• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget

 

Sandra Fluke is a student at Georgetown Law. She's also a "reproductive rights activist" who agrees wholeheartedly with the Obama administration's controversial contraceptive mandate. Her reasoning, though, is likely to enrage some critics.

During a testimony in front of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee on Monday (a meeting that was held by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi), Fluke — who was coincidentally the only witness heard — described the financial constraints that purchasing birth control puts on her peers.

"Forty percent of the female students at Georgetown Law reported to us that they struggled financially as a result of this policy," Fluke said, referring to the fact that the university doesn't pay for contraception. "Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school."

She detailed, among other stories, how one woman felt "embarrassed" and "powerless" at the pharmacy counter when she "learned for the first time" that contraceptives weren't covered by the university's health care plan.

CNS News' Craig Bannister, though, challenged Fluke's $3,000 figure and came up with some pretty interesting numbers:

$3,000 for birth control in three years? That's a thousand dollars a year of sex – and, she wants us to pay for it. [...]

At a dollar a condom if she shops at CVS pharmacy's website, that $3,000 would buy her 3,000 condoms – or, 1,000 a year…

Assuming it's not a leap year, that's 1,000 divided by 365 – or having sex 2.74 times a day, every day, for three straight years. And, I thought Georgetown was a Catholic university where women might be prone to shun casual, unmarried sex. At least its health insurance doesn't cover contraception (that which you subsidize, you get more of, you know).

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0







http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/islamic-group-threatens-wnd/

 

Islamic group threatens WND

'We would not want to take you down the same route as we have with others'

Published: 15 hours ago

byBob Unruh

A man who says he represents the United Muslim Nations International organization has warned WND to "moderate" its reporting on issues involving Islam because of how Muslims may react.

The warning came in an email to WND from Faarooq al Mohammedi, who said he was asking on behalf of the Muslim organization that WND "comply as it would be in the companies (sic) best interest as we would not want to take you down the same rout (sic) as we have with other non-complaint media firms."

The email warned WND to take "extra precaution when publishing religiously sensitive material or in creating religiously sensitive suspicions about peoples (sic) religious beliefs and practices."

He threatened, "We would appreciate it if you could tighten your screening and moderation processes of articles to be published, any fake material published by WND will be taken as a breach of world news standards, religiously sensitive matters are to be based on solid and undeniable facts, failure to produce proofs of such published articles will give us no option but to bring about the complete removal of WND online as well as from the public in any print media."

The essence of the warning was that WND needed to project an attitude of dhimmitude, the subservient role demanded of nonbelievers in a Muslim society. Dhimmis "recognize" their inferior status and appropriately serve the master Muslims.

Contacted by WND at a telephone number in Africa, Mohammedi could cite no specific issues with WND's reporting. Instead, he promoted a worldwide Islamic caliphate, a subject mentioned in a WND report several days earlier about a coming conference in Austria.

"Isn't this interesting?" said WND Founder and Editor Joseph Farah, "This guy makes an indictment, but can provide zero evidence to back it up. Nevertheless, he is making sweeping threats about shutting down WND and enlisting the help of unnamed governments.

"This is why Americans who believe in free speech must never permit international agencies to be involved in policing the Internet. Nor can we afford to allow ourselves to be bullied into self-censorship and standards of 'political correctness' by special interest groups."

Pamela Geller, who writes at AtlasShrugs and long has waged battles against the encroachment of Islamic religious law in the United States, said while she was not familiar with the group, the tactic is common.

"The tactic is pure Islamic supremacist intimidation, a tried-and-true strategy that they employ frequently," she said. "They cannot answer us, so they try to shut us down."

Geller repeatedly has fought over the right to have ads criticizing Islam in the same locations as ads that promote Islam. She frequently has to go to court to get the same access that pro-Islamic organizations are freely granted.

Mohammedi told WND in the telephone interview today that his concern is that publishing material he doesn't like "creates a problem on a global scale."

"Some people have different ways of reacting to different articles that are published," he said. "We're trying to prevent certain unwanted events from happening due to these publications.

"We need that (publication) to come to an end because if you want peace and stability around the world, you would need these things to come to an end as well."

