• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0
[[ Note:  address corrected.  ]]








 

An amazing web site. Someone gave a lot of time and effort to create it. 

Honor the names of the Fallen by passing this on.... 

 

 

Very sobering.  

A virtual wall of all those lost during the Vietnam War with bio's and other information on our lost heroes. 

 

Dedicated to those who served in Vietnam and sacrificed their lives for our country. 

 

http://www.virtualwall.org/iStates.htm

 

Click on a state, scroll down to the city then click on their names to see photos, bio and medals.

 






--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0





Geotagging poses security risks
March 7, 2012
http://www.army.mil/article/75165/Geotagging_poses_security_risks/
By       Cheryl Rodewig

Photos from smartphones are geotagged even when the user is unaware.
Smartphone users can adjust their privacy settings to limit who can view
their geotagged locations.

FORT BENNING, Ga. (March 7, 2012) -- "Is a badge on Foursquare worth your
life?"

The question was posed by Brittany Brown, social media manager of the Online
and Social Media Division at the Office of the Chief of Public Affairs. It
may sound outlandish, but in the age of social geotagging, it can be a
reality.

There are a number of location-based social media applications and
platforms, including Foursquare, Gowalla, SCVNGR, Shopkick, Loopt and Whrrl,
currently on the market. They use GPS features, typically in the user's
phone, to publish the person's location and offer rewards in the form of
discounts, badges or points to encourage frequent check-ins.

Security risks for the military:

A deployed service member's situational awareness includes the world of
social media. If a Soldier uploads a photo taken on his or her smartphone to
Facebook, they could broadcast the exact location of their unit, said Steve
Warren, deputy G2 for the Maneuver Center of Excellence, or MCoE.

"Today, in pretty much every single smartphone, there is built-in GPS,"
Warren said. "For every picture you take with that phone, it will
automatically embed the latitude and longitude within the photograph."

Someone with the right software and the wrong motivation could download the
photo and extract the coordinates from the metadata.

Warren cited a real-world example from 2007. When a new fleet of helicopters
arrived with an aviation unit at a base in Iraq, some Soldiers took pictures
on the flightline, he said. From the photos that were uploaded to the
Internet, the enemy was able to determine the exact location of the
helicopters inside the compound and conduct a mortar attack, destroying four
of the AH-64 Apaches.

Staff Sgt. Dale Sweetnam, of the Online and Social Media Division, said
geotagging is of particular concern for deployed Soldiers and those in
transit to a mission.

"Ideally, Soldiers should always be aware of the dangers associated with
geotagging regardless of where they are," he explained.

General hazards for family members:

While especially relevant for those in the military, cautions about
geotagging extend to anyone who uses that feature.

Facebook is in the process of rolling out Timeline, a new layout that
includes a map tab of all the locations a user has tagged.

"Timeline presents some unique security challenges for users who tag
location to posts," Sweetnam said.

"Some of those individuals have hundreds of 'friends' they may never have
actually met in person, he explained. "By looking at someone's map tab on
Facebook, you can see everywhere they've tagged a location. You can see the
restaurants they frequent, the gym they go to everyday, even the street they
live on if they're tagging photos of their home. Honestly, it's pretty scary
how much an acquaintance that becomes a Facebook 'friend' can find out about
your routines and habits if you're always tagging location to your posts."

Most of the applications let people limit who can see their check-ins to
friends or friends of friends.

"A good rule of thumb when using location-based social networking
applications is do not become friends with someone if you haven't met them
in person," Sweetnam said. "Make sure you're careful about who you let into
your social media circle."

Even if there is nothing classified about an individual's location, a series
of locations posted online over the course of a month can create a pattern
that criminals can use.

"We live in a different world now," Warren said.

"If someone were going to get a hold of your phone, they could figure out a
lot about who you are. It's like a beacon that's always out there
communicating with towers and plotting your moves on a computer somewhere.
Literally, if you don't turn off that feature on your phone people are going
to be able to recreate your whole day."

Ways to stay safe:

"In operations security, we talk about the adversary," said Kent Grosshans,
MCoE OPSEC officer. "The adversary could be a hacker, could be terrorists,
could be criminals; someone who has an intent to cause harm. The adversary
picks up on pieces of information to put the whole puzzle together."

Grosshans suggests disabling the geotagging feature on your phone and
checking your security settings to see who you're sharing check-ins with.

"If your husband's deployed and you go ahead and start posting all these
pictures that are geotagged, now not only does an individual know your
husband's deployed and he's not at home, but they know where your house is,"
he said.

Ultimately, it's about weighing the risks.

"Do you really want everyone to know the exact location of your home or your
children's school?" Sweetnam said. "Before adding a location to a photo,
Soldiers really need to step back and ask themselves, 'Who really needs to
know this location information?'"

Grosshans said it's as important to Soldiers as to family members.

"Be conscious of what information you're putting out there," he said. "Don't
share information with strangers. Once it's out there, it's out there.
There's no pulling it back."

==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.



















--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Bare Naked Islam

Palestinian women aren't the only Muslim lard asses in the region

by barenakedislam

BNI has shown that Palestinian women have the third highest obesity rate in the world. Apparently, 11 out of 13 of the countries with the highest female obesity rates are also Muslim countries, but at least they aren't begging the world for food as the Palestinians are.

Obesity kills an average 20,000 people every year in Saudi Arabia, where nearly 70 per cent of the population are suffering from overweight, a Saudi medical expert has said.

EMIRATES  Women in Gulf oil producers are suffering from obesity but they conceal their fat bodies under their traditional flowing black abayas and burqas, medical experts have said.

A surge in the rate of obesity in the Gulf, which has one of the highest per capita incomes in the world, has given rise to a black market for slimming medicines, some of which are only exploiting people, they said.

Speaking at a medical conference in the western Saudi Red Sea port of Jeddah on Tuesday, they also dismissed what they dubbed as "myths" that water and rice could cause fatness and that tight belt could cause slimness.

