• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Political Vel Craft

Breaking => New Quo Warranto Eligibility Lawsuit Filed Against Obama In Washington, D.C. ~ Demands Return To 'Rule Of Law' Under The U.S. Constitution!

by Volubrjotr

A new quo warranto lawsuit has been filed in Washington over Barack Obama's presidential eligibility, but unlike similar challenges brought by noted attorneys since before Obama was elected, this one is by a contender for the presidency. A quo warranto action, which dates back nearly 1,000 years in Western civilization, is a challenge to an [...]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/01/breaking-new-quo-warranto-eligibility-lawsuit-filed-against-obama-in-washington-d-c-demands-return-to-rule-of-law-under-the-u-s-constitution/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism,
Homophobia

The Huffington Post Rebecca Searles First Posted: 02/ 1/2012 8:52
am Updated: 02/ 1/2012 3:21 pm

Are racists dumb? Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals?
A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario
suggests the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes.
The study, published in Psychological Science, showed that people who
score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop
prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood.

I.Q., or intelligence quotient, is a score determined by standardized
tests, but whether the tests truly reveal intelligence remains a topic
of hot debate among psychologists.

Dr. Gordon Hodson, a professor of psychology at the university and the
study's lead author, said the finding represented evidence of a
vicious cycle: People of low intelligence gravitate toward socially
conservative ideologies, which stress resistance to change and, in
turn, prejudice, he told LiveScience.

Why might less intelligent people be drawn to conservative ideologies?
Because such ideologies feature "structure and order" that make it
easier to comprehend a complicated world, Dodson said. "Unfortunately,
many of these features can also contribute to prejudice," he added.

Dr. Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist, echoed those sentiments.

"Reality is complicated and messy," he told The Huffington Post in an
email. "Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler
solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive
capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies."

But Nosek said less intelligent types might be attracted to liberal
"simplifying ideologies" as well as conservative ones.
In any case, the study has taken the Internet by storm, with some
outspoken liberals saying that it validates their suspicions about
conservatives and conservatives arguing that the research has been
misinterpreted.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/intelligence-study-links-prejudice_n_1237796.html?ref=science&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.









http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/how-obamas-eligibility-fiasco-poses-trouble-for-dems/

How Obama's Eligibility Fiasco Poses Trouble For Dems

Posted by Kevin "Coach" Collins on January 31, 2012 · 

inShare5

If Georgia's Secretary of State says Obama is off the ballot, it will set in motion a scary domino effect that will devastate down ballot Democrats.

It's doubtful that the media will explain what is likely to happen if there is a blank space at the top of the Democrat slate in Georgia next November, but here's a likely scenario.

The results the latest IBD/TIPP survey hold nothing but bad news for Obama and his Democrats. Almost 2 /3 of the respondents agreed that we are preparing for the most important election since 1860. Even in the of hard evidence, can there be any doubt that those who are disinterested and feel no sense of urgency about this election probably have very little connection to our America except as a place to demand from to pay for their America?

"Voter Interest" in this election can rightly be used interchangeably with "voter intensity", which in turn translates to "voter enthusiasm" to vote.

Last March, Republican enthusiasm was 5 points higher than Democrat enthusiasm, but that difference had grown to a 21 point edge in an October CNN survey.

CNN found that 64% of Republicans are either extremely or very enthusiastic about voting in November which was up 3 points from June. Democrats by contrast had just a 43% enthusiasm level as they looked forward to voting in November.

These kinds of numbers are the stuff of titanic defeats for Democrats.

A 2010 enthusiasm edge of 19 points at 63/44 for Republicans gave them pickups of 680 state level legislative seats and 64 Congressional seats.

Today's IBD/TIPP survey shows that Republicans are 26 points more enthusiastic than Democrats with no telling how far the gap will grow. Clearly getting rank and file Democrats out to vote for Barack Obama or anyone other Democrat will be an uphill battle.

