• Feed RSS
There was an error in this gadget
0


New post on Fellowship of the Minds

Warning: Older Men Scam. Hehehehehe.

by Steve

Women often receive warnings about protecting themselves at the mall and in dark parking lots, etc. This is the first warning I have seen for men. I wanted to pass it on in case you haven't heard about it.
A 'heads up' for those men who may be regular customers at Lowe's, Home Depot, Costco, BJ's, and even Wal-Mart. This one caught me totally by surprise. Over the last month I became a victim of a clever scam while out shopping. Simply going out to get supplies has turned out to be quite traumatic. Don't be naive enough to think it couldn't happen to you or your friends.

Here's how the scam works:

Two nice-looking, college-aged girls will come over to your car or truck as you are packing your purchases into your vehicle. They both start wiping your windshield with a rag and Windex, with their breasts almost falling out of their skimpy T-shirts (It's impossible not to look). When you thank them and offer them a tip, they say 'No' but instead ask for a ride to McDonald's. You agree and they climb into the vehicle. On the way, they start undressing. Then one of them starts crawling all over you, while the other one steals your wallet.

I had my wallet stolen August 4th, 9th, 10th, twice on the 15th, 17th, 20th, 24th, & 29th. Also September 1st & 4th, twice on the 8th, 16th, 22nd, and very likely again this upcoming weekend.

So tell your friends to be careful. What a horrible way to take advantage of us older men. Warn your friends to be vigilant. Wal-Mart has wallets on sale for$2.99 each. I found even cheaper ones at the dollar store and bought them out in three of their stores.
Also, you never get to eat at McDonald's. I've already lost 11 pounds just running back and forth from Lowe's, to Home Depot, to Costco, Etc.

Please, send this on to all the older men that you know and warn them to be on the lookout for this scam. (The best times are just before lunch and around 4:30 in the afternoon)

~Steve~                                                H/T  I_Man

Steve | April 26, 2012 at 2:52 am | Tags: Confidence trick, Costco, Home Depot, Lowe, McDonald, Wal-Mart, Walmart, Windex | Categories: crime, Humor | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-dTR

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/warning-older-men-scam-hehehehehe/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

ATF Claims 70 Percent of Guns Found in Mexico Come From US

by Scotty Starnes

How many "found" guns came from the ATF's blatant gun trafficking scheme called "Fast and Furious?"

From The Hill:

Nearly 70 percent of all guns found in Mexico came from the U.S. over the past four years, according to data released by the federal government on Thursday.

As most know, the ATF is using these mythical numbers to push for stricter gun controls here in the US.

More than 68,000 of the 99,691 firearms that were recovered between 2007 and 2011, and submitted to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) for trace testing, were either made in the U.S. or legally brought into the U.S. at one point, according to the agency.

Both gun-rights supporters and opponents have used the ATF's numbers in years past to argue for their cause.

Gun-rights advocates say the numbers do not accurately reflect the true number of guns found in Mexico, which they argue is much higher. But instead, the ATF's data reflect only the number of guns that were submitted for traces. Some gun advocates in the U.S. have argued further that Democrats try to use the inflated numbers to make their case for stricter gun laws.

It's a proven fact. Not to mention that the US government sells firearms to the Mexican military...oh who happened to "misplace' 9,000 firearms. Under Obama, the US has increased sales of firearms to Mexico. This along with the Fast and Furious scheme which is being done to push for more gun controls.

But groups in favor of curbing illegal guns look at the ATF's numbers as an accurate reflection of the U.S.'s largely invisible role in the bloody drug violence that has plagued Mexico for the past five years and resulted in the killing of more than 47,000 people.

Yes, Mexico's corrupt government, terrible economy and violent drug cartels have no blame its all those 'evil' legally purchased US guns fault.

In 2011, the ATF recovered and traced about 20,000 guns that were found in Mexico. About half of those – 10,514 – were manufactured in the U.S., and nearly 4,000 of the traced guns had been previously brought into the U.S. legally, according to the ATF's numbers. About 3,600 of the guns found in 2011 were made outside of the U.S.

