There was an error in this gadget
0
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Red Barron
Date: Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Subject: [New post] Plenty of Room on the Cain Train for Palin Supporters!
To: majors.bruce@gmail.com
New post on Red Barron
<http://1.gravatar.com/blavatar/fd92af254da8447ed94b6ec11e746762?s=32&ts=1317860403>
<http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/04b9acbeb7aa34aea30d13a5499e8e15?s=50&d=identicon&r=G>
Plenty of Room on the Cain Train for Palin Supporters!
by chrisrbarron
Tonight comes word that former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has decided not to run for President. Governor Palin has been, and will continue to be, an important and outspoken leader of the Tea Party movement. I have immense respect for Governor Palin and her supporters are some of the most dedicated and fiercely loyal in [...]
Read more of this post
chrisrbarron | October 5, 2011 at 8:19 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p18Jjk-4W
Comment See all comments
Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://therealredbarron.com/2011/10/05/plenty-of-room-on-the-cain-train-for-palin-supporters/
Thanks for flying with <http://s.wordpress.com/i/emails/wp-footericon.png> WordPress.com
<http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redbarronradio.wordpress.com&blog=16857138&post=306&subd=redbarronradio&ref=&email=1&email_o=wpcom>
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
----------
<thismessage:/mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=132d7d020077ded4&attid=0.1&disp=emb&zw>
Hi Team!
*? 2 ALL:
KEY ELEMENT OF OBAMA HEALTH CARE REFORM PRODUCING UNDERWHELMING EFFECT -
<thismessage:/mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=132d7d020077ded4&attid=0.2&disp=emb&zw>
(above): People line up for an appointment for a
free medical clinic at the Sports Arena in downtown
Los Angeles on Sunday April 25, 2010. - HuffPost
Arthur Delaney reports:
"Enrollment in a new federal program for the uninsured is far below expectations from when the program launched following the enactment of health care reform last year.
"Since its creation in July 2010, the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan has insured 30,395 people, according to the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the program. Officials initially estimated the initiative could reach as many as 375,000 by the end of 2010. There are up to 25 million uninsured Americans who have pre-existing conditions like heart disease or diabetes.
"The most recent enrollment numbers are the first to reflect HHS efforts to make the program more affordable and more accessible, according to an HHS official. In the 23 states where the federal government runs the program directly, enrollment in July jumped to 8,712, a 15 percent boost from the previous month, before new lower premiums took effect.
"The PCIP provides market-rate health coverage for uninsured people shunned by the health insurance industry. A recent government audit said the biggest obstacles to higher enrollment are costly premiums and the requirement that applicants be uninsured for six months to be eligible. Another problem is a lack of awareness about the program."
<thismessage:/mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=132d7d020077ded4&attid=0.3&disp=emb&zw>
Key element of Obama health care reform producing underwhelming effect - what are your comments?
Greg Dempsey
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SECULARHUMANIST/
Voice of the People
========
Key Element Of Health Care Reform Producing Underwhelming Effect
'Nobody's Talking About It'
Arthur Delaney huffingtonpost.com
First Posted: 10/5/11 02:14 PM ET Updated: 10/5/11 02:37 PM ET
WASHINGTON -- Enrollment in a new federal program for the uninsured is far below expectations from when the program launched following the enactment of health care reform last year.
Since its creation in July 2010, the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan has insured 30,395 people, according to the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the program. Officials initially estimated the initiative could reach as many as 375,000 by the end of 2010. There are up to 25 million uninsured Americans who have pre-existing conditions like heart disease or diabetes.
The most recent enrollment numbers are the first to reflect HHS efforts to make the program more affordable and more accessible, according to an HHS official. In the 23 states where the federal government runs the program directly, enrollment in July jumped to 8,712, a 15 percent boost from the previous month, before new lower premiums took effect.
The PCIP provides market-rate health coverage for uninsured people shunned by the health insurance industry. A recent government audit said the biggest obstacles to higher enrollment are costly premiums and the requirement that applicants be uninsured for six months to be eligible. Another problem is a lack of awareness about the program.
Olivia Grey Pritchard, a freelance photographer in New Orleans, said she didn't hear about the PCIP until she complained about her fruitless search for insurance on Facebook. Pritchard has been uninsured since returning from Africa earlier this year, where she said her insurance had been provided by the humanitarian organization that had hired her to take pictures.
She said her Facebook complaint went something like this: "I am willing to pay, so it is absolutely ridiculous I can't get coverage because of a benign tumor from seven years ago."
A friend sent her a few informative links. "At first I was really shocked I hadn't come across it," said Pritchard, 30. "Nobody knows about it. Nobody has signed up for it. Nobody's talking about it."