Very dangerous territory for Democrats

A December Gallup mega survey of 5000 voters in 12 swing states revealed non-white enthusiasm was 32%. Compared to 2008 when 65% of blacks voted 97% for Obama, this is a stunning number.

If black enthusiasm to vote is already less than half 2008 levels, one has to wonder how many blacks will turn out to vote for ANY Democrat without Obama at the top of their ticket.

If the Obama Citizenship cases in other states are successful, it will be a disaster for down ballot Democrats like never before.

Related posts:

  1. Obama's 2012 Chances Slipping Away With Two Key Democratic Groups The results of a USAToday/Gallup survey of thousands of registered…
  2. Not Just Barney: Eight Veteran House Dems Retiring Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) caused a bit of a stir…


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.






Evidence that Lyndon Johnson was directly involved in JFK's assassination. In the first minute his lawyer states, "I know as attorney for Lyndon Johnson that he murdered John Kennedy."
http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/assassinations/men_who_killed_kennedy_9_assassinations



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
U.S. seeks to end combat operations in Afghanistan next year, Panetta says
The United States and NATO will seek to end combat operations in
Afghanistan next year and shift to a role of providing support and
training to Afghan security forces, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta
says.

U.S. military commanders had said in recent weeks they would begin a
transition this year toward taking more of an advisory role as
Afghanistan's national army and police take greater responsibility for
fighting the insurgency. But Panetta's remarks are the first time the
Obama administration has said it could foresee an end to regular U.S.
and NATO combat operations by the second half of next year.

Read more at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/war-zones/panetta-us-nato-will-seek-to-end-afghan-combat-mission-next-year/2012/02/01/gIQAriZJiQ_story.html

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Open Borders Doesn't Mean No Borders
by Jacob G. Hornberger

Whenever libertarians bring up the idea of open borders, some people in the controlled-borders crowd immediately go ballistic, exclaiming, "But borders are essential to preserve our national sovereignty. If we abolish borders, our nation will cease to exist."

But open borders does not mean that borders are eliminated, erased, or abolished. An open border simply means that people are free to cross the border. The border doesn't disappear. It remains in place, only people are now free to cross it.

Additionally, even though people are free to cross the border, the jurisdictions on both sides of the border retain their respective sovereignties. When a person crosses the border and enters into a new jurisdiction, he becomes subject to the laws of that jurisdiction. Sovereignty remains intact even though there are people crossing the border into that particular jurisdiction.

Consider, for example, Virginia and Maryland. The border between the two states is the Potomac River. It is completely open. Every day, countless citizens of Maryland cross the border and freely enter Virginia. By the same token, countless citizens of Virginia cross the border and freely enter Maryland.

There is no government checkpoint on either side of the border. No one keeps count of how many people are crossing back and forth between the two states.

In other words, the border between Maryland and Virginia is completely open. Yet, the border between the two states does not disappear. It remains fully intact and continues to serve as the dividing line between the two states.

Moreover, notwithstanding the fact that the border has been completely open for centuries, neither Maryland nor Virginia has ever lost its respective sovereignty. Maryland continues to have jurisdiction over its territory and the same goes for Virginia. When a Marylander crosses into Virginia, he becomes subject to the laws of Virginia. The same holds true for a Virginian who crosses into Maryland.

These principles are no different with respect to a border between two countries. Simply because people are free to cross an international border, back and forth, doesn't mean that the border disappears or that the two nations lose their respective sovereignties. The border remains intact and the two nations retain jurisdiction over their respective territories, notwithstanding the fact that people in both nations are free to cross back and forth.

Let me give you a real-life example of open borders. I grew up in a border town ­ Laredo, Texas. The border between Texas and Mexico is much like the border that separates Maryland and Virginia ­ it's a river, called the Rio Grande. From downtown Laredo, a person can see Mexico across the river. On the Mexican side is Nuevo Laredo, a city that is larger in population than Laredo. Keep in mind that Laredo, along with the rest of Texas, was once part of the entire northern half of Mexico.