"The Gulf society is suffering from a rise in obesity, particularly in women, a problem that is partly disguised by the traditional black female over-garment worn in the Gulf….the abaya serves to hide the extent of obesity in Gulf women. In the same way, the male dishdasha (garment) also hides men's bellies," said Dr. Abdul Rahman Musaiqir, head of the Arab Center for Nutrition at Bahrain University.

In a paper presented at the two-day conference on nutrition in the Gulf, he warned against what he described as erroneous information in the media."

"All these have led people to try out incorrect methods to lose weight, and among the most popular myths in Gulf society are that eating rice and drinking water with meals increase belly size, grapefruit helps reduce fat, strapping up your belly reduces fat, sweating reduces fat, skipping breakfast helps weight loss, and that saunas help burn fat," he said.

He added that other beliefs persist, such as that walking does not help reduce fat levels and that if excessive weight is hereditary nothing can be done about it.

Another specialist said the rise in obesity rates in the Gulf had created a "black market" for medicines and that trade was flourishing in herbs of unknown origin that "exploit people of limited medical knowledge."

"A lot of people have started turning to alternative medicine and holistic medicine," said Dr. Abdullah Al-Baddah from the Saudi National Center for Alternative Medicine.

"There are also other alternative complementary forms of medical treatment currently used to tackle obesity such as acupuncture, hypnotism, medicinal herbs and energy treatment, and we should make people aware of which practices are beneficial and which are not."

In its report about the conference on Wednesday, the Saudi Okaz newspaper cited data by the World Health Organization showing Saudi Arabia has one of the largest rates of obesity at around 35.6 per cent, the third behind the tiny Pacific Island nations of Nauru at 78.5 per cent and Tonga at 56 per cent.

"Obesity is associated with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, gallbladder diseases and certain types of cancer," the paper said, quoting Dr. Raja'a Al-Raddadi, a community medicine consultant and head of the research and studies department at the Jeddah Health Directorate.

Al-Raddadi said the prevalence of obesity in the Kingdom increased from 22.1 per cent in the early 1990s to 35.6 per cent in 2005. "The growing epidemic of obesity can be explained by the rapid changes in dietary patterns and physical inactivity especially among women and girls."(And some young boys) Traditional diets rich in grains, fiber, fruits and vegetables have been replaced with meals high in fats, sugar and sodium, she said.

"Saudis, especially females, also spend more time watching television and less time on physical activities. Reversing these trends requires drastic changes in individual behavior and the elimination of societal barriers to healthy lifestyle choices through some preventive health programs," she added.

barenakedislam | March 12, 2012 at 5:31 pm | Categories: Women | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-G0E

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.com/2012/03/12/palestinian-women-arent-the-only-muslim-lard-asses-in-the-region/




--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

"Of course, the most important argument for the legalization of prostitution services is that such prohibitions violate one's most basic and inherent rights. Prostitution is the voluntary sale (or rental) of a labor service. Individuals own their own bodies and their own labor services and have the absolute right to decide how those labor services should be used. As long as the prostitution transaction is voluntary, there is no justification for governmental interference. Indeed, such interference constitutes an infringement of the privacy and personal liberty of the individuals involved."

The Case for Legalized Prostitution
by Paul Armentano, December 1993

Prostitution may be the world's oldest profession, and laws prohibiting prostitution may well be the oldest example of government regulation and government (sex) discrimination. In a free society, however, all such laws are inappropriate because they violate the basic rights and liberties of the individuals involved.

Recent research indicates that over one million women in the United States earn their living by full-time prostitution. Furthermore, roughly one in every six American men has been a willing client of a prostitute within the past five years. Even more interesting and alarming is the fact that engaging in sex with a prostitute is now the third most common way for an American male to contract the AIDS virus.

Ironically perhaps, the rising threat of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases has become one of the most compelling arguments for the complete legalization of prostitution. According to current evidence, roughly half of the street prostitutes in Washington, D.C., and New York City are HIV-positive. In Newark, New Jersey, the estimate is that close to 60% of all prostitutes carry the AIDS virus. Yet, in the relatively "free market" of Nevada, where prostitution is legal, not one (as of 1989) of the state-licensed prostitutes has ever tested positive for AIDS.

It is true that Nevada's licensed bordellos require monthly blood tests, but such precautions would likely occur in the absence of state regulation. The reason is economic: the bordellos compete with each other, and the suppliers have strong incentives to ensure that the "service" that their customers receive is safe. Clearly, the spread of AIDS would be reduced by the decriminalization of prostitution services.

Furthermore, like the all-too-publicized war on drugs, the war on prostitution is yet another battle being waged with tax dollars rather than common sense. Let's look at the price tag for a moment. It is estimated that one in every ten police officers works on vice-related activities. Currently, it is assumed that as much as one-half of a typical urban city's prison female population are prostitutes. In fact, the city of Los Angeles alone spends close to 100 million dollars annually dealing with illegal prostitution. The real cost, of course, is that these public resources could have been used to protect law-abiding citizens from real criminals.

And sadly, also like the war on drugs, the war on prostitution is futile and forever doomed to fail. There is no effective way to close down a market between willing buyers and sellers. At best, stringent local harassment may affect where prostitutes work, but it will never stop them altogether. According to a study done by the Rand Corporation, for instance, the city of Los Angeles' policy of "shooing away streetwalkers has done nothing except push them across the city's boundaries."

Of course, the most important argument for the legalization of prostitution services is that such prohibitions violate one's most basic and inherent rights. Prostitution is the voluntary sale (or rental) of a labor service. Individuals own their own bodies and their own labor services and have the absolute right to decide how those labor services should be used. As long as the prostitution transaction is voluntary, there is no justification for governmental interference. Indeed, such interference constitutes an infringement of the privacy and personal liberty of the individuals involved.