An HHS official said the administration has been doing more outreach to increase the PCIP's enrollment.
"In just the past two weeks we have engaged in over 115 events across the country to highlight the program," the official said. "These events work to educate people about the program, especially those most likely to interact with people potentially eligible for PCIP -- pharmacists, social workers, providers at local health community centers, etcetera."
Monthly premiums for the PCIP in Louisiana can be as low as $193, but Pritchard is waiting to sign up. She said that when she called HHS to ask about a policy, she was told the $1,000 deductible would reset in January -- meaning that she'd have to pay $1,000 for her own care between now and then before the plan started covering her costs. She's waiting until the beginning of next year to apply so that she can get the most out of the program.
Though the requirement that applicants be uninsured for six months has been cited as a main reason for low enrollment, several people have told HuffPost they canceled expensive policies just so they could sweat out six months for a more affordable plan.
Richard Vieira, a 54-year-old accountant who lives near San Francisco, Calif., said he dropped his $1,100-per-month policy in December and received PCIP coverage in July, but not without some trouble. He said that in April, he had to go to the hospital for an appendectomy that cost more than $100,000. (Vieira said he hired a consulting firm to negotiate with the hospital, resulting in a drastically lower bill.)
"It was just about right in the middle of my wait. I felt pretty unlucky," Vieira said. "Prior to that I was hardly using the insurance at all."
Arthur Delaney is the author of "A People's History of the Great Recession," HuffPost's first e-book.
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
[DailyKos]
A group for readers of DailyKos and other progressive sites.
Group Email Addresses
Post message: DailyKos@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: DailyKos-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: DailyKos-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: DailyKos-owner@yahoogroups.com
MARKETPLACE
Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.
<http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=9ae8d966-efd8-11e0-a5ee-7fc22236e9df&T=1d1h06lkk%2fX%3d1317877441%2fE%3d1705083764%2fR%3dgroups%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d4247519113%2fH%3dY29udGVudD0iTWVtYmVyX0RpcmVjdG9yeTtHcm91cHM7MzYwO1Bob3RvcztCcmllZmNhc2U7UGVyc29uYWxzO0FsZXJ0cztBdXRvcy1DdXN0b207R2VvY2l0aWVzO01lc3NlbmdlcjsiIGRpc2FibGVzaHVmZmxpbmc9IjEiIHNlcnZlSWQ9IjlhZThkOTY2LWVmZDgtMTFlMC1hNWVlLTdmYzIyMjM2ZTlkZiIgc2l0ZUlkPSI0NDUyNTUxIiB0U3RtcD0iMTMxNzg3NzQ0MTIwNDQxMSIg%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3dAC238962&U=13c3g7qe5%2fN%3dDB8jB9GDJHs-%2fC%3d493064.14543979.14562481.13298430%2fD%3dMKP1%2fB%3d6060255%2fV%3d1>
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
---------
http://www.examiner.com/right-side-politics-in-national/democrats-anonymous?CID=examiner_alerts_article
'Democrats Anonymous'
Dan Spencer
, Right Side Politics Examiner
October 5, 2011 - Like this? Subscribe to get instant updates.
The good folks at American Crossroads have produced another great video. This one, "Democrats Anonymous" offers for Democrats fed up with the Obama Regime's job-killing policies, ridiculous proclamations and demands for more and more tax revenue.
Watch "Democrats Anonymous."
Now Democrats afflicted with doubts about Obama's radical agenda can get help and no longer have to suffer alone and in silence.
Video: American Crossroads: Democrats Anonymous
Video: American Crossroads: Democrats Anonymous
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
New Members 1
Visit Your Group
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM! Please visit: www.operationshoebox.com
MARKETPLACE
Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
__,_._,___
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
WordPress.com
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2011/10/michelle-obama-promotes-new-exercise.html
Michelle Obama promotes new exercise regimen for Mexico: Gunwalking.
Reduces the incidence of over-weight Mexicans by a considerable percentage.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Eric Holder: Perjury for me -- but not for thee, Roger
William Anderson
Legendary Major League Baseball pitcher Roger Clemens faces a retrial for perjury for allegedly lying to Congress during a hearing. The U.S. Department of Justice and Congress spared no expense to try to put him into prison after he testified that he had not used steroids. (During his first trial, the federal prosecutor brought in hearsay "evidence" that the judge already had ruled inadmissible, which led to a mistrial.)
Fast forward to this year. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who ultimately is responsible for the Clemens prosecution, told Congress last May that he only had heard of the infamous "Operation Fast and Furious" just a few weeks before. However, as this article demonstrates, Holder had been briefed about this program on a number of occasions during the summer of 2010.