For decades, Laredo has had the biggest celebration in the country in honor of George Washington's birthday. When I was kid, U.S. officials would completely open the border between Laredo and Nuevo Laredo in order to allow Nuevo Laredoans to freely enter Laredo to enjoy the festivities, including watching a grand parade led by Pocahontas and featuring Laredo's debutants.

Countless Mexicans would flood across the border. The border was completely open. Yet, the border did not disappear. The Rio Grande remained intact, just as the Potomac River does. Laredo did not lose its sovereignty and, for that matter, neither did Texas or the United States. Mexicans who crossed into Laredo were subject to the laws of Laredo, the state of Texas, and the United States.

The situation is the same in Europe, where for many years citizens in the EU countries have been free to cross the borders of other EU countries. Every day, citizens of Italy, for example, cross the border into France, and vice versa. The borders haven't disappeared, and Italy and France are still standing, each retaining sovereignty within its respective borders.

Indeed, how many Americans realize that after the United States acquired the entire northern half of Mexico in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, the new border between Mexico and the United States remained completely open for well over half-a-century, enabling Mexicans to continue traveling freely to what had previously been the northern half of their country? (The Border Patrol wasn't founded until 1924.) Mexicans would freely cross the border into the United States to visit, work, invest, and even open businesses in competition with American businesses. When they did so, they were, of course, subject to the laws of the United States and the particular states and localities where they went. In the process, the new border between Mexico and the United States did not disappear and neither country lost sovereignty over its respective post-treaty jurisdiction.

Americans have become so accustomed to open borders within the United States that hardly anyone is afraid of them. We hardly ever hear anyone expressing concern that the borders between the respective states are disappearing … or that the states are losing their sovereignty ... or that Marylanders or people from other states who come to Virginia are stealing jobs away from Virginians … or that there is a trade deficit between Maryland and Virginia or any other states ... or that Virginians are moving to Maryland to get on welfare … or that it is too easy for terrorists to cross borders within the United States.

If only Americans could apply their favorable mindset toward open borders within the United States to international borders. What would disappear is not borders and national sovereignty but rather the fear and isolationism that come with controlled borders.

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2012-02-01.asp


New post on Bare Naked Islam

MUSLIM HONOR KILLER: "Here, listen, my dear daughter, do you know that this is the last day? Tonight, you're going to die."

by barenakedislam

Did you know the first Muslim Honor Killing on American soil happened back in 1989? Of course not. They weren't calling them 'honor killings' back then. Come to think of it, they aren't calling them honor killings very often today, either.

NY TIMES  Tina (her full name was 'Palestina') was the last daughter at home and the most American of the family. She had lived in Brazil, Puerto Rico and on the West Bank, but she was happiest in St. Louis. An honor student, she played high school soccer over her father's objections. Again over his objections, she went to the junior prom, only to be taken away by family members.

ZEIN ISA, Muslim father of Tina

Hoping to hear evidence of terrorist activities, the Federal Bureau of Investigation planted listening devices in the tiny apartment of a Palestinian-American more than two years ago. What the F.B.I. taped were the screams of a teen-age girl being stabbed to death. Sadly, the FBI was not monitoring the tapes when the murder took place.

Now, a jury that heard the tape-recorded voice of the 16-year-old pleading in vain for her life has convicted her parents of murder and recommended that they be put to death.

The jury deliberated more than four hours Saturday before asking for the death penalty against Zein Isa and his wife, Maria. On Friday, the jurors had convicted them in the death of their daughter Tina, the father for stabbing her and the mother for holding her down.

The girl's screams and moans as she begged her parents not to kill her were captured by devices secretly planted in the apartment by Federal agents who were looking into possible illegal activities by Mr. Isa on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization. Cultures and Generations Clash.

Mr. Isa was born in Palestine and his wife in Brazil -- and the parents' attempts to control their daughter who, it seems, wanted to be an American teen-ager.

The seven-minute tape of the killing, on which the father is heard shouting in Arabic "Die quickly!" in answer to his daughter's cries, chilled the jury of seven women and five men and shocked court officials who thought they had seen and heard everything.

