• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0
 
Dr. Paul is a much more polished, and classy individual than Ross.  Congressman Paul is just naive as Hell when it comes to foreign policy!  It baffles the mind, that someone that intelligent, especially with regard to economics,  could be so disillusioned.
 
Dr. Paul would make a great Secretary of Treasury!  Let's hope the new conservative Administration chooses him for the position!


You would FIRST need to get the neocons out of the running. There are no 'conservatives' currently in the hunt.

Do explain this alleged 'naivete'.

Regard$,
--MJ

"A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending have enslaved the people." -- James Madison



On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Stew Webb <stewwebb@stewwebb.com> wrote:
Breaking News November 10, 2011
J.P. Morgan Gate Escalates
http://www.stewwebb.com/JP_Morgan_Gate_Escalates_11102011.htm

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Hey Geoffrey!
 
Dr. Paul is a much more polished, and classy individual than Ross.  Congressman Paul is just naive as Hell when it comes to foreign policy!  It baffles the mind, that someone that intelligent, especially with regard to economics,  could be so disillusioned.
 
Dr. Paul would make a great Secretary of Treasury!  Let's hope the new conservative Administration chooses him for the position!
 


 
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:34 PM, geoffrey theist <gtheist957@gmail.com> wrote:
remember ROSS PEROT???!!!


On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:59 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

Ron Paul: Third-party power or GOP kingmaker?
By Brent Budowsky - 11/08/11 10:30 AM ET

Wouldn't you rather I write about Ron Paul than about Herman Cain, who will soon flame out, or Rick Perry, who has already flamed out? The new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll suggests Ron Paul would win 18 percent as a third-party candidate running against Obama and Romney!

The other underestimated factor in the Republican race is that proportional representation will give Ron Paul potentially major influence in choosing the nominee at the convention, and major leverage because he certainly would be a powerful third-party candidate if he does run.

The GOP nominating process has turned into a debacle for the conservative wing of the party. Donald Trump was a joke. Rick Perry self- destructed, as I predicted he would. Now conservatives are reduced to making excuses for Herman Cain as woman after woman emerges with charges of abuse. Frankly it is pretty sad that certain conservatives, including some highly visible conservative Republican women, were reduced to invoking Clarence Thomas, high-tech lynching and the bogus race issue as woman after woman emerges with charges against Cain.

The next question for Republicans will be whether Mike Huckabee, who would be a formidable candidate, sees a boomlet for him to jump in. And whether Jon Huntsman makes a serious bid to be a viable alternative to the "well-lubricated weather vane," Mitt Romney.

If the final choice is Obama versus Romney, the campaign would be purgatory for true liberals and true conservatives, with the final choice of Romney and Obama being a battle of two Rorschach tests. Can anyone imagine Ron Paul, Rick Perry and Herman Cain raising Mitt Romney's hand in triumph at a convention where a Romney nomination would leave many conservatives appalled and disgusted?

Ron Paul has been the constant of the 2012 campaign. If he entered a general election as a third-party candidate against Romney and Obama with 18 percent, that number might well rise after presidential debates between the three of them.

There is another scenario. Mitt Romney is obviously having big trouble rising above 25 to 30 percent of Republican support. If Perry and Cain both drop out early in 2012, as I predict, Ron Paul's numbers would rise for the Republican battle.

Could Ron Paul win a direct two-candidate contest of Paul v. Romney? I would like to see a poll about that race. Alternatively:

With proportional representation, Ron Paul could have potentially decisive influence at the convention, if Romney does not have enough supporters to win the nomination. What would Ron Paul do? This is a very interesting question.

My wild guess today is that Ron Paul could either help lead a dramatic move to entice a new true conservative to challenge and defeat Romney (such as Huckabee), or Dr. Paul could emerge as a third-party candidate equal to or stronger than Ross Perot was.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/192299-ron-paul-third-party-power-or-gop-kingmaker

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
"General Patton said that an ounce of sweat can save a pint of blood. Similarly, a little reading and thinking this time of year can save a heap of gravedigging in the future."

Memorial Day Reflections and Revisionism
by James Bovard, Posted November 10, 2011

On Memorial Day, the media do their usual sacralizing of war. Instead, it should be a day for the ritualized scourging of politicians. During the last 60 years, their lies have resulted in the unnecessary deaths of almost 100,000 thousand American soldiers and millions of foreigners. And yet, people still get teary-eyed when politicians take the stage to talk about their devotion to the troops.