The government does have a legitimate role to play in the prostitution market. As with all markets, it should ensure that all exchanges are truly voluntary. In short, it should protect individual rights to property, especially the right not to be coerced.

Currently, since prostitution is illegal outside of Nevada, most prostitutes are in a "no-man's-land" as far as physical protection is concerned. They are often beaten and brutalized, with no real legal recourse. In a free market for prostitution services, suppliers of labor services that are physically harmed would have the same rights to police protection and to legal recourse as the rest of us.

The moral and economic case for the legalization of prostitution is overwhelming. Government prohibition and regulation blatantly violate the rights of the individual and are economically expensive. Therefore, America's views and strategies on the topic of prostitution must undergo an immediate and radical change. The time has come to abandon the nation's archaic attempts to legislate personal morality. The time has come to face up to the facts and to implement the only policy that can truly make a positive difference. The time has come for the legalization of prostitution.

http://www.fff.org/freedom/1293e.asp

0

Daylight Saving Time and Republicans
Posted by Laurence Vance on March 12, 2012 07:06 AM

Hey Republicans, when you take control of the Congress and the White House like you say you are going to do in the 2012 election, how about actually doing something important like eliminating Daylight Saving Time -- a relic of the world wars. Especially since you Republicans extended it in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. House Republicans voted 200-31 in favor of the bill. (Ron Paul voted no.) Senate Republicans voted 48-6 in favor of the bill. It is the Energy Policy Act of 2005 that made possible the Solyndra debacle. Thanks Jim DeMint. Should the U.S. even have an energy policy? I argue no here.
0

# How do they serve drinks on Italian cruise ships? -

On the rocks

# What vegetables do you get with dinner on Italian cruise ships? - Leeks

# What's the fastest way to get off an Italian cruise ship? - Follow the captain

# When the captain of the ill fated Costa Concordia was asked if he knew where he was going he replied "off course."

# So the captain of the Costa Concordia will soon be in the dock. That's more than can be said for his ship.

# The captain says he is not guilty of manslaughter. He has witnesses to prove he was nowhere near the passengers who died.

# I like my women how I like my Italian Cruises. Wet, wrecked and ready to go down.

# The Costa Concordia is probably the most expensive thing to go down in Italy since Berlusconi's last hooker.

# What's the difference between the Italian economy and the stricken cruise liner Costa Concordia?

Nothing - The bottoms dropped out of both.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

For superior tax relief, abolish income and property taxes
March 11th, 2012
Murray Sabrin

Assembly Majority Leader Louis Greenwald calls for "a 20 percent property tax relief credit to homeowners of the first $10,000 in property taxes paid for all homeowners earning up to $250,000 per year" in a March 11 op-ed (The Record).  This plan would be phased in over years, according to Greenwald, "and it would be funded by asking New Jersey's millionaires to pay their fair share."  What is a millionaire's "fair share" in taxes?  Greenwald does not define, identify his redistributionist heist.

Mr. Greenwald's data show that this plan would provide greater middle class tax relief than Governor Christie's ten percent across the board income tax cut.   Great.  So let's have a bipartisan compromise, for now.  An income tax cut and a property tax cut.   Upper income residents will have more incentive to stay in New Jersey as their income taxes are cut, while keeping more of their money to invest in new business ventures or expand their current enterprises.  Middle income homeowners will get much needed tax relief and will not be forced out of their houses because of ever rising property taxes.  As Greenwald admits, "high property taxes are the cancer that is killing our state; it is the tax without a conscience. "

If the Majority Leader believes that the property tax is "without a conscience," then why does he not call for its abolition?  Shouldn't "unconscionable " things, acts be abolished immediately or ASAP because they violate our sensibilities?

The governor's tax plan and the Democrats' proposal should be the initial steps in abolishing both the income tax and property tax.  Both taxes have negative consequences for the economy and the people's income and wealth.  Taxes deprive all taxpayers with the means to provide for themselves and their families.   And one of the most important social and economic goals we all should strive for is financial independence­a virtue that everyone across the political spectrum should support.

Yet, politicians from both major political parties have embraced policies that make a substantial portion of the population dependent on government for basic necessities.  The entitlement and dependency culture must be phased out or we risk become a mega Greece.  In addition, the abolition of the state income tax and property taxes will mean that the people will be in charge of how much they want to pay for their children's education and local police services.

Without taxes to redistribute (the income tax) and property taxes to pay for municipal services, we would eliminate the cost of tax collections, a substantial savings at the state and local levels.  Then, all public services would have to be paid for by the people–voluntarily–according to the venerable law of supply and demand.

In the final analysis, lowering taxes requires lowering spending, an oversight that Mr. Greenwald blatantly ignores.  Raising taxes on millionaires will not solve New Jersey's unconscionable property taxes.  But abolishing income and property taxes means no more political posturing over taxes and gimmicks like rebate checks, no more redistribution of income and most importantly putting the people in charge of how much they want to spend on schools and local police.

http://murraysabrin.com/?p=1190

Exclusive: Why Can't You Smoke Pot? Because Lobbyists Are Getting Rich Off of the War on Drugs
Lee Fang
3.7.2012 at 11:00 AM

John Lovell is a lobbyist who makes a lot of money from making sure you can't smoke a joint. That's his job. He's a lobbyist for the police unions in Sacramento, and he is a driving force behind grabbing Federal dollars to shut down the California marijuana industry. I'll get to the evidence on this important story in a bit, but first, some context.

At some point in the distant past, the war on drugs might have been popular. But not anymore ­ the polling is clear, but beyond that, the last three Presidents have used illegal drugs. So why do we still put hundreds of thousands of people in steel cages for pot-related offenses? Well, there are many reasons, but one of them is, of course, money in politics. Corruption. Whatever you want to call it, it's why you can't smoke a joint without committing a crime, though of course you can ingest any number of pills or drinks completely within the law.