Regarding WND, Mohammedi could not identify a single specific concern but said he knew there were some, and he would respond by email. The email never arrived.

He could only say there were articles regarding "suspicions" about Islam.

"The religion is very open, very open. There's nothing to be suspicious about," he said.

He said the email to WND was part of a campaign.

"I've dealt with quite a few people. We've got the government involved with ombudsmen, and they've made adjustments," he said.

"Basically, our advice is that people need to take extra precautions and moderate whatever gets published," he said, referring to recent references about a caliphate, although he could not say they were from WND.

"They carry the (caliphate) message … it's almost like there's some suspicion of something terrible. Islamically, the system of the caliphate is supposed to be a good thing. It shouldn't be seen as something bad," he said.

"It will prevent a lot of conflicts around the world itself, as well as provide the world with a central government structure."

Farah said his grandparents "did not flee the Muslim-dominated Middle East so their grandson would have to guard his words about Islamic oppression around the world and, more frequently, right here in the U.S."

"As long as I am alive, WND will continue to tell the truth about Shariah, jihad and Islamic terror," Farah said.

While Mohammedi said the organization's website was not operating at this point, WND located a site that appeared to represent the organization.

The site states: "The true Muslim stands firm and strong against the Kufar (unbeliever), we the Mu'min will always defeat the Kufar and we have love amongst each other."

The site also said its headquarters is in Jerusalem and explained, "We are not only an organization on a path to unite the entire Muslim Ummah, we are an organization of international human rights as per the commandments/Shariah (Divine Law) of the almighty Allah in the blessed Holy Quran and as prescribed by the Sunnah (examples) of our beloved Nabi (prophet) Mohammed."

Links there lead to articles titled "The World under the Islamic Caliphate," "Hezbollah," the "Palestinian Liberation Organization," "Islamic Organization of North America" and others.

The earlier WND story on the Caliphate Conference 2012 reported how it was being organized by Hizb ut-Tahrir, which was described as a "pan-Islamic extremist group that seeks to establish a global Islamic state, or caliphate, ruled by Islamic Shariah law."

If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WND Poll.

 



 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.




Click here if you cannot see this email.

Imprimis
February 2012 • Volume 41, Number 2

Blasphemy and Free Speech

Paul Marshall
Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute

PAUL MARSHALL is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute's Center for Religious Freedom. He has published widely in newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, First Things, The New Republic, and The Weekly Standard. He is the author or editor of more than 20 books on religion and politics, including Their Blood Cries Out, Religious Freedom in the World, and Blind Spot: When Journalists Don't Get Religion. Most recently he is the co-author, with Nina Shea, of Silenced: How Apostasy and Blasphemy Codes are Choking Freedom Worldwide.
 

The following is adapted from a lecture delivered at Hillsdale College's Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship in Washington, D.C., on February 3, 2012.

separator

A growing threat to our freedom of speech is the attempt to stifle religious discussion in the name of preventing "defamation of" or "insults to" religion, especially Islam. Resulting restrictions represent, in effect, a revival of blasphemy laws.
 
Few in the West were concerned with such laws 20 years ago. Even if still on some statute books, they were only of historical interest. That began to change in 1989, when the late Ayatollah Khomeini, then Iran's Supreme Leader, declared it the duty of every Muslim to kill British-based writer Salman Rushdie on the grounds that his novel, The Satanic Verses, was blasphemous. Rushdie has survived by living his life in hiding. Others connected with the book were not so fortunate: its Japanese translator was assassinated, its Italian translator was stabbed, its Norwegian publisher was shot, and 35 guests at a hotel hosting its Turkish publisher were burned to death in an arson attack.
 
More recently, we have seen eruptions of violence in reaction to Theo van Gogh's and Ayaan Hirsi Ali's film Submission, Danish and Swedish cartoons depicting Mohammed, the speech at Regensburg by Pope Benedict XVI on the topic of faith, reason, and religious violence, Geert Wilders' film Fitna, and a false Newsweek report that the U.S. military had desecrated Korans at Guantanamo. A declaration by Terry Jones—a deservedly obscure Florida pastor with a congregation of less than 50—that he would burn a Koran on September 11, 2010, achieved a perfect media storm, combining American publicity-seeking, Muslim outrage, and the demands of 24 hour news coverage. It even drew the attention of President Obama and senior U.S. military leaders. Dozens of people were murdered as a result.