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/atf-claims-70-percent-of-guns-found-in-mexico-come-from-us/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


New post on Doctor Bulldog & Ronin

Friday Night Document Dump: Obama Overthrows Congress and Sends $192 Million to Terrorist Squatters in Gaza

by doctorbulldog

Unfreakin' believable!  It's commie crap like this which solidifies my resolve to oust this pompous, fascist, muzzie-sucking, elitist impostor---even if it means voting for a libtarded moron like r'Omni!!!:

Friday night news dump: Obama bypasses Congress, funds Palestinian Authority
ED MORRISSEY - HotAir.com

Isn't it funny what you can find out on Friday evening about what our executive branch does?  For instance, Agence France-Presse reported last night that Barack Obama bypassed Congress to send $192 million to the Palestinian Authority, claiming that national security required the US to put money into Mahmoud Abbas' pocket:

President Barack Obama has signed a waiver to remove curbs on funding to the Palestinian Authority, declaring the aid to be "important to the security interests of the United States."

A $192 million aid package was frozen by the US Congress after the Palestinians moved to gain statehood at the United Nations last September.

But in a memo sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, published by the White House, the president said it was appropriate to release funds to the authority, which administers the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

In signing the waiver, Obama instructed Clinton to inform Congress of the move, on the grounds that "waiving such prohibition is important to the national security interests of the United States."

Congress deliberately froze those funds, and not just because of the statehood demand through UNESCO.  Hamas, a terrorist organization, reconciled with Fatah and has rejoined the PA, which means we're putting almost $200 million into the hands of a terrorist organization.  The language of the Palestinian Accountability Act could not be clearer: "[N]o funds available to any United States Government department or agency … may be obligated or expended with respect to providing funds to the Palestinian Authority."  Obama literally waived that statutory language off yesterday afternoon.

CLICK HERE to continue reading over at Hot Air.

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/friday-night-document-dump-obama-overthrows-congress-and-sends-192-million-to-terrorist-squatters-in-gaza/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
0

 

An alternate perspective:
http://kochvcato.com/2012/04/26/anytime-anyone-says-anything-libertarian-spit-on-them/ 

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (4)
Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



 



CARTAGENA, Colombia (BHN) - Candid photos out of Columbia apparently show Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also engaging in inappropriate acts at the same brothel as members of President Obama's security detail.

"Yes, I'm sure it was Mrs. Clinton," an employee at "The Pley Club" confided. "She was very drunk, very loud, and smelled like a wet yak."

Press photos released earlier showed Mrs. Clinton drinking with companions at a local restaurant.

The White House has so far refused to comment on this story.

My comments: Holy Pope-on-a-rope! Some things cannot be unseen!

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mTyp4OVgbvY/T5rKynHtYdI/AAAAAAAAam0/o7-U6CXjpq8/s640/untitled.bmp



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Check out this video on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao0k9qDsOvs&feature=youtube_gdata_player


Sent from my iPad


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bruce major
Date: Saturday, April 28, 2012
Subject: Dan Savage discusses bible at High School Journalism convention
To: majors.bruce@gmail.com


Check out this video on YouTube:

Dan Savage discusses bible at High School Journalism convention


Sent from my iPad

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: GOProud
Date: Saturday, April 28, 2012
Subject: GOProud Condemns Dan Savage's Anti-Christian Tirade
To: Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com>


<http://www.goproud.org/view.image?id=777>
<http://www.goproud.org/view.image?id=780>

For Immediate Release
April 28, 2012

GOProud Condemns Dan Savage's Anti-Christian Tirade
Jimmy LaSalvia, GOProud Executive Director – "Dan Savage's outrageous anti-Christian tirade hurts – not helps – the fight for gay rights in this country."

(Washington, D.C.) – Today, GOProud – a national organization of gay and straight Americans seeking to promote freedom by supporting free markets, limited government, and a respect for individual rights, condemned a speech given by left wing gay activist Dan Savage. "Dan Savage's outrageous anti-Christian tirade hurts – not helps – the fight for gay rights in this country," said Jimmy LaSalvia, GOProud Executive Director. "There is nothing incompatible between being a Christian and believing that all people should be treated equally, and Dan Savage's attacks on Christianity only fuel those on the extremist fringe who oppose gay rights."

"Dan Savage should apologize for his comments and should apologize to the high school students in attendance who he called 'pansy-asses,'" continued LaSalvia. "It is ironic that someone whose claim to fame is fighting bullying would resort to bullying tactics in attacking high school students who were offended by his outrageous remarks."

"GOProud works with people of faith every single day – gay and straight. We believe strongly that people of faith should be treated with respect," concluded LaSalvia.

# # #

GOProud is a national organization of gay and straight Americans who seek to promote freedom by supporting free markets, limited government, and a respect for individual rights. We work on the federal level to build strong coalitions of conservative and libertarian activists, organizations and policy makers to advance our shared values and beliefs. 426 C St., NE, Washington, DC 20002. For more information visit our website www.goproud.org

***Dan Savage's comments can be seen here.***

Please help GOProud stand up to the intolerant Left!
Click here to make a contribution today!

