• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0


Hell, yea !!!



 


 Things southern boys don't say.....



 TOP 31 THINGS THAT YOU WILL

NEVER HEAR  SOUTHERN BOYS SAY:

31. When I retire, I'm movin'  north.

30. Oh I just couldn't, she's only sixteen.

29.  I'll take Shakespeare for 1000, Alex.

28. Duct tape won't fix  that.

27. Come to think of it, I'll have a Heineken

26.  We don't keep firearms in this house.

25. You can't feed that  to the dog.

24. No kids in the back of the pickup, it's just  not safe.

23. Wrestling is fake.

22. We're  vegetarians.

21. Do you think my gut is too big?

20.  I'll have grapefruit and grapes instead of biscuits and  gravy..

19. Honey, we don't need another dog.

18. Who  gives a damn who won the Civil War?

17. Give me the small bag  of pork rinds.

16. Too many deer heads detract from the  decor.

15. I just couldn't find a thing at Wal-Mart  today.

14. Trim the fat off that steak.

13. Cappuccino  tastes better than espresso.

12. The tires on that truck are  too big.

11. I've got it all on the C: DRIVE.

10.  Unsweetened tea tastes better.

9. My fiancé, Bobbie Jo, is  registered at Tiffany's.

8. I've got two cases of Zima for the  Super Bowl.

7. Checkmate

6. She's too young to be  wearing a bikini.

5. Hey, here's an episode of "Hee Haw" that  we haven't seen.

4. I don't have a favorite college  team.

3. You Guys.

2. Those shorts ought to be a little  longer, Betty Mae.

AND THE NUMBER ONE THING THAT YOU WILL NEVER  HEAR A SOUTHERN BOY SAY:

1. Nope, no more beer for me. I'm  driving a whole busload of us down
to re-elect  OBAMA



------ End of Forwarded Message

 

__._,_.___
 
Yahoo! Groups
.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

If the Economy Is Getting Better….Questions To Ask the Uninformed Obama Supporters

by Scotty Starnes

I try to point out that the information provide to us by the government, and it's agencies, are false. Today we heard about the so-called great news that the unemployment rate dipped down to 8.3%. Obama and his media menions are clapping like seals while ignoring important facts like almost 6 million Americans have dropped out of the American labor force and this number isn't counted in the Bureau of Labor Statistics' numbers.

Remember, the recession ended in July of 2009. Why are all the economic numbers worse after the recession supposedly ended?

Here's some important questions to ask those who seriously believe (not many but still a ton of uninformed Obama-bots) the economy is improving:

If the economy is getting better, then why did new home sales in the United States hit a brand new all-time record low during 2011?

If the economy is getting better, then why are there 6 million less jobs in America today than there were before the recession started?

If the economy is getting better, then why is the average duration of unemployment in this country close to an all-time record high?

If the economy is getting better, then why has the number of homeless female veterans more than doubled?

If the economy is getting better, then why has the number of Americans on food stamps increased by 3 million since this time last year and by more than 14 million since Barack Obama entered the White House?

If the economy is getting better, then why has the number of children living in poverty in America risen for four years in a row?

If the economy is getting better, then why is the percentage of Americans living in "extreme poverty" at an all-time high?

If the economy is getting better, then why is the Federal Housing Administration on the verge of a financial collapse?

If the economy is getting better, then why do only 23 percent of American companies plan to hire more employees in 2012?

If the economy is getting better, then why has the number of self-employed Americans fallen by more than 2 million since 2006?

If the economy is getting better, then why did an all-time record lowpercentage of U.S. teens have a job last summer?

If the economy is getting better, then why does median household income keep declining?  Overall, median household income in the United States has declined by a total of 6.8% since December 2007 once you account for inflation.

If the economy is getting better, then why has the number of Americans living below the poverty line increased by 10 million since 2006?

If the economy is getting better, then why is the average age of a vehicle in America now sitting at an all-time high?

If the economy is getting better, then why are 18 percent of all homes in the state of Florida currently sitting vacant?

If the economy is getting better, then why are 19 percent of all American men between the ages of 25 and 34 living with their parents?

If the economy is getting better, then why does the number of "long-term unemployed workers" stay so high?  When Barack Obama first took office, the number of "long-term unemployed workers" in the United States was approximately 2.6 million.  Today, that number is sitting at 5.6 million.

