Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

All YELLING will go unread! — J. A. A. —

On Apr 20, 1:19 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> <sigh>
> Again, the WORDS of your effort do not match your claims. In fact, there is a constant INCREASE of 15% of the previous year's GNP.
> There is no 'maximum' cited. Were a 'maximum' cited it would not be the 'maximum' but the amount used.
> Again, What has GNP to do with anything?
> When I reply in baby portions as you request, the Moderators will whine that there are 20 responses instead of 1. Strange how what's good for the goose is not for the gander.
> Again, 'yelling' is all caps. I do not use all caps. If only you might concentrate on the words, concepts and ideas presented instead of concocting all sorts of nonsense.
> Regard$,
> --MJ
> I am interested in politics so that one day I will not have to be interested in politics. -- Alyssa RosenbaumMJ:  My ideal for total taxation by government (ALL government) is 10%
> of the GNP.  The reason the stated percentages are higher, is to allow
> for a gradual down-sizing of government.  I state the maximums for
> taxes, not the minimums!  Stop the yelling and shorten your replies.
> I'll only read the first paragraph of what you write.  It's not
> necessary for you to copy and paste what I said.  Just top post with
> your comment.  The readers already know what I have said!  —  J. A. A.Section 6, 7 & 8: The House shall have the power to collect taxes,
> customs duties and user fees that are due from the states and
> territories, with the proviso that user fees shall not be applied to
> major areas of government services so that the total cost of federal
> government exceeds 15% of the previous year's GNP.What relation does GNP have to anything?
> Why should Government spending EXCEED 15% GNP?Additionally, the
> House shall have the power to: regulate commerce with nations, among
> states, and with Indian tribes; coin money and set the value of such,
> and of foreign money; set standards for weights and measures; punish
> counterfeiters; establish uniform rules of naturalization, but
> specifically excluding destitute persons seeking jobs and benefits at
> the expense of local, state or federal governments or the Citizens;
> establish uniform laws on bankruptcies; establish post offices; create
> tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court; punish piracies and felonies
> committed at sea, and offenses against the laws of nations; declare
> war and appropriate money for such, but for no longer than two years;
> grant letters of marquee and reprisal and make rules concerning
> capture; raise, support and maintain the Army, Navy, Marine Corp., Air
> Force and Coast Guard, and make laws regulating such, as well as the
> militias to uphold the laws, suppress insurrections and repel
> invasions; provide for organizing, arming, disciplining and governing
> those parts of the militias employed in the service of the USAbut
> each state selects its militia officers.You have lost a great deal in your translation.
> You have also created a standing army -- which the Founders PROPERLY sought to avoid.
> One would THINK you might have sought to CORRECT the misapplication of AIS8C3 and other enumerations.With assent by the apt state legislatures, the House may purchase
> property for, and have continuous authority over, all needed forts,
> magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and buildings. The House determines
> fair, maximum sentences for federal crimes, and defines and imposes
> reasonable, uniform sanctions for non criminal violations of federal
> rules and/or procedures. The House shall make laws as necessary and
> proper to execute the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by
> this New Constitution of the United States of America to any
> department or office thereof.What do you imagine these 'federal crimes' to entail?
> Jefferson, for instance, listed them in the Kentucky Resolution (nullification):... the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations, and no other crimes whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the -- day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States," (and all their other acts which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution,) are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory.What 'crimes' are you ADDING?Regard$,
> --MJ
> "All States are governed by a ruling class that is a minority of the population, and which subsists as a parasitic and exploitative burden upon the rest of society. Since its rule is exploitative and parasitic, the State must purchase the alliance of a group of "Court Intellectuals," whose task is to bamboozle the public into accepting and celebrating the rule of its particular State. The Court Intellectuals have their work cut out for them. In exchange for their continuing work of apologetics and bamboozlement, the Court Intellectuals win their place as junior partners in the power, prestige, and loot extracted by the State apparatus from the deluded public." -- Murray Rothbard