<http://www.goproud.org/view.image?id=780>
<http://www.goproud.org/view.image?id=779>

privacy - unsubscribe

<http://www.goproud.org/view.image?id=778>
<http://www.goproud.org/smtp.mailopen?id=9083>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Take Action: Tuesday is May Day: Directory Occupy General Strike In
Over 125 Cities


May Day Directory: Occupy General Strike In Over 125 Cities



While American corporate media has focused on yet another stale
election between Wall Street-financed candidates, Occupy has been
organizing something extraordinary: the first truly nationwide General
Strike in U.S. history. Building on the international celebration of
May Day, past General Strikes in U.S. cities like Seattle and Oakland,
the recent May 1st Day Without An Immigrant demonstrations, the
national general strikes in Spain this year, and the on-going student
strike in Quebec, the Occupy Movement has called for A Day Without the
99% on May 1st, 2012. This in and of itself is a tremendous victory.
For the first time, workers, students, immigrants, and the unemployed
from over 125 U.S. cities will stand together for economic justice.

See below for what we believe to be the most comprehensive list yet
compiled of cities where Occupy May Day events are being planned, as
well as other resources. Note: This is a living document. Check back
for updates! If you have any additional events, please let us know in
the comment section of this article. You are encouraged to share this
page in as many ways as possible!

General Resources

6 Ways to Get Ready for the May 1st GENERAL STRIKE
Why And How To Strike On May Day
Global Facebook Event
Follow on Twitter: @OWSMayDay | @OccupyGenStrk | @StrikeEverywher |
@OccupyGenStrike | #M1GS | #GeneralStrike | #MayDay
MayDaySolidarity2012
StrikeEverywhere.net
May Day Legal Fund
May Day Fund NYC
WhyIStrike.tumblr.com
HowIStrike.tumblr.com
MayDayGallery.tumblr.com
Key City-wide May Day Sites
New York City - MayDayNYC.org
Bay Area, California - StrikeMay1st.com
Chicago - ChicagoSpring.org/May1
Southern California - OccupyMay1st.org
Seattle - May1stSeattle.org
Find a nearby city with planned actions:

http://occupywallst.org/article/may-day/

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy



--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


A libertarian journalist is at the White House dinner tonight
Reason editor at the White House Correspondents Dinner

Source: dclibertarian.blogspot.com

 

Bruce Majors sent this using ShareThis.


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


---


http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/
 


"Sharia Free Zone" – New British Freedom Poster

Posted on February 9, 2012 by creeping

If Muslims are outraged by these posters, one can only conclude they support child grooming, homophobia, oppression of women, terrorism, hate preaching and honor killing and want sharia law. via "Sharia Free Zone" – New British Freedom Poster « British Freedom.

A sad state of affairs that Brits actually feel the need to make and hang these posters. Londonistan calling.


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Report any problems, suggestions or abuse to Individual-Sovereignty-owner@yahoogroups.com

.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The New Republic Daily
Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Subject: Obama's Political Strategy: More Naive Than Brilliant
To: bruce <majors.bruce@gmail.com>


Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

The New Republic Daily Report
02/15/12

Obama's Political Strategy: More Naive Than Brilliant
Noam Scheiber Like </span>http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-stump/100772/in-which-i-question-obamas-long-game-strategy<span class="Apple-style-span"> on Facebook

At least on the left, by far the oldest and most energetically-debated question about Obama is whether his bipartisanship is naïve or shrewdly strategic (in addition to being sincere, which almost everyone concedes it is). Since at least 2007, battle-scarred liberals like Paul Krugman—and for that matter Hillary Clinton—have derided his bipartisan musings as gauzy blather at best and, at worst, dangerously provocative, since Republicans would exploit them. And, since almost as far back, some liberals have embraced a counter-narrative: Obama's insistence on engaging with his opponents would actually make him a more effective leader, since it would rally the public to his side. As Mark Schmitt, then of The American Prospect, put it:

[P]erhaps we are being too literal in believing that "hope" and bipartisanship are things that Obama naively believes are present and possible, when in fact they are a tactic…

One way to deal with that kind of bad-faith [conservative] opposition is to draw the person in, treat them as if they were operating in good faith, and draw them into a conversation about how they actually would solve the problem. If they have nothing, it shows.