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/if-the-economy-is-getting-better-questions-to-ask-the-uninformed-obama-supporters/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.






Concerns grow over volcanic eruptions

By Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/environment/story/2012-02-01/deadly-us-volcanoes/52923094/1?csp=Dailybriefing

Published: 2/1/2012 7:52:20 PM

Scientists have known for decades that hidden under those impressive vistas at sites such as Death Valley and Yellowstone National Park are magma pools that under the right conditions can trigger explosive eruptions.

Now, new research is changing scientists' understanding of the timing of those eruptions, and prompting them to call for greater monitoring of sites to help save lives when the next big volcano explodes.

Two recent papers highlight the shift. One looked at a Death Valley volcano thought to be 10,000 years old and found it last erupted just 800 years ago, and is still an eruption danger. The other found that large caldera volcanoes, such as the one under Crater Lake in Oregon, can recharge in a matter of decades, rather than the thousands of years previously thought.

"The understanding of the timing of eruptions and the timing of the building up to eruptions is changing," says Margaret Mangan, the scientist in charge of volcano monitoring in California for the U.S. Geological Survey. "These two papers are very nice examples of good scientific work."

One thing that's coming to light is that eruptions are often clustered, with "long stretches of inactivity punctuated by periods of activity that can go on for years," Mangan says.

The first paper looked at the Ubehebe Crater (you-bee-HE-bee) at the northern end of California's Death Valley. It's about half a mile wide and 700 feet deep. It was long believed to have been caused by a volcanic eruption sometime in the past 10,000 years or so.

However, researchers recently looked at beryllium in the rocks and were able to date the last series of eruptions to just 800 years ago. They say the ingredients necessary for another eruption are all still there.

Ubehebe Crater is the result of what's known as a phreatomagmatic (free-at-oh-mag-MAT-ick) eruption. That means that it has a huge pocket of molten rock, or magma, deep below it. When it begins to push to the surface and comes into contact with water, superhot steam is created, building up pressure until it explodes.

It had been thought that the eruptions would occur only during wet climate periods, and as Death Valley is famously dry now, there was little concern. But using U.S. Geological Survey data, the scientists show that the current water table may be just 500 feet below the surface of the crater. The paper was published this month in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

The relatively recent eruption means that the magma underground, which can take thousands of years to cool, is likely still hot. When water and hot magma come into contact, it can produce something "like a very large bomb going off," says Brent Goehring, a geochemist at the department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., and one of the paper's authors.

Another worry is that caldera volcanoes, such as Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines and Krakatoa in Indonesia, may be able to blow much more quickly than previously believed.

Caldera volcanoes consist of large underground lakes of magma. As more magma builds up, the pressure builds and the magma starts getting pushed upward through cracks in the Earth's surface. When the pressure gets too great, it explodes.

Caldera volcanoes typically have a long quiet period prior to eruptions. Writing in Wednesday's edition of the journal Nature, researchers looked at the eruption of the Santorini volcano in Greece around 1,600 B.C., which released as much as 12 cubic miles of magma.

By analyzing feldspar crystals formed within the magma and then ejected during the eruption, the researchers found that the volcano's magma chamber grew by as much as 10% in the final few decades before it blew, says Tim Druitt, a volcanologist at Blaise Pascal University, Clermont-Ferrand, France, and senior author on the paper.

For this reason, scientists are calling for greater monitoring, including satellite surveillance, to detect ground swelling.

There are several large and still active calderas in the United States, including the one under Yellowstone National Park. All are closely monitored. What worries the researchers are other unmonitored calderas around the world with the potential to send huge clouds of ash into the atmosphere, causing massive ecological and climate damage.



 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0


New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

R.I.P Occupy Movement (Video)

by Scotty Starnes

Bring in the Lysol and HazMat Teams to disinfect areas "occupied" by Occupiers.

Occupy has brought us murders, rapes, sexual assaults, prostitution charges, child endangerment charges, child porn charges, public masturbation, lice infestation, rat infestation, Molotov cocktails, graffiti, millions in property damage.  and over 6,000 arrests.