Read the rest of this issue...

CONNECT WITH US

facebook twitter youtube

SOCIAL SHARING

Share

MESSAGE TOOLS

» Share this message
» Forward to a friend
» View this message online


separator

separator

Hillsdale College



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0



 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.

 

Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, 

a crack pipe and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.

 

 

 

 

__._,_.___
 
.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Fellowship of the Minds

Railgun Packs a Punch Without an Explosive Warhead

by catscanner150

Technology Military Video Captures Destructive Power of Navy's Newest Railgun

Posted on February 28, 2012 at 4:53pm by Buck Sexton

  • US Navy Railgun Destroys Anything in Its Path

It's a new version of the railgun, and it packs an earth-shattering, hypersonic punch.

In the past, railguns have been high-tech but massive beasts that looked like only the largest naval ships could handle one. With continued testing and experimentation, that's starting to change.

As you can see from the screenshot above depicting the loading of a prototype rail gun built by defense contractor BAE, these amazing weapons are getting smaller, and inching closer to combat readiness.

Gizmodo lays out just how incredible this new weapon is, stating that "it fires a 40-pound metal slug up to 5,600 miles per hour… slamming into its target with 32 times the force of a 1-ton car being thrust at 100 mph."

Below you can see the oddly shaped projectile ripping through heavy barriers like butter.

US Navy Railgun Destroys Anything in Its Path

Gizmodo contacted the Navy, and they agreed that the technology is becoming more compact and therefore more usable. "It finally looks like a gun," the Navy said.

Rail guns are designed to destroy basically anything, anywhere, on the land, sea, or in the air. The Navy may one day destroy the biggest, most expensive ships with nothing but a hunk of metal traveling really, really fast.

The military even hopes to use rail guns one day to shoot down incoming missiles.

US Navy Railgun Destroys Anything in Its Path

It's a true marvel of science, as all of this is accomplished with nothing more than kinetic energy. The projectiles do not contain any explosives. In fact, the Navy has been using non-aerodynamic rounds on purpose in tests so that a round doesn't go off-range and smash through a neighboring town or interstate.

One day, however, the Navy will be using conical projectiles for maximum penetration.

US Navy Railgun Destroys Anything in Its Path

The Navy plans to continue testing rail guns over the next five years, eventually pushing the energy used to 32 megajoules- – over even more.

It hasn't happened yet, but one day, the railgun may change the way wars are fought.

~Tom in NC

catscanner150 | February 29, 2012 at 1:30 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-cNs

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/02/29/railgun-packs-a-punch-without-an-explosive-warhead/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
Q: What's the difference between a gay man and a freezer?
A: Freezer doesn't fart when you pull the meat out.
---
Q: How do you fit 4 queers on a barstool?
A: Flip it upside-down.
---
A Gay man goes to the Doctor, To have an AIDS test. The Doctor comes
in and tells him he has AIDS, the man goes, "my god what can I do" the
doctor goes "there is one thing you can do". the gay goes "what what
is it". The Doctor, says "Eat 15 cans of beans,, a pound of Jalapeno
Peppers, 18 bannanas, 10 boxes of crackers, and a gallon of prune
juice". the Gay goes "will this cure it". the Doctor Replies "Hell no,
but it will show you what your ass is for".
---
What AIDS Means
Adios
Infected
Dick
Sucker
---
1. If you are over thirty and you have a washboard stomach, you are
gay. It means you haven't sucked back enough beer with the boys and
have spent the rest of your free time doing sit-ups, aerobics, and
doing the Oprah diet.

2. If you have a cat, you are a Flaaaaming homo. A cat is like a dog,
but gay - it grooms itself constantly but never scratches itself, has
a delicate touch except when it uses its nails, and whines to be fed.
And just think about how you call a dog... "Killer, come here! I said
get your ass over here, Killer!" Now think about how you call a
cat..."Bun-bun, come to daddy, Snookums!" Jeeezus, you're fit to be
framed, you're so gay.