Some of the groups who want to keep the drug illegal are police unions that want more members to pay more dues. One of the primary sources for cash for more policing activities are Federal grants for penalizing illegal drug use, which help pay for overtime, additional police officers, and equipment for the force. That's what Lovell does, he gets those grants. He also fights against democratic mechanisms to legalize drugs.

In 2010, California considered Prop 19, a measure to legalize marijuana and tax it as alcohol. The proposition gained more votes than Meg Whitman, the former eBay executive and Republican gubernatorial nominee that year, but failed to pass. Opponents of the initiative ran ads, organized rallies, and spread conspiracy theories about billionaire George Soros to confuse voters.

Lovell managed the opposition campaign against Prop 19. He told Time Magazine that he was pushing against the initiative because, "the last thing we need is yet another mind-altering substance to be legalized."

But Republic Report reviewed lobbying contracts during the Prop 19 fight, and found that Lovell's firm was paid over $386,350 from a wide array of police unions, including the California Police Chiefs Association.

While Lovell may contend that he sincerely opposes the idea of marijuana legalization, he has constructed an entire business model predicated on pot prohibition.

Shortly after President Obama's stimulus program passed, Lovell went to work channeling the taxpayer money for California into drug war programs. According to documents Republic Report obtained from the Police Chiefs Association, Lovell helped local departments apply for drug war money from the Federal government. Here's a copy of one letter sent to a police department in Lassen County, California:

There is big money in marijuana prohibition. Lovell represented a police union in a bid to steer some $2.2 million dollars into a "Marijuana Suppression Program." In 2009 and 2010, California police unions sought a $7,537,389 chunk of Federal money for police to conduct a "Campaign Against Marijuana Planting" program.

The anti-marijuana money went directly into the paychecks of many officers. For example, police departments in Shasta, Siskiyou, and Tehama Counties formed a "North California Eradication Team" to receive $550,000 in grants that helped pay for overtime, a new officer, and flight operations:

The total amount awarded was $550,000, to be split between Shasta, Siskiyou and Tehama counties, which make up the Northern California Marijuana Eradication Team (NorCal-MET). Broken down in the agenda worksheet, the sheriff's office is expecting to spend $20,000 on flight operations, $94,895 for the full-time deputy's salary and benefits, $16,788 for the administration assistant salary and benefits and $29,983 to cover up to 666.29 hours of overtime.

The Federal anti-marijuana honeypot might have dried up if Prop 19 had passed. Legalizing marijuana would have generated billions in tax revenue for the state of California, while also reducing victimless crime prosecutions. But for lobbyists like Lovell, legalization was a direct assault on hundreds of thousands of dollars in potential fees for helping to solicit taxpayer money for his clients.

Police unions also contributed about $100,500 to a campaign account used to coordinate opposition to Prop 19. Of the $386,350 in fees paid by police unions to Lovell through 2009 and 2010, status update reports reviewed by Republic Report reveal that Lovell worked on a number of issues, from advocacy against Prop 19 to channeling grants and monitoring legislation.

Of course, police unions aren't the only interest group with a stake in maintaining broken drug laws. The beer industry, alcohol corporations, and prison guard unions also contributed money to help Lovell stop Prop 19. Howard Wooldridge, a retired police officer who now helps push for legalization as a citizen advocate, told Republic Report that drug company lobbyists also fight to keep marijuana illegal because they view pot as a low-cost form of competition.

http://www.republicreport.org/2012/exclusive-why-cant-you-smoke-pot-because-lobbyists-are-getting-rich-off-of-the-war-on-drugs/

Fox & CBS: GOP & Newt Moving Towards RP Foreign Policy
Submitted by lib on Sun, 03/11/2012 - 18:33

On the Sunday morning news circuit today, Newt and other republicans are moving towards RP's foreign policy. They want to get out of Afghanistan and don't believe being in the middle of these Middle Eastern countries is good and rather counterproductive.

They mentioned Ron Paul being against from the start what Republicans are now saying:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/03/11/gingrich_i...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/03/11/fox_news_s...

Bob Schieffer: Is it time for us to leave Afghanistan, Mr. Speaker?

Newt Gingrich: I think it is. I think that we have to reassess the entire region. I think the revelations about Pakistan having hidden Bin Laden for seven years in a military city near their national defense university and then hunting down not the people who were protecting Bin Laden but hunting down the people who were helping America. I think the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. When you look around the region, this is going to get much worse. That's why I've called for an American energy policy. We need to decide that we're going to produce our own oil and we're going to frankly be capable of surviving without having to define or dominate the region because I don't think we have the willpower or the capacity to do the things you'd have to do to fundamentally change the region.

Schieffer: You say it is time to leave. Do you mean just, let's leave, let's start leaving right now, not wait around?

Gingrich: I think we need to reconsider the whole region. We need to understand that our being in the middle of countries like Afghanistan is probably counterproductive. We're not prepared to be ruthless enough to force them to change, and yet we're clearly an alien presence. That was the real meaning of the reaction to the Koran burning. The fact is those Korans had been in fact defaced by Muslims who were prisoners. They had been abused by Muslims, not by Americans, and yet the instantaneous anti-foreigner sentiment is so deep that I think we need to recognize that we're walking on egg shells in places like Afghanistan, and after $20 billion in the last decade, it's pretty hard to argue that the Pakistanis are seriously our allies when they hide Bin Laden for seven years.

http://www.dailypaul.com/220098/foxcbs-newt-moving-towards-rp-foreign-policy

0
"What was initially encouraging about such questioning was the emphasis on individuals asking themselves: why have I allowed myself to become exploited by systems that do not serve my interests? ... with people asking themselves such questions as: "what attitudes and beliefs do I embrace that have led to my loss of control over my life?""
"In the cosmic sense of time, such inquiries generally lasted anywhere from five to ten seconds. Exploring how one's thinking has contributed to his or her downfall is particularly discomforting. When one becomes aware of the presence and influence of "dark side" energies within, the desire to rid oneself of such traits often leads to projecting them onto others, and then taking punitive actions against the designated scapegoat."