Scotty Starnes | February 3, 2012 at 3:16 PM | Tags: #Occupy, Occupiers, Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Washington | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-6xF

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/r-i-p-occupy-movement-video/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

"Tax debates are always about "reform" -- which always means a slight shift in who pays what, with an eye to raising ever more money for the government. A far better solution would be to forget the whole thing and return to the original idea of a free society: You get to keep what you earn or inherent. That means nothing short of abolishing the great mistake of 1913. Forget the flat tax. The only just solution is no tax on incomes ever."

Ninety-Nine Years of Evil
By Jeffrey Tucker
Feb 3rd, 2012

Today is the 99th anniversary of the signing of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution. It enshrined into law an idea that stands in total contradiction to the driving force behind the American Revolution and the whole idea of freedom itself.

The great "old right" commentator Frank Chodorov once described the income tax as the root of all evil. His target was not the tax itself, but the principle behind it. Since its implementation in 1913, he wrote, "The government says to the citizen: 'Your earnings are not exclusively your own; we have a claim on them, and our claim precedes yours; we will allow you to keep some of it, because we recognize your need, not your right; but whatever we grant you for yourself is for us to decide.'"

He really does have a point. That's evil. When Congress ratified the 16th Amendment on Feb. 3, 1913, there was a sense in which all private income in the U.S. was nationalized. What was not taxed from then on was a favor granted unto us, and continues to be so.

This is implied in the text of the amendment itself: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

Where are the limits? There weren't any. There was some discussion about putting a limit on the tax, but it seemed unnecessary. Only 1% of the income earners would end up paying about 1% to the government. Everyone else was initially untouched. Who really cares that the rich have to pay a bit more, right? They can afford it.

This perspective totally misunderstand the true nature of government, which always wants more money and more power and will stop at nothing to get both. The 16th Amendment was more than a modern additive to an antique document. It was a new philosophy of the fiscal life of the entire country.

Today, the ruling elite no longer bother with things like amendments. But back in those days, it was different. The amendment was made necessary because of previous court decisions that stated what was once considered a bottom-line presumption of the free society: Government cannot tax personal property. What you make is your own. You get to keep the product of your labors. Government can tax sales, perhaps, or raise money through tariffs on goods coming in and out of the country. But your bank account is off-limits.

The amendment changed that idea. In the beginning, it applied to very few people. This was one reason it passed. It was pitched as a replacement tax, not a new money raiser. After all the havoc caused by the divisive tariffs of the 19th century, this sounded like a great deal to many people, particularly Southerners and Westerners fed up with paying such high prices for manufactured goods while seeing their trading relations with foreign consumers disrupted.

People who supported it -- and they were not so much the left but the right-wing populists of the time -- imagined that the tax would hit the robber baron class of industrialists in the North. And that it did. Their fortunes began to dwindle, and their confidence in their ability to amass and retain intergenerational fortunes began to wane.

We all know the stories of how the grandchildren of the Gilded Age tycoons squandered their family heritage in the 1920s and failed to carry on the tradition. Well, it is hardly surprising. The government put a timetable and limit on accumulation. Private families and individuals would no longer be permitted to exist except in subjugation to the taxing state. The kids left their private estates to live in the cities, put off marriage, stopped bothering with all that hearth and home stuff. Time horizons shortened, and the Jazz Age began.

Class warfare was part of the deal from the beginning. The income tax turned the social fabric of the country into a giant lifetime boat, with everyone arguing about who had to be thrown overboard so that others might live.

The demon in the beginning was the rich. That remained true until the 1930s, when FDR changed the deal. Suddenly, the income would be collected, but taxed in a different way. It would be taken from everyone, but a portion would be given back late in life as a permanent income stream. Thus was the payroll tax born. This tax today is far more significant than the income tax.

The class warfare unleashed 99 years ago continues today. One side wants to tax the rich. The other side finds it appalling that the percentage of people who pay no income tax has risen from 30% to nearly 50% in this period of economic downturn. Now we see the appalling spectacle of Republicans regarding this as a disgrace that must change. They have joined the political classes that seek advancement by hurting people.

It's extremely strange that the payroll tax is rarely considered in this debate. The poor, the middle class and the rich are all being hammered by payroll taxes that fund failed programs that provide no security and few benefits at all.

It's impossible to take seriously the claims that the income tax doesn't harm wealth creation. When Congress wants to discourage something -- smoking, imports, selling stocks or whatever -- they know what to do: Tax it. Tax income, and on the margin, you discourage people from earning it.

