• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


THE FACTS ARE IN........

 

As a result of a Judicial Watch filing under the Freedom of Information Act, the USAF 
released documents detailing House Speaker Pelosi's use of United States Air Force

aircraft between March 2009 and June 2010. The data are published in the Judicial

Watch Verdict of December 2010, Volume 16, Issue 12.

Here are the main highlights revealed by the USAF. Keep in mind that all the data below 
relate to United States Air Force aircraft used by one woman over a sixteen month period.
Several of these flights included Ms Pelosi's guests such as grown children, grandchildren,

various in-laws, friends, and hangers-on. Over 95% of the trips were between the west

coast and Washington , DC or what we might call a commute between home and the office.

 

READ it and WEEP!!
Total trips:  85 trips over a 68 week period or 1.25 average trips per week.
Total mileage: 206,264 miles or 2,427 average miles per trip
Total flying time: 428.6 hours or an average of 5 hrs per trip
Cost to the taxpayers:  $2,100,744.59 or $27,715.00 per trip or $1,285,162.00 per year
Cost of in flight food and alcohol: $101,429.14 or $1,193.00 per trip or $62,051.00 per year.

On one junket to Baghdad, according to the Air Force report, she had the aircraft bar 
stocked with Johnny Walker Red Scotch, Grey Goose Vodka, E&J Brandy, 
Bailey's Irish Creme, Maker's Mark Whiskey, Courvoisier Cognac, Bacardi 
Rum, Jim Beam Whiskey, Beefeater Gin, Dewars Scotch, Bombay Sapphire 
Gin, Jack Daniels Whiskey, Corona Beer and several varieties of wine. 
This was obviously a very important "gubment bidness" trip.

Evidence generally speaks for itself, and in Ms. Pelosi's case it speaks the language of abuse and (evidently) a serious familial drinking problem, for in a single year she and her spawn drank an

amount in excess of the net income of the average employed American! When she said, "... If the 
stimulus doesn't pass, five hundred million people might lose their jobs...", I thought she was unintentionally revealing her ignorance. I'm now more inclined to think she was pickled.

Even though she can no longer abuse the USAF, she can either fly on her broom, or fly 
Southwest Airlines, where bags fly free.


If you are an AMERICAN citizen it is YOUR DUTY to PASS THIS ON!!

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on COTO Report

Jungle fungus eats plastic, beats cancer

by Rady

By Rady Ananda Activist Post Researchers have found the first endophytic fungus that eats plastic, and can use it as its sole food source even in an oxygen-free environment. [1] Pestalotiopsis microspora presents a massive bioremediation opportunity for landfills, where buried and surface plastics can be degraded naturally.

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://coto2.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/jungle-fungus-eats-plastic-beats-cancer/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Representatives of the trash bag industry will be in heavy attendance at the shows.

New post on Bare Naked Islam

Just what the world needs, a Muslim 'baghead' modeling agency

by barenakedislam

Muslim Model Agency 'Underwraps' founder Nailah Lymus

Modeling and modesty are two words that seem mutually exclusive, but a Muslim fashion designer in New York City is trying to change that. A new agency for Muslim models, called 'Underwraps' is launching next week during New York Fashion Week. Its goal? To prove that models can be gorgeous, stylish, and yet still maintain their religious beliefs.

Fashionista   Nailah Lymus is an American-born Muslim whose parents converted to Islam before she was born. She adheres to the modesty tenets of the religion, which require that clothes be loose enough so as not to reveal your shape, and that basically the only body parts that can be visible are your face, hands and feet. Sound challenging? It doesn't have to be. I chatted with Lymus this week about her background, Muslims in fashion, and her plans to launch a modeling agency.

Lymus is a self-taught designer who originally studied child development. While interning at a boutique, she ended up designing and selling some pieces there, and what was once a hobby suddenly got lucrative. She's since made it a full time profession, and has turned her eye towards models. Specifically, Muslim models.

"[Muslim models] come from a background where they dress Islamically appropriate, but to be in this industry and to be a model you kind of have to forfeit that," Lymus said. "That's why I wanted to start this agency, so you don't have to do that. You don't have to lose who you are to be in this business."

To that end, she's starting Underwraps as an agency for girls who are committed to maintaining modesty standards in their dress, but hope to work with mainstream designers. That's Lymus' long-term goal. "We take things seriously and are professional just like other models. During fashion week I'll be sending them out to castings just like anyone else," she told me.