3. If you suck on lollipops, Ring-Pops, baby pacifiers, or any such
nonsense, rest assured, you are a Gaylord. A straight man only sucks
on bar-b-que ribs, crab claws, raw oysters, crawfish guts, pickled
pigs feet, or tits. Anything else and you are in training to suck El
Dicko and undeniably a fag.

4. If you refuse to take a dump in a public bathroom or piss in a
Parking lot, you crave a deep homosexual relationship. A man's world
is his bathroom; he defecates and urinates where he pleases.

5. If you drink decaf coffee with skim milk, you like a high hard one
in the poop chute. Coffee is to be hard strong, black, and full aroma.
A straight man will never be heard ordering a "Decaf Cafe Latte with
Skim milk" and he will never, ever know what artificial sweetener
tastes like. If you've had NutraSweet in your mouth, you've had a man
there, too.

6. If you know more than six names of colors or four different types
of dessert, you might as well be handing out free passes to your ass.
A real man doesn't have memory space in his brain to remember all of
that crap as well as all the names of all the players in the Major
league, NFL, NHL, college ball, PGA and NASCAR. If you can pick out
chartreuse or you Know what a "fressier" is you're gay. And if you can
name ANY type of textile other than denim, you are faggadocious.

7. If you drive with both hands on the wheel, forget it, you're dying
to tune a meat whistle. A man only puts both hands on the wheel to
honk at a slow-ass driver or to cut the punk off. The rest of the time
he needs that hand to change the radio station, eat a hamburger, hold
his beer, or play with his honey in the passenger seat.

8. If you enjoy romantic comedies or French films, mon-frere, vous le
Gay, oui? The only time it is acceptable to watch one of those is with
a woman who knows how to reward her man. Watching any of the above
films by yourself or with another man is likely to result in SHC
(spontaneous homosexual combustion), which is what happens to fags
when they Flame out too.

---
A man and his son were talking about sex. The son asked his father,
"dad, what does a pussy look like?"
The dad asked him, "before or after sex?"
"Ummmm, before sex", the kid replied.
The dad said, "have you ever seen a beautiful red rose with soft red
petals?"
"Yeah" said the son.
"Well, what about after sex?" said the son.
His dad replied, "have you ever seen a bulldog eating mayonnaise"!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
No Apologies
by Newt Gingrich

Dear Fellow Conservative,

President Obama's apologies keep getting more outrageous and more
destructive.

They started in the summer of 2008, before he was even elected
president. Then-Senator Obama travelled to Berlin to introduce himself
as "a citizen of the world," and said, "I know my country has not
perfected itself…We've made our share of mistakes, and there are times
when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best
intentions."

Next came the Apology Tour of 2009, when President Obama travelled to
France to apologize for our "failure to appreciate Europe's leading
role in the world," saying "America has shown arrogance and been
dismissive, even derisive." (It's hard to know where to begin with
that one.)

He told the Turkish Parliament that "the United States is still
working through some of our own darker periods in our history."

He apologized to Central and South America for the United States
having "at times been disengaged and…having sought to dictate on our
terms."

In Cairo, he explained American actions after the Sept. 11 Attacks by
saying, "The fear and anger that it provoked was understandable, but
in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our ideals," and said
tensions between the U.S. and Muslim world were due in part to "a cold
war in which Muslim-majority countries were often treated as proxies
without regard to their own aspirations."

An illegally leaked diplomatic cable from Japan to the U.S. even seems
to suggest President Obama wanted to visit Hiroshima to apologize for
the atomic bombing during World War II, until Japan nixed the idea.

For all this apologizing the president was rewarded with a Nobel Peace
Prize, but his actions weakened the United States diplomatically and
made America less secure.

As damaging as President Obama's compulsion to apologize has been,
however, it was not until last week that we saw its true potential to
put American lives and military objectives at risk. By apologizing
unnecessarily to Afghan President Hamid Karzai for the inadvertent
burning by U.S. forces of Korans which had been confiscated from
imprisoned extremists, the president made the situation in Afghanistan
even worse.


