A Hindu, a Jew, and a Muslim Stop at a Farm

The Latest from Planck's Constant

---

A Hindu, a Jew and a Muslim Stop at a Farm Posted: 14 Nov 2011 09:16 PM PST Photo Credit: James Neeley A Hindu, a Jew and a Muslim are all walking through the country and stop at a farmer's house to see if they could sleep there for the night. The farmer informed them that he had only one spare room, and that it had only two twin beds. They were welcome to it, but one of them had to sleep in the horse barn. After much discussion, the Hindu volunteered to go to the barn. A few moments later, there was a knock on the bedroom door. It was the Hindu - he told the Jew and the Muslim that the filth and the stench of horse manure was more than he could bear and he could not possibly sleep in the barn with the horses. Annoyed, the Jew volunteered to sleep in the barn. But not a few minutes later there was a knock on the door. It was the Jew - he said that the filth and the stench of horse manure was more than he could bear and he could not possibly sleep in the barn with the horses. Finally the Muslim said that he would go to the barn. A few moments later there was a knock on the door. It was the horses.

You are subscribed to email updates from Planck's Constant To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reminder: Newt Gingrich Teamed Up With Hillary Clinton, Wanted Government MANDATED Health Care

New post on ACGR's "News with Attitude" Reminder: Newt Gingrich Teamed Up With Hillary Clinton, Wanted Government MANDATED Health Care by Harold Gary P. Jackson, ATimeForChoosing Blog 11/4/2011 You just thought THIS was Newt Gingrich's ultimate betrayal: I mean seriously, this was only at the time Conservatives were in a death struggle with the global warming zealots and con artists like Al Gore who looked to cash in on the $10 TRILLION a year carbon trading business. [...] Read more of this post Harold | November 15, 2011 at 6:43 am | Categories: Bail-Outs, Corruption, Criminal Activity, Debt, Elections/Voting, Financial, Government, Legislative, Progressives, Stimulus | URL: http://wp.me/pmtmV-6UF Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/08-589/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

I Hate My Job Day - Oh, My

This is one of those, "You have to see it to believe it~!",,, and I'll bet that J & J thermometer sales have spiked, by those who want to see the truth for themselves~!

Subject: Fwd: I Hate My Job Day

 

 

 

  

 

 

When you have an 'I Hate My Job day'  [Even if you're retired, you sometimes have those days]  Try this out:  Stop at your pharmacy   and go to the  thermometer section and purchase   a rectal thermometer made by Johnson & Johnson. Be very sure you get this brand. When you get home, lock your doors, draw the curtains and disconnect the phone so you will not be disturbed.  Change into very comfortable clothing and sit in your favorite chair. Open the package and remove the thermometer.  Now, carefully place it on a table or a surface so that it will not become chipped or broken    Now the fun part begins. Take out the literature from the box and read it carefully.  You will notice that in small print there is this statement:  "Every Rectal Thermometer made by Johnson & Johnson is personally tested and then sanitized." Now, close your eyes and repeat out loud five times,' I am so glad I do not work in the thermometer quality control department at  Johnson & Johnson.'  HAVE A NICE DAY; AND REMEMBER, THERE IS ALWAYS SOMEONE ELSE WITH A JOB THAT IS MORE OF A PAIN IN THE BUTT THAN YOURS!    if you haven't got a smile on your face and laughter in your heart...  Maybe you should go and work for Johnson and Johnson!  Enjoy life now - It has an expiration date!

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

The Dumbest Media Question I've Ever Heard

The Dumbest Media Question I've Ever Heard

By Bernard Goldberg

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | You know the expression, "You can't make this stuff up"? Well, over the weekend CNN gave us just such a moment - an example of bias so blatant and so unprofessional that when I first heard it I thought I was watching a Saturday Night Live comedy routine.

It happened at a news conference in Honolulu, at the end of the APEC summit. CNN White House correspondent Dan Lothian brought up the weekend GOP debate and told the president that several candidates said in their view waterboarding is not torture. "I'm wondering," Lothian asked the president, "if you think they're uninformed, out of touch, or irresponsible."

I actually laughed when I heard the question. Bias is usually much more subtle, and not nearly as funny. The president just stood there, silent, for a few seconds. Even he seemed stunned at the unvarnished bias of the question. I got the impression he wanted to say, "Come on, man. I know you guys love me - and for good reason - but this is downright embarrassing." Instead, he smiled and asked if it was a multiple- choice question - then said he thought the Republicans were wrong, that waterboarding is torture. Fine.