"It's worse than any movie, any film, anything I thought that I would ever hear in my life," said Bob Craddick, an assistant prosecutor for seven years, who has heard the tape seven or eight times.

Judge Charles A. Shaw of Circuit Court set a Dec. 13 sentencing date for Mr. Isa, 61, a naturalized American citizen, and his wife, 48. The only alternative to the death sentence is life in prison without parole. The defendants are expected to appeal the verdict.

The Isa's defense said  the tape from Nov. 6, 1989, tells a story not of murder but of a struggle in which Mr. Isa killed the girl in self-defense after she threatened them and demanded money. The parents also maintained that their daughter may have been using drugs or alcohol, and that she had defied them by dating a young man they disapproved of.

On the night of her death...

Tina's father says: "Here, listen, my dear daughter, do you know that this is the last day. Tonight, you're going to die?"

Tina responds: "Huh?"

Zein Isa replies: "Do you know that you are going to die tonight?"

The girl's mother asks her questions about items in her schoolbag. In the midst of her conversation with her mother, Tina begins to shriek in fear.

"Keep still, Tina!" says her father.

"Mother, please help me!"

"Huh? What do you mean?" the mother says.

"Help! Help!"

"What help?" the mother responds.

Tina screams, and Maria says: "Are you going to listen? Are you going to listen?"

Screaming louder, Tina gasps: "Yes! Yes! Yes, I am!" then coughs and adds, "No. Please!" Six Wounds in Chest

The mother says, "Shut up!"

Tina continues to cry, but her voice is unintelligible.

"Die! Die quickly! Die quickly!" the father says.

The girl moans, seems to quiet, then screams one last time.

"Quiet, little one! Die my daughter, die!" the father says.

Tina was stabbed six times in the chest with a boning knife, which pierced her heart, one lung, and liver, investigators said. Mr. Zein admitted on the witness stand that he put his foot on his daughter's mouth to quiet her.

After the verdicts were read, an agitated family friend who would give her name only as Mrs. Abraham expressed her dismay at what she saw as the jury's failure to acknowledge the Palestinian culture. "I feel it's not right. We follow our religion," said Mrs. Abraham. She said the Isas had to discipline their daughter or lose respect. "They'd be embarrassed in front of everybody in the country like somebody when they go without their clothes outside."

barenakedislam | February 1, 2012 at 12:54 pm | Categories: Religion of Hate | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-Fdl

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.com/2012/02/01/muslim-honor-killer-here-listen-my-dear-daughter-do-you-know-that-this-is-the-last-day-tonight-youre-going-to-die/




--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0




 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

 



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0



 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Adelson, Gingrich, and the Selling of America
Foreign policy and campaign finance reform
by Justin Raimondo, January 25, 2012

If you want to know what's wrong with our campaign finance laws – and our political system in a more general sense – look at the way Sheldon Adelson is buying the Republican nomination for his sock puppet, Newt Gingrich.

Right now, the anonymous donors to a political action committee, or PAC, can buy ads on behalf of – or against – a candidate, and spend unlimited amounts as long as there is no official connection between the PAC and any candidate. This degree of separation, however, is pure fiction: in reality, "former" aides to the candidate can and do operate these " Super PACs," which are funded by one Daddy Warbucks or another: no overt coordination is necessary. What's important here is disclosure, or the lack of it: the PACs don't have to say who is funding these ads, only that the "Committee for Good Government" or some such semi-fictional entity is paying for it. In this way, Adelson – a casino billionaire, one of the richest people in the country – can drop a cool $10 million into the race (with more in the pipeline) and in effect buy the election, without the average voter knowing who is paying the bills. In short, Adelson can operate in the dark, as far as Joe Voter is concerned – and darkness is what the Adelsonian agenda requires above all.

So what is Adelson's agenda?