Suffice it to say, the debate is still raging three-plus years into Obama's term. My forthcoming book on the Obama administration and the economy—and my recent excerpt in particular—argue that Obama was overly-credulous in his dealings with Republicans, and that this was costly for the country. (Though I think Obama has done a lot more good than bad on balance.)

My former TNR colleagues Jonathan Chait and Andrew Sullivan have argued that, if you take a few deep breaths and focus on the end result, Obama's bipartisanship has been somewhere between reasonably effective (Chait) and nearly-masterful (Sullivan). "What liberals have never understood about Obama is that he practices a show-don't-tell, long-game form of domestic politics," Andrew wrote in a recent Newsweek cover story. "What matters to him is what he can get done, not what he can immediately take credit for."

No one disputes that Obama has looked much stronger politically over the past six to eight months, and so some amount of vindication is clearly in order. The relevant question is really twofold: First, how deliberate was Obama's strategy? And second, how much should we weigh political success when we evaluate his performance in office?

Continue Reading "Obama's Political Strategy: More Naive Than Brilliant"
 Facebook Twitter Reddit StumbleUpon Digg

The Land of No: Love in Class-Riven America Andre Dubus III Like http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/magazine/100520/poverty-manhattan-rent-land-no?passthru=YWU0MjFkYjNlMjRmMjU0NGFmMGNiMTJmMDU3OGNkMTQ on Facebook

The Surprising Trends That Suggest Young People Won't Vote in 2012 Cheryl Russell Like http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/100774/young-voters-election-2012 on Facebook

 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to the TNR Daily newsletter. To unsubscribe from future mailings, follow this link: https://www.pubservice.com/TNR/NROptOut.aspx?PC=NR&AN=864906&ZP=20009

Our mailing address is:
The New Republic
1331 H St. NW
Washington, DC 20005

Add us to your address book

Copyright (C) 2012 The New Republic All rights reserved.

Forward this email to a friend.






Sent to majors.bruce@gmail.comwhy did I get this?
unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences
The New Republic · 1331 H St. NW · Washington, DC 20005

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.


-
 

So You Want To Own a Gun

Posted By Bob Owens On April 15, 2012

PJ Media actually hit me with a pretty tall order with what appeared to be a simple suggestion for an article: a step-by-step process for those who know absolutely nada about guns yet want to arm themselves.

My immediate response — "Sure, I'll get right on it" — was tempered roughly .00093 nanoseconds later by the realization of the task ahead of me.

Getting a gun — especially the first one — is a pretty big deal.

For those of us who grow up in "gun cultures" where firearms are merely another tool and fact of life, getting your first gun may consist of getting a pint-sized .22-caliber single shot rifle almost as long as you are tall when you are a child. It is a simple and expected rite of passage that is a mark of growing expectations, trust, and new-found maturity.

We're generally accompanied by an experienced and patient relative — a father, grandfather, aunt, or older sibling — and the time we spend with those first firearms fills us with nostalgia in later years. The adventures spent afield plinking at cans and paper targets or hunting is remembered as much or more for the bonding and the fellowship as it is for the experience of shooting a gun itself.

Over time, if we have good and patient instructors, we learn and apply the rules of gun safety religiously, develop an appreciation for the joy of marksmanship, and find a reverence and respect for nature that those who choose to remove themselves from the circle of life will never know. It is the sort of upbringing I experienced with my father. It is similar to the stories captured by fellow North Carolinian Robert Ruark in The Old Man and the Boy, his much-loved classic.

For those of us who come into knowing firearms this way, guns are pleasant touchstones connecting the past, present, and future. Many others have found similar if more transient first impressions about guns at summer camps or with scouting or similar youth groups, and they either chose to pursue their passion later in life or to hold the experiences as a fond memory.

Unfortunately, as our culture urbanizes and suburbanizes, and woodlands and fields fall prey to mall sprawl and McMansions, the first impressions many of us get of firearms don't come with gentle guidance. All too often, it comes through the crime reports on the evening news, the bloodied visages of victims of a tyrant's military oppression, or the heart-rending stories of suicides, murders, and accidents. This is compounded by ever-more-bloody Hollywood entertainment and video games that promote the most shocking and puerile use of weapons imaginable. We've become acculturated to view guns as malevolent occupying entities that have the power to thrust bloodlust upon us simply by picking them up, or as booby traps that will go off unexpectedly at the slightest touch. As a result of this cultural brainwashing, it is sometimes more difficult to get adults to act rationally around guns than children.