For Memorial Day 2011, the Washington Post included numerous touching photographs of graves, recent widows or fatherless kids by the graves, and stories of the troops' sacrifices. The Post buried a short article in the middle of the A-Section (squeezed onto a nearly full-page ad for Mattress Discounters) about the U.S. military's having killed dozens of Afghan civilians and police in a wayward bombing in some irrelevant Afghan province. The story's length and placement reflected the usual tacit assumption that any foreigner killed by the U.S. military doesn't, by definition, deserve to be treated as fully human.

The Washington Post celebrations of Memorial Day never include any reference to that paper's culpability in helping the Bush administration deceive America into going to war against Iraq. When Post reporters dug up the facts that exposed the Bush administration's false claims on the Iraqi peril, editors sometimes ignored or buried their revelations. Washington Post Pentagon correspondent Thomas Ricks complained that in the lead-up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, "There was an attitude among editors: 'Look, we're going to war, why do we even worry about all this contrary stuff?'"

The Post continued aiding the war party by minimizing its sordidness. When the Bush administration's claims on Iraq's nuclear-weapons program had collapsed, the Washington Post article on the brazen deceits was headlined, "Depiction of Threat Outgrew Supporting Evidence." According to Post media columnist Howard Kurtz, the media are obliged to portray politicians as if they are honest. He commented in 2007, "From August 2002 until the war was launched in March of 2003 there were about 140 front-page pieces in the Washington Post making the administration's case for war. It was, 'The President said yesterday.' 'The Vice President said yesterday.' 'The Pentagon said yesterday.' Well, that's part of our job. Those people want to speak. We have to provide them a platform. I don't have [sic] anything wrong with that." Washington Post reporter Karen DeYoung declared in 2004, "We are inevitably the mouthpiece for whatever administration is in power."

The Post was not alone in its groveling to war. Major television networks behaved like government-owned subsidiaries for much of the period before and during the Iraq War. CNN chief news executive Eason Jordan explained a month after the United States attacked Iraq, "I went to the Pentagon myself several times before the war started and met with important people there and said, for instance, at CNN, 'Here are the generals we're thinking of retaining to advise us on the air and off about the war,' and we got a big thumbs-up on all of them. That was important." Jessica Yellin, a CNN correspondent who formerly worked for MSNBC, commented in 2008, "When the lead-up to the war began, the press corps was under enormous pressure from corporate executives, frankly, to make sure that this was a war that was presented in a way that was consistent with the patriotic fever in the nation and the president's high approval ratings." NBC news anchor Katie Couric stated that there was pressure from "the corporations who own where we work and from the government itself to really squash any kind of dissent or any kind of questioning of it."

Before the war, almost all the broadcast news stories on Iraq originated with the federal government. PBS's Bill Moyers noted that "of the 414 Iraq stories broadcast on NBC, ABC, and CBS nightly news, from September 2002 until February 2003, almost all the stories could be traced back to sources from the White House, the Pentagon, and the State Department."

But this record of servility and deceit has not slackened the media's enthusiasm to drench Memorial Day with sanctimony.


How to observe Memorial Day

Memorial Day should be a time to remember the government's crimes against the people. Politicians have perennially sent young Americans to die for false causes or on wild-goose chases.

Over the past century, war memorials have become increasingly popular. However, most of the memorials do little or nothing to inform people of the chicaneries or deceits that paved the way to or perpetuated the war. It would be a vast improvement if each war memorial also had an adjacent monument of major lies ­such as an engraved plaque listing the major deceits by which the American public were swayed to support sending American boys off to die for some grand cause.

The Vietnam War memorial in Washington, for instance, lists the names of each American killed in that conflict. If that memorial could be complemented by excerpts from the Pentagon Papers ­ or from some of the major admissions of deceit by some of that war's policymakers ­ the effect on the public would be far more uplifting.

Sheldon Richman, the editor of The Freeman and senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation, proposes renaming Memorial Day Revisionist History Day. In a post on his personal blog on Memorial Day 2008, he declared,

The state inculcates an unquestioning faith in its war-making by associating it with patriotism, heroism, and the defense of "our freedoms." This strategy builds in its own defense against any criticism of the government's policies. Anyone who questions the morality of a war is automatically suspected of being unpatriotic, unappreciative of the bravery that has "kept us free," and disrespectful of "our troops," in a word, un-American.