My sources tell me that these are a few more questions Dan Lothian may ask the president as the campaign heats up:

"Mr. President, Dan Lothian here from CNN. First I want you to know that we all love you at CNN and think Republicans are Nazis. Now to my question: Do you agree that they're Nazis or do you think they're simply morons?"

"Mr. President, should Herman Cain be executed for raping those women?"

"B. I hope you don't mind Barack if I simply call you B, my main man. Mitt Romney is a Mormon. Should he even be allowed to run for president, especially given the fact that he has 19 wives? And if he wins, should he be allowed to serve? I would say, no, B Man. You agree, right?"

"Good morning, Mr. President. Here's some coffee and cupcakes I brought to the press conference for you. Question: We took a vote at CNN and decided that the U.S. government should put your face up there on Mt. Rushmore with those other guys who were president. Are those who oppose this great idea uninformed, out of touch, or irresponsible?"

You think someone at CNN will take Mr. Lothian aside and say, "Honest reporters don't do what you did, so don't do it anymore!" Neither do I.

 

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Obama's catastrophic pipeline cop-out

 

 

 

 http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Obama+catastrophic+pipeline/5715471/story.html

 

 

Ottawa Citizen

 Division of Canwest Publishing Inc. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obama's catastrophic pipeline cop-out

 

The U.S. president has handed a victory to Occupy protesters and Hollywood hipsters over common sense

 

By David Wilkins, The Ottawa Citizen November 15, 2011 7:21 PM 

 

 

 

  

 

David Wilkins, former U.S. ambassador to Canada, says U.S. President Barack Obama's delay on the Keystone pipeline decision goes against common sense.

 

Photograph by: Bruno Schlumberger, The Ottawa Citizen

 

The proposed Keystone XL Pipeline offers nothing but promise: tens of thousands of desperately needed jobs, and a big step toward ensuring North American energy security.

 

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Do We Have a Constitution or Not?

Do We Have a Constitution or Not?

The entire purpose of our Constitution is to restrain the federal government. Today, both Democrat and Republican leaders regularly pretend we don't have a Constitution in areas where they prefer not to be restrained. First the Democrats, or as The American Spectator's James Antle explains concerning today's ObamaCare court decision:

"Do we even have a written Constitution? That is really the fundamental question at stake in the Obamacare case. Many countries are governed by unwritten constitutions, a patchwork of court decisions, legal and political precedents, laws, and customs that shape the boundaries of government rather than any single document. Over the past eighty years, the United States has increasingly moved to that system as well. But even the post-New Deal, post-World War II consensus has always tried to appeal to our written Constitution for authority, which its champions have pretended to revere as a living document.

This case is the biggest conflicit between the unwritten constitution that gives the federal government virtually unlimited power to, as Laurence Silberman puts it, 'forge national solutions to national problems' and the actual Constitution on which Washington bases its legitimacy, a document that created a limited federal government of enumerated powers. Those powers, by the way, are delegated by the states and the people."

Antle asks: "Who delegated the power to impose an individual mandate?"

And now for Republicans' disregard for the Constitution, or as Conservative HQ's Richard Viguerie writes of Saturday night's foreign policy debate:

"Saturday's CBS/National Journal Republican presidential debate on foreign policy once again showed the limits of the establishment media's grasp of constitutional principles and how the Constitution, as the law that governs government, should instruct our foreign policy. During the entire event, the questions seemed to assume that the President is unconstrained in his or her ability to act in matters of national security ­ and that the role of Commander-in-Chief is tantamount to being a military dictator. Unfortunately, with the exception of Congressman Ron Paul, the Republican candidates for President generally joined this shallow analysis and skipped-over the Constitution in their answers…

Those who object to re-establishing the Constitutional role of Congress in matters of national security because it makes national security too public and too complicated might ponder what Congressman Ron Paul said during Saturday's debate, '…you go to the Congress and find out if our national security is threatened… [then] you get a declaration of war and you fight it and you win it and get it over with.'

Viguerie concluded: "That sounds a whole lot less complicated, and a whole lot more in line with what the Founders had in mind for how to conduct our foreign relations, than what is going on in national security policy right now."

http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/11/14/do-we-have-a-constitution-or-not/

Iowa caucus-goers are paying attention to Ron Paul, even if the media won't

Iowa caucus-goers are paying attention to Ron Paul, even if the media won't
Published: Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 10:33 AM     Updated: Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 3:15 PM
By Paul Mulshine/The Star Ledger


Check this poll of likely Iowa caucus attendees. The results amount to a statistical dead heat, but in pure numbers only Herman Cain is ahead of Ron Paul.

