Take the Brain Fitness Quiz!

New post on Fellowship of the Minds Take the Brain Fitness Quiz! by Dr. Eowyn Do you know how to keep your brain sharp? Do you worry about losing your mental sharpness as you age? Alzheimer's disease is the ultimate mind and memory thief, but there are other forms of dementia, and there's also garden-variety cognitive decline. The good news is there are things you can do to keep your brain fit. Are you taking advantage of them? Take this short 6-question quiz to find out how much you know about preserving your mind. Click here! ~Eowyn Dr. Eowyn | November 6, 2011 at 4:00 am | Tags: Alzheimer's, dementia, exercise, Nutrition | Categories: Health Care | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-apn Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/11/06/take-the-brain-fitness-quiz/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Why Liberals Hate Themselves

New post on Fellowship of the Minds Why Liberals Hate Themselves by sage_brush   For what is the hope of the hypocrite, though he hath gained, when God taketh away his soul?  Job 27:8   Big H/T to Tom Tancredo   sage sage_brush | November 7, 2011 at 12:27 pm | Tags: Bittle Whittle, Job 27 | Categories: Culture War, God, Idiots In General, Insanity, Liberals, Media, Occupy Atlanta, Occupy Wall Street | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-asQ Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/why-liberals-hate-themselves/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

DNC Forcing Non-Labor Union Hotel Workers in Charlotte, NC to Go on Furlough so Unionize Hotel Workers Can Work During DNC Convention

New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog DNC Forcing Non-Labor Union Hotel Workers in Charlotte, NC to Go on Furlough so Unionize Hotel Workers Can Work During DNC Convention by Scotty Starnes Democrats discriminating against non-unionized workers. No way. They would never sell out the taxpayers in favor of the unions. (Don't look at what they're trying to do to Boeing). From BigGovernment: In February, when the Democratic National Committee chose Charlotte, North Carolina as the host city for its September 2012 convention, it left the door wide open for the Charlotte-area's union-free workforce to be discriminated against in favor union workers. Although Charlotte's Democrat Mayor, Anthony Foxx  (who is facin g GOP challengerScott Stone in Tuesday's election), has denied the allegation, it appears Foxx has been misleading Charlotte residents on both his (alleged) job creation record as well as the outsourcing of DNC convention jobs to union labor. On Friday, RedState's Ben Howe broke the story of the Democratic National Committee discriminating against a Charlotte-area business for the 2012 convention because its workers were not unionized. When John told him he was not, the Committee member told him, "We were just told that we cannot accept bids unless they are from companies that are unionized." Politico also had another Charlotte business owner who was told the DNC was looking to use union labor for its Convention: He was told the Convention was looking to use local contractors to run the project, but union labor to staff it — and then, he said, he was told he would have to sign an agreement stating he would use union labor for the project. "We asked the question, how do you want to use local when no one local is unionized?" Webb told POLITICO. Continue reading>>> Scotty Starnes | November 7, 2011 at 6:33 PM | Tags: Charlotte, DNC, North Carolina, outsourcing, union workers, unions | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-66z Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/dnc-forcing-non-labor-union-hotel-workers-in-charlotte-nc-to-go-on-furlough-so-unionize-hotel-workers-can-work-during-dnc-convention/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Here Is a List of the Best 50 Bars in the World

http://eater.com/archives/2011/11/07/here-is-a-list-of-the-best-50-bars-in-the-world.php

 

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: NO Ban on Light Bulbs!

Holy shit.....that is an easy one....they will dispense gasoline based
on the metric system. No big deal. you will no longer buy a "gallon"
but 3.8 liters... gas tanks will be sized metrically as well in new
models.

All done.