Right now Underwraps has four girls in development, who aren't officially signed yet. She'll bring them to industry events during fashion week and let them get a taste of the attention. Besides having a "look", Lymus believes that the girls have to have strong personalites and be able to handle the pressures of the industry, and also the misconceptions. Especially since 9/11, there's a lot of misunderstanding about Islam and its expectations of women. Lymus hopes to shatter the more common ones—like that women can't work or that they have to wear full abayas.

Could an agency like this succeed? It would take a special girl, and an open-minded designer to make it happen. While runways featuring lots of bare skin tend to get attention, there are many designers who could theoretically use Muslim models. Haider Ackermann's spring show, which featured layered looks and even veils, is one that comes to mind. Regardless of whether or not Underwraps is successful, we love that agencies featuring non-traditional models are trying to make a go of it.

barenakedislam | February 8, 2012 at 4:21 pm | Categories: Islam in America | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-Fsq

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.com/2012/02/08/just-what-the-world-needs-a-muslim-baghead-modeling-agency/




--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0


New post on Fellowship of the Minds

Insect woman

by Dr. Eowyn

cicada wasp

Her name is Ioana Spangenberg, a Romanian model.

5ft 6ins tall and weighing just 84 lbs, her hips are 32ins but her waist measures only 20 ins -- 5" bigger than a CD. The average model's waist is 24"-28".

Spangenberg insists "I eat three big meals and I snack on chocolate and crisps all the time."

My question is: "Where do her internal organs go?"

[Diagram from Wikipedia]

But then if women in the Victorian era could have an 18" waist but weighed 160 lbs, then anything is possible!

~Eowyn

Dr. Eowyn | February 8, 2012 at 12:43 pm | Tags: Ioana Spangenberg | Categories: Animals, Health Care | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-cmA

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/insect-woman/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
I do not mind multiple posts about a subject that bring forth
differing points of view... I welcome them.

However several posts in one day all spewing the same identical
information on the same identical subject with absolutely no change in
content from one multi posting day to the next is SPAM!!!

Tommy, we have had this discussion before. It will stop now or I will
stop it permanently.

Mark, the Costa Rican Moderator.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Java and Justice
By FRANK BRUNI
Published: February 6, 2012


If you're among the fair-minded Americans who believe that two men or
two women should be able to wed, there's an easy though slightly
caloric way to express that. Get a caramel macchiato. Maybe make it a
venti. Then get another tomorrow.

Starbucks, you see, is under fire for its public support of the
same-sex marriage legislation that recently passed the State Senate in
Washington, where the company has its headquarters. That legislation
is expected to clear the House as well and be signed by Gov. Christine
Gregoire in the next few weeks. Washington would become the seventh
state in which such marriages are legal.

The Christian conservatives who have been trying to stop that aren't
pleased. They're involved in an effort to gather enough signatures to
suspend the law's implementation until a voter referendum can be held.
In the meantime, Steven Andrew, the president of USA Christian
Ministries, has called for a national boycott of the coffee chain,
saying that while its executives "can follow Satan if they want to,"
God-fearing Americans shouldn't join them on that caffeinated road to
hell.

I mention Starbucks not so much to rally to its defense as to make a
point about same-sex marriage, enacted in New York last June and now
under serious consideration in Maryland, Maine and New Jersey. It's
the future. And the response of corporate behemoths based in the state
of Washington reflects that.

In addition to Starbucks, Microsoft and Amazon spoke up for same-sex
marriage. All have surely taken note of several polls over the last
year suggesting — for the first time — that a slight majority of
Americans supports it. All have no doubt taken even greater note of a
generational divide. In a Gallup poll, 70 percent of people in the
18-to-34 age range favored same-sex marriage, while only 39 percent of
people 55 and older did.

More so than politicians, corporations play the long game, trying to
engender loyalty for decades to come, and they're famously fixated on
consumers in their 20s and 30s.

They see support for same-sex marriage as a winner, something that
will help with employee recruitment as well. On Microsoft's in-house
blog last month, the company's general counsel, Brad Smith, explained
its backing of the Washington legislation in part by noting "an
unprecedented national and global competition for top talent."
Microsoft, he said, doesn't want to lose potential recruits to states
with fairer laws.