But in fact the forces aren't "serving their country" or "keeping us free." They are doing the bidding of hack politicians, well-connected economic interests, and court intellectuals who are striving to satisfy personal ambition, attain wealth, or create historical legacies.

To counter this common outlook, in which people are indoctrinated from birth, we should do what we can to teach others that the government's version of its wars is always self-serving and threatening to life, liberty, and decency.

General Patton said that an ounce of sweat can save a pint of blood. Similarly, a little reading and thinking this time of year can save a heap of gravedigging in the future. Richman recommended the following works as a start:

Wartime: Understanding and Behavior in the Second World War, by Paul Fussell. Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the American Civil War, by Jeffrey Rogers Hummel. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy, by William Appleman Williams. The Civilian and the Military: A History of the American Antimilitarist Tradition, by Arthur Ekirch. The Politics of War: The Story of Two Wars Which Altered Forever the Political Life of the American Republic, 1890–1920, by Walter Karp. The Costs of War, edited by John Denson.

I would add to the list the following works:

The Illusion of Victory: America in World War I, by Thomas Fleming. The New Dealers' War: F.D.R. and the War within World War II, by Thomas Fleming. Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers, by Daniel Ellsberg, Liberty, Security, and the War on Terror, edited by Richard M. Ebeling and Jacob G. Hornberger The Failure of America's Foreign Wars, edited by Richard M. Ebeling and Jacob G. Hornberger.

Memorial Day can benefit from the creativity of free spirits across the board. Tom Blanton, the mastermind of the website Project for a New American Revolution, proposed in an exchange on my website (www.jimbovard. com) changing Memorial Day to make it far more realistic:

It used to be that Memorial Day was to honor dead soldiers. In recent years, we are asked to also honor veterans (who already have a day) and active duty members of the armed services. This may be an indication that the politicians feel there aren't enough dead soldiers....
I think Memorial Day should simply be renamed Tombstone Day and people should decorate their yards with styrofoam tombstones like they do for Halloween. True-believers might even consider a few flag-draped coffins made of cardboard and maybe hanging dismembered arms and legs made of rubber from their trees.

Blanton's proposal would provide a shot in the arm for party stores during the slow period between Valentine's Day and Halloween. And it would be a spark for conversations that were far more substantive than the usual flag waving.

I would favor celebrating Memorial Day the way the British used to celebrate Guy Fawkes Day. Fawkes was the leader of a conspiracy in 1604 to blow up the Parliament building in London. Until recently, the British celebrated the anniversary of that day by burning Guy Fawkes in effigy. (Government officials have recently banned such burnings on the grounds that something bad might happen because of the fires. The movie V for Vendetta probably made some bureaucrats nervous.)

It would be appropriate to celebrate Memorial Day by burning in effigy the politicians whose lies led to the deaths of so many Americans (and innocent foreigners). Those whose images deserve to be torched run the gamut from Lyndon Johnson to Defense Secretary Robert McNamara to Richard Nixon to Bill Clinton (Kosovo) to George W. Bush (Iraq, et cetera), to Barack Obama (Afghanistan, Libya, et cetera). The burnings could be accompanied by recitations of the major offenses against the truth and liberty that each politician committed.


http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1108c.asp
0
:






---------- Forwarded message ----------


 
 
   Not only great pictures  but a great story must see to the end
 
    
  
This is ONE Lucky Guy  with a good camera.   

The  fellow sitting on the tailgate of his pickup truck  never
Realized the show he was  missing.
 
  
  
  

The  little duck watches as the Eagle speeds straight
At him at  about 40 mph.
 
  
  
  
  

With perfect timing, the  duck always dove and escaped with
A mighty splash! Then  he'd pop to the surface as soon as
The Eagle flew past.  This was repeated over and over for
Several minutes. I  worried the poor duck would tire and that
Would be the end  of him.
 
  
  
  
  

A  second Eagle joins the attack! The duck kept diving
"just  in time", so the Eagles began to dive into the water after  him!
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

After several minutes  the Eagles got frustrated and began to
Attack each other.  They soon began to dive vertically,
Level out, and attack  head-on in a good old-fashioned game
Of high-speed  "Chicken". Sometimes they banked away
From each other at  the last possible second. Other times
They'd climb  vertically and tear into each other while falling
Back  toward the water. (The duck catches his breath at the
Right  side of this picture.)
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

A  terrible miscalculation! The luckiest shot of my life  catches
This 100 mph head-on collision between two Bald  Eagles.
 