He and his allies have been campaigning for war with Iran for years, not only here but in the Middle East. Adelson is a major financial backer of Israel's ultra-nationalist Likud party, which calls in its platform for a "Greater Israel," and he has backed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the hilt. The 16 th richest man in the world, with his casino empire stretching from Macao to Las Vegas, he thought nothing of giving $60 million to Israel's anniversary celebration. He is also a major backer of AIPAC, the most important pro-Israel lobbying organization – but downsized his contribution when the group signed on to the two-state solution advanced by both Republican and Democratic presidents – on the grounds that the plan means Israel is "committing suicide." He supports the extremist – and increasingly violent – "settler" movement, and is the money-bags behind the "Clarion Fund," which is responsible for flooding the US with anti-Arab propaganda. As a major contributor to the "Birthright" program, which sponsors trips to Israel by students from around the world, he addressed a recent Birthright gathering in Israel, where he declared:

"Read the history of those who call themselves Palestinians, and you will hear why [Newt] Gingrich said recently that the Palestinians are an invented people. There are a number of Palestinians who will recognize the truth of this statement."

In spite of being a highly-paid and sought after "historian" of note, you'll be surprised, I'm sure, to learn Gingrich takes his lessons from Adelson, whose academic credentials are far less impressive. Because Newt didn't always believe the Palestinians are a figment of their own imaginations: this idea coincided with Adelson's generous donations to Gingrich, Inc.

In a 2005 article for the Middle East Quarterly, Professor Newt opined that the Palestinians are "a relatively wealthy, educated, and cosmopolitan people," who are "in some ways among the most international and most advanced people in the Arab world." So advanced that they "invented" themselves? He also called for the US government to "establish a program of economic aid for the Palestinians to match the aid the U.S. government provides Israel."

While Newt's 2005 piece disparages the role of diplomacy, and attacks the present Palestinian leadership (including the Palestinian Authority/PLO) as nothing but a bunch of "terrorists," he writes:

"The U.S. government should become the protector of the Palestinian people's right to have a decent amount of land. The desire of some Israelis to use security as an excuse to grab more Palestinian land should be blocked by Washington even if that requires employing financial or other leverage to compel the Israeli government to behave reasonably on the issue of settlements. It is vital to our credibility in the entire Middle East that we insist on an end to Israeli expansionism. It is vital to our humanitarian duty to the Palestinian people that we protect the weaker party from the stronger power. It is vital that the world sees that our total support for Israeli security is not matched by a one-sided support for more extreme Israeli territorial demands."

Upon receiving a record amount of $13 million from Adelson – the latest installment was a check for $5 million from Miriam Adelson, his Israeli-born wife – Newt the Historian woke up one morning to discover that there are no Palestinians – only a horde of drooling Orcs trespassing on Israeli land.

While expressing concern in his 2005 article that the Iranians could develop nuclear weapons, he gave it "another generation of violence and hatred" until it would result in "a devastating attack on Israel." These days, however, he is taking Adelson's view, which is that war with Iran is inevitable and necessarily imminent. As Connie Bruck reported in her definitive 2008 New Yorker profile:

"Adelson is also funding, with a $4.5-million grant, a think tank, the Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies, at the right-leaning Shalem Center, in Jerusalem. Netanyahu allies are on its staff. Natan Sharansky, the chairman of One Jerusalem, also chairs the Adelson Institute. Sharansky helped organize a "Democracy and Security" conference last June, in Prague, which was attended by President Bush. Iran was a major topic of discussion. A month after the Prague conference, Adelson attended a fund-raising event at the C.A.A. talent agency, in Los Angeles, for Steven Emerson, an investigative journalist specializing in Islamic extremism and terrorism, who was showing a ten-minute trailer for a film he wanted to make. Emerson introduced Sheldon and Miriam to the overflow crowd in C.A.A.'s two-hundred-seat theatre, saying that they were his generous supporters. After Emerson's presentation, Pooya Dayanim, a Jewish-Iranian democracy activist based in Los Angeles, chatted with Adelson. Recalling their conversation, Dayanim observed that Adelson was dismissive of Reza Pahlevi, the son of the former Shah, who had participated in the Prague conference, because, Adelson said, 'he doesn't want to attack Iran.' According to Dayanim, Adelson referred to another Iranian dissident at the conference, Amir Abbas Fakhravar, whom he said he would like to support, saying, 'I like Fakhravar because he says that, if we attack, the Iranian people will be ecstatic.' Dayanim said that when he disputed that assumption Adelson responded, 'I really don't care what happens to Iran. I am for Israel.'"