Tax debates are always about "reform" -- which always means a slight shift in who pays what, with an eye to raising ever more money for the government. A far better solution would be to forget the whole thing and return to the original idea of a free society: You get to keep what you earn or inherent. That means nothing short of abolishing the great mistake of 1913. Forget the flat tax. The only just solution is no tax on incomes ever.

But let's say that one day we actually become safe from the income tax collectors and something like blessed peace arrives. There is still another problem that emerged in 1913. Congress created the Federal Reserve, which eventually developed the power to create -- on its own -- all the money that government would ever need, even without taxing.

For the practical running of the affairs of the state, the Fed is far worse than the income tax. It creates the more-insidious tax of inflation. In a strange way, it has made all the debates about taxation superfluous. Denying the government revenue does nothing to curb its appetites for our liberties and property. The Fed has managed to make it impossible to starve the beast.

Chodorov was correct about the evil of the income tax. Its passage signaled the beginning of a century of despotism. Our property is no longer safe. Our income is not our own. We are legally obligated to turn over whatever our masters say we owe them. You can fudge this point: None of this is compatible with the old liberal idea of freedom.

You doubt it? Listen to Thomas Jefferson from his inaugural address of 1801. What he said then remains true today:

"…what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people? Still one more thing, fellow citizens ­ a wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned."

Regards,

Jeffrey Tucker


http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/ninety-nine-years-of-evil/
0

Ron Paul: Reactionary or Visionary
by Patrick J. Buchanan

After his fourth-place showing in Florida, Ron Paul, by then in Nevada, told supporters he had been advised by friends that he would do better if only he dumped his foreign policy views, which have been derided as isolationism.

Not going to do it, said Dr. Paul to cheers. And why should he?

Observing developments in U.S. foreign and defense policy, Paul's views seem as far out in front of where America is heading as John McCain's seem to belong to yesterday's Bush-era bellicosity.

Consider. In December, the last U.S. troops left Iraq. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta now says that all U.S. combat operations in Afghanistan will end in 18 months.

The strategic outposts of empire are being abandoned.

The defense budget for 2013 is $525 billion, down $6 billion from 2012. The Army is to be cut by 75,000 troops; the Marine Corps by 20,000. Where Ronald Reagan sought a 600-ship Navy, the Navy will fall from 285 ships today to 250. U.S. combat aircraft are to be reduced by six fighter squadrons and 130 transport aircraft.

Republicans say this will reduce our ability to fight and win two land wars at once -- say, in Iran and Korea. Undeniably true.

Why, then, is Ron Paul winning the argument?

The hawkishness of the GOP candidates aside, the United States, facing its fourth consecutive trillion-dollar deficit, can no longer afford to sustain all its alliance commitments, some of which we made 50 years ago during a Cold War that ended two decades ago, in a world that no longer exists.

As our situation is new, said Abraham Lincoln, we must think and act anew.

As Paul argues, why close bases in the U.S. when we have 700 to 1,000 bases abroad? Why not bring the troops home and let them spend their paychecks here?

Begin with South Korea. At last report, the United States had 28,000 troops on the peninsula. But why, when South Korea has twice the population of the North, an economy 40 times as large, and access to U.S. weapons, the most effective in the world, should any U.S. troops be on the DMZ? Or in South Korea?

U.S. forces there are too few to mount an invasion of the North, as Gen. MacArthur did in the 1950s. And any such invasion might be the one thing to convince Pyongyang to fire its nuclear weapons to save the hermit kingdom.

But if not needed to defend the South, and a U.S. invasion could risk nuclear reprisal, what are U.S. troops still doing there?

Answer: They are on the DMZ as a tripwire to bring us, from the first day of fighting, into a new land war in Asia that many American strategists believe we should never again fight.

Consider Central Asia. By pushing to bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO, and building air bases in nations that were republics of the Soviet Union two decades ago, the United States generated strategic blowback.

China and Russia, though natural rivals and antagonists, joined with four Central Asian nations in a Shanghai Cooperation Organization to expel U.S. military power from a region that is their backyard, but is half a world away from the United States.

Solution: The United States should inform the SCO that when the Afghan war is over we will close all U.S. military bases in Central Asia. No U.S. interest there justifies a conflict with Russia or China.

Indeed, a Russia-China clash over influence and resources in the Far East and Central Asia seems inevitable. Let us get out of the way.