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

MJ: You are a blue, bold-faced liar! Ha, ha, HA! — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 20, 1:12 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> So instead of responding (a theme with you) you again spew nonsense.
> I suppose it *is* a good way for you to maintain your pleasing vision.
> [You do realize that 'yelling' is typically all caps? You will be hard pressed to find where I used all caps -- but then you will find t difficult to support MOST of the silly accusations you hurl at individuals.]
> Regard$,
> --MJ"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it, and then misapplying the wrong remedies" -- Groucho MarxAt 05:05 AM 4/20/2011, you wrote:OK, MJ.  We'll make you President for a day.  Since you like to yell
> all the time, not one reader in a thousand takes you seriously about
> anything.  Why do you YELL, MJ?  Is that because you are ear deaf to
> anything logical that is said?  Ha, ha, HA!  —  J. A. Armistead —
> >
> On Apr 19, 8:46 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >
> 1. Get our government out of the entitlement business! Privatize
> Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc.
> Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in
> programs from being hurt who are close to retirement. But unlike
> Republicans, once and forever, get the USA out of managing the
> entitlement business! If government pulls any of the strings, things
> will start getting bad again, soon.Please explain how one privatizes Social Security -- or why such needs to be privatized.
> Similarly, do the SAME for Medicare/Medicaid, etc.
> These unconstitutional programs should be abolished.2. Inform China and our other creditors that the USA will not be
> paying them any interest on their loans. We will repay the principal,
> but only when doing so won't jeopardize our recovery.Will have to consider what the unintended consequences might entail ...3. Bring home 90% of US troops within 90 days. Leave 10% of the
> troops in bases around the world to serve as a front guard in case
> redeployment is necessary.What happened to that Constitution thingy? Bring home 100% of the troops ... 90 days may work. Dismantle theunconstitutionalstanding army OR pass an amendment to keep it. IMMEDIATELY slash the so-called 'defense' budget by at least half -- further cuts to follow.4. Stop wasting billions and billions of dollars on political
> campaigns! That money is going into the pockets of the media. Those
> media rascals salivate over the ad money they generate by "talking up"
> how 'close' the elections are going to be. Britt Hume, though a
> conservative, keeps pumping air into Obama by talking about the money
> Obama can spend (waste!) to get re elected. Barack Obama is a cash
> cow for the media. That's why no one in the media will call the
> majority of Democrats CROOKS!<sigh>
> Government should spend ZERO on campaigns.
> Individuals (and their created groups, etc.) have the freedom and liberty to spend as many dollars as they desire.
> Remove the ability for Politicians to peddle pull (ie. follow the constitution as written) and you eliminate the bulk. If Archer Daniels Midland, for instance, does not reap zillions in subsidies and other advantages (read: regulations), they are unlikely to be concerned with pumping millions into various campaigns. If they receive nothing, who cares if they continue to give millions.5. 'Fat cats' should stop being wimps! Government has become no-
> longer-legal STEALING from the supposed rich to give to the poor. The
> Democrats talk about how Republicans are wanting to give tax breaks to
> the wealthy while denying women medical screenings. Republicans
> should be talking about how "Democrats are criminals for seeking
> stolen benefits for themselves and other criminals!"That you fail to realize that Ds and Rs are effectively the same is troubling.
> The Income Tax should be abolished (thus ending the bulk of the class warfare). Required dollars should be apportioned between the Sovereign States -- with the States paying from dollars they raise as they choose (50 of them in competition for Citizens) coupled with an across-the-board 3% tariff. No borrowing is permissible EXCEPT for cash flow needs UNLESS War (in accordance with AIS8C11) and then all extra proceeds go ONLY to that cause.1. The Constitution does NOT allow political parties! Those arequasi governmental bodies which get to decide who our candidates for
> public office can be, and decide who "the leaders" in Congress are.
> Because our country was conceived as a Representative Republic, such
> fact tacitly mandates that each representative shall have identical
> power! Seniority nor party affiliation can give more power to ANYONE!The Constitution *does* allow Congress to make its OWN rules. Additionally PEOPLE will organize into various factions (which is their liberty to do so).
> What is needed, rather, is to eliminate the various CAMPAIGN and ELECTION laws -- which have zero Constitutional basis -- which enable the Duopoly to maintain their positions.2. The US Senate is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL oligarchy of elitists who
> effectively have been running-the-USA-into-the-ground since the birth
> of this nation. Senators aren't determined by having a parity of the
> population which they each serve. Though the Senate was begrudgingly
> included in the 'words' of the Constitution, it has never been within
> the SPIRIT of the Constitution!Huh? The Senate served as the Representatives of the States -- you know, those parties to the Constitution? Those parties that put it into effect? Those parties charged with the power/authority to amend that agreement?
> Amendment 17 (which is unconstitutional per Article V -- 10 states have STILL not ratified) should be rescinded/repealed/abolished.
> This STATE check against Federal usurpation (along with others) need to be restored.3. The principle of FAIR representation makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to
> allow the State of Iowa to have more "power" in determining who our
> candidates for President can be. And by the same general reasoning,
> it makes the entire primary system UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because the
> states with earlier-dated primaries always have the most influence in
> determining who can run.Again, this is part and parcel to the Election/Campaign laws which maintain the Duopoly along with the ability of Politicians to peddle pull.
> Having some utopian same date primary changes neither.
> The underlying idea of the system was to have the House choose the President from the 'search committee' provided by the various State Legislature chosen electors (remember those States who are party to that Constitution thingy). By choosing two, it was expected that the Electors would NEVER reach the required majority.
> ADDITIONALLY, having the top two vote getters (presumably persons with DIFFERENT ideals/positions) restores yet ANOTHER check eliminated.4. Political party conventions are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because those
> are "governed" by the unsanctioned and UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the
> UNCONSTITUTIONAL political parties!This is nonsensical.
> Again, your problem *is* and *remains* that unconstitutional Election/Campaign laws have been made. There are no 'Federal' Elections. The ONLY thing the Congress *is* charged with concerning such is that they may set a uniform date as to when the Electors are to be chosen and other time/dates associated with those electors.5. The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow any
> individual or group to have more influence on the outcome of an
> election or referenda than one-person-one vote. That criminalizes
> entertainment or media celebrities who use their influence to garner
> votes for any candidate. And it makes any groupsuch as labor unions
> who seek more 'power' than could ever be manifested by just their
> members' votes, criminals. Labor unions and other unconstitutional
> group influences, effectively, have been blackmailing candidates by
> implying… "You vote for 'us' or you won't get elected." Since the
> latter is a SUBVERSION of the Constitution that shifts the par of