And Cain's support is noticeably soft. In all likelihood, he will be a non-factor in the caucuses as voters figure out he is not a serious candidate.

Paul, by comparison, has the most committed supporters in a caucus process in which commitment is the most important value.

Regardless of who wins the caucuses, Paul will be a major factor. That makes it even more inexcusable for the major media to shut him out of the debates.

And then there's the fact that only Paul has a realistic concept of how the U.S. should conduct foreign policy. If you doubt that, read Pat Buchanan's comments on the insane foreign policy espoused by the candidates not named Paul.

In that South Carolina debate, Ron Paul, the one person there proven right on Iraq, was given less than 90 seconds to speak.

Under the Constitution, said Paul, no president has the right to launch an unprovoked attack on Iran without congressional authorization.

Before America goes to war with Iran, let Congress, whose members are forever expressing their love for the Constitution, follow it, and vote on war with Iran. And before we go to the polls in 2012, let's find out if the GOP is becoming again the same old War Party that bankrupted the nation.

And then there's Richard Viguerie's observations on the media's ignroance of the constitutional principles espoused by Paul:

Saturday's CBS/National Journal Republican presidential debate on foreign policy once again showed the limits of the establishment media's grasp of constitutional principles and how the Constitution, as the law that governs government, should instruct our foreign policy.

During the entire event, the questions seemed to assume that the President is unconstrained in his or her ability to act in matters of national security -- and that the role of Commander-in-Chief is tantamount to being a military dictator.

Unfortunately, with the exception of Congressman Ron Paul, the Republican candidates for President generally joined this shallow analysis and skipped-over the Constitution in their answers to the questions raised by their establishment media interrogators.

And while we're on the subject of liberty-loving candidates, just why is Gary Johnson being kept out of debates that are open to such dubious characters as Rick Santorum, Jon Huntsman and Michele Bachmann?

http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2011/11/iowa_caucus-goers_are_paying_a.html

Occupy’s List of Demands

New post on Doctor Bulldog & Ronin Occupy's List of Demands by doctorbulldog I figured that since the American public is pretty much clueless as to what the Occupiers are petitioning their government for, I would post their demands for your perusal and add my own comments. Now, I have to tell you all that I really, really, really, tried as hard as I could to find something, anything to agree with the Occupiers on, but there isn't one damn line item I could wholeheartedly support: Proposed list of demands from Occupy Wall Street: 1.  Repeal the Taft-Hartley Act. Unionize ALL workers immediately. That's just wonderful; give more money to the communist morons who helped put us in this financial mess to begin with.  And, what if I don't want to shell out my hard earned money to a union?.  Are you saying that I don't have a right to opt out?  How "Progressive" of you. 2.  Raise the minimum wage immediately to $18/hr. Create a maximum wage of $90/hr to eliminate inequality. $18/hr?  Are you crazy?  I've had some great jobs that supported me just fine at wages well below that---in California, even!  Heck, the average worker in America makes $19.81/hr.   This is just another Communist attempt to level the playing field.  It doesn't take a rocket scientist (which I am) to figure out that the employers will just increase the price of their widgets in order to balance the books.  Prices go up, inflation runs rampant.  Also, a cap of $90/hr is ridiculous; just about everyone who makes anything near that is SALARIED!  Ergo, the cap is meaningless.  But, let's ignore that for the moment and say that there's a cap of $90/hr.  What if I am a better worker than my coworker who is paid the same amount as I am?  Why should I be punished for being a better worker?  Is that fair?  What motivation, beyond my own sense of pride and self-worth, would I have to continue working so hard? 3.  Institute a 6 hour workday, and 6 weeks of paid vacation. 6 x 5 = 35.  That's five hours less money than I had before.  Yeah, way to go; not only will inflation go up because of the $18/hr minimum wage, you'll have less money at the end of the week to pay for it.  Brilliant!  But hey, you'll have more time off to enjoy your pay-cut---just don't even think about going to Disneyland with your family. 4.  Institute a moratorium on all foreclosures and layoffs immediately. Oh, that's just great:  A business which is hemorrhaging money can't lay off a few workers in order to keep all the other workers from losing their jobs once the company finally buckles from under the weight of  having to keep said few workers.  Yeah, that's freakin' brilliant... 5.  Repeal racist and xenophobic English-only laws. Uh, yeah...  So that we can kill more trees (tree-huggers, where are you? ) to print up voting instructions in all languages.  And, we can have even more confusing traffic signs that look like a freakin' Rosetta Stone: Read more of this post doctorbulldog | 15 November, 2011 at 6:27 pm | Categories: politics | URL: http://wp.me/p1NPg-7rW Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/occupys-list-of-demands/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Fwd: New Post at [HillBuzz.org]