On Nov 7, 2:50 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> As per usual, Republitards fear mongering about anything and
> everything...
> would you buy a used car from these creeps?
> Then why the hell would you vote for one???<snip>
> There is no looming ban or phase out of incandescent bulbs. The entirehullabaloo is based on a fictitious claim manufactured by Barton.
> All major lighting manufacturers, including Philips, Sylvania and GE,
> currently produce and sell incandescent light bulbs that meet or
> exceed the new standards (with no compromise in functionality). InThe unconstitutionality of this nonsense aside ...
> Do explain the difference between:
> a. Combustion engine automobiles MUST achieve 10,000 mpg to be sold within the US.
> b. Combustion engine automobiles are hereby banned.
> Be certain to include the END RESULT in your analysis.
> Regard$,
> --MJ
> "Many people want the government to protect the consumer. A much more urgent problem is to protect the consumer from the government" -- Milton Friedman.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Immigration and Misplaced Blame

Yelling does little for your delusion.
Migration, of course, is one of those (natural) rights.

Maybe THAT is the problem. You simply do not understand/grasp (natural) rights.

I certainly did not 'consent' ... the same applies for MOST within this Country.

You might seek out some Spooner, as well.

Regard$,
--MJ

"By what right do men exercise power over each other?" -- Auberon Herbert




At 09:18 PM 11/7/2011, you wrote:

SHOW ME THE MAP OF THE WORLD THAT DOES NOT HAVE THOSE LINES... YOUR ARGUMENT IS BASED IN FANTASY... MINE IN REALITY... "CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED" MEANS EXACTLY THAT.... "NO GOVERNMENT.....NO GOVERNED" , "NO GOVERNED....NO GOVERNMENT"

THIS REQUIRES CITIZENSHIP OR CONSENT (2 WAY...NOT 1 WAY STREET) TO BE GOVERNED...  A FOREIGN NATIONAL WITHOUT THAT 2 WAY CONSENT IS ILLEGAL

PLEASE TAKE A READING COMPREHENSION CLASS!!!!!!!!!!!!

JUST NOTICED THE CAPS....SORRY.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:35 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

You remain confused.

To Secure (natural) rights ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

Governments are created to secure (natural) rights.

You want Government to VIOLATE (natural) rights ... and then insert some nonsense about voting and map lines.

INSTEAD of securing (natural) rights, you want Government to extend and withhold permission -- which has NOTHING to do with the Declaration et al.

Regard$,

--MJ

A right is the sanction of independent action. A right is that which can be exercised without anyone's permission. If you exist only because society permits you to exist, you have no right to your own life. A permission can be revoked at any time. If, before undertaking some action, you must obtain the permission of society -- you are not free, whether such permission is granted to you or not. Only a slave acts on permission. A permission is not a right. -- Alyssa Rosenbaum

At 04:47 PM 11/7/2011, you wrote:

Hey MJ'..... It's right HERE:

That to secure these rights,

Governments are instituted among Men,,,,,,,,,,,,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

Foreign nationals are not "Governed" nor can they "Vote".  Please read and heed the Documents you try to quote.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

At 12:26 PM 11/4/2011, you wrote:

 MJ says:  They argue that we can't have people circumventing the

system because it undermines the rule of law. But laws are legitimate

only when they protect the natural rights of others.

Laws are designed to protect the natural rights of that countries

citizens... Definitely NOT "natural rights of others."

Where was THAT portion of the Declaration?

Regard$,

--MJ

It is a very dangerous doctrine to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions. It is one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. ... The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments coequal and cosovereign within themselves. -- Thomas Jefferson to Jarvis, 1820

--

Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

 

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/

* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.

* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--

Mark M. Kahle H.

--

Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

 

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/

* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.

* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--

Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

 

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/

* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.

* Read the latest breaking news, and more.




--
Mark M. Kahle H.



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Immigration and Misplaced Blame

SHOW ME THE MAP OF THE WORLD THAT DOES NOT HAVE THOSE LINES... YOUR ARGUMENT IS BASED IN FANTASY... MINE IN REALITY... "CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED" MEANS EXACTLY THAT.... "NO GOVERNMENT.....NO GOVERNED" , "NO GOVERNED....NO GOVERNMENT" 

THIS REQUIRES CITIZENSHIP OR CONSENT (2 WAY...NOT 1 WAY STREET) TO BE GOVERNED...  A FOREIGN NATIONAL WITHOUT THAT 2 WAY CONSENT IS ILLEGAL 

PLEASE TAKE A READING COMPREHENSION CLASS!!!!!!!!!!!!