  
  
  
  
  
  

One Eagle stayed aloft  and flew away, but the other lies
Motionless in a crumpled  heap.
The lucky duck survived to live another  day.
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

It's sad to watch an  Eagle drown. He wiggled, flapped and
Struggled mostly  underwater.. He finally got his head
Above water and with  great difficulty managed to get airborne.
To my  astonishment, he flew straight toward me,
And it was the  most wretched and unstable bird flight I've ever  seen!
 
  
  
  
  
  
  

The  bedraggled Eagle circled me once - then lit atop a nearby fir  tree.
He had a six-foot wingspread and looked mighty  angry.
I was concerned that I might be his next target, but  he was so
Exhausted he just stared at me. Then I wondered  if he would topple
To the ground. As he tried to dry his  feathers, it seemed to me that
This beleaguered Eagle  symbolized America in its current trials.
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

My half-hour wait was  rewarded with this marvelous sight.
He flew away, almost  good as new.. May America recover as  well.
 

 





--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



 


 
If your happy and you know it poop your pants - YouTube
Jayden made her own song. If your happy and you know it poop your pants, if your happy and u know it poop you pants! Haha this kid the ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSlfEmBiNXQ


.



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
You better read up on Iran's capabilities Sarge.....You sound like a Moonbat this week.
 
(Good to see ya by the way!)
 
KeithInTampa
 
 


 
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:40 AM, SgtUSMC <devildawg367@gmail.com> wrote:
Yea, well, Iraq was going to attack us with Scuds that only had a 90
mile range. Some people are clueless.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
Thanks for sharing this Travis!
 
Yes, we are PlainOl'!  You called that one right, (as you often do!)
 
KeithInTampa (This Week)
 
 
 


 
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:47 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
yes, Americans are in a fight against socialists

aim small ... miss small

On Nov 10, 9:47 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  **
>
>  ****
>
> [image:https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/319981_213446528...]
> ****
>
> [image:http://toddkinsey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TeaParty-OWS.jpg]****
>
> [image:http://toddkinsey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TeaParty-OWS-11...]**
> **
>
> [image:http://toddkinsey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TeaParty-OWS-2.jpg]***
> *
>
> [image:http://toddkinsey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TeaParty-OWS-3.jpg]***
> *
>
> [image:http://toddkinsey.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TeaParty-OWS-5.jpg]***
> *
>
> ** **
>
>  Untitled4.jpg
> 136KViewDownload
>
>  Untitled2.jpg
> 85KViewDownload
>
>  Untitled6.jpg
> 198KViewDownload
>
>  Untitled3.jpg
> 158KViewDownload
>
>  Untitled5.jpg
> 173KViewDownload
>
>  Untitled1.jpg
> 186KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
remember ROSS PEROT???!!!

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:59 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

Ron Paul: Third-party power or GOP kingmaker?
By Brent Budowsky - 11/08/11 10:30 AM ET

Wouldn't you rather I write about Ron Paul than about Herman Cain, who will soon flame out, or Rick Perry, who has already flamed out? The new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll suggests Ron Paul would win 18 percent as a third-party candidate running against Obama and Romney!

The other underestimated factor in the Republican race is that proportional representation will give Ron Paul potentially major influence in choosing the nominee at the convention, and major leverage because he certainly would be a powerful third-party candidate if he does run.

The GOP nominating process has turned into a debacle for the conservative wing of the party. Donald Trump was a joke. Rick Perry self- destructed, as I predicted he would. Now conservatives are reduced to making excuses for Herman Cain as woman after woman emerges with charges of abuse. Frankly it is pretty sad that certain conservatives, including some highly visible conservative Republican women, were reduced to invoking Clarence Thomas, high-tech lynching and the bogus race issue as woman after woman emerges with charges against Cain.

The next question for Republicans will be whether Mike Huckabee, who would be a formidable candidate, sees a boomlet for him to jump in. And whether Jon Huntsman makes a serious bid to be a viable alternative to the "well-lubricated weather vane," Mitt Romney.