But it is in Europe that America may find the greatest savings.

During the Cold War, 300,000 U.S. troops faced hundreds of thousands of Soviet troops from northern Norway to Central Germany to Turkey. But not only are there no Russian troops on the Elbe today, or surrounding West Berlin, they are gone from Germany, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Between Russia and Poland lie Belarus and Ukraine. Moscow no longer even has a border with Turkey.

Why, when NATO Europe has two nuclear powers and more than twice the population of a Russia whose own population has shrunk by 8 million in 20 years and is scheduled to shrink by 25 million more by 2050, does Europe still need U.S. troops to defend it?

She does not. The Europeans are freeloading, as they have been for years, preserving their welfare states, skimping on defense and letting Uncle Sam carry the hod.

In the Panetta budgets, America will still invest more in defense than the next 10 nations combined and retain sufficient power to secure, with a surplus to spare, all her vital interests.

But we cannot forever be first responder for scores of nations that have nothing to do with our vital interests. As Frederick the Great observed, "He who defends everything defends nothing."

http://buchanan.org/blog/
0


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HillBuzz.org <ads@hillbuzz.org>
Date: Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:00 AM
Subject: New Post at [HillBuzz.org]
To: ads@hillbuzz.org


HillBuzz.org has posted a new item, '"Worst President Ever" Painting Making
Rounds Via Email'

You may view the latest post at
http://hillbuzz.org/worst-president-ever-painting-making-rounds-via-email-78374

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.

Best regards,
HillBuzz.org
ads@hillbuzz.org


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
1







Why You Must Not Store Bottled Water

Posted on March 17, 2011 by Rock

In the first part of my series on how to store water, I mentioned that storing flats of bottled water is about the most dangerous way of doing it. It's too bad, too, because nothing could be easier or more convenient than picking up a case or two of bottled water every month, stacking them in the garage, and forgetting about them.

Alas, in this case convenience comes with a very high price.

Let's set aside for a moment the fact that 40% of bottled water does not come from some pristine lake or underground glacier. Much of it is no different than what you can get out of your own tap, and that's not counting the brands that actually get run through a filter.

If you think all bottled water is somehow more pure than kitchen tap water, you could be in for a nasty surprise. The bottled water industry is less regulated than municipal tap water, and some of the water out there isn't even filtered at all. It's simply poured into those bottles direct from the faucet and sold to you, the trusting sucker, at a 1900% markup.

In blind taste tests, consumers actually chose tap water over some of the samples of bottled water they were offered.

But that's just the side of bottled water that is a national scam, it's not the physically harmful part. The real danger from bottled water is…the bottles. Almost all are manufactured using the chemical Bisphenol-A, which turns out to be a very nasty thing indeed.

Recent studies have been demonstrating that Bisphenol-A (BPA) can wreak all kinds of havoc on the human body, including fatigue, cancers, neurological disorders, cardiovascular disease, infertility, diabetes, and, of all things, obesity. Ever wonder why you're not losing weight after drinking that bottled water during your workout? The chemicals in that bottle could be working against you.

But the most alarming finding of late is that BPA may be the reason we're seeing so many children experiencing the onset of early puberty. Young girls raised on bottled water are beginning to develop breasts as early as seven and eight years old, and boys are experiencing their own set of problems, as the chemical seems to trigger estrogen hormones within both sexes. Meanwhile, in grown men, erectile dysfunction is affecting a younger and younger demographic.

The reason seems to be that Bisphenol-A acts as an endocrine disruptor, mimicking the human hormones that regulate growth and development, and throwing a curve ball into the normal processes of sexual development.

If you haven't heard of any of this it's because of the efforts of the Society of the Plastics Industry, a lobby that represents thousands of products made with BPA.  Sales of that chemical now top $6 billion dollars a year, and for decades that industry has been able to control the debate on whether BPA is harmful to human health.  According to a recent expose published by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, The Food and Drug administration has been relying on studies financed by the industry itself to declare the chemical safe.  So much for reliance on Big Brother to look out for your best interests.

But now the truth is leaking out.  A rash of new studies are showing that the chemical is far from benign; that it's capable of doing much more damage to humans much more quickly than anyone had previously suspected.

Here's what makes it worse: letting those water bottles sit around for a long time, and exposing them to heat.