The Remnant Meets the White Rose
by Butler Shaffer

[In reference to feminist groups in Iraq]: They are very strong. Their approach is unique because they have no leaders. They do not have a head or branch offices. . . . This movement is made even stronger by not having leaders. If one or two people lead it, the organization would weaken if these leaders were arrested. Because there is no leader, it is very strong and not stoppable. -- Shirin Ebadi, 2003 Nobel Peace Prize recipient

The 1960s generated important questions whose pursuits were unfortunately abandoned in favor of a return to the status quo. From a variety of social perspectives, inquiries began to coalesce around the core issue: why are the lives of individuals dominated by an institutional order whose interests are enforced by state power? The civil rights movement, college free-speech campaigns, the resurgence of feminism and libertarian thought, and the anti-war demonstrations, were the more prominent expressions of this concern.

What was initially encouraging about such questioning was the emphasis on individuals asking themselves: why have I allowed myself to become exploited by systems that do not serve my interests? One saw this particularly in the feminist and libertarian movements, with people asking themselves such questions as: "what attitudes and beliefs do I embrace that have led to my loss of control over my life?"

In the cosmic sense of time, such inquiries generally lasted anywhere from five to ten seconds. Exploring how one's thinking has contributed to his or her downfall is particularly discomforting. When one becomes aware of the presence and influence of "dark side" energies within, the desire to rid oneself of such traits often leads to projecting them onto others, and then taking punitive actions against the designated scapegoat. It is this tendency -- which Carl Jung so thoughtfully analyzed -- that underlies Ron Paul's difficulties in explaining to the boobeoisie how American military aggression in the Middle East led to the 9/11 attacks. By repressing our own dark side ambitions for coercive power over others, it becomes easy for Boobus to fall for the line that others wish to dominate us; that those upon whom we trespass want to destroy us because of our virtues!

These habits have been within us for centuries, and provide the foundations for the divisions and conflicts upon which all political systems depend. Thus have Americans succumbed to the Civil War fiction that the inflated power of the state over people's lives was occasioned by the desire to end slavery. Likewise, many post-World War II Germans were convinced that "they were free" under Nazi rule.

In much the same way, the self-awareness explorations undertaken in the 1960s, and which spanned race, gender, political dispositions, and often age, quickly deteriorated into a reinforcement of the divisiveness and inter-group conflicts upon which state power depends. The civil rights and feminist movements began turning to the state to use its powers to rectify past wrongs; a split occurred among libertarians, with many continuing to insist upon a transformation of individual thought, while others turned to electoral politics and/or moving their organizations to the Washington, D.C. area which, to their minds, was the meaningful setting for change.

These efforts reflected rudimentary inquiries that too often lacked a central focus. For the same reason that recent converts to a political cause or religion become eager proselytizers -- out of a felt need to shore up their own thinking -- those who had a brief glimpse of a world better suited to their interests became impatient for change. This lack of focus was nowhere more evident than in the anti-war movement of the '60s and early '70s. Reactions to the Vietnam War -- responses that could be either increased or diminished by the intensity with which that war was conducted -- had little to do with exploring the conditions that generated peace. More recently, anti-war sentiments have taken on a partisan tone: wars conducted by Bill Clinton received scant attention, while those begun by the George W. Bush administration evoked vigorous reactions that continued until Barack Obama took over their management.

Our divisive, contradictory, and irrational thinking has been a major contributor to the demise of Western Civilization. Most of us have lost a principled center to our lives. We have conditioned our minds to look to institutions -- particularly the state, schools and universities, organized religions, the media -- for our identities and direction, a theme I explored in my Calculated Chaos book. We have, in other words, bought into Plato's pyramidal model of society run, from the top-down, by "philosopher kings."

In recent decades, we have experienced the fallacy of the idea that complex systems could be organized and managed by elites of "experts;" that social order could be mandated by the few, if only they enjoyed sufficient coercive powers to enforce their edicts. The failure of one group of authorities to accomplish such ends has generally led only to demands to replace this group with another, and rarely to a questioning of the model of formally-structured order itself.

But as the failures of collective thinking continue to pile up; as systems of centralized economic planning are outperformed by free markets; as political systems -- to which people looked for the protection of their lives, liberty, and property -- expose their savage, plunderous, inhumane foundations; as wars, looting, and police brutalities come to be seen as the raison d'etre of the state; and as other institutions were unable to make any principled responses that might rehabilitate the avowed purposes of governments, societal turbulence arose. Such qualities as respect for life, liberty, contractual obligations, and property; the inviolability of the individual; and the insistence upon voluntary as opposed to violent relationships among people, went into free-fall and were sucked into an existential black hole dominated by the collective energies that bring down civilizations.

Most Americans seem to recognize that something is amiss in a world that no longer meets their expectations. But lacking in what the late Joseph Campbell referred to as "invisible means of support," they remain rudderless regarding the direction to be taken. Like their 1960s' predecessors, their frustrations have led many of them into such cul-de-sacs as the Tea Party or the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations, efforts that allow the political establishment to marginalize and redirect their energies to reinforcing the status quo. Such appeasements are offered in the form of politicians who pick up the rhetoric of "peace" and "liberty" but continue advocating statist practices; and legislative or judicial inquiries into peripheral matters that do not challenge the sacred center of political interests.

There are, of course, many others who see through the gossamer fabric of promised change offered by a system that has no intention to change or to tolerate those who seek change. These are the men and women -- many of them quite young -- who see the sharp contrasts between existing institutional systems and the conditions that are necessary to life; whose minds can distinguish fantasy from realism. They know what others may unconsciously sense (but lack the courage to express), namely, that the entire institutionally-dominated social system is one intricately-connected racket, engaged in at the expense of their lives.