> power away from individuals and toward specific groups, the leaders of
> such groups are guilty of TREASON!More nonsensical bullshit.
> As noted previously, Government becomes important SOLELY because Government has dictated rules, regulations, advantage, etc. which people seek to influence. It is GOVERNMENT which should be prohibited (which they largely are already according to the Constitution as written) from providing advantage to some at the expense of everyone else (which LIMITS Government to securing the (natural) right of ALL...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Mark: If you use "legalese" as your standard of verbal perfection,
you should be impressed that I practically ban lawyers from the human
race! Read, and weep! — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 20, 1:29 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mostly I am neutral to the point where it steps on my toes when I
> visit a particular nation. As to Gaza, I went there as an envoy to
> start low level talks between the Palestinians, Israelis, US, UK and a
> small host of others. I was 100 meters from the Hamas bomb that killed
> my three Palestinian contacts. I live in the real world.... you read
> about my work but NEVER about me. Tell me, just what experience do you
> have that qualifies you to speak on anything ?? .I can tell from your
> writing that you are indeed ignorant. For instance, your constitution,
> to be acceptable, needs to be able to be translated as it would effect
> changes in legal agreements between nations.... it is not. The
> language used is substandard and colloquial.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I'm wrong, then say anything to suggest that you are pro right.
> > Mostly you are con anything that has a chance to succeed.  —  John A.
> > Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > On Apr 18, 11:49 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Having been IN Gaza just a couple of months ago on assignment I would
> > > say that I have a much better grasp of what is happening in the real
> > > world. Who is Rush Limbaugh and why would I take a Gringos word for
> > > anything ?? They have a really bad habit of screwing up everything to
> > > meet their own idea of what and who people should be.
>
> > > As far as doing any walking.... you have NO clue. Again I ask... What
> > > has Gaddafi done that is a clear and present danger to the US in the
> > > last ten years ??
>
> > > On Apr 18, 9:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Mark:  Instead of straddling so many fences, why don't you watch
> > > > the news and think about what is going on in the world.  I simply
> > > > don't have the time to walk you through the relevancy of the turmoil
> > > > that's everywhere.  Listen to Rush Limbaugh.  He has the world
> > > > situation pegged fairly well.  —  J. A. A. —
>
> > > > On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Einstein,
>
> > > > > Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
> > > > > give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
> > > > > there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
>
> > > > > Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
> > > > > considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
>
> > > > > Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
> > > > > about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
> > > > > (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
> > > > > clear and present danger??
>
> > > > > On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dear Mark:  I own Google stock.  It's an American multinational
> > > > > > Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.  Google
> > > > > > World shows the new complex quite well.  In many ways you are very
> > > > > > naive.  Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> > > > > > noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> > > > > > TREASON every day of their existence.  Would you put on moderation
> > > > > > someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> > > > > > Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> > > > > > their citizens?  Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > > > > > committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> > > > > > resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies.  He has caused
> > > > > > more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> > > > > > ever lived, including Hitler.
>
> > > > > > Treason is a recognized capital offense.  Those in our government and
> > > > > > in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> > > > > > tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> > > > > > giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  Keith suggested that you,
> > > > > > Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".  He's viewed
> > > > > > you all in a favorable light, before.  As for me, I suspect you are so
> > > > > > screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> > > > > > better government.  That means you have schizophrenia.  Get some couch-
> > > > > > time, Mark.  You need it!  —  J. A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > > > On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Einstein,
>
> > > > > > > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> > > > > > > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> > > > > > > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > > > > > > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> > > > > > > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > > > > > > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> > > > > > > > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> > > > > > > > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> > > > > > > > nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful
> > > > > > > > capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> > > > > > > > feel.
>
> > > > > > > > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> > > > > > > > is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> > > > > > > > that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> > > > > > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> > > > > > > > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you
> > > > > > > > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> > > > > > > > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> > > > > > > > now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last
> > > > > > > > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> > > > > > > > with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> > > > > > > > of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> > > > > > > > But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of
> > > > > > > > a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> > > > > > > > country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things
> > > > > > > > along by talking-up my document on the NET.  — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > > > > Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Hey John!
>
> > > > > > > > > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> > > > > > > > > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > > > > > > > > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > > > > > > > > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > > > > > > > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > > > > > > > > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > > > > > > > > > or otherwise stupid.  —  John A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> > > > > > > > > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > > > > > > > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> > > > > > > > > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> > > > > > > > > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  — John
> > > > > > > > > > > A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > > > > > > > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.).  I'm thrilled that
> > > > > > > > > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > > > > > > > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> > > > > > > > > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple things can
> > > > > > > > > > > turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> > > > > > > > > > > business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> > > > > > > > > > > doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin didn't give a
> > > > > > > > > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> > > > > > > > > > > > millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > > > > > > > > > citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  — J. A. A.
> > > > > > > > > > > > —
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Mark: Thanks for your RARE sane-toned reply! You should realize that
I'm wanting to correct the deficiencies in our government and our
society. I definitely am not a defender of the status quo in our
government, nor in how our society gets along! If you have monkeys,
where do you live? — J. A. Armistead —
>
On Apr 20, 1:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Einstein,
>
> I do not masquerade under that name. It was sarcastically given to me
> a few years ago on this very forum. I liked it. Most of this grand
> world are not citizens of the USA... why the surprise ?? As to Keith
> being a lawyer... so am I. Keith is allowed to do as he pleases... He
> and I are ALWAYS in agreement in everything except politics, religion
> and life in general. It is not the interpretation of your present
> constitution that is causing problems.... it is the misinterpretation.
> The same would happen with yours only much faster. The most crippling
> thing in the US is your absolute lack of multi-party recognition. A
> coalition type government would serve you much better. You installed
> these as being superior post world war II in many countries.
>
> As to monkeys... I have two types in my garden (yard to you) they seem
> to function together much better than the US government.
>
> As to your misplaced national pride... there are many countries that
> enjoy more actual personal freedoms than yours.
>
> I do not have to sell my home (if I were to decide to) to someone I or
> my neighbors do not like. I do not have to hire a secretary unless she
> has physical characteristics that I enjoy (and I am free to advertise
> this). I do not have to ask anyone for permission to buy a gun. I do
> not have to allow law enforcement on my property unless I want to. It
> is perfectly acceptable here, when addressing a group of people that
> are strangers, to ask for a response from the "Negro" or the "fat man"
> or the "woman with big tits" .... and the list goes on. Get a grip and
> learn something before spouting from ignorance. Your society is
> repressive.
>
> On Apr 20, 2:40 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark:  The fact that you masquerade under the name the Annointed (sic)
> > One, shows you've got mental problems.  Aren't you even a citizen of
> > the USA?  Don't you like anything about anything?  Keith implied that
> > you were anxious to read my next "missive".  Why is Keith, a lawyer,
> > having to speak for you monkeys?  My guess is you could get-off most
> > criminal charges by pleading insanity.  So far, most that you've said
> > supports the latter conclusion.  —  J. A. A. —
>
> > On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Einstein,
>
> > > Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
> > > give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
> > > there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
>
> > > Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
> > > considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
>
> > > Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
> > > about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
> > > (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
> > > clear and present danger??
>
> > > On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Mark:  I own Google stock.  It's an American multinational
> > > > Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.  Google
> > > > World shows the new complex quite well.  In many ways you are very
> > > > naive.  Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> > > > noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> > > > TREASON every day of their existence.  Would you put on moderation
> > > > someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> > > > Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> > > > their citizens?  Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > > > committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> > > > resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies.  He has caused
> > > > more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> > > > ever lived, including Hitler.
>
> > > > Treason is a recognized capital offense.  Those in our government and
> > > > in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> > > > tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> > > > giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  Keith suggested that you,
> > > > Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".  He's viewed
> > > > you all in a favorable light, before.  As for me, I suspect you are so
> > > > screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> > > > better government.  That means you have schizophrenia.  Get some couch-
> > > > time, Mark.  You need it!  —  J. A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Einstein,
>
> > > > > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> > > > > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> > > > > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > > > > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> > > > > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > > > > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
>
> > > > > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> > > > > > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> > > > > > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> > > > > > nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful
> > > > > > capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> > > > > > feel.
>
> > > > > > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> > > > > > is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> > > > > > that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> > > > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> > > > > > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you
> > > > > > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> > > > > > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> > > > > > now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last
> > > > > > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> > > > > > with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> > > > > > of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> > > > > > But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of
> > > > > > a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> > > > > > country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things
> > > > > > along by talking-up my document on the NET.  — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > > Patriot
>
> > > > > > On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Hey John!
>
> > > > > > > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> > > > > > > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > > > > > > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > > > > > > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > > > > > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > > > > > > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > > > > > > > or otherwise stupid.  —  John A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> > > > > > > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > > > > > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> > > > > > > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> > > > > > > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  — John
> > > > > > > > > A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > > > > > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.).  I'm thrilled that
> > > > > > > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > > > > > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> > > > > > > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple things can
> > > > > > > > > turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> > > > > > > > > business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> > > > > > > > > doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > > > > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin didn't give a
> > > > > > > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> > > > > > > > > > millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > > > > > > > citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  — J. A. A.
> > > > > > > > > > —
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > > > > > > > > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >  John,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Jonathan: "Polite" public figures can't go around calling everyone
stupid. There are contexts in which public health care makes sense.
But FORCED Obama Care isn't that context! — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 20, 12:54 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> 1) Trump has no ideology!
>
> 2) The District of Criminals is filled with Republican socialists.
>
> On 04/20/2011 02:00 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jonathan: That would be "the pot calling the kettle black".  If Trump
> > was a socialist he would be a Democrat and pro Obama.  When one's
> > ideology has failed, like yours has, blame the opposition for your own
> > socialist-communist traits.  You, like Mark, are very screwed-up in
> > the head.  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
> > On Apr 19, 12:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> *John,
>
> >> I cannot belive you call me -- a voluntaryist/anarchist -- a socialist,
> >> yet you cannot see that Donald Trump is a full-blown socialist. Pay
> >> attention!*
>
> >>http://www.americablog.com/2009/02/donald-trump-is-socialist.htmlhttp......
>
> >> On 04/18/2011 08:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> Folks:  The following essay contains the first two articles of my New
> >>> Constitution.  I'm copying it, below, so those looking in the present
> >>> post can find it.  Hope you readers are having a great Spring!
> >>> Can Donald Trump �Fix� the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?
> >>> The contrast is striking between the potential presidential candidacy
> >>> of The Donald and every other might-be candidate mentioned.  For one
> >>> thing, if The Donald says he can fix something�like our broke economy�
> >>> you can damn-well take him seriously!  Some of you may recall that a
> >>> certain new ice skating rink in New York�s Central Park started
> >>> leaking water and couldn�t be used.  That work had been done by three
> >>> or four labor unions with each one pointing the fingers at the other.
> >>> After millions of dollars had been wasted on attempted patches, The
> >>> Donald took over the entire job and had happy skaters out on that ice
> >>> before long.
> >>> Every day when I realize how much labor unions of all kinds are
> >>> effectively screwing the US economy and preventing our having a really
> >>> �free� free enterprise system, I think of The Donald.  He has been
> >>> able to find considerable success working in the morass of labor
> >>> unions and government regulations that are found in NYC.  That man
> >>> THRIVES on being able to get the disparate powers-that-be to get the
> >>> job done!  Part of the secret is his charisma.  But most of it is
> >>> because he is a trustworthy man-of-his-word.  He makes sure that all
> >>> those involved in a project realize just what their responsibilities
> >>> are, and what they are expected to do if there are any glitches.  In
> >>> short, The Donald is one of the top businessmen in the country of all
> >>> time.  His executive experience probably exceeds that of the governors
> >>> of most states.  Under him people do their jobs and do them well.
> >>> Just having The Donald as the head man improves the quality of
> >>> projects, because it�s an honor just to be associated with one of his
> >>> projects!
> >>> Obviously, Donald Trump is politically conservative.  But he doesn�t
> >>> owe-his-soul to the Republican Party like most of his would-be rivals
> >>> do even without realizing that they do.  The USA has been hamstrung
> >>> trying to avoid looking like a colonialist aggressor every time we
> >>> �invade� other nations to help the oppressed. The reason oil fields
> >>> get set on fire is because those people suppose we are there� just for
> >>> their oil.  By destroying the oil, they believe we will simply go
> >>> away.  The blind-leading-the-blind in our government think that the
> >>> USA has the financial wherewithal to finance long wars, and will have
> >>> enough wherewithal remaining to rebuild the busted infrastructure of
> >>> the invaded countries; train the new armies; and care for those �poor�
> >>> people till they are back on their feet.  All of that is being done
> >>> like forced charity from the big-hearted American People whose
> >>> standards of living keep dropping, because of the explosion in the
> >>> size and the over-control of our government.  If The Donald can get us
> >>> trillions of dollars worth of oil to repay the American Taxpayers for
> >>> our sacrifices, I�ll vote for him!
> >>> Some good news is that Republicans now have trillions of dollars in
> >>> �possible� budget cuts that might save this country.  The bad news is
> >>> that those takes-too-long-to-happen cuts will still leave the never-
> >>> should-have-been-there-in-the-first-place entitlement programs being
> >>> run by government.  After the nearly 15 years that I�ve spent penning
> >>> and polishing my New Constitution, I have better than average ideas
> >>> how to fix our government, fast.  The following 5 things aren�t
> >>> written into the New Constitution, but are of fundamental importance:
> >>> 1.  Get our government out of the entitlement business!  Privatize
> >>> Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc.
> >>> Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in
> >>> programs from being hurt who are close to retirement.  But unlike
> >>> Republicans, once and forever, get the USA out of managing the
> >>> entitlement business!  If government pulls any of the strings, things
> >>> will start getting bad again, soon.
> >>> 2.  Inform China and our other creditors that the USA will not be
> >>> paying them any interest on their loans.  We will repay the principal,
> >>> but only when doing so won�t jeopardize our recovery.
> >>> 3.  Bring home 90% of US troops within 90 days.  Leave 10% of the
> >>> troops in bases around the world to serve as a front guard in case
> >>> redeployment is necessary.
> >>> 4.  Stop wasting billions and billions of dollars on political
> >>> campaigns!  That money is going into the pockets of the media.  Those
> >>> media rascals salivate over the ad money they generate by �talking up�
> >>> how �close� the elections are going to be.  Britt Hume, though a
> >>> conservative, keeps pumping air into Obama by talking about the money
> >>> Obama can spend (waste!) to get re elected.  Barack Obama is a cash
> >>> cow for the media.  That�s why no one in the media will call the
> >>> majority of Democrats CROOKS!
> >>> 5.  ï¿½Fat cats� should stop being wimps!  Government has become no-
> >>> longer-legal STEALING from the supposed rich to give to the poor.  The
> >>> Democrats talk about how Republicans are wanting to give tax breaks to
> >>> the wealthy while denying women medical screenings.  Republicans
> >>> should be talking about how �Democrats are criminals for seeking
> >>> stolen benefits for themselves and other criminals!�
> >>> Be it known:
> >>> 1.  The Constitution does NOT allow political parties!  Those are
> >>> quasi governmental bodies which get to decide who our candidates for
> >>> public office can be, and decide who �the leaders� in Congress are.
> >>> Because our country was conceived as a Representative Republic, such
> >>> fact tacitly mandates that each representative shall have identical
> >>> power!  Seniority nor party affiliation can give more power to ANYONE!
> >>> 2.  The US Senate is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL oligarchy of elitists who