So, assuming that both Clemens and Holder have lied under oath, which action was worst? If Clemens lied, it was about something he had ingested into his body that may have let him throw a baseball longer (and faster) than otherwise may have been the case. Operation Fast and Furious, on the other hand, resulted in scores of people being murdered, shot down with weapons that the government purposely made sure got into the hands of Mexican drug gangs.
From what I can tell, however, the government thinks that what Clemens allegedly did was much worse. Eric Holder will not face a second of scrutiny, as I am sure that the White House and the New York Times will come to his aid. In fact, the NYT recently had an article that tried to whitewash the whole thing, claiming that only Republicans were making any noise about the memos. Holder will not have to worry about being indicted (especially since prosecutors are not in the habit of indicting themselves). There are "two Americas," but they are not rich and poor; they are the Ruling Political Classes -- and everyone else.
http://williamlanderson.blogspot.com/2011/10/eric-holder-perjury-for-me-but-not-for.html
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
The Budget Mess: A Crisis in Legitimacy
by Sheldon Richman, Posted October 5, 2011
Reality has finally caught up with the ruling elite, and its members inside and outside of government are in a panic. They have freely spent the taxpayers' money for generations, building a corporatist warfare-welfare state, and when that wasn't enough to finance their projects, they borrowed just as freely. For a long while it paid off handsomely in power and wealth, but now even they realize things can't go on as they have for so long.
This fiscal year the government will spend $3.8 trillion, more than 40 percent of which will be borrowed. In the last full year before the current administration came to power, outlays were just under $3 trillion. Earlier this year, the Office of Management and Budget estimated that in 2016 spending will rise to $4.5 trillion. Red ink abounds. The FY2008 deficit stood at less than half a trillion dollars -- an astounding amount in its day -- then hit a record $1.88 trillion in 2009. According to administration estimates, the deficit won't fall below a trillion dollars until 2013, then it will begin rising again in 2016.
Bear in mind that deficit projections depend on assumptions about future economic growth and therefore future revenues and expenditures. The state of the economy influences how much money the state collects in taxes and how much it spends. At a time when people are clamoring for the deficit to be shrunk, officials have an incentive to be unrealistically optimistic in their projections in order to mollify the public. The costs of erring on the rosy side are low: they are not likely to be held accountable several years later when their predictions don't come true, because it will be all too easy to blame "unforeseeable" circumstances.
It should also be noted that budget discussions overflow with opportunities for creative accounting, or, more bluntly, deceit. The most recent example is the supposed $38 billion budget cut for FY2011. Although that figure, a tiny percentage of federal outlays, was only about half of what House Republicans said they wanted, it turns out that the compromise between the House leadership and the White House was, in the Washington Post's words, "accounting alchemy." The Post reported,
- A federal budget compromise that was hailed as historic for proposing to cut about $38 billion would reduce federal spending by only $352 million this fiscal year, less than 1 percent of the bill's advertised amount, according to the Congressional Budget Office…. The findings from the budget office warned that the deal may never come close to delivering on its promises. The analysts found that $13 billion to $18 billion of the cuts involve money that existed only on paper and was unlikely to be tapped in the next decade.
In Orwellian Washington a cut can really be an increase.
Many of the alleged cuts were actually the canceling of agency spending authority that wasn't being used. "A Washington Post analysis of the 459-page budget revealed at least 98 cases in which Congress took back unused IOUs and called it a cut," the paper reported.
That's government accounting for you -- smoke and mirrors, in Jimmy Breslin's memorable phrase.
The effects of deficit spending
All this deficit spending has had a deep structural effect on America's political economy. In mid April the national debt was $14.3 trillion, about 98 percent of GDP. Of that, about 68 percent 67 percent of GDP is held by people or entities outside the U.S. government; 47 percent is held by foreigners (32 percent of total debt). China holds $1.1 trillion. Last year the administration's Mid-Session Budget Review projected the debt would hit 100 percent of GDP by 2012, and a doubling of the debt by 2020, exceeding 100 percent of GDP for the rest of the decade. (The debt figure does not include all the government's liabilities, such as the obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or the unfunded liabilities of Social Security and Medicare.)
To see the yearly budget impact of this, note that in 2010 the U.S. government paid more than $400 billion in interest, a little less than the Medicare budget. It was the fourth-largest budget item. (About half was paid to the public.) This year the government is on track to exceed that amount. It is estimated that in 2019 the government will pay $700 billion in interest. Obviously, those figures are all subject to changes in the interest rate.
Obama's 2012 budget is slightly smaller than his last budgets, because previous budgets contained extraordinarily large items, such as his so-called stimulus bill and his health-care "reform."