I have long been of the opinion that adults have a moral obligation to protect their children from tyranny. I have failed to meet that duty as to my children and grandchildren, but I am encouraged that so many of the next generation are aware of what my generation has ignored, namely, that peace and liberty are essential -- not simply convenient -- to their existence. While aged supporters of the old order continue to show up at political rallies on behalf of the dinosaurs who promise to remain faithful to the status quo, and who promise to increase the rain of death upon foreign nations, so many of the young are infusing their energies into the campaign of Ron Paul.

The boiling magma that bubbles beneath the earth's surface and periodically erupts as volcanic activity is part of the process by which the planet sustains and renews itself. By analogy, similar pressures have long been at work within human societies to keep social systems within parameters that sustain life. The collapse of the Soviet Union a quarter-century ago was one example of such dynamics. An earlier effort was undertaken in Germany in 1941, wherein several young men and women formed a group, known as the White Rose, to peacefully resist the system of National Socialism. The better-known members of this group, brother and sister Hans and Sophie Scholl, were medical students in Munich. They, and their White Rose associates, distributed anti-government leaflets, for which they were later arrested and charged with "treason" as "despicable criminals." They were quickly tried, convicted, and immediately beheaded for their "crimes." It is to the memory and spirit of such persons that my soon-to-be-published book, The Wizards of Ozymandias, is dedicated.

I call upon the history of such courageous and principled people who remind us that human civilization has always depended upon the kinds of values and practices with which our institutionalized world is at war. There is a life force beneath the turmoil of events that will continue to insist upon its primacy; an awareness of the interconnectedness of our individualities that is threatened by our collective madness. Such life-sustaining energies are always at risk of being co-opted by institutional interests and being channeled into the maintenance of establishment authority.

This life force finds expression in persons who understand what Albert Jay Nock identified as the underlying principles of "the humane life." Nock called such independent men and women "the Remnant" who, following the collapse of civilization, would help to "build up a new society" grounded in the "august order of nature." No purpose will be served in trying to locate such people, Nock tells us. They will seek those who share in their understanding that the restoration of civilization will not rest on slogans, propaganda, or political programs and posturing; but on principles that transcend fashion, and remain true no matter how many public opinion polls deny their relevance.

I have no idea how the 2012 presidential race will turn out. I do know that, unless Ron Paul should prevail, the outcome will make not one whit of a difference in lessening how the political structure will operate. Whatever the outcome of the elections, it is clear that the political establishment's chosen sock-puppet-in-chief will continue -- and, doubtlessly, expand upon -- the state power and violence that has been in place since 9/11. In the course of trying to solidify its weakened foundations, the state will waste no effort in trying to harness and redirect the energies of those who understand and oppose its threats to humanity. Great pressures -- as well as temptations -- will be offered to persuade critics to return to their assigned stalls; to content themselves -- in the words of Frank Chodorov -- with "cleaning up the whorehouse, while keeping the business intact."

If mankind fails to make a fundamental change in its thinking and behavior -- and quite soon -- we may be the first species to have engineered its own extinction. How will you and I respond to the opportunities and the necessity for contributing to the intellectual and spiritual transformation of our world? Most of the men and women of my generation will prove as disinterested in confronting this question as they were, decades ago, in failing to see the destructive path upon which institutionalism was taking us.

As is usually the case, the youth of the world -- those generally under the age of forty -- will be left with the task of cleaning up the collective mess that their parents and grandparents were disinterested in preventing. The young know that it is the fate of every Ponzi scheme -- whose logic underlies most government programs -- to reach a point where no additional succession of suckers can be generated to absorb the pyramiding costs from which predecessors will benefit. Like the denizens of Orwell's Animal Farm who finally recognized the cozy relationship between the ruling pigs and the human exploiters, our children are learning that the politically-directed institutional order wants neither more nor less than to dominate every facet of their lives; to reduce them to the status of organizational livestock.

To whom can the young look for self-liberating encouragement and insight? Certainly not to the kinds of adults who plaster their cars with bumper-stickers reading "support the troops" or "proud parents of a soldier." I have never understood the mindset of parents who failed in what is, perhaps, their highest moral duty: to protect their sons and daughters from harm or destruction brought on by others. How any human being can love the state more than they do their own child is beyond my capacities to explain.

There are middle-aged or older men and women who can help to inform and inspire these younger people. Ron Paul has done the most in this respect, serving as both an outlet for the expression of the deeply-held sentiments of millions, as well as a catalyst for a more fundamental understanding of the conditions necessary for human well-being. But others need mentioning: Lew Rockwell and the contributors to the Lewrockwell.com website; Justin Raimondo and contributors to Anti-war.com; readers of both websites who forward writings on to others; everyone associated with the Ludwig von Mises Institute; The Independent Institute; the Institute for Justice; and individuals from a variety of political and social perspectives, including Bob Higgs, Chris Hedges, Amy Goodman, Julian Assange, Robert Scheer, Tom Woods, Glenn Greenwald, Walter Block, John Pilger, along with others too numerous to list. Nor can we overlook those defenders of peace and liberty who are no longer living, such as Murray Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek, Ayn Rand, H.L. Mencken, Albert Jay Nock, and stand-up philosopher George Carlin.

As has always been true, however, the next generation will have no other source of energy with which to transcend the utterly insane world in which they find themselves, than to look deeply within their own minds and souls. Unlike the limited efforts of so many in the 1960s and 1970s, this generation has far more immediate costs at stake to be able to settle for partial or superficial alternatives. The political system will waste little time trying to seduce the younger generation into embracing some make-believe libertarian or "peaceful-warrior" politician as a substitute for the Ron Paul it could not bend to its will.

In the years to come, those devoted to preserving the kind of thinking and values upon which decent society depends, would do well to consider Nock's Remnant as a model. To move beyond this abstraction, I would suggest Sophie and Hans Scholl and the White Rose, as more vivid images. Consistent with the informal, decentralist processes by which men and women now organize with little or no formal organization (e.g., the Internet, flash mobs, Wikileaks, Anonymous, YouTube, Craigslist, e-Bay, Facebook, Occupy groups, etc.) a modern White Rose might be brought into existence. It might be formless in nature, with men and women coming together more in spirit than in body, and with a shared mindset that celebrates and defends life instead of institutions. It would have no corporate charter over which members would fight for control; no officers, organization charts, membership cards, or secret handshakes; no flags or logos; not even an official website.