JUST NOTICED THE CAPS....SORRY.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:35 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

You remain confused.

To Secure (natural) rights ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

Governments are created to secure (natural) rights.
You want Government to VIOLATE (natural) rights ... and then insert some nonsense about voting and map lines.
INSTEAD of securing (natural) rights, you want Government to extend and withhold permission -- which has NOTHING to do with the Declaration et al.

Regard$,
--MJ

A right is the sanction of independent action. A right is that which can be exercised without anyone's permission. If you exist only because society permits you to exist, you have no right to your own life. A permission can be revoked at any time. If, before undertaking some action, you must obtain the permission of society -- you are not free, whether such permission is granted to you or not. Only a slave acts on permission. A permission is not a right. -- Alyssa Rosenbaum

At 04:47 PM 11/7/2011, you wrote:

Hey MJ'..... It's right HERE:

That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men,,,,,,,,,,,,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed


Foreign nationals are not "Governed" nor can they "Vote".  Please read and heed the Documents you try to quote.





On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

At 12:26 PM 11/4/2011, you wrote:

 MJ says:  They argue that we can't have people circumventing the

system because it undermines the rule of law. But laws are legitimate

only when they protect the natural rights of others.

Laws are designed to protect the natural rights of that countries

citizens... Definitely NOT "natural rights of others."

Where was THAT portion of the Declaration?

Regard$,

--MJ

It is a very dangerous doctrine to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions. It is one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. ... The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments coequal and cosovereign within themselves. -- Thomas Jefferson to Jarvis, 1820

--

Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

 

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/

* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.

* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Mark M. Kahle H.



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Mark M. Kahle H.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

America-hating Obama Loves the People’s Republic of China (Video)

New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog America-hating Obama Loves the People's Republic of China (Video) by Scotty Starnes Obama's own words, and actions, are his worst enemy. Well, Obama does act like  a Communist Dictator and loves borrowing Commie money. No wonder he loves China more than America. H/T to Granny Jan Scotty Starnes | November 7, 2011 at 6:44 PM | Tags: China, Communist, President Obama | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-66D Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/america-hating-obama-loves-the-peoples-republic-of-china-video/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Obamacare Contains $5 Billion In Covert Bailout In Taxpayer’s Money, For Unions, State Public Employees, And Corporation Health Care Coverage.

New post on Political Vel Craft BREAKING => Obamacare Contains $5 Billion In Covert Bailout In Taxpayer's Money, For Unions, State Public Employees, And Corporation Health Care Coverage. by Volubrjotr Back in April of this year I wrote about the covert bailout that was buried in the Obamacare bill which gives $5 billion of taxpayer money to unions, states (for public employees) and corporations for health care coverage for retirees aged between 55 and 64. The program is called the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program or [...] Read more of this post Volubrjotr | November 7, 2011 at 23:23 | Tags: $5 billion, general motors, Mike Enzi, obama, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, republican, sun yat sen, United Auto Workers, vladimir lenin | Categories: barack obama, government, obama, political, politics, soetoro, subversion, treason, yes we can | URL: http://wp.me/psXSG-do6 Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/11/07/breaking-obamacare-contains-5-billion-in-covert-bailout-in-taxpayers-money-for-unions-state-public-employees-and-corporation-health-care-coverage/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf. R-Va.: Obama’s Science Czar Committs Treason ~ John Holdren Delivers U.S. Technology To The Chinese.