> >>> effectively have been running-the-USA-into-the-ground since the birth
> >>> of this nation.  Senators aren�t determined by having a parity of the
> >>> population which they each serve.  Though the Senate was begrudgingly
> >>> included in the �words� of the Constitution, it has never been within
> >>> the SPIRIT of the Constitution!
> >>> 3.  The principle of FAIR representation makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to
> >>> allow the State of Iowa to have more �power� in determining who our
> >>> candidates for President can be.  And by the same general reasoning,
> >>> it makes the entire primary system UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because the
> >>> states with earlier-dated primaries always have the most influence in
> >>> determining who can run.
> >>> 4.  Political party conventions are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because those
> >>> are �governed� by the unsanctioned and UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the
> >>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL political parties!
> >>> 5.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow any
> >>> individual or group to have more influence on the outcome of an
> >>> election or referenda than one-person-one vote.  That criminalizes
> >>> entertainment or media celebrities who use their influence to garner
> >>> votes for any candidate.  And it makes any group�such as labor unions�
> >>> who seek more �power� than could ever be manifested by just their
> >>> members� votes, criminals.  Labor unions and other unconstitutional
> >>> group influences, effectively, have been blackmailing candidates by
> >>> implying� �You vote for �us� or you won�t get elected.�  Since the
> >>> latter is a SUBVERSION of the Constitution that shifts the par of
> >>> power away from individuals and toward specific groups, the leaders of
> >>> such groups are guilty of TREASON!
> >>> 6.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to give equal
> >>> time to discuss any socialist idea!  Since socialism and communism
> >>> aren�t fair, then it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow democrats to
> >>> represent anyone in Congress!
> >>> 7.  Because socialism and communism are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, it is
> >>> similarly UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow a �President�, like Barack Obama�
> >>> who has been masquerading as president�to remain in the White House!
> >>> And it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for our taxpayer-financed Secret Service to
> >>> give that socialist-communist bastard protection, when they should be
> >>> arresting Obama and everyone on his White House staff for TREASON!
> >>> 8.  The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow the
> >>> US Supreme Court to decide any issue in lieu of citizen-approved
> >>> legislation!  And it
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of
no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
having you "get real" too much to ask? — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> questions posed to you.)
>
> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jonathan:  For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist.  I
> > suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
> > Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> > your own.  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
> > On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
>
> >> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> Jonathan:  Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> >>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government should
> >>> control everything (with him in charge).  The fact that you even ask
> >>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> >>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are.  The remaining 5% are
> >>> just stupid.  You're in both of those groups.  ï¿½ J. A. Armistead �
> >>> Patriot
> >>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> John,
> >>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites based
> >>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> >>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression means.
> >>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the
> >>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> >>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off this
> >>>> tremendous task?
> >>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Mark:  I own Google stock.  It's an American multinational
> >>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.  Google
> >>>>> World shows the new complex quite well.  In many ways you are very
> >>>>> naive.  Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>>>> TREASON every day of their existence.  Would you put on moderation
> >>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>>>> their citizens?  Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies.  He has caused
> >>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense.  Those in our government and
> >>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  Keith suggested that you,
> >>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".  He's viewed
> >>>>> you all in a favorable light, before.  As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>>>> better government.  That means you have schizophrenia.  Get some couch-
> >>>>> time, Mark.  You need it!  ï¿½  J. A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>      wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>>>> nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>>>> capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>>>> feel.
> >>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>>>> is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> >>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you
> >>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>>>> now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last
> >>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>>>> with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>>>> But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> >>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things
> >>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET.  ï¿½ John A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hey John!
> >>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> >>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> >>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> >>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> >>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> >>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> >>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid.  ï¿½  John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> >>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> >>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> >>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> >>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  ï¿½ John
> >>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> >>>>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.&      N.).  I'm thrilled that
> >>>>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> >>>>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> >>>>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple things can
> >>>>>>>>>> turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> >>>>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> >>>>>>>>>> doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> >>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin didn't give a
> >>>>>>>>>>> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> >>>>>>>>>>> millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> >>>>>>>>>>> citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  ï¿½ J. A. A.
> >>>>>>>>>>> �
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley<
> >>>>>>>>>>>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>     John,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> >>>>>>>>> differs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from yours. How fascist of you!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Jonathan!  Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> >>>>>>>>> great