Corporate recognition of a rapidly changing world isn't limited to the
coasts or to companies widely considered progressive. While J.C.
Penney, based in Plano, Tex., hasn't waded into the same-sex marriage
debate, it recently hired as a pitchwoman Ellen DeGeneres, an
outspoken advocate of gay rights who is married to the actress Portia
de Rossi. On Friday, in the face of pushback from (you guessed it)
Christian conservatives, it reaffirmed its commitment to her.
DeGeneres is also a pitchwoman for CoverGirl makeup.

A growing number of politicians presumed to have sights on higher
offices and elections down the road seem to read the trend lines and
tea leaves the same way companies do.

Andrew M. Cuomo, the New York governor, didn't just assent to marriage
equality. He led the charge for it, guaranteeing that it would be a
cornerstone of his gubernatorial legacy. Gov. Martin O'Malley of
Maryland, the chairman of the Democratic Governors Association, is
following suit. He devoted parts of his State of the State address to
an appeal for marriage equality, and has tweeted about it repeatedly.

The issue plays out in quieter ways, too. In Washington, final-hours
support came from State Senator Brian Hatfield, a Democrat who
considers himself a devout Christian and who said in a statement that
he "went as far as to ask God for a sign." It came, he said, in an
e-mail he got from former State Representative Betty Sue Morris, a
fellow Democrat, who recounted how much she regretted a vote she cast
against same-sex marriage in 1996 — and why.

She shared her story with me on the phone on Monday. "In December of
1998," began Morris, 70, who then started crying. "Excuse me. I just
remember it so vividly. My beautiful daughter, Annie, was home for
Christmas, and she told us that she was gay."

In the days that followed, Morris said, she remembered her vote and
"felt like I had denied her something. A wholeness. A freedom."

"Here's this precious child that you love and you care for," she
added. "You don't want to be a part of making them grieve for
anything."

As it happens, she said, Annie didn't even remember the vote. Now 47,
she lives in California and married her longtime partner in 2008, just
before Proposition 8 overturned the state's short-lived same-sex
marriage law. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to rule
imminently on the proposition's constitutionality.

Morris told me: "Whenever someone opposes this, I always counsel: you
never know. You never know when it will be your child or your
grandchild. And you will eat your words."


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0

Elections 2012 | February 7, 2012
Nevada vote fraud official
Jeffrey Phelps

As if anyone who's been paying attention over the last few weeks is actually surprised, another caucus state is taken down by GOP officials, permanently altering the outcome of yet another election, rendering its results forever in question.

This time, however, the people of Nevada are the immediate victims of mounting state GOP scandals, as the historical "First in the West" Nevada Caucus has been officially rendered a fraud, and the unwitting citizens and voters are once again left holding the bag.

So far, the overall magnitude of the circumstances has gone largely unnoticed by the people of the US in general, but that didn't deter NV GOP Chairwoman, Amy Tarkanian from filing her resignation the very next morning on Sunday, as obvious and rampant, widespread election fraud is sweeping through the country in an establishment elite attempt to hide the real results, in favor of a pre-chosen candidate, despite the wishes of the American people.

Very similar to the circumstances that played out in Iowa just weeks ago, also forcing a state GOP official there to recently submit his own resignation, precincts across the state of Nevada are now coming up with mismatching numbers, missing votes, and ultimately and permanently unverifiable results, rendering the entire United States 2012 election process a total failure and, so far, unrecoverable.

After almost every Caucus thus far, the election has to be ultimately rendered meaningless. with the only real solutions being independent Grand Jury investigations, total do-overs, or simply allow the establishment and it's minions to steal the nomination away from the people and the candidate they are actually trying to choose, and simply give it to Mitt Romney instead.

Amazingly, as state after state is ransacked by establishment backed party officials, as Romney continues to benefit from all the pre-meditated mayhem, the establishment's media continues to act as if nothing whatsoever is happening and everything is under control, as if all this has been the plan all along.

Breaking the story of Chairwoman, Tarkanian's resignation, while trying to be as quiet about it as possible, The Nevada Sun did their very best to spin the circumstances and cleverly word the story, attempting to leave the reader with the impression that everything was going to be ok, when the actual reality of the circumstances is obviously quite dire.

 As it turns out, just as in Iowa, the likelihood that Ron Paul should have actually been the winner is very high. Not only did CNN show live coverage of a special late evening vote count in a populated Las Vegas precinct that had Ron Paul winning by almost 60%, statistics are showing that Ron Paul may have actually won the entire caucus by approx. the same margin, had in not been for another round of State GOP election fraud that is seemingly never going to be address by the powers that be, for obvious reasons.