New post on Political Vel Craft U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf. R-Va.: Obama's Science Czar Committs Treason ~ John Holdren Delivers U.S. Technology To The Chinese. by Volubrjotr Congressman says he's alarmed that President Obama's science "czar," John Holdren, apparently has been collaborating with the Chinese even though Congress specifically prohibited that activity in a bill signed into law by his boss, Obama. The accusations from U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf. R-Va., came this week in a hearing of the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee [...] Read more of this post Volubrjotr | November 7, 2011 at 22:22 | Tags: BarackObama, china, Frank Wolf, holdren, John Holdren, nasa, Office of Science and Technology Policy, united states | Categories: barack obama, government, obama, political, politics, soetoro, subversion, treason, yes we can | URL: http://wp.me/psXSG-dnD Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/11/07/u-s-rep-frank-wolf-r-va-obamas-science-czar-committs-treason-john-holdren-delivers-u-s-technology-to-the-chinese/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Immigration and Misplaced Blame

You remain confused.

To Secure (natural) rights ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

Governments are created to secure (natural) rights.
You want Government to VIOLATE (natural) rights ... and then insert some nonsense about voting and map lines.
INSTEAD of securing (natural) rights, you want Government to extend and withhold permission -- which has NOTHING to do with the Declaration et al.

Regard$,
--MJ

A right is the sanction of independent action. A right is that which can be exercised without anyone's permission. If you exist only because society permits you to exist, you have no right to your own life. A permission can be revoked at any time. If, before undertaking some action, you must obtain the permission of society -- you are not free, whether such permission is granted to you or not. Only a slave acts on permission. A permission is not a right. -- Alyssa Rosenbaum






At 04:47 PM 11/7/2011, you wrote:

Hey MJ'..... It's right HERE:

That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men,,,,,,,,,,,,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed


Foreign nationals are not "Governed" nor can they "Vote".  Please read and heed the Documents you try to quote.





On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

At 12:26 PM 11/4/2011, you wrote:

 MJ says:  They argue that we can't have people circumventing the

system because it undermines the rule of law. But laws are legitimate

only when they protect the natural rights of others.

Laws are designed to protect the natural rights of that countries

citizens... Definitely NOT "natural rights of others."

Where was THAT portion of the Declaration?

Regard$,

--MJ

It is a very dangerous doctrine to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions. It is one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. ... The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments coequal and cosovereign within themselves. -- Thomas Jefferson to Jarvis, 1820

--

Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

 

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/

* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.

* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Mark M. Kahle H.



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Immigration and Misplaced Blame

Hey MJ'..... It's right HERE:

That to secure these rights, 

Governments are instituted among Men,,,,,,,,,,,,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed


Foreign nationals are not "Governed" nor can they "Vote".  Please read and heed the Documents you try to quote.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:57 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

At 12:26 PM 11/4/2011, you wrote:

 MJ says:  They argue that we can't have people circumventing the
system because it undermines the rule of law. But laws are legitimate
only when they protect the natural rights of others.

Laws are designed to protect the natural rights of that countries
citizens... Definitely NOT "natural rights of others."

Where was THAT portion of the Declaration?

Regard$,
--MJ

It is a very dangerous doctrine to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions. It is one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. ... The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments coequal and cosovereign within themselves. -- Thomas Jefferson to Jarvis, 1820

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Mark M. Kahle H.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Tarzan Update!

 

Tarzan Update!

I was at the store yesterday, and I ran into Tarzan! I asked him how it was going and if he was making any more movies.

He told me, "Me no longer make movies, me have severe arthritis, both shoulders and not swing from vine to tree".

I asked how Jane was doing? 
He told me, "Jane in bad shape, in nursing home, 
has Alzheimer's and not recognizes anyone".
 How sad!

I asked about Boy, and he told me, "Boy, gone big city,   get with bad women, on drugs and alcoholic; and only time hear from him, when in trouble or need something".

I asked about Cheeta: 
he beamed and said, "Cheeta do good. 
She marry lawyer, had plastic surgery,
 now live in White House!!!"

 

I know, something bad is going to happen to me!!!!!!!!!!

 

__._,_.___

 

.

.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.