Gingrich called for the assassination of Iranian scientists even before the bombs started to go off inside Iran, and vies with Rick Santorum to see who can rattle the saber in Tehran's direction the loudest.

War with Iran is the culmination of the "Clean Break" Strategy presented to Netanyahu in 1996 by a group of American neoconservatives who recommended a new strategy of aggression that would break the Jewish state out of what they perceived to be a cul de sac that would fatally subvert the Zionist project. Instead of playing defense, Israel must go on the offensive, and take out Saddam Hussein's Iraq, his brother Ba'athists in Syria, and ultimately effect a change of regime in Iran. With Saddam gone, Bashar al-Assad on the way out, and Iran in America's cross hairs, the "Clean Break" has so far been a resounding success: all that remains is for a US President to give the order to attack Iran. If Adelson has his way, that day will come soon: that is what he thinks he is buying when he pours his millions into the Gingrich campaign.

The idea is to make support for Israel a "wedge issue" to benefit the Republican party, like abortion or gay marriage: by funding Gingrich, Adelson hopes to complete the Likud-ization of the GOP. Such a party will junk the two-state solution upheld by every Republican president, go along with the "Clean Break" strategy – and willingly destroy the American economy by starting a war that would instantly drive the price of energy through the roof.

The "wedge" strategy is looked on with distrust and real fear by the mainstream Jewish leadership in this country, which has always valued the bipartisan pro-Israel consensus as the basis of the "special relationship." The Likudnik Clean Breakers, however, are taking a radical new tack, one that could easily set off a political backlash, and lead to an increase in anti-Israel – and anti-Semitic – sentiment in the Democratic base. In Israel, too, there is resentment of Adelson, the American, telling Israelis what's best for them and meddling in their politics. He says "I am for Israel," but Israelis know he isn't of Israel, and can afford to play war games from a safe distance.

That someone pursuing the agenda of a foreign country can hide behind some benign-sounding PAC and pour unlimited amounts of anonymous cash into our elections represents a real threat to our national security – and ought to make one think twice about our current campaign finance laws. Furthermore, it is a national disgrace that Miriam Adelson – who has not renounced her Israeli citizenship – can write a $5 million check and hand it to a candidate who is beating the war drums day and night on Israel's behalf. Political contributions from foreign sources are illegal, and that's the way it ought to be: but what about dual citizens? Should they be allowed to influence the American political process in favor of their other allegiance – and, while we're on the subject, why do we allow dual citizenship, anyway?

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/01/24/adelson-gingrich-and-the-selling-of-america/


New post on Bare Naked Islam

HONOR IN ISLAM…honor killings, honor mutilations, honor gougings

by barenakedislam

A Bangladeshi college professor's husband allegedly gouged her eyes out when he suspected her of cheating.

The Daily Beast  Rumana Monzur, 33, became an assistant professor at Dhaka University in the country's capital, and a year ago set out to earn a master's degree in political science as a Fulbright scholar at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. This past May, missing her husband and 5-year-old daughter, she returned to Dhaka to write her dissertation. Little did she know her world would soon turn dark, quite literally.

A Muslim, she completed her late-afternoon prayer, and returned to the computer, her daughter drawing on the bed nearby.  Monzur's husband, Syeed Hasan Sumon, came in and she showed him her Facebook page of photos from her life in Canada, doing yoga and ice skating with friends after which he flew into a rage, accusing her of an affair with an Iranian student in Canada.