As the French discovered in both Algeria and Vietnam; as the Soviets discovered in Afghanistan; and as Americans continue to learn in their efforts to control people on their home soil, resistance to tyranny is most effective when its energies are diffused among tens of thousands of people who insist upon their liberty. Shirin Ebadi's words at the start of this article remind us of a lesson applicable to all forms of social behavior: informal networks are far more effective than structured, top-down corporate systems in synthesizing the spontaneity and resiliency that so expresses the life process.

If we pay close attention to events in our world, we are reminded of the fallacy of the long-standing belief that "in unity there is strength." Formalized, structured systems foster strength for the organization only to the degree it promotes the weakness of its members. Centrally-organized behavior creates a jugular vein of vulnerability, a point which, when attacked, allows the attacker to control or destroy the entire group. The ease with which Adolf Hitler took over so many European nations by causing the surrender of their officials contrasts with the difficulties the French underground movement caused Hitler's armies. It also helps to explain how Switzerland has managed to stay free of wars for so many years.

There are no guarantees that informal, leaderless networks of people intent on maintaining their liberty will always prevail. Sophie and Hans Scholl did end up being murdered by German Bushobama role-models (Sophie at the age of twenty-one). A modern version of the White Rose could increase the opportunities for free minds to discover what it means to live in peace and liberty. Its adherents would enjoy not only independence and anonymity, but access to a myriad of ever-expanding technologies that promote the centrifugation of information and ideas. As F.A. Harper reminded us, "the man who knows what freedom means, will find a way to be free."

As the state continues to insist upon its vicious ways, and as the vision provided by the White Rose continues to inform seeking minds, individuals might draw further inspiration from the poem The Seedkeepers, written by a Palestinian whose name I do not know, but whose sentiments are to be found in Nock's Remnant:

Burn our Land.
Burn our dreams.
Pour acid on our songs.
Cover with sawdust the blood of our massacred people.
Muffle with your technology the screams of all that is
free, wild and indigenous.
Destroy our grass and soil.
Raze to the ground every farm and every village our
ancestors had built.
Every tree, every home, every book, every law and all
equity and harmony.
Flatten with your bombs every valley.
Erase with your edits our past, our literature, our
metaphor.
Denude the forest and the earth till no insect no bird
no word can find a place to hide.
Do that and more.
I do not fear your tyranny.
I do not despair ever.
For I guard a seed, a little seed, that I shall
safeguard and plant again.


http://lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer248.html
0

No Paul = No Vote in November
by Ron Holland

"I would also say of Ron Paul -- he doesn't need to win. In his view he is winning already. This is an ideological point he is making. But here's why it's electorally significant – a lot of people, I mean 41 percent in Virginia, only two people on the ballot, still a lot of people voted for Ron Paul. A lot of those voters are portable. They're not Republican -- they're not dedicated Republican voters."  -- Tucker Carlson, Editor, The Daily Caller

It is time for a groundswell of Ron Paul supporters to quietly, respectfully but firmly make their position clear to the mainstream media and the GOP establishment. Simply put, "No Paul on the ticket means no vote for the GOP in November".

The Ron Paul Campaign has the GOP establishment stuck between a rock and a hard place even though they have not won a single state in the primaries to date. Every Paul supporter knows the underhanded tactics used by the Republican leadership at the state and national level as well as the organized smear and news blackout campaign carried out by the mainstream media.


Making Nice For the November Election

As we move into the last months of the GOP presidential nomination campaign, most of the establishment media are now "making nice" with Ron Paul and his supporters. He actually gets questions during the debates, some press coverage and the other candidates seem friendly. The reason is simple. The Republican Party desperately needs the votes of Ron Paul supporters in order to win in November against Obama.

Obviously Virginia Heffernan didn't get the memo in her typical anti-Paul elitists drivel titled Ron Paul's Pointless Internet Presidency posted on Yahoo earlier in the week but now this is the exception rather than standard procedure for the press. The word has gone out to be nice and respectful to Ron Paul so they can get our votes in November.


Too Little To Late

The Republican establishment has obviously done its homework with focus groups, polling etc. and here is their situation. Although they have successfully held back the Ron Paul campaign to date from threatening to win the GOP presidential nomination, in the dirty tricks process they have ostracized the substantial Paul voting constituency even more from the GOP than before.

Paul supporters are far more than portable as suggested by Tucker Carlson, rather they are toxic toward the GOP elites and very few will now support any of the establishment candidates after the abusive treatment given to Ron Paul as well as the crude attacks against Paul supporters. I well understand these feelings of resentment, as I am a Ron Paul supporter. There is no way I will vote for either Romney, Santorum or Gingrich although I certainly prefer their fake rhetoric to the Obama propaganda. If Ron Paul isn't the Republican nominee for president, then the establishment nominee desperately needs the votes of his supporters in order to beat Obama in the fall general election.

The establishment knows the Gingrich and Santorum voters in the GOP Presidential primary will eventually vote for Mitt Romney in November if he wins the Republican presidential nomination at the GOP convention beginning on August 27th, 2012. They also know and fear that most Ron Paul supporters will not vote for the nominee and will likely stay away from the polls in droves thus hurting the other Republican candidates for the House and Senate as well for state and local elections. Basically 15% of the GOP primary voters will sit out the 2012 November election and this almost guarantees the re-election of Barack Obama.


I Don't Really Care If the Democrats or Republicans Win in November?

My answer is regardless of whether Romney or Obama wins the general election despite all the anti-Obama rhetoric by the Republican establishment, little will change on major issues. Romney's campaign promises are identical to all other presidential campaign promises, much to do about nothing. Neither Bush nor Obama kept their campaign promises and neither will Romney.


