Stunning video shows how Obama’s family pics are Photoshopped fakes

Dr. Eowyn posted: "You must watch this video. It shows, step by step, how many of Obama's family pictures from his youth are Photoshopped images. Adobe Photoshop is a graphics editing program developed and published by Adobe Systems, which enables its users to create, a" Respond to this post by replying above this line New post on Fellowship of the Minds Stunning video shows how Obama's family pics are Photoshopped fakes by Dr. Eowyn You must watch this video. It shows, step by step, how many of Obama's family pictures from his youth are Photoshopped images. Adobe Photoshop is a graphics editing program developed and published by Adobe Systems, which enables its users to create, alter, and manipulate photos and images with tools such as retouching, cropping, slicing, moving, magic wand, and eraser. Malcolm X The video also makes a visually compelling case that the real biological father of President Lucifer (who was born in 1961) may be Malcolm X (1925-1965), the black Muslim political activist who, on February 21, 1965, at age 39, was assassinated by three members of the Nation of Islam (NOI). Less than a year before he was killed, Malcolm X had left the NOI. The video is the work of TheDrRJP. This is what he wrote on the video's YouTube page: Before 2004, the media had never heard of Barack Obama. They did not know about his birth place, his family, his education, his religion, his background, and his whereabouts. They still do not know. Everything they thought they know about Obama was fabricated for their benefit from that point forward. All of these photos "made available to the public" by the Obama Campaign and Obama's "family and friends" are forgeries created for the conspiracy to package, sell, and elect an illusion of the perfect Presidential candidate. A conspiracy put Obama into politics. A conspiracy put him in office. A conspiracy is keeping him in power. The Journolist conspiracy was one of hundreds of similar conspiracies to keep Americans from knowing they are being conned by the biggest criminal conspiracy in modern history. ~Eowyn   Dr. Eowyn | June 19, 2013 at 1:36 pm | Tags: Adobe Photoshop, Barack Obama Sr., Malcolm X, Stanley Ann Dunham, Stanley Dunham, TheDrRJP | Categories: conspiracy, Liberals/Democrats/Left, Obama, Obama's eligibility, Science & technology, United States, US Presidents | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-m9G Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2013/06/19/stunning-video-shows-how-obamas-family-pics-are-photoshopped-fakes/ Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

--
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

3 Former NSA Employees Praise Edward Snowden, Corroborate Key Claims

3 Former NSA Employees Praise Edward Snowden, Corroborate Key Claims
The men, all whistleblowers, say he succeeded where they failed.
Conor Friedersdorf
Jun 18 2013

USA Today has published an extraordinary interview with three former NSA employees who praise Edward Snowden's leaks, corroborate some of his claims, and warn about unlawful government acts.

Thomas Drake, William Binney, and J. Kirk Wiebe each protested the NSA in their own rights. "For years, the three whistle-blowers had told anyone who would listen that the NSA collects huge swaths of communications data from U.S. citizens," the newspaper reports. "They had spent decades in the top ranks of the agency, designing and managing the very data collection systems they say have been turned against Americans. When they became convinced that fundamental constitutional rights were being violated, they complained first to their superiors, then to federal investigators, congressional oversight committees and, finally, to the news media."

In other words, they blew the whistle in the way Snowden's critics suggest he should have done. Their method didn't get through to the members of Congress who are saying, in the wake of the Snowden leak, that they had no idea what was going on. But they are nonetheless owed thanks.

And among them, they've now said all of the following:

• His disclosures did not cause grave damage to national security.
• What Snowden discovered is "material evidence of an institutional crime."
• As a system administrator, Snowden "could go on the network or go into any file or any system and change it or add to it or whatever, just to make sure -- because he would be responsible to get it back up and running if, in fact, it failed. So that meant he had access to go in and put anything. That's why he said, I think, 'I can even target the president or a judge.' If he knew their phone numbers or attributes, he could insert them into the target list which would be distributed worldwide. And then it would be collected, yeah, that's right. As a super-user, he could do that."
• "The idea that we have robust checks and balances on this is a myth."
• Congressional overseers "have no real way of seeing into what these agencies are doing. They are totally dependent on the agencies briefing them on programs, telling them what they are doing."
• Lawmakers "don't really don't understand what the NSA does and how it operates. Even when they get briefings, they still don't understand."
• Asked what Edward Snowden should expect to happen to him, one of the men, William Binney, answered, "first tortured, then maybe even rendered and tortured and then incarcerated and then tried and incarcerated or even executed." Interesting that this is what a whistleblower thinks the U.S. government will do to a citizen. The abuse of Bradley Manning worked.
• "There is no path for intelligence-community whistle-blowers who know wrong is being done. There is none. It's a toss of the coin, and the odds are you are going to be hammered."

The fact that former NSA employees have said these things doesn't automatically make them true. All have reason to identify with Snowden (though one thinks he may have crossed a line by talking about surveillance on China). What this interview does mean is that some of Snowden's allegations seem even more credible than they did when he was the only one making them.


http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/06/3-former-nsa-employees-praise-edward-snowden-corroborate-key-claims/276964/