Apparently the prisoners were writing in the books—and the books were
inadvertently burned with the military's trash outside Bagram Air
Base, where they were spotted during the incineration process by local
Afghans.

The violence that has erupted in Afghanistan in response to this
mishap has been completely disproportionate. Riots and protests across
the country have resulted in more than 30 people killed and hundreds
injured. At least four Americans have died in targeted attacks since
the crisis began. In one incident, an Afghan official apparently
murdered his counterparts in the U.S. military, inside a base.

Instead of the United States treating this issue as it was—an
accident, not reflective of any American policy or attitude—our
leaders behaved as though the protests were based on a legitimate
grievance. Afghanistan received apologies from "Afghanistan commander
Gen. John Allen, the White House, NATO's International Security
Assistance Force and other Pentagon officials," as Fox News reported.

The United States apologized for this accidental disposal even though
the military intentionally burned a significant number of Bibles in
2009 that had been sent unsolicited from an American church, on the
fear that "if they did get out, it could be perceived by Afghans that
the U.S. government or the U.S. military was trying to convert
Muslim." Clearly there's no endemic lack of sensitivity in the
military leadership.

Yet finally, on Thursday, President Obama apparently could resist no
longer. He wrote President Karzai a letter in which he expressed his
"deep regret," offered his "sincere apologies," and promised to "take
appropriate steps to avoid any recurrence, to include holding
accountable those responsible."

Tens of thousands of American men and women are in Afghanistan
fighting to maintain security and prop up President Karzai's
government. Thousands of American and coalition troops have died. Four
have been killed as a result of the protests. And President Obama is
promising to "hold accountable those responsible" for the
unintentional burning of a few books prisoners were themselves
desecrating to pass messages.

The president's letter is outrageous, and he first owes an apology to
the men and women in uniform for his failure as commander-in-chief to
defend their honor. What's worse, he may have made their jobs even
more dangerous. By apologizing he inflamed the sense that Afghans had
been wronged and gave anti-American forces there the message that
their violent, senseless protests were achieving something. It might
come as a surprise to the president, but not all of his apologies win
people over. Most of the time, they just make America look weak.

There's no doubt that President Obama has a lot to apologize for. But
before he continues diminishing the United States on the world stage,
he should start by apologizing to the American people.

Your Friend,
q
Newt

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

0
From Lisa


Surely you've heard of the "Homosexual Agenda" over the years. Yet no one
has actually seen the Agenda ...until now. After months of undercover work,
I have been able to obtain a copy of the actual Homosexual Agenda directly
from the Head Homosexual!

6:00 am - Gym
8:00 am - Breakfast (oatmeal and egg whites)
9:00 am - Hair appointment
10:00 am - Shopping
12:00 PM - Brunch

2:00 PM
1) Assume complete control of the U.S. Federal, State and Local
Governments as well as all other national governments
2) Recruit all straight youngsters to our debauched lifestyle
3) Destroy all healthy heterosexual marriages
4) Replace all school counselors in grades K-12 with agents of Colombian
and Jamaican drug cartels
5) Establish planetary chain of "homo breeding gulags" where
over-medicated imprisoned straight women are turned into artificially
impregnated baby
factories to produce prepubescent love slaves for our devotedly pederastic
gay leadership
6) bulldoze all houses of worship, and
7) Secure total control of the Internet and all mass media for the
exclusive use of child pornographers.
2:30 PM - Get forty winks of beauty rest to prevent facial wrinkles from
stress of world conquest

4:00 PM - Cocktails
6:00 PM - Light Dinner (soup, salad, Chardonnay)
8:00 PM - Theater
11:00 PM - Bed du jour


HR

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bethanie Gordon
Date: Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Subject: [The_Fair_Forum] Democrats grow confident of House win
To: The_Fair_Forum@yahoogroups.com


 

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/8491b776-6235-11e1-872e-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=published_links/rss/world_us/feed//product#axzz1nnWCzx6q

February 28, 2012 7:18 pm

Democrats grow confident of House win

By James Politi in Washington

Democrats say they are optimistic that they can regain control of the House of Representatives in the November election, an outcome that would mark a sharp reversal from the thumping defeat dealt to the party in 2010.