There was even a CNN videotaped situation outside of that same precinct that had event staff attempting to prevent a Ron Paul supporter from entering the premises, seemingly so he couldn't assure a fair results count.

Perhaps the most obvious aspect of the situation, however, may be the fact that Nevada is a known Libertarian state, Ron Paul has basically campaign there since his last attempt at the white house, his numbers have almost doubled in every state since then, yet Nevada state GOP 'officials' expect everyone to believe he actually received fewer votes there in 2012 than he did in 2008?

The situation has become so desperate for the American People and the rule of law, even the historically very humble and quiet Ron Paul should consider coming forward to cry foul. Something he has yet to do, largely because he came so close to winning in Iowa, despite GOP state officials rigging the outcome for Romney…then Santorum.

He also knew he'd be targeted by that same establishment's media and ridiculed as a conspiracy theorist, if he tried speaking out against what should be obvious if it were actually handled honestly by the media, both locally and nationally.

It's now become so obvious that the establishment will do anything to rig the results they are even willing to do it openly, even in caucus states that have paper ballots that are harder to hide.

This desperate attempt to make Mitt Romney the candidate, despite the wishes of the American people, must be a dead give-away that, should he happen to end up beating Obama, he is the one that is guaranteed to continue the overall and continual, multi-decade, establishment 1%'r agenda, whether the people of the United States agree with it or not.

Considering the fact that it seems Ron Paul should be the one actually winning the majority of the caucuses and primaries thus far, goes a long way in showing those paying attention that Obama also represents that same status quo that Mitt Romney does, something the establishment is refusing to let the people of America chose not to go along with.

One thing is for sure, it's going to be very interesting to watch this play out, as scandal after scandal mounts, state by state. Will the people simply sit back and allow the establishment to force their favorite candidate into office, regardless of what the people desire? Only time will tell...

Sources:

Iowa Situation:

Iowa Vote Fraud Official: http://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/iowa-vote-fraud-official

Matt Strawn, Iowa GOP Chairman, To Step Down http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/31/matt-strawn-iowa-gop-chairman-resigns-_n_1244186.html

Nevada Situation:

Vote count in GOP caucus continuing in Nevada's largest county http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/feb/05/vote-count-gop-caucus-continuing-nevadas-largest-c/

Nevada GOP dealing with 'trouble box' of questionable ballots http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/feb/05/nevada-gop-dealing-trouble-box/

Excess Ballots Were Counted In Clark County, Nevada http://youtu.be/LphvuOJh8Ak

Ron Paul Trounces Everyone! In Only Nevada Caucus Vote Counted On Live TV http://youtu.be/J8zFzebsoAU

 NEVADA CAUCUS VOTE FRAUD PROOF! 2012 NEVADA CAUCUS PRIMARY VOTER FRAUD PROOF http://youtu.be/Z3D9-NNuC4g

Newt Gingrich Supporter: Everyone Is Voting For Ron Paul! http://youtu.be/12lXCXEtJnY

Move Over, Iowa, Nevada Has A Caucus Problem Too http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/02/05/146415698/move-over-iowa-nevada-has-a-caucus-problem-too

It is official: Elections in America are a complete hoax http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/it-is-official-elections-america-are-a-complete-hoax?CID=obinsite

Why Nevada's GOP caucuses were a jackpot of embarrassments http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2012/02/05/why-nevadas-gop-caucuses-were-a-jackpot-of-embarrassments/?gta=commentlistpos#commentlistpos

Nevada! Clark County Vote Fraud http://robertwanekreports.com/nevada-clark-county-vote-fraud/

https://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/nevada-vote-fraud-official

February8th
26 Things Non-Paul Voters Are Basically Saying
Tom Woods

I am trying to understand the thinking behind the great many Americans who have decided to vote for a mainstream politician in 2012.

Now before you read the below and send me an angry email telling me I should be nice, that I should try to persuade them through love, etc., let me note that I have generally done that. My video appeal to Iowa radio host Steve Deace was a friendly, reasoned discussion of Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich. My videos about Rick Santorum have been straightforward examinations of the facts. (See my video on Santorum's view that we need inflation in order to prosper, and my video on why Catholics should instead vote for Ron Paul.)

But once in a while you just can't take it anymore, and you have to let loose.

So, whether they realize it or not, here are 26 things non-Paul supporters appear to be saying.

(1) The American political establishment has done a super job keeping our country prosperous and our liberties protected, so I'm sure whatever candidate they push on me is probably a good one.