Sumon pulled his wife's hair, throwing her to the bed and pinning her arms down with his legs, she says. Then, in an account that is bone-chilling, she says her husband pressed his fingers into her eyes, gouging them out. According to Monzur, he gnawed at her cheek, lips, and nose, biting off bits of flesh, blood spilling throughout the room as Monzur flailed. Her daughter, Anusheh, stood in a corner of the room, screaming, as two household servants struggled to open the locked door. A neighbor took her to the hospital, where her parents soon arrived. The diagnosis: blindness. "I lost my eyes," says Monzur. "I don't want anyone to suffer like I am suffering. It is horrible."

Rumana Monzur is now unable to see her daughter Anoushe, who was in the room during the horrific attack by her father

Two days later, Bangladeshi police arrested Monzur's husband, presenting him to the media handcuffed in jeans and a striped T shirt outside the police detectives' headquarters. According to a Bangladesh online news story, headlined "Hassan Alleges Betrayal By Rumana," the husband launched the type of smear campaign Monzur's father had feared: "She had an affair with an Iranian male during her stay in Canada for her studies since August last year," he told the press. He had deleted the Iranian man's name from her Facebook friends, he said. "Finding the Iranian guy's name deleted, she attacked me, and we had a scuffle," he said. "I lost my glasses and since I don't see well, she might have been hurt in the fight."

A month after the attack, in her hospital room in Dhaka, Monzur's voice trembled as she related details from her marriage. She says he started beating her a few days after they were married in 2001, with a respite for a few years when he was "good," causing her to overlook his alleged abuse. Her father supported her leaving her husband. Her in-laws urged her to stay with him, until they returned from the U.S., family members say. The night of the attack, she said, "he pulled my hair and pressed me against the bed and grabbed my neck. He put his fingers into my eyes. He threatened me when he left that he would not let me live. He will kill me no matter where I go."

"In Canada I learned how to dream," Romana Monzur told The Globe and Mail in an interview. She says she hopes to regain her sight to finish her studies and take care of her daughter.

But, in the way that this story was handled differently than many, this wasn't just another headline about an attempted "honor killing" by a disgraced Muslim man. This time, the local and diaspora Bangladeshi community challenged the justification of violence. When a reporter asked Monzur at a second press conference about the allegations of an affair, Bangladeshi colleagues of Monzur, including her former professor, Mohsin, shouted, "Shame! Shame!" to quiet the spurious claims. "We have to change the very concept of what is 'good' and what is 'bad' in our societies," says Mohsin. "We have to shame the perpetrators."

UPDATE: On Dec.. 4, 2011, Hasan Sayeed Sumon, who tortured and blinded his wife Rumana Manzur, was found dead in his prison cell at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University.

Rumana went back in Canada to receive what she hopes will be treatment to allow her to see again.

RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:

canada-god-curse-them-may-the-devil-shit-on-their-graves-said-muslim-father-after-he-honor-killed-his-3-daughters-and-first-wife

former-muslim-confirms-islam-sanctions-honor-killings

more-muslim-honor-killings-in-america

lawsuit-honor-killings-covered-up-by-city-of-dearborn-demand-a-special-investigation.html

bloodbath-in-berlin-muslim-man-kills-mother-and-sister-of-his-ex-wife

arizona-iraqi-muslim-dad-found-guilty-of-honor-killing-his-own-daughter

zuhdi-jasser-chastises-the-judge-and-the-sentence-imposed-on-the-muslim-man-who-honor-killed-his-own-daughter

well-well-well-yet-another-muslim-honor-killing-in-america

muslim-honor-punishment-warning-graphic-images

honor-killings-murder-in-the-name-of-pride

in-islam-blood-cleanses-honor

victim-of-horrific-islamic-honor-mutilation

more-muslim-honor-killings-in-canada

you-have-dishonored-your-family-please-kill-yourself

it-took-him-30-minutes-to-strangle-his-sister-to-death-with-a-metal-wire-and-her-own-scarf

violent-oppression-of-women-in-islam-warning-graphic-images

turkey-another-day-another-honor-killing

 


 

barenakedislam | January 31, 2012 at 8:23 pm | Categories: Women | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-FcJ

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.com/2012/01/31/honor-in-islam-honor-killings-honor-mutilations-honor-gougings/




--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.