"We've gone from a gale force wind against us to a sustained breeze at our backs," said Steve Israel, the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, on Tuesday.

Democrats would need to capture 25 seats to take back the House from the Republicans who swept into power in the midterm elections on a wave of Tea Party anger at President Barack Obama. If that were to happen, it would mark the latest in rapid succession of historical political realignments in the House – including the Democratic triumphs of 2006 and 2008.

Most political analysts see Democrats gaining seats – probably between five and 10 – but falling short of recapturing the majority. But Mr Israel says he can envisage a 21-seat gain, putting Democrats "in range" of the target. "I would sign an affidavit that it's going to be razor close," he says.

While most of the attention has been on the contest to determine the Republican presidential nominee, the Congressional elections will be crucial in shaping the outcome of the huge fiscal decisions facing the US after November.

Among the questions facing the Congress will be how to handle the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts, whether to continue payroll tax relief and how to deal with billions in automatic spending cuts in defence and domestic programmes that are scheduled to begin next year. At the same time, lawmakers will probably need to raise the debt ceiling.

The growing confidence in the Democratic party is partly a result of the improving fortunes of Mr Obama, whose approval ratings have risen in recent months on the back of a better economy and the unsettled Republican race.

Mr Israel says Americans are also experiencing a form of "buyer's remorse" against Republicans, blaming them for the repeated impasses on fiscal policy, from the April standoff on a government shutdown, to the debt ceiling crisis in August, to the payroll tax cut extension fight in December.

The Democratic strategy now is to target those Republicans – some of them Tea Party favourites such as Allen West of Florida, Joe Walsh of Illinois and Chip Cravaack of Minnesota – who won in 2010 in mixed or even Democratic-leaning districts, and are now facing the prospect of a shortlived career on Capitol Hill.

But analysts say the odds of a Democratic takeover of the House remain long. "The last three elections were wave elections. This is going to be more of a whirlpool," says David Wasserman, of the Cook Political Report in Washington. "There are vulnerabilities on both sides" he says.

Paul Lindsay, communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee, dismissed Mr Israel's claims.

"Returning Nancy Pelosi to the Speaker's chair may be a dream for Steve Israel, but Americans have no interest in rewarding Washington Democrats who continue to inflict damage on an already-fragile economy," he says.

So far, Democrats have an advantage over Republicans in fundraising, with the DCCC raking in $67m in this election cycle, while its Republican counterpart bringing in $59m, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. But the flood of outside money – the super political action committee funds – that are dominating US political campaigns, is a big wild card, and could well tilt the financial balance in Republican favour.

The US Chamber of Commerce, the biggest lobbying group for corporate America, is also weighing in with advertising campaigns mostly to benefit their Republican allies.

"We're engaging earlier and more aggressively than ever to educate constituents about which leaders recognise the role free enterprise plays in leading our economic recovery," said Tom Donohue, Chamber president, this month.

If Democrats were to win back the House, it could serve to offset the possibility that Republicans might gain the majority in the Senate, where they only need a net win of four seats to ensure control and are benefiting from the retirement of many Democratic senators in swing states.

Such a "swap" of control of the two chambers of Congress would be unique in post-Civil War US political history, says Kyle Kondik, of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. But Mr Kondik wouldn't rule it out: "I can definitely see Democrats picking up seats in the House – Republicans are at a high water mark. But it might not get them the majority."

 

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group
.....the forum for free & fair debate, Everyone welcome. Hate Obama's health care plan, tell us!
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=23857963/grpspId=1705291755/msgId=55778/stime=1330540985/nc1=5758219/nc2=4025291/nc3=3848614>
__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Goodbye, First Amendment: 'Trespass Bill' will make protest illegal


Federal ?Trespass Bill? will make protest illegal
http://rt.com/usa/news/348-act-tresspass-buildings-437/
Basically a federal law to make it a felony to protest any place too
close to a federal politician, even if you didn?t know they were going
to be or near the building or other facility!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

 
Where did all the wealth go?
 