Imagine you've just taken a tray of warm cinnamon rolls from the oven. That wonderful smell that's filling your house is billions of molecules actually leaving the hot pastries and filling the air. What is entering your nostrils are really billions of tiny, invisible, quantum bits of cinnamon roll that have been violently thrown off by the heat and are now flying around the room.

That's pretty much what's happening with Bisphenol-A, but in a much less delectable way. Billions of molecules of the stuff are constantly dissolving off the inside of the bottle and into the water you will eventually drink.  Heat speeds up the process, and heat plus time only makes it worse. If you've got cases of water just sitting in your garage summer after summer, you're asking for trouble big time.

Have you ever wondered how far those flats of water have traveled by train or truck before they ever got to the store, and how much heat they've been exposed to along the way? The trucks carrying that water are not refrigerated, and in the summer those bottles can get very hot.  Scientists estimate that within six months of bottling, enough BPA has leached into the water in that bottle to seriously mess you up.  This isn't the water you want to have waiting for you in an emergency.

The good news is that some experts believe BPA does not stay in your system permanently. The bad news is that the average person still absorbs the poison so frequently (BPA is also present in the packaging of virtually every microwave meal), that it's probably present in your system all the time anyway, constantly working it's evil magic.

Want to put your health in even greater jeopardy? Refill that plastic bottle and use it again and again. That's what my wife and I have been doing for several years, unaware that each time we refilled a plastic water bottle we were practically scraping poisons off the inside of the bottle and swirling them into our clean water.

Because of the convenience of having bottles of cold water always in the refrigerator, we regularly would buy a flat of water, refilling each bottle from our kitchen filter numerous times.

We don't do that any more.

You can Google the dangers of bottled water as I did, and never come to the end of reports documenting the harm that stuff does. Not long ago I went out and bought plastic bottles that are labled BPA free, and we fill and reuse those now. Sometimes I even drink my water the old fashioned way, from a glass.

After what I know now, I wouldn't take another drink of bottled water on a dare.

 

 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Creeping Sharia

Philadelphia City Council Passes Resolution Welcoming Sharia Law

by creeping

An update on these previous posts, via Philadelphia City Council Introduces Resolution Denouncing Anti-Foreign (Sharia) Law Bill [UPDATED] | PhillyNow Philadelphia City Council members Curtis Jones, Jr. and Maria Quinones Sanchez have introduced Resolution 120031, which sends an overnight package straight to Harrisburg containing one (1) middle finger. The Resolution, as yet unnamed, "Urg[es] the [...]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/philadelphia-city-council-passes-bill-oking-sharia-law/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Posted this morning at Electric Politics, a podcast interview
regarding the leadership transition in North Korea, with Dr. Bruce
Cumings, Chair of the History Department at the University of Chicago.
The good news is, Bruce thinks that the transition probably will be
relatively uneventful and that Kim Jong-un may actually bring a little
more openness to the rest of the world. Bruce is probably right.

As always, if you like this podcast please forward the link.

http://www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2012/02/whither_korea.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.







 

[As the day approaches when Iran finally gets nuclear weapons, we're going to be hearing a lot of "what if" scenarios comparing Iran's present behavior with its future behavior after it gets the bomb. It's not a pretty picture, and day-to-day life on planet earth is bound to grow more tense and less secure - in ways we can't imagine yet - if Iran isn't stopped. df]

 

 

WSJ editorial, 2/1/12

A warning on Iran

Remember that bizarre story from last fall about an Iranian agent based in Texas who allegedly sought to conspire with Mexican drug gangs to blow up Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the U.S. in a crowded Washington, D.C., restaurant? The Justice Department insisted the story was true. Yet the Administration's reaction was otherwise muted, and the press corps went out of its way to cast doubt on the story. The Iranians can't be that crazy?

Well, yes, they can be, at least according to President Obama's top intelligence adviser. In testimony yesterday to the Senate Intelligence Committee, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper warned that Iran's leadership, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, "have changed their calculus and are now more willing to conduct an attack in the United States as a response to real or perceived actions that threaten the regime."

Translation: Not only is Iran prepared to use terrorism in retaliation for any military strikes against it, they're also prepared to get their retaliation in first. "There is more to unfold here," he said. "They're trying to penetrate and engage in this hemisphere."