If the final choice is Obama versus Romney, the campaign would be purgatory for true liberals and true conservatives, with the final choice of Romney and Obama being a battle of two Rorschach tests. Can anyone imagine Ron Paul, Rick Perry and Herman Cain raising Mitt Romney's hand in triumph at a convention where a Romney nomination would leave many conservatives appalled and disgusted?

Ron Paul has been the constant of the 2012 campaign. If he entered a general election as a third-party candidate against Romney and Obama with 18 percent, that number might well rise after presidential debates between the three of them.

There is another scenario. Mitt Romney is obviously having big trouble rising above 25 to 30 percent of Republican support. If Perry and Cain both drop out early in 2012, as I predict, Ron Paul's numbers would rise for the Republican battle.

Could Ron Paul win a direct two-candidate contest of Paul v. Romney? I would like to see a poll about that race. Alternatively:

With proportional representation, Ron Paul could have potentially decisive influence at the convention, if Romney does not have enough supporters to win the nomination. What would Ron Paul do? This is a very interesting question.

My wild guess today is that Ron Paul could either help lead a dramatic move to entice a new true conservative to challenge and defeat Romney (such as Huckabee), or Dr. Paul could emerge as a third-party candidate equal to or stronger than Ross Perot was.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/192299-ron-paul-third-party-power-or-gop-kingmaker

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Thursday, Nov 10, 2011 1:40 PM Eastern Standard Time
Newt Gingrich, book-shilling faux candidate, surges
The scandal-plagued, unelectable former House speaker stumbles toward the top tier
By Alex Pareene

In last night's hallucinatory GOP presidential debate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich did his usual blustery free-associative word-barrage routine that for years convinced numerous reporters and pundits that he was somehow an intellectual statesman. The highlight was probably when Gingrich was asked what he'd done to earn his consulting firm a $300,000 contract from Freddie Mac. Gingrich insisted the money was for history lectures. That is not really the case.

Gingrich also took on healthcare policy, by repeatedly pointing out that he did not have enough time to say anything about healthcare policy, a subject about which he is known to be among the world's foremost thinkers.

GINGRICH: Well, I just want point out, my colleagues have done a terrific job of answering an absurd question. To say in 30 seconds…

BARTIROMO: You have said you want to repeal "Obama-care," correct?

GINGRICH: I did. Let me finish, if I may. To say in 30 seconds what you would do with 18 percent of the economy, life and death for the American people, a topic I've worked on since 1974, about which I wrote about called "Saving Lives and Saving Money" in 2002, and for which I founded the Center for Health Transformation, is the perfect case of why I'm going to challenge the president to seven Lincoln-Douglas style three-hour debates with a timekeeper and no moderator, at least two of which ought to be on health care so you can have a serious discussion over a several-hour period that affects the lives of every person in this country.

A book plug, an assertion of unparalleled expertise, and a hilarious proposal that makes no sense -- all in one answer? He's still got it.

I haven't checked to see how sales of "Saving Lives and Saving Money" are looking this morning, but I am sure Gingrich was grateful for the opportunity to advertise it for free via a supposed presidential debate.

According to Politico, here's where the campaign trail has taken candidate Gingrich today:

Hosting a town hall meeting and book signing at the Detroit Metropolitan Airport Westin Hotel

You gotta shake a lot of hands if you want to win the Detroit Metropolitan Airport Westin Hotel caucuses.

After 20 years of pretending to mull presidential bids in order to keep his name in the papers, Newt actually went through with the fake presidential bid this year in order to put his name in even more papers ­ and drum up business for the various schemes that keep him in diamond cuff links. (Most of his campaign staff quit because all Gingrich wanted to do was organize screenings of his documentaries.) It's a transparent fraud from a transparent bullshit artist.

But in this environment, this year, astoundingly, it's actually sort of working. Because Gingrich's campaign-crippling missteps happened before those of Perry, Bachmann and Cain (in some cases up to 25 years before), he's consolidating support from the "anyone but Romney" crowd. Real Clear Politics puts him third nationally, and his numbers have been steadily rising since September. The Mark Blumenthal "outsiders" survey has him surging among early state Republican bigwigs and for some reason he's polling in first place in Mississippi.

The Gingrich campaign is becoming so lifelike that Bill Kristol's Weekly Standard has gone all-in on Newt, declaring him the winner of last night's debate, playing up his poll numbers and praising his message.