Haven't you been wondering: how can everyone in the civilized world go broke at the some time,
and no one else has gotten super rich? We're talking $15 trillion! It boggles the mind.
 
While I can't vouch for the veracity of the below reports, I feel they are too important to withhold.
Besides, it's the first explanation of the world's missing wealth that makes any sense.
 
 

Missing Foundations
by Linh Dinh
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/02/26-1

 
 


The Republican Establishment are concerned that conservatives, i.e. the TEA Party, will not support them or the RINOs come Nov. They argue that any of them would be better than their Democrat opponent.

 
 
Too bad they didn't think of that when they withheld support for Sharron Angle, Joe Miller, Christine O'Donnell, Meg Whitman and Carlie Fiorina.


The GOP could've had a majority in the Senate at the very least.

 



  


____________________________________________________________consumerproducts.com

Recent Activity:
Visit our main page!!
http://www.rumormillnews.com/

Come join the FUN!
CGI - Common Grounds Independent Media 
Everyone can post!!
RMN READER'S Forum -
http://www.rayelan.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi
.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

 

BO has slashes the value of a dollar in half in only three years.
Let's give him five more; a buck will become worthless. Then
DC can confiscate all your Gold; again.
We forget FDR did that.

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0
Good Morning Members,
 
Google is having "issues"  with their search engines, and this is somehow affecting the Groups and G-Mail services.  If you are having trouble loading the pages from the Group's message board,  we are aware of the problem(s)......We feel your pain!
 
It's our experience that these problems usually clear themselves up in a relatively short period of time.   "Relative"  being the operative word here.  If you are experiencing problems with viewing the web pages from the Group,  hitting your "Re-Load"  button on your browser may be of benefit;  but otherwise,  there's not much we can do, other than to suffer through!  Hopefully the problem(s) will be corrected in the next 24 hours or so.
 
Thanks for your understanding and patience!
 
KeithInTampa

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Bipartisan House Bill Looks to Strip Eminent Domain Powers from Local, State Governments

by Scotty Starnes

I'm beyond shocked. The House of Representatives is actually fighting for the people it represents. This is a bipartisan bill that looks to strip eminent domain powers from local and state governments in order to protect property rights of American citizens.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House sought Tuesday to undercut a 2005 Supreme Court ruling that gives state and local governments eminent domain authority to seize private property for economic development projects.

Sponsors of the bill, which passed by a voice vote, said it was needed because the 5-4 high court ruling skewed constitutional intentions that eminent domain apply only to land for public use projects.

That ruling, said bill cosponsor Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., justified "the government's taking of private property and giving it to a private business for use in the interest of creating a more lucrative tax base." As a result, he said, the "government's power of eminent domain has become almost limitless, providing citizens with few means to protect their property."

His legislation would withhold for two years all federal development aid to states or locales that take private property for economic development. It also bars the federal government from using eminent domain for economic development purposes and gives private property owners the right to take legal action if provisions of the legislation are violated.

Sensenbrenner, a conservative, was joined in sponsoring the legislation by Rep. Maxine Waters of California, a liberal Democrat and senior member of the Congressional Black Caucus. She said that economic development projects have "all too often been used by powerful interest groups to acquire land at the expense of the poor and politically weak."

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/02/29/bipartisan-house-bill-looks-to-strip-eminent-domain-powers-from-local-state-governments/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0



New post on Fellowship of the Minds

Good/bad Snowe news

by Dr. Eowyn

The good news is that RINO Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), blaming the "increasing polarization in Washington," surprised every one when she announced today she will not seek reëlection.

The bad news is that, as The Washington Post puts it, "Snowe's retirement represents a major setback for the GOP's efforts to regain a majority in the Senate. As a moderate Republican, she may be the party's only hope to hold a seat in the strongly blue state."

However, maybe Maine isn't that blue after all since a Republican, Paul LePage, was elected governor in 2010.

~Eowyn

Dr. Eowyn | February 28, 2012 at 6:29 pm | Tags: Olympia Snowe | Categories: 2012 Election, Republican Party, United States | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-cMP

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/goodbad-snowe-news/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.