Also, war-related spending is assumed to diminish although we'll see. The Libyan intervention cost more than $600 million as of April 4 and it was just starting. Nevertheless, projections have outlays exceeding 25 percent of GDP before settling in the range of 22-23 percent of GDP. That's higher than most of the period 1947–2008 (there were exceptions in the 1980s). Over ten years, so-called mandatory spending would increase $1.3 trillion, while so-called discretionary spending would fall $1.45 trillion relative to "baseline projections." Here's what the Congressional Budget Office said about Obama's 2012 budget plan:
- If the President's proposals were enacted, the federal government would record deficits of $1.4 trillion in 2011 and $1.2 trillion in 2012. Those deficits would amount to 9.5 percent and 7.4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), respectively. (By comparison, the deficit in 2010 totaled 8.9 percent of GDP.) Those deficits would exceed the ones projected to occur under current law, by $26 billion and $83 billion, respectively.
- The deficit under the President's proposals would fall to 4.1 percent of GDP by 2015 but would generally rise thereafter. Compared with CBO's current-law baseline projections, deficits under the proposals would be about 0.5 percentage points of GDP higher in 2012, 1.3 percentage points higher in 2013, and 1 to 2 percentage points higher thereafter. By 2021, the deficit would reach 4.9 percent of GDP, compared with 3.1 percent under CBO's baseline projections. Over the 2012–2021 period, deficits under the President's budget would total $9.5 trillion, compared with $6.7 trillion under those baseline projections.
- The deficit under the President's proposals would fall to 4.1 percent of GDP by 2015 but would generally rise thereafter. Compared with CBO's current-law baseline projections, deficits under the proposals would be about 0.5 percentage points of GDP higher in 2012, 1.3 percentage points higher in 2013, and 1 to 2 percentage points higher thereafter. By 2021, the deficit would reach 4.9 percent of GDP, compared with 3.1 percent under CBO's baseline projections. Over the 2012–2021 period, deficits under the President's budget would total $9.5 trillion, compared with $6.7 trillion under those baseline projections.
Unsustainable policies
But let's not get lost in these numbers. Virtually everyone agrees that the current situation is unsustainable. It's easy to see why the ruling elite think so, and it has nothing to do with new-found compassion for the long-suffering taxpayers or the consumers who will suffer if the price inflation resulting from the Federal Reserve's monetary expansion kicks in. The elite are concerned that if some control is not achieved over the spending, by 2025 all revenues collected by the national government will be swallowed up by the three pillars of the welfare state -- Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security - and interest on the debt. Today all so-called entitlements combined account for more than half the budget. Add interest and it's up to two-thirds. With the baby boomers beginning to retire and going on Social Security and Medicare, and with Medicaid set to expand under Obamacare, an explosion in outlays is just up the road. Medicare alone has unfunded liabilities of $37 trillion over the next 75 years. Social Security's hole is shallower but given the demographics, the problem is clear the worker-retiree ratio is heading towards 2 to 1 in 2040. (It was more than 16 to 1 in 1950.)
But if all revenues go to those programs and interest, how will the politicians do all the other things they like doing: subsidizing pet projects (many of which are carried on by well-connected businesses); policing the globe for political and economic reasons, which often means fighting overt and covert wars and channeling billions to the military-industrial complex; engineering a national education policy; running the infrastructure (more money for corporate cronies); and generally centralizing power in Washington, D.C.?
Obviously, the ruling elite cannot let that happen. Yet to attempt to maintain spending on all those things, federal outlays would have to exceed half the GDP, perhaps up to three-quarters of all the wealth produced by the American people. Tax rates designed to raise that amount could ignite a tax revolt and further erode the legitimacy of the corporatist warfare-welfare state. Investors might be too nervous to lend, at least at low interest rates.
As the politicians and their patrons must see it, the corporatist warfare-welfare state faces a double crisis. The first is fiscal. Unless they do something soon, they won't have the money to maintain the gravy train. Discipline will be imposed on them from outside. The other looming crisis is a crisis in legitimacy. People are catching on that the politicians have used the borrowing power to hide the cost of government, imposing heavy burdens on future generations. If the ruling elite doesn't at least appear to fix things they could have trouble at the polls.
Hence, House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan's "Path to Prosperity," which has been endorsed by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, and Obama's expression of support for modest budget cutting. But both approaches, whatever their differences in detail and style, have one overriding feature in common: they aim at preserving the corporatist warfare-welfare state. Neither represents a rethinking of the role the U.S. government has played in any of its spheres, domestic or foreign, for generations. Both embrace the long-held view that a government-business partnership is indispensable to a smooth-running economy, that the welfare state is important in maintaining public legitimacy and in ameliorating the anti-competitive effects of corporatism, and that global military hegemony is indispensable for self-serving political and economic interests. In other words, neither side wishes to see a truly free market.
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1107b.asp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