Course of Action

First, we redouble our efforts in voting and funding the Ron Paul Campaign up through the final primary and caucus.

Second, in editorials, articles or discussions with the press or GOP leadership always stress and emphasize your plans to stay at home on election day, if a Ron or Rand Paul is not on the ticket.

Third, at the Republican National Convention when the presidential nomination is handed to Romney assuming he wins, we continue to stress "NO PAUL = NO VOTE IN NOVEMBER".

Finally, then we wait at the convention for the personal phone call from Mitt Romney following private preliminary discussions where Rand Paul is asked to be the Vice Presidential candidate on a Romney/Paul ticket after assurances Ron Paul will be nominated for an appropriate cabinet level appointment such as Secretary of the Treasury or Defense.

Ron Paul deserves some family time off following the years of campaigning and educating the American people about liberty. He has done more to advance the cause of limited government, liberty and free-markets than any American since the time of the American Revolution.

Mitt Romney has spent the last 7 years running for President of the United States so obviously he really wants to win. Romney and his advisors must know without the 15% plus of GOP voters supporting Ron Paul who unlike Gingrich and Santorum will sit the election out, that he cannot defeat Barack Obama without our support. His only option is to put a "Paul" on the ticket.

Although a Vice President Rand Paul is a great tactical victory, this is only a battle in a long war for the restoration of liberty and legitimate Constitutional government to the United States.

When I was a young man in the military during the 1970's, I well remember the antiwar crowds shouting "Hell no, we won't go" in opposition to the Vietnam War. Today, 40 plus years later, I'm a grandfather and maybe older and wiser but still willing to more respectfully tell the same power elites running this country and both political parties, "Hell no, I won't go" again but this time it is to the polls in November unless there is a Paul on the ticket.

Will you join me?

http://lewrockwell.com/holland/holland60.1.html







 

An amazing web site. Someone gave a lot of time and effort to create it. 

Honor the names of the Fallen by passing this on.... 

 

 

Very sobering.  

A virtual wall of all those lost during the Vietnam War with bio's and other information on our lost heroes. 

 

Dedicated to those who served in Vietnam and sacrificed their lives for our country. 

 

http://www..virtualwall.org/iStates.htm

 

Click on a state, scroll down to the city then click on their names to see photos, bio and medals.

 






--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Bare Naked Islam

MUSLIM guide to public asslifting (aka disturbing the peace) on college campuses

by barenakedislam

God help any Christian who dares to try promoting public prayer on campus. They would shut him right down, saying it is offensive to Muslims.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKmJOElAkpU

barenakedislam | March 12, 2012 at 4:57 pm | Categories: Islam in America | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-G0y

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.com/2012/03/12/muslim-guide-to-public-asslifting-aka-disturbing-the-peace-on-college-campuses/




--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Bare Naked Islam

Anatomy of a rabid smear campaign against the NYPD initiated by terror-linked CAIR…..

by barenakedislam

And promoted by the useful idiots and Islamofascist apologists of the New York Times.

Act for America  New York Police Department Commissioner Ray Kelly has been under fire from Muslim Brotherhood Front Group CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations), and one of America's top media enablers of radical Islam—the New York Times

Kelly has been attacked for using the documentary film "The Third Jihad" in counterterrorism training. If you have not yet seen this film, you can view it below.

Now "The Third Jihad" is fighting back. This shot video is a powerful rebuttal to the smear campaign CAIR and the New York Times have waged against Commissioner Kelly. Wayne Kopping, the director of "The Third Jihad", responds to attempts by terror-linked groups to delegitimize the documentary which exposes the subversive activities of radical Islamic groups such as CAIR. As you will see in the video, the New York Times ran an editorial that clearly alters a quote from the film to fit its story line and discredit Commissioner Kelly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdBTuUH5AAA

Some Highlights from the New York Slimes Smear:

(H/T Family Security Matters)

  • The New York Times cites the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as a credible source, while continuing its policy of never mentioning that CAIR was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood, and operates as a Hamas support group.
  • NYT also suppressed the facts that CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator 2007 Holy Land Foundation conspiracy trial, which resulted in the FBI cutting off all formal contact with the group and that an FBI official has described CAIR as a "front for Hamas."
  • NYT primarily relies on two sources for comments: Zead Ramadan of CAIR-NY, and Faiza Patel, of the Brennan Center of Justice, but which the Timesdeliberately fails to mention that both of whom represent organizations that have repeatedly refused to condemn Hamas and other Islamic terrorist groups or have blamed the FBI for fabricating Islamic terror plots.
  • An IPT investigator videotaped Ramadan at a press event refusing to answer her questions as to whether Hamas is a terrorist organization.
  • The Times cites CAIR's Zead Ramadan as a legitimate source of criticism of the film but fails to report that Ramadan contributed $1,000 to Viva Palestina, an organization led by noted anti-Semite George Galloway, that supports Hamas financially and politically, in 2010.
  • Patel of the Brennan Center has long been a critic of law enforcement's attempts to counter terrorism, even denouncing the NYPD's operation that resulted in the arrest of accused lone-wolf jihadist Jose Pimentel, charged with plotting to bomb U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • The Times failed to report that their only two sources for their story--CAIR and the Brennan Center, who are made to seem independent and impartial are actual apologists for Islamic terrorist groups. In fact, the Times failed to report that the Brennan Center received CAIR's "Safe While Free" Award in 2009.
  • The Times failed to report one actual flaw in the film but based its demonization of the film based largely on emails it did not disclose that it received from CAIR, a Hamas front group.

 The Third Jihad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3BGwQr8xg4

barenakedislam | March 12, 2012 at 4:31 pm | Categories: CAIR Nazis | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-G0l

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.com/2012/03/12/anatomy-of-a-rabid-smear-campaign-against-the-nypd-initiated-by-terror-linked-cair/




--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.