Larry should have kept some 'dna'

On Nov 15, 4:12 pm, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: HillBuzz.org
> Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2011
> Subject: New Post at [HillBuzz.org]
> To: a...@hillbuzz.org
>
> HillBuzz.org has posted a new item, 'Is Barack Obama Gay? - PART II: The
> Larry
> Sinclair Interview'
>
> You may view the latest post athttp://hillbuzz.org/is-barack-obama-gay-part-ii-the-larry-sinclair-in...
>
> You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates
> are
> posted.
>
> Best regards,
> HillBuzz.org
> a...@hillbuzz.org

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: New Post at [HillBuzz.org]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HillBuzz.org
Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Subject: New Post at [HillBuzz.org]
To: ads@hillbuzz.org


HillBuzz.org has posted a new item, 'Is Barack Obama Gay? - PART II: The Larry
Sinclair Interview'

You may view the latest post at
http://hillbuzz.org/is-barack-obama-gay-part-ii-the-larry-sinclair-interview-44427

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.

Best regards,
HillBuzz.org
ads@hillbuzz.org

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

A CLEVER PIECE OF ART ! ! !

 

---A CLEVER PIECE OF ART ! ! ! So I said to him, "Barack, I know Abe Lincoln, And you ain't no Abe Lincoln." OBAMA, A DEMOCRAT, IS FOND OF QUOTING ABRAHAM LINCOLN. SO WHY DOESN'T HE USE THIS FAMOUS LINCOLN QUOTE: You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves. - A. Lincoln

 

 

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Bill Would Ban Masturbating While Driving

Bill Would Ban Masturbating While Driving

WASHINGTON (CAP) - The habits of thousands of American drivers could be changing as early as next year if paperwork filed by Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH) can gain traction in the Senate. The proposed bill would ban two-handed masturbation while behind the wheel.

"You need at least one hand to operate a motor vehicle," Gregg told the Washington Post. "And if you can't take care of the rest of your business with just one hand, then perhaps you shouldn't be driving."

While Gregg's proposal would ban only two-handed masturbation, others say they would like to see an outright ban on self-pleasurement while in the driver's seat. As such, some lawmakers fear the bill could wither and die before it ever sees the light of day.

SHARE

politics NEWS

Romney Lobs Sexual Allegations At Self

Police On The Hunt For Escaped Exotic Republicans

Obama Encourages Slacks For Job Seekers

Romney's Renovations To Include Salon, Dungeon

Michele Bachmann Promises No New Earthquakes

"One hand or two, jacking off while driving is dangerous," said Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT). "It takes someone's attention away from the road for those precious seconds when the feeling of elation rushes through your loins.

"And if you aren't paying attention, the results can be devastating," said Baucus. "And messy."

Many states have laws that ban negligent driving, which technically covers any driving behavior that could endanger other people or property. However, the legislature has been hesitant in the past to put specific restrictions on any sexual activity conducted within the confines of a vehicle during operation.

"Listen, our lawmakers are quite cognizant of the hypocritical factor," said one senator's aide who spoke to CAP News on the condition of anonymity. "So as this bill gains public momentum, I think you're going to find more and more Congressman moving out of their vehicles and into public restrooms.

"Really, it's just smart politics," the aide added.

A similar measure making its way through the House of Representatives seeks a total ban on such sexual practices for teenage drivers, easing back to one hand at age 21 and totally removing any restriction by age 25.

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

Feds Seek To Prosecute Sandler For 'Jack & Jill'

Asteroid Drops Off Tom Cruise On Way By

Mother-Daughter Liver Transplant Day Shaping Up

Occupy Paducah Protestors Threaten Quilt Museum

Groupon Expands Into Recreational Drugs

Mass. Electric Restores Power From 2008 Ice Storm

CAP NEWS AUDIO

Destitute Ken Doll

Mattel's new recession-proof doll lets girls expand their imaginations while throwing in a little dose of reality.

CAUGHT ON FILM

British Prime Minister David Cameron and Queen Elizabeth II shake on a new agreement that allows women in Britain to stand while they pee.

FROM THE VAULT

November 10, 2006

TO UNSUBSCRIBE, HIT REPLY AND ASK TO BE REMOVED FROM FUTURE MAILINGS.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.