Despite these manufactured fears, gun ownership in the U.S. is now at its highest level in history [1]. Obviously, even the saturated biases of media aren't all influencing.

So you're interested in getting your first gun. Where should you start? First, you need to know what you plan to do with it.

Unfortunately, many first-time shooters feel pressured into buying their first firearm by the circumstance of fear. When I worked behind the gun counter as a salesman at a sporting goods chain, many of my first-time customers were young couples that had recently experienced a burglary or a similar "wake-up call" when a crime shattered the illusion of safety they had in their neighborhood.

This is not the best time to to buy a weapon. When you're emotional, you tend to latch on to the first thing that might possibly provide something that approximates a good answer to your problem. That leads to buyer's remorse. Nevertheless, if you have reason to fear an immediate crime from a specific source, just about any firearm is better than none.

In this specific unfortunate circumstance, I would try to guide the customer to a reasonably priced weapon that provides a balance of defensive firepower, practical accuracy, and user safety. At the time and in my long-gun-only chain, that choice was often either a .410 or a 20-gauge "youth and ladies" shotgun. The specific caliber, action, and configuration depended upon the specific characteristics of the users.

I tended to steer physically infirm or petite shooters towards the .410 because of the reduced recoil and lighter weight frame. I have a friend who is 6 feet tall and 240 pounds man and has severe carpal tunnel syndrome. He can't hang on to a gun with any noticeable recoil. The .410 would be the better option for him or for many people with similar maladies. I typically recommended the 20-gauge for other users, as it would provide an adequate mix of stopping power, inherent accuracy, and safety. I'd then try to tailor the ammunition to their specific living arrangements. If they lived in apartment buildings or densely packed urban housing, I'd generally suggest larger "game load" shot sizes used for hunting rabbits. If they lived in the suburbs, where there is a little more of a space buffer between homes, I'd recommend lower velocity duck hunting or turkey hunting loads. Unless a couple lived alone (no kids or pets) in a rural area, I almost never recommended the "conventional wisdom" defensive loading of buckshot, as the stout recoil, deafening indoor blast, and risk of overpenetration was too great of a risk.

Fortunately, most people won't find themselves in such a stressful position when contemplating their first gun purchases. Instead, they will be able to go find out what is best for their needs in a more relaxed and contemplative manner.

It returns to that first essential question: What do you you want to be able to do with your gun?

Are you going to buy it and a box of ammo and stick it in the back of the closet for "just in case"? Or are you going to buy a gun because shooting looks like a lot of fun? Do you intend to shoot socially, maybe even in some sort of shooting sport or competition? Are you looking at weapons because of an uncertain economic future? Are you a fledgling collector looking for a historical piece? Are you fascinated by marksmanship?

Congratulations! Any or all of these reasons (and hundreds more) are great reasons for starting down the path to gun ownership, which we'll begin tackling in more detail in the next installment.

Also read:

Bunkers, Food, Armor: Disaster Prep Hits Mainstream [2]


Article printed from PJ Media: http://pjmedia.com

URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/blog/so-you-want-to-own-a-gun/

URLs in this post:

[1] highest level in history: http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/midwest/view/20120406obama_factor_keeps_ammunition_factory_humming/

[2] Bunkers, Food, Armor: Disaster Prep Hits Mainstream: http://pjmedia.com/blog/bunkers-food-armor-disaster-prep-hits-mainstream/

 

So You Want To Own a Gun (Part Two)

Posted By Bob Owens On April 27, 2012 @ 12:00 am In Uncategorized | 38 Comments

With our initial installment [1], we discussed how people come about wanting to own their own firearm, and the pivotal question for all first-time purchasers: "What do you want to be able to do with your gun?"

The answers are as varied as the people considering gun ownership. You may want to be able to protect yourself and others in an insecure world; you may be nurturing a desire to master the skill of marksmanship. Possibly, the competitor in you desires to push yourself and to excel in one of many shooting sports. Or maybe, it's just: "That looks fun and I want to do it."

You know what? That's perfect. As long as you want to do it safely.

Whatever your specific interest, there are several ways to ease yourself into the world of shooting if this is your first experience with firearms. The path I'd recommend to inexperienced shooters starts with a formal beginner's class. These classes focus on demystifying the mechanics of firearms while simultaneously imparting the essential rules of gun safety.

The NRA's Home Firearm Safety course is a great non-shooting foundational class that aspires to impart "basic knowledge, skills, and to explain the attitude necessary for the safe handling and storage of firearms and ammunition in the home." It's like the classroom portion of driver's ed — such a class starts you off on the right path, putting safety first. Even if you later decide that you don't want to own a gun, you leave prepared with knowledge of gun safety, and that's never a bad thing. In an ideal world, every novice would take such a basic gun safety course (either the recommended NRA course or something comparable).