Mr. Clapper, a former Air Force general, is not given to flights of exaggeration. That should give his warnings some weight, especially among those who believe that, for all the aggressive rhetoric, Iranian leaders conduct foreign policy in a prudent and rational way and are amenable to negotiations.

Mr. Clapper's testimony comes as Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is warning that Iran is about a year away from having a nuclear bomb. So here's a question to those who oppose military strikes on Iran: If the regime is prepared to stage terrorist strikes in America when they don't have a bomb, what will they be capable of when they do have one?

###

Dan Friedman
NYC





--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0







http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/44367?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=6ff80cc2a9-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email

 

Obama: I Pushed Dodd-Frank And Health Care Reform Because Of Christ

Make Way for 'Saint Obama the Pious'

- Judi McLeod Thursday, February 2, 2012
(1) Comments | Print friendly | Email Us

8


Launched to an unsuspecting world from stage prop Greek columns in the summer of 2008 as The Messiah who could walk on water, Barack Obama revealed today all he has since done is for Jesus.

All that was missing at the National Prayer Breakfast, when he claimed that guidance for what he is doing to the Free World comes from above, were the Gregorian chants.

The Marxist misery he's foisting on the Free World with his job-killing and spirit-killing policies don't come from Karl Marx and Saul Alinsky, because, according to a freshly minted pious Obama, it is all for Him.

Some of the true believers at this morning's prayer breakfast must have all but fallen off their chairs when they heard the new Sermon from the Mount from a politician who has admitted he gets his prayer reminders via his Blackberry.

"And so when I talk about our financial institutions playing by the same rules as folks on Main Street, when I talk bout making sure insurance companies aren't discriminating against those who are already sick, or making sure that unscrupulous lenders aren't taking advantage of the most vulnerable among us, I do so because I genuinely believe it will make the economy stronger for everybody. But I also do it because I know that far too many neighbors in our country have been hurt and treated unfairly over the last few years, and I believe in God's command to 'love thy neighbor as thyself.'" (Buzzfeed

, Feb. 2. 2012)

That's the story from Saint Obama The Pious and he's likely sticking to it until at least November 6.

The Golden Rule definition that followed Obama's 'Love thy Neighbor' spiel knocked him down off the sanctimonious Sainthood perch to the dark, dank cellar of unbridled Marxism: "I know the version of that Golden Rule is found in every major religion and every set of beliefs—from Hinduism to Islam to Judaism to the writings of Plato," Obama added.

(OMG! he must have been reading Mark Levin's runaway bestseller Ameritopia).

All but guaranteed that Obama also knows about the Earth Charter, drafted by his mentor, Canadian-born, UN Poster Boy Maurice Strong and former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. The Earth Charter was specifically devised to replace the Ten Commandments.

"The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments." (Maurice Strong).

"Do not do unto the environment of others what you do not want done to your own environment…My hope is that this charter will be a kind of Ten Commandments, a 'Sermon on the Mount' that provides a guide for human behavior toward the environment in the next century." (Mikhail Gorbachev, Los Angeles Times, May 8, 1997).

Steven Rockefeller chaired the Drafting Committee of the Earth Charter and remains a key leader of the organization to this day.

The same Obama, who is forcing abortion on the Roman Catholic Church, today claims he "often falls to his knees in prayer", and emphasized his religious values in determining where to lead the country.

"I'd be remiss if I stopped there; if my values were limited to personal moments of prayer or private conversations with pastors or friends. So instead, I must try—imperfectly, but I must try—to make sure those values motivate me as one leader of this great nation".

Meanwhile, just seeing Obama at work shows which side he's on. And it's not the Side of the Angels.


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Dear Secretary of Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission,

SRI LANKA: An innocent man was illegally arrested, tortured and laid with a fabricated charge

Name of the victim: Mr. Kanahipadi Kankanamge Nalin (29) of Dodamgo, Kaluthara
Alleged perpetrator:
1. Police officer Kamalasiri
2. Civil Defence Force Officer Wickramasinghe
3. Sub Inspector (SI) Mahinda
4. Police Officer Kamalsiri
5. Police Officer Ishantha
6. Officer-In-Charge (OIC)

All are attached to the Dodangoda Police Station

Date of incident: 20 November 2011
Place of incident: Dodangoda Police Station

I am writing to express my serious concern over the case of Mr. Kanahipadi Kankanamge Nalin (29) of Dodamgo, Kaluthara. Nalin is married and a businessman by profession. On 20 November 2011 Nalin went to see the newly opened expressway from Colombo to Galle. He went with his wife, Ms. Wickramasinghe Kankanamge Nadika Lakmali (26), one of his drivers Kalu Malli and the driver's daughter. They went by a Tipper numbered, WP 484959 belonging to Nalin.
After seen the road while they were on their way home the child wanted to eat an ice cream so the vehicle was stopped in front of the Gurukanda Restaurant near the Thudugala Junction. Then the driver went with his daughter to buy the ice cream while Nalin and his wife waiting at the vehicle.