(2) Our country is basically bankrupt. Unfunded entitlement liabilities are in excess of twice world GDP. Therefore, it's a good idea to vote for someone who offers no specific spending cuts of any kind.

(3) Vague promises to cut spending are good enough for me, even though they have always resulted in higher spending in the past.

(4) I prefer a candidate who plays to the crowd, instead of having the courage to tell his audience things they may not want to hear.

(5) I am deeply concerned about spending. Therefore, I would like to vote for someone who supported Medicare Part D, thereby adding $7 trillion to Medicare's unfunded liabilities.

(6) I am opposed to bailouts. Therefore, I will vote for a candidate who supported TARP.

(7) The federal government is much too involved in education, where it has no constitutional role. Therefore, I will vote for a candidate who supported expanding the Department of Education and favored the No Child Left Behind Act.

(8) Even though practically everyone was caught by surprise in the 2008 financial crisis, which we are still reeling from, it's a good idea not to vote for the one man in politics who predicted exactly what was bound to unfold, all the way back in 2001.

(9) I am not impressed by a candidate who inspires people, especially young ones, to read the great economists and political philosophers.

(10) I am concerned about taxes. Therefore, I will not vote for the one candidate who has never supported a tax increase.

(11) I believe it is conservative to support bringing the Enlightenment to Afghanistan.

(12) Even though I lost half my retirement portfolio when the economy crashed from the sugar high the Federal Reserve's artificially low interest rates put it on, I would like to vote for someone who is not really interested in the Federal Reserve.

(13) Even though 50 years of the embargo on Cuba did nothing to undermine Fidel Castro, and in fact handed him a perfect excuse for all the failures of socialism, I favor continuing this policy.

(14) If someone has a drug problem, prison rape is the best solution I can think of.

(15) Even though the Constitution had to be amended to allow for alcohol prohibition, and even though I claim to care about the Constitution, I don't mind that there's no constitutional authorization for the war on drugs, and I will punish at the polls anyone who favors the constitutional solution of returning the issue to the states.

(16) I believe only a "liberal" would think it was inhumane to keep essential items out of Iraq in the 1990s, even though one of the first people to protest this policy was Pat Buchanan.

(17) The Brookings Institution says Newt Gingrich's 1994 Contract with America was an insignificant nibbling around the edges. I favor people who support insignificant nibbling around the edges, as long as they occasionally trick me with a nice speech.

(18) I am deeply concerned about radical Islam, so it was a good idea to depose the secular Saddam Hussein ­ who was so despised by Islamists that Osama bin Laden himself offered to fight against him in the 1991 Persian Gulf War ­ and replace him with a Shiite regime friendly with Iran, while also bringing about a new Iraqi constitution that makes Islam the state religion and forbids any law that contradicts its teachings.

(19) Indefinite detention for U.S. citizens seems like nothing to be worried about, especially since our political class is so trustworthy that it could never abuse such a power.

(20) Following up on (19), I believe Thomas Jefferson was just being paranoid when he said, "In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution."

(21) Even though the war in Iraq was based on crude propaganda I would have laughed at if the Soviet Union had peddled it, and even though the result has been hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis, four million people displaced, trillions of dollars down the drain, tens of thousands of serious injuries among American servicemen and an epidemic of suicide throughout the military, not to mention the ruination of America's reputation in the world, I see no reason to be skeptical when the same people who peddled that fiasco urge me to support yet another war as my country is going bankrupt.

(22) I do not trust the media. But when the media tells me I am not to support Ron Paul, who says things he is not allowed to say, I will comply.

(23) I know the media will smear or marginalize anyone who would really fix this country. But when the media smears and marginalizes Ron Paul, I will draw no conclusion from this.

(24) I want to be spoken to like this: "My fellow Americans, you are the awesomest of the awesome, and the only reason anyone in the world might be unhappy with your government is because of your sheer awesomeness."

(25) I think it's a good idea to vote for Mitt Romney, whose top three donors are Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, and Morgan Stanley, and a bad idea to vote for Ron Paul, whose top three donors are the U.S. Army, the U.S. Navy, and the U.S. Air Force.

(26) I have not been exploited enough by the cozy relationship between large financial firms and the U.S. government, and I would like to see it continue.


http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/26-things-non-paul-voters-are-basically-saying/
0



Withholding Consent
February 7, 2012 by Danny Sanchez

"I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces." -Étienne de La Boétie
0




 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0





 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0





 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.