Next, ideally you would spend some range time with a friendly, knowledgeable, and patient instructor who has various firearms for you to try out and is willing to show you how firearms work and teach you basic shooting techniques.

You might be surprised to find your own circle of friends could lead to contact with someone who may be able to satisfy some or all of those goals. If you don't find such a shooting buddy, you can find gun ranges in most civilized parts of the country, where you can rent firearms (particularly handguns) and try them out.

Firearms are built with different goals in mind, and no one gun can do all things. At this point, you need to start narrowing down your goals and individual circumstances, as these are ultimately going to inform the purchase of your first gun.

If your eventual goal is to obtain a concealed carry permit or to obtain a handgun for personal protection or sport, the course of action I'd suggest is to first look at a handgun chambered in .22 Long Rifle (.22 LR). The .22 LR is an inexpensive, low recoil, and relatively quiet cartridge that allows shooters of every skill level to focus on the fundamental skills of shooting without being distracted by the kick or noise of larger-caliber weapons. I'd advise trying out both revolvers and semi-automatic pistols to decide which appeals to you, which feels more comfortable in your hand, and which has controls that you can manipulate.

At this point, you may notice a very loud wailing and gnashing of teeth around you. In all likelihood, that is the multitude of handgun shooters crying out in anguish at the mention of ".22 LR" in any proximity to a discussion of concealed carry and defensive handguns. Their complaints are not without merit — the conventional wisdom is that the smallest acceptable cartridge for self-defense is a .380 ACP in a pistol or a .38 Special in a revolver. I'm not disagreeing with that sentiment at all.

I'm suggesting you'll learn faster, and often without imparting many bad habits you have to overcome later, if you learn your fundamentals with a .22 handgun. It's all about the fundamentals. Even advanced courses boil down to learning to use the fundamentals more efficiently to promote accurate shooting. As former Delta Force operator and noted weapons trainer Larry Vickers [2] has noted: "Speed is fine. Accuracy is final."

If your goal is to learn to use a long-arm for anything other than wingshooting, I'm going to make a similar, and unsurprising, recommendation. Semi-automatic or bolt-action (your preference) .22 LR rifles are a ridiculously inexpensive entry into firearms ownership, with decent quality new rifles retailing for $200 or less, and used rifles for even less than that. Unlike most other rifles, rifles chambered in .22 LR are also welcome on many "pistol only" ranges that don't have the ability to safely contain centerfire rifles. Again, practice is key. So where do you get the training you need in order to learn the fundamentals?

While is is often abused as a political punching bag, the National Rifle Association does a marvelous job of firearms education with the Home Firearms Safety course, and then their hands-on "FIRST Steps" and "Basic" series of classes [3] for owners of rifles, pistols, and shotguns. They also have a well-regarded hunter safety program that is required in many states to get a hunting license. In general, these NRA courses are the McDonald's of firearms instruction: you're going to get the same basic ingredients prepared the same way, and you'll find them almost everywhere. For what they offer as foundational courses rooted in safety, they are hard to beat.

A very useful rifle-specific alternative to NRA rifle training is Project Appleseed [4], which is a combination of rifle marksmanship training and American heritage that welcomes rifle shooters of any stripe, and is designed around a course of fire tailored to those carrying magazine-fed .22 LR semiautomatics.

We're talking foundational shooting, which probably is disconcerting news to someone interested in whether their first pistol should be either X or Y. Your first gun should be one that you can use to master the fundamentals. After you've fired a few thousand rounds downrange, you'll have a better idea of who you are as a shooter and will be able to make a more informed decision on what will satisfy your particular needs.

Of course, merely buying a gun doesn't make you a shooter any more than buying a car makes you a NASCAR driver. In our next installment, we'll talk specifically about gun and purpose-specific training.


Article printed from PJ Media: http://pjmedia.com

URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/blog/so-you-want-to-own-a-gun-part-two/

URLs in this post:

[1] initial installment: http://pjmedia.com/blog/so-you-want-to-own-a-gun/

[2] Larry Vickers: http://vickerstactical.com/tactical-tips/accuracy/

[3] series of classes: http://www.nrainstructors.org/CourseCatalog.aspx

[4] Project Appleseed: http://www.appleseedinfo.org/

 

 

__._,_.___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.