Two police officers who were in uniform approached them and ordered them to remove the vehicle from that place as it was in front of the restaurant. Nalin told the officers that as the driver went into the restaurant he needed to wait for him to return. Then the police officers later identified Kamalasiri and Wickramasinghe attached to the Dodangoda Police Station in Kalutara, dragged Nalin out of the vehicle and started to beat him with. Then Nalin's wife Nadika came to the officers and pleaded with them not to assault her husband but the officers continued to assault him. Nalin suffered a hemorrhage due to the beating. Another group of police officers who had been notified by the first officers approached by a three wheeler and they also beat Nalin. Then they dragged Nalin into the three-wheeler and brought him to the Dodangoda Police Station.

At the police station the Officer-in-Charge (OIC) of the station came to him and told him "I waited till you were brought to me". Then the officers brought Nalin to the Traffic Branch of the police compound and there also he was assaulted. Nalin identified Sub Inspector (SI) Mahinda, Kamalsiri, Ishantha and Civil Defence Force officer Wickramasinghe as some of the officers who assaulted him.

Then Nalin pleaded with the officers to take him for medical treatment as he bleeding heavily. Then the officers brought him to the Wilpatha Rural Hospital. While the doctors were treating him he explained that he was severely tortured by the police officers. The doctor advised the officers to admit him for further treatment. He was admitted but Nalin observed the police officers talking to the doctor in a confidential manner.

During the night several of Nalin's relatives came to visit him but the police officers who were on watch did not allow them to do so. When Nalin asked for permission for them to visit one of the officers beat Nalin even at the hospital.

On the next morning Nalin was discharge from the hospital despite pleading with the staff not to discharge him as he still suffering severe pain. But the doctor who was on service worked with the police officers and allowed them to take Nalin back to the police station where he was locked in a cell.

Later the OIC called Nalin to his room and then he was threatened with a fabricated charge and prosecution in the High Court. He further threatened him that his throat would be cut and he would not be allowed to live. Then late in the evening he was produced him before the Magistrate of Kalutara. Later Nalin learned that he was charged with obstructing the official duties of the police. Nalin vehemently denies the charge and states that police officers fabricated the charge against him.

Nalin further states that police officers tortured him and filed the fabricated charge against him because as when he was working in South Korea a police officer named Manju, who was attached to the Dodangoda Police Station attempted to have an extramarital affair with his wife which she refused. He further states that after he returned to Sri Lanka and started several businesses police officer Manju started to harass them. He made a complaint to the Police Headquarters and later under the supervision of an Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP), an inquiry which resulted in Manju being transferred to another police station. Later Nalin learned that the OIC stated that he wanted to take revenge on Nalin.

Nalin states that he was illegally arrested, detained, tortured and laid with fabricated charges thereby violating his fundamental rights.

I request your urgent intervention to ensure that the authorities listed below instigate an immediate investigation into the allegations of illegal arrest, illegal detention, torture by the police perpetrators, and the prosecution of those proven to be responsible under the criminal law of the country for misusing powers of state officers and for wrongful prosecution. The officers involved must also be subjected to internal investigations for the breach of the department orders as issued by the police department.

Yours sincerely,
William Nicholas Gomes
William's Desk
www.williamgomes.org



--
William Nicholas Gomes
Journalist & Human Rights Activist
80/ B Bramon Chiron, Saydabad,
Dhaka-1203, Bangladesh.
Cell: +88 019 7 444 0 666
E-mail:
William [at] williamgomes.org,editorbd[at]gmail.com
Skype: William.gomes9
Face book:
www.facebook.com/williamnicholasgomes
Twitter:
twitter.com/williamgomes
Web site :www.williamgomes.org


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.