NASA truly believe they are working for the agency with the most advanced space technology in existence, or are simply there to get a paycheck.
Any nuclear attack that has taken place is a total and complete tragedy. If those who perpetuated the attack desired to do the right thing, they should have organized a way to come forward to the public, and share what they knew. Instead, these individuals -- many of which have probably been actively participating in suppression of various topics -- may have taken another path that limits their personal risk while ending the lives of others. Standing up and releasing highly classified information about extraterrestrial life, exotic technologies that could benefit all of humanity, or the operations of ultra secretive organizations, can be risky. In fact, it can be very dangerous, but fear of persecution is not an excuse for a nuclear attack.
I would urge the individuals and organizations that want to do the "right thing" to avoid conflicts with other entities, and simply speak up. Despite their rank, position, or situation they should organize the information they have, and share it with the world. We live in an age where communication is easier than ever before. If someone really wants to tell a story, in a matter of hours or less they can upload videos of their testimony to YouTube, send the video to thousands of people via email, post the information on countless message boards, drop a few hundred DVDs in the mailbox, create a Facebook profile with the information, and transmit the information in so many ways NO ONE will be able to stop it.
The more aspiring "good guys" who are willing to come forward and distribute their story at the same time the better it is for everyone involved.
There is no excuse for violence. Even when it comes protecting ones self, the best defense is honesty and full disclosure. I think the motivations and sincerity of any group that would perpetuate an act of violence should be questioned.
Let's hope if a nuclear attack did happen on one or more top secret bases, that these will be last such attacks.
What the world needs is the truth, the full truth, and nothing but the truth.
Sterling Adds...
The fact that the President and Congress have such low approval ratings has a lot to do with how unbelievable they have become. Who can trust the government when they say: "This is how and why 9/11 happened, and this is what we should do about it;" when a common sense look at what actually happened screams so loudly to the contrary." Some truth from the government would be nice, but it will take some time before people start believing again because they have been lied to for so long.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