What the hell is the endgame here? There is no conceivable scenario in which Newt Gingrich is allowed to win the Republican nomination for the presidency ­ not with his divorces and jewelry store credit lines and history of environmentalism ­ but we could end up with a New Gingrich, public intellectual, who's all the more self-satisfied and ubiquitous for having actually won a presidential primary. We all lose.

http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/newt_gingrich_book_shilling_faux_candidate_surges/
0

Notes From the Debates
Posted by Butler Shaffer on November 10, 2011 11:47 AM

It was interesting watching the GOP "debates" last night. For every question asked of Ron Paul, three or four -- or more -- were asked of each of the other candidates. While Ron continues to be labeled a kook," or "extermist," or the man who has "no chance to get the nomination," his thinking set the tone and identified the issues to which the others felt compelled to respond. The need to "cut government spending" was just the beginning, followed by criticism of the Federal Reserve and the need to find out who the recipients of Federal Reserve payments were (an inquiry none of the other candidates would have thought of on their own, and echoed Ron's work). The strangest copy-cat response to Ron's proposals came from Rick Perry who jumped on the "cut government departments" bandwagon ­ and immediately fell on his head ­ by saying he would cut three departments, but couldn't think of the third one he had in mind. Coming shortly after his speech in which he sounded as if he were on drugs or was in the midst of a seizure, Perry's performance probably eliminated him from any serious consideration for the GOP nomination. But the "debate" helped confirm to thoughtful minds that Ron Paul offers the only intelligent response to issues that he alone has raised, and to which other candidates now have to pretend to address.

It's certainly an improvement over the days when GOP types focused their attention on whether Willie Horton should have been paroled, or the importance of the pledge of allegiance!!
0
my vote would be yes.

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:27 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
Do you think the following should be a requirement of all US
politicians:

"I acknowledge I have read, understand and will faithfully support the
Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights. I
entirely renounce and abjure all oaths and allegiances other than to
the United States of America. I will faithfully read, and comprehend
ALL legislation before I cast my vote or sign any bill or legislation.
I will not sign, pass or vote for any legislation that violates the
Constitution of the United States of America, so help me God."

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Bare Naked Islam

KABOOM! Premature detonation of a suicide bomber

by barenakedislam

PAKISTANI Muslim has committed a fatal error and accidentally detonated his suicide bomb belt before coming into the mosque. No 72 virgins for you, buddy. BIVOUAC  (H/T Susan K) Surprised and delighted to have escaped death, his co-religionists rush in take souvenir photos with their cell phones.

Read more of this post

barenakedislam | November 10, 2011 at 7:27 PM | Categories: Laughing at Islam | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-C1z

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/11/10/kaboom-premature-detonation-of-a-suicide-bomber/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Parody of Obama's 2012 "What If…" Ad (Video)

by Scotty Starnes

Facts are stubborn things.

Scotty Starnes | November 10, 2011 at 2:18 PM | Tags: 2012, parody, President Obama, What if | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-67K

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/11/10/parody-of-obamas-2012-what-if-ad-video/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Bare Naked Islam

CAL STATE Muslim Students Association asks you to take the 'Hijab Challenge'

by barenakedislam

I call it a headbag. But somehow Muslims think that by challenging non-Muslim women to wear the headbag/hijab, it will promote 'tolerance' for the most intolerant and abusive to women religion in the world - Islam. I bet they don't tell women about this kind of 'tolerance': Canadian Muslim girl honor killed by her father [...]

Read more of this post

barenakedislam | November 10, 2011 at 4:18 PM | Categories: Islam in America, Women | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-C0C

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/11/10/cal-state-muslim-students-association-asks-you-to-take-the-hijab-challenge/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



New post on Bare Naked Islam

OOPS! Pig Hearts being sold to Muslims as 'halal' (Islam-approved) meat

by barenakedislam

SOUTH AFRICA: Orion Cold Storage Company in Cape Town has been importing pork (forbidden in Islam) products from Belgium and Ireland, relabeling them as halal sheep and veal products and selling them to the Muslim market.  VOCFM  It has also been importing kangaroo meat from Australia, relabeling it as halal beef products; importing poultry from [...]

Read more of this post

barenakedislam | November 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM | Categories: Laughing at Islam | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-C0R

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/11/10/oops-pig-hearts-being-sold-to-muslims-as-halal-islam-approved-meat/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.