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did.  Barbara Walters, a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> street?  As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> >>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> >>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> network closed.  Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> >>>>>>>>> game
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> polls.  Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
> >>>>>>>>> candidate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> say, should rally behind my New Constitution�a document for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> people!  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>      On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>     John,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> instead want to dictate what
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Jonathan: My New Constitution makes it a crime for any public
official to "tag" anyone as being left or right. The USA will survive
ONLY if all group-against-group fighting stops! Capitalism will
benefit all the people, not just the had-been conservatives. Less
expensive government leaves more money in people's pockets. And that
will encourage more charity close to home. — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 20, 12:43 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> Rush Limbaugh is at best a neo-conservative who spouts off when "the
> left" does something insane but keeps his mouth shut when "the right"
> does the same insane thing. He does nothing more than perpetuate a
> left-right war of the mindless for profit.
>
> Anyone who blindly sides with "the left" or "the right" is someone who
> does not think for themselves.
>
> On 04/20/2011 01:49 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Mark:  Your being in Gaza... does that mean you are Jewish?  Rush
> > Limbaugh is the number one conservative radio talk-show host in
> > America.  He isn't screwing-up anything, because he doesn't have the
> > balls to actually lead the revolution that's needed to take back this
> > country from the socialist-communists.  If you aren't an American,
> > then I can't see why you care about what I do to save this country.
> > Your oblique protections of Barack Obama show you to be pro left.  If
> > I'm wrong, then say anything to suggest that you are pro right.
> > Mostly you are con anything that has a chance to succeed.  ï¿½  John A.
> > Armistead �  Patriot
> > On Apr 18, 11:49 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> Having been IN Gaza just a couple of months ago on assignment I would
> >> say that I have a much better grasp of what is happening in the real
> >> world. Who is Rush Limbaugh and why would I take a Gringos word for
> >> anything ?? They have a really bad habit of screwing up everything to
> >> meet their own idea of what and who people should be.
>
> >> As far as doing any walking.... you have NO clue. Again I ask... What
> >> has Gaddafi done that is a clear and present danger to the US in the
> >> last ten years ??
>
> >> On Apr 18, 9:37 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
>
> >>> Dear Mark:  Instead of straddling so many fences, why don't you watch
> >>> the news and think about what is going on in the world.  I simply
> >>> don't have the time to walk you through the relevancy of the turmoil
> >>> that's everywhere.  Listen to Rush Limbaugh.  He has the world
> >>> situation pegged fairly well.  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
> >>> On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>> Einstein,
> >>>> Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
> >>>> give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
> >>>> there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
> >>>> Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
> >>>> considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
> >>>> Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
> >>>> about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
> >>>> (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
> >>>> clear and present danger??
> >>>> On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Mark:  I own Google stock.  It's an American multinational
> >>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.  Google
> >>>>> World shows the new complex quite well.  In many ways you are very
> >>>>> naive.  Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>>>> TREASON every day of their existence.  Would you put on moderation
> >>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>>>> their citizens?  Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies.  He has caused
> >>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense.  Those in our government and
> >>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  Keith suggested that you,
> >>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".  He's viewed
> >>>>> you all in a favorable light, before.  As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>>>> better government.  That means you have schizophrenia.  Get some couch-
> >>>>> time, Mark.  You need it!  ï¿½  J. A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>>>> nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>>>> capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>>>> feel.
> >>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>>>> is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> >>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you
> >>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>>>> now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last
> >>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>>>> with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>>>> But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> >>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things
> >>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET.  ï¿½ John A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hey John!
> >>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> >>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> >>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> >>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> >>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> >>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> >>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid.  ï¿½  John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> >>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> >>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> >>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> >>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  ï¿½ John
> >>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> >>>>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.&  N.).  I'm thrilled that
> >>>>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> >>>>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> >>>>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple things can
> >>>>>>>>>> turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> >>>>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> >>>>>>>>>> doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> >>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin didn't give a
> >>>>>>>>>>> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> >>>>>>>>>>> millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> >>>>>>>>>>> citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  ï¿½ J. A. A.
> >>>>>>>>>>> �
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley<
> >>>>>>>>>>>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>   John,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> >>>>>>>>> differs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from yours. How fascist of you!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Jonathan!  Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> >>>>>>>>> great
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did.  Barbara Walters, a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Liberals Continue to Ridicule Trig Palin

Libtard slime can't get much lower than this. 

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2011/04/liberals-contin.html

 

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Will the Atlas Shrugged Movie disappoint?"

An update on the sales for the movie: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/how-atlas-shrugged-shocked-hollywoods-179930 Posted by Marsha Enright

Like this discussion » Comment » Stop Following Discussion »

NEW  Now you can comment by replying to this email.

LinkedIn values your privacy. At no time has LinkedIn made your email address available to any other LinkedIn user without your permission. ©2011, LinkedIn Corporation.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Henry David Thoreau Versus the United States

Henry David Thoreau Versus the United States
By THOMAS H. NAYLOR

There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly.

Henry David Thoreau, “On Civil Disobedience”

Henry David Thoreau, the iconoclastic, nineteenth century New England writer, has long been associated with simple living, solitude, independent thinking, environmental integrity, civil disobedience, nonviolence, and passive resistance.  But few seem to have noticed that he was also a card-carrying secessionist.

Best known for its influence on Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., the South African anti-apartheid movement, and the Eastern European anti-communist movement in the 80s, Thoreau’s famous 1849 essay “Civil Disobedience” reads like a secessionist’s manifesto.

His two-year stay at Walden Pond near Cambridge, Massachusetts between 1845 and 1847, on which his 1854 book Walden was based, was little short of a personal secession from his village, his state, and his country.  About personal secession Thoreau once said, “Some are petitioning the State to dissolve the Union.  Why do they not dissolve it themselves—the union between themselves and the State?”

In 1854, when the population of the United States was around 20 million, Thoreau thought the country was already too large.  “The nation itself is an unwieldy and overgrown establishment, cluttered with furniture and tripped up by its own traps, ruined by luxury and heedless expense.”  He called for a “rigid economy” and “Spartan simplicity of life.”  “Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity!” he said.

Thoreau’s principal grievances with the federal government were over its de facto support of slavery and its participation in the Mexican-American War, both of which he considered to be immoral.

When a sixth of the population of a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country (Mexico) is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army (the U.S. Army), and subjected to military law, I think it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and revolutionize.

During the first half of the nineteenth century before the Civil War, New England was a political hotbed for secessionists, most of whom were abolitionists.  Massachusetts Senator Timothy Pickering, a former high-ranking general in the Revolutionary War, was one of the most important leaders of the New England secession movement.

New England Federalists, who believed that the policies of the Jefferson and Madison administrations were proportionately more harmful to New England than to other parts of the country, thrice led independence movements aimed respectively at the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, the national embargo of 1807, and the War of 1812.  In 1814 New England secessionists expressed their opposition to the War of 1812 and the military draft of the Hartford Convention.

Thoreau, who was vehemently opposed to slavery, called for abolitionists to “effectively withdraw their support, both in person and property, from the government of Massachusetts.”  He told them that, “if they had God on their side, even though they did not constitute a majority, that was enough.”

In response to the question, “How does it become a man to behave toward this American government today?”  Thoreau presciently responded, “He cannot without disgrace be associated with it.”  Clearly a man ahead of his time!

As for civil disobedience, of which secession is a special case, Thoreau said, “If an injustice requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law.  Let your life be a counter-friction to stop the government machine.”  Thoreau actually spent a night in jail for not paying his poll-tax.

No doubt many anarchists have taken note of the following two statements by Thoreau in “Civil Disobedience. “That government is best which governs not at all,” and “I simply wish to refuse allegiance to the State, to withdraw and stand aloof from it effectually.”

If Thoreau were alive today, it seems unlikely that he would have an e-mail address.  He was not convinced that we all had to be connected.

We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas, but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate…We are eager to tunnel under the Atlantic and bring the Old World some weeks nearer to the New, but perchance the first news that will leak through into the broad, flapping American ear will be that the Princess Adelaide has the whooping cough.

Perhaps the reason given by Thoreau as to why he escaped to Walden Pond says it all:

I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.

I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, to live so sturdily and Spartan-like as to put to rout all that was not life.

Thoreau’s philosophy of secession was based on the premise that an individual’s moral principles have the first claim on his or her actions, and that any government which requires violation of these principles has no legitimate authority whatsoever.

One can only imagine what Thoreau would think of the United States today – a nation which has lost its moral authority and is unsustainable, ungovernable, and unfixable.  What would he think of a government owned, operated, and controlled by corporate America and Wall Street?  How would he feel about the illegal wars with Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya?  What about our unconditional support for the bellicose state of Israel?  Would he condone the torture of military combatant prisoners?  And, alas, the war on terror?

Henry David Thoreau was arguably the most thoughtful, nonviolent secessionist of the nineteenth century.  Unlike well known southern secessionists such as John C. Calhoun, Jefferson Davis, and Robert E. Lee, Thoreau’s message was not tainted by the scourge of slavery.

Modern day New England liberals who summarily reject secession as a kind of racist conspiracy, should re-visit Thoreau.  They just might be surprised at what they find.

Thomas H. Naylor is Founder of the Second Vermont Republic and Professor Emeritus of Economics at Duke University. His books include: Downsizing the U.S.A., Affluenza, The Search for Meaning and The Abandoned Generation: Rethinking Higher Education

http://counterpunch.org/naylor04192011.html

---

Freedom Is Always